In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.

Whether inherited sin or committed sin, the God that puts one person’s sin onto others and even have the innocent killed for the guilty is not worthy of adoration. Not even honest humans suffer the innocent for the guilty.
The God or son of God or prophet that regards one sector of humanity as “dogs” and “swine” and even preach so they would not understand and be saved is the God/son of God/prophet not worthy of honor much less of adoration and worship. Even humans fight against racism and bigotry.   


Whereas the Christian baptism contains the formula “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” there is no documentation of any praise uttered by Jesus (or by John the Baptist). (Interestingly, whereas the Christians’ Father’s name is Jehovah1 and the son’s name is Jesus, the Holy Ghost has no name; perhaps he should be called Jasper–making them all “Jays”).

   From whom/where did this phrase, “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost,” originate –from the celestial realm or the human foundry?

Whereas Jesus’ mission, as he declared,2 was wholly and solely to the Jews; so much so that he regarded non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in parables so they would not understand and be saved.After Jesus’ make-believe resurrection, Matthew has Jesus telling his disciples to “teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”–(Matthew 28:19), and Mark has Jesus giving instructions to “preach the gospel to every creature…They shall up serpents; and if they drink and deadly thing, it shall not hurt them” and afterwards Jesus “was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God”–(Mark 16:15-19. Mark must have had uber super vision to know where Jesus sat).

The phrase “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” is a farce. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din exposed in his Open Letters To The Bishops of Salisbury & London, (pp. 31-32):

“The concluding eleven verses of St. Mark-(16:9-20) and the well-known verse of St. Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are forgeries, an admitted addition to the ancient MSS (manuscripts). The fact was discovered by the first translator of the Bible into English and they made a marginal note in their version of the Bible which continued for some time. But we do not find the said note in any of the copies now published by the said society(Foreign Mission Society). Is it fair and honest to keep others in darkness as to the true value of the contents of the Bible? The reader must know thatconcluding portion of St. Mark and the verse in St. Matthew are spurious and a subsequent addition. But I am afraid the Foreign Mission would not allow the correction. It would tell against their very Mission, if they eliminate the verse from St. Matthew; they lose the only pillar that supports the structure of the Trinity. No other verse in the whole Scripture speaks of it. The said eleven verses of St. Mark are the only justification for the existence of the Foreign Mission. You, as well as I, know, my Lord, that the call to Jesus came solely and wholly from Judaism. He came only to gather the scattered sheep and would not give the children’s bread to the dogs, the world beyond the Israelites. The Foreign Mission is a mere trespass on lands forbidden by the Master. It transcends the limit marked by Jesus.Throughout his life the Gentiles and others did not concern him: they were the swine. Then came the make-believe Resurrection, and they say the Master changed his mind as to his mission and ordered it to be carried to the four corners of the world (indicating that he was unsure  of his mission), but this all depends upon the questionable verses of St. Mark, and hence their retention in the Bible. St. Matthew is no authority on this point. The word “nations” there is a mistranslation and a wrong substitute for “the tribes”–the rest of the Jewish tribes scattered all over the world. This being the case, the Mission cannot afford to eliminate the verses from their version, nor will they put marginal notes, as did the old versions, to show the true nature of the verses.3 It would weaken the cause and show the futility of their status, since in carrying on evangelical work in the non-Christian world they are acting against the express admonition of the Master. It may be that reasons other than religion are at the back of it all, and goading their activities, but decency, if not religion, assuredly demands the publishing of things as they are.”

   What devotee(s) of God would make fabrication(s) in the Name of God? Is it not telling a lie on God that He revealed these “forged” verses? Is it not telling a lie on Jesus that he uttered these “forgeries”?  

   Even if Jesus had said to teach the Gospels to all nations, yet this would not make Jesus GOD or SON OF GODor one in a TRINITY with God or vicarious atoner or that mankind INHERITED SIN from Adam/Eve. These cardinal doctrines of CHRISTIANITYare lies, falsehood, and blasphemy. See CHRISTIANITY-LIES EVIL, HATE). (For more Christian jugglery in the Bible see BIBLE-CORRUPT & OBSOLETE).

