Allah-cut Mohammad’s aorta; Jesus biggest fake in history


In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms

If Mohammad is/was a false Prophet, this false Prophet has given to the world the best Book in Scriptural history (see Qur’an-science).

Allah revealed in Qur’an 5:67: “O Messenger (Mohammad), deliver that (Qur’an) which has been revealed to thee from thy Lord (Allah); and if you do (it) not, thou hast not delivered His message.  And Allah will protect thee from men. Surely, Allah guides not the disbelieving people.”
And in Qur’an 69:44-46 Allah says: “And if he (Mohammad) had fabricated against Us certain sayings, We would certainly have seized him by the right hand, Then cut off his heart’s vein.”

And Hadiths note that a Jewess gave Prophet Mohammad poisoned sheep to eat, and nearing his death Mohammad expressed that he could feel the pain of the poison in his aorta. (It is not uncommon for people to feel the pain in their later years for an injury sustained in early life and/or to feel the pain occasionally).

Critics juxtapose the above verses of the Qur’an to Mohammad’s “pain” from this poisoned sheep and claim as proof that Mohammad was a false Prophet.
(Feeling “pain” and “cutting of aorta” are heaven-to-earth contrasts. Significantly, “Death occurs immediately after traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta 75%–90% of the time since bleeding is so severe, and 80–85% of patients die before arriving at a hospital.”1 But Prophet Mohammad lived about FOUR YEARS after this alleged tearing of his aorta. Mohammad then must be more Super than the man from Krypton).

Prophet Mohammad’s mission lasted about twenty-two years (610-632) and chapter 69 of the Qur’an was an early revelation at Makkah (probably in the second year of the Prophet’s mission) which would leave about twenty years between chapter 69 and the end of the Prophet’s life; and the Prophet was given poisoned sheep about four years before his death which would give us about sixteen years between the revelation of chapter 69 and the eating of the poisoned sheep.
The question to the critics is, at what point in this sixteen-year period did Mohammad made the fabrication and what saying/verse did he fabricate so that Allāh cut his aorta with poisoned sheep? (Incidentally, why would Allāh need to have this Jewess poison Mohammad when Allāh could easily have struck Mohammad dead?)

Conversely. To the end of Mohammad’s mission –including these sixteen years between chapter 69 and the poisoned sheep fiasco– rather than being castigated or have his aorta cut, Allāh exalts Mohammad:

  • “Surely Allah and His angels bless the Prophet. O you who believe, call for blessings on him and salute him with a (becoming) salutation” (Qur’an 33:56)
  • “Truly, you (Mohammad) are one of the messengers” (Qur’an 36:3)
  • “he (Mohammad) has come with the truth and he confirms the messengers.” (Qur’an 37:37)
  • “Your companion (Mohammad) has not strayed, nor has he erred, Nor does he speak from (his own) desires, It is not but a revelation revealed” (Qur’an 53:1-4)
  • “He (Allāh) it is Who has sent His Messenger (Mohammad) with the guidance and the Religion of Truth that He may make it prevail over all religions. And Allah is enough for a witness”–Qur’an 48:28)
    “He it is Who has sent His Messenger with the guidance and the Religion of Truth that He may make it prevail over all religions, though the polytheists are averse”–(Qur’an 9:33; 61:9. Trinitarian Christians are polytheists).

Allāh also enjoins us to obey/follow Mohammad–(Qur’an 3:32 and several other places):
-“On that day will those who disbelieved and disobeyed the Messenger desire that the earth were levelled with them. And they can hide no fact from Allāh”–(Qur’an 4:42)
-“And whoever obeys Allāh and the Messenger, they are with those upon whom Allah has bestowed favours from among the prophets and the truthful and the faithful and the righteous, and a goodly company are they!”–(Qur’an 69).
Strange that Allāh would honor and tell us to honor and follow Mohammad if Mohammad was a forger against Him.

However, Qur’an 69:44-46 need to be taken in its larger text, from verses 38-48 which states:
“But nay! I swear by that which you see, And that which you see not!  Surely, it is