   Equally significant, Ahmed Deedat has shown in his booklet Is the Bible God’s Word? that the word “VIRGIN” in Isaiah 7:14 has been replaced with the phrase “a young woman” in the RSV (Revised Standard Version) Bible; the word “BEGOTTEN” of “begotten son” of John 3:16, has been “excised;” the verse of 1-John 5:7 which speaks of the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost (the Trinity) “has also been scrapped from the RSV” Bible; and the verses of Mark 16:19 and Luke 24:51 which refer to the Ascension of Jesus were “expunged” but later “restored to the text.” Deedat also notes that while these terms have been “unceremoniously excised” from English Bibles, they are retained in the Bible’s nearly 1500 other languages.(Such is the Church’s deception and desperation to snare the innocent native into eating the “body” and drinking the mythical “blood” of Christ –SPIRITUAL CANNIBALISM. This is probably the lowest depth of spiritual depravity).

These Christians are pathetic. They adulterate their “Book of God” then they turn around with audacity and ask this same God Whose Book they adulterated to give them their “daily bread.” In fact, they not only pray to God to give them “daily bread,” but instead of repenting and correcting their misdeeds and follow the path of true religion as taught by Prophet Mohammad they brazenly pray to God and missionize to have Muslims and all mankind be accomplices in their iniquities. In following mortal-minted doctrines, tampering with the Book of God, and praying to God for Muslims to follow them, Christians are praying to God that Muslims not only be accomplices with them in their iniquities but also for God to sanction their sullying His Book. And yet these Christians expect to sit with Jesus “on the right hand of God. (Reminds me of Muslims defying Allāh and sectifying themselves and even killing one another and yet expect Allāh to give them Jannah. See ISLAM-SECTISM). What maroons.

   In contrast to the Christian’s baptism with its farcical phrase –“In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”– and thesprinkling of water on the new-born (or dunking the grown in water). One is initiated into Islam by taking the Shahadah (declaration of faith) proclaiming the Majesty, Magnificence, and unparalleled Glory of Allāh, and the Messengership of Mohammad (which is also recited into the ears of the new-born, that the only being greater than himself/herself is Allāh).

   One who takes this Shahadah Ash-hado anl-laa-elaa-ha il-Allāh, wa ash-had anna Mohammadan abdo-hu wa Rasuloh: I testify there is no God but Allāh, and I testify Mohammad is the servant and Messenger of Allāh– is professing the belief that:

   –Allāh God is One i.e. He is not One in a Trinitywhether it be the Hindu Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva, the Christian Trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or the Pagan Trinity of Juno, Jupiter, and Minerva– nor is He One in a Duality–as in the Zoroastrian’s God of darkness and all things evil, and God of light and all things good– nor is Allāh God One in a polytheism. And Allāh is One in attributes–there is no other existence with attributes as He.

 Allāh God is Eternal, Absolute, i.e. He never dies nor can be killed. As a son is the successor of his father and as Allāh God is eternal He does not need a son to succeed Him. Allāh God is not dependent on anyone, but all are dependent upon Him. Allāh God is Absolute, i.e. there was none before Him, and there is none after Him.

   –Allah God begets not, i.e. as Fatherhood (begetting) requires the joining of sperm with ovum, and being One and Only, the First and Creator of all and thus could not have a consort, Allāh God begets not.4

   –Allāh God is not begotten, i.e. Being the First and Creator of all and thus having no mother and father, He is not Begotten/ born. A woman created by God cannot be the mother of God. God cannot be son of a woman. As one who is born of a woman is not “clean,”5 if God was born of a woman Adam and Eve, not born of a woman, would be cleaner than God.  

   –There is none like Allāh God, i.e. being First and Last, Evident and Immanent and one in attributes there is none like Him; being Omnipotent, Omniscient and Omnipresent He incarnates not; being Just He has no “chosen people” to the exclusion of others; being Beneficent and Merciful He needs no ‘blood sacrifice’ to forgive sins; and does not give to every action an equal and opposite reaction–He forgives sins altogether or He requites evil with its like; and He rewards good up to seven hundredfold–(Qur’an 39:53; 6:160; 2:261. Bokhari Vol. 1; ch. 32, #40).  

The Shahadah also incorporates belief in all of Allāh’s Angels, Revealed Books and Prophets; the Resurrection and Judgment; and Heaven and Hell. (While Allāh tells us to believe in all His prophets and revealed Books He also tells us what not to believe in those books and things that are passing under the names of these prophets –such as karma and reincarnation, trinity, inherited sin, vicarious atonement, Divine sonship etc.

“There is no God but Allāh;

Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh!”

Even if one has no intention of doing any good he/she should not hold in worship any but Allāh. While we are alive we have the grand opportunity to turn to Allāh. When we die –and no one knows when– there is no second chance. This grand opportunity evaporates like a dewdrop in Hell.

   Allāh God invites us to forgive us our sins–(Qur’an 14:10). And He implores us in loving, compassionate terms through His illustrious Prophet and mercy to the world, Mohammad to convey to us: “Say: O My servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allāh, surely Allāh forgives all sins. Verily, He is Most Forgiving. Ever Merciful”–(Qur’an 39:53).

Allāh loves us.

Allāh wants to guide us.

Allāh wants us to be pure.

Allāh wants us to have a life in Paradise.

What is holding you back from BAPTIZING

with Allāh, the Best of Baptizers?

(Qur’an 2:138).



1. Jehovah’s Witnesses wrote: “The name Jehovah appears some 7,000 times in the original text of the Bible. The meaning associated with the name is I shall prove to be what I shall prove to be.” (Exodus 3:14).This is Christian crockery. The name “Jehovah” is not even mentioned once in the “original text” of the Bible. Jehovah is not a scriptural name of God. The language of the Israelites was/is Hebrew. As Ahmed Deedat points out, there is no “J” in the Hebrew alphabet. It is said that Jews refrained from articulating the name of God because it was too Holy, thus they referred to God as YHWH. The name “Jehovah” was coined in the human mint eighteen hundred years after Jesus and stamped with the Divine head by the founding Father(s) of the Jehovah’s Witnesses: it was coined from the Jewish formula YHWH–which would give Yehowah, Yahowah, or Yahweh, etc. but by no stretch of the English language can it produce Je-ho-Vah. (See our response to claims by JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES). Christ did not cry from the cross to “Jehovah”: he cried to “ELI”


3. Encyclopaedia Biblica, p. 1880, Section G., Westcott and Hort, The New Testament in the Original Greek, Appendix).

4. That God can do anything is no argument (God cannot create His mother). This is not a question about God creating an item; it is a matter of God having a relation. Whereas God has the power to create an object, He could not have a mother/father as He is ‘un-born’ and is the First and the Creator of all. Mary was not the consort of God so that her son, Jesus, could be son of God.   Scientists who clone animals are not fathers of these clones; clones are not children of these scientists. If Jesus is son of God because he is said to be “fatherless” and of “virgin” birth, human clones who would be “fatherless” and even of “virgin” birth would also be sons/daughters of God. Son of God as Allāh God reveals and as research has uncovered, is a remnant of Paganism –(Qur’an 9:30. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din has detailed the pagan nature of Christianity in his revealing book, The Sources Of Christianity, for this book see

5. The Bible–(Job 4:17; 25:4) states: “shall a man be more pure than his maker?” “How then can man be justified with God? or HOW CAN HE BE CLEAN THAT IS BORN OF A WOMAN?” in which event, according to Christians, Adam, Eve, and “Melchisedec” (Heb.7:1-3) not born from a woman are cleaner than God (Jehovah’s Witnesses reject Trinity). As Jesus is said to be God and as he was born of a woman, Jesus is a God of the womb–Christians worship a womb-God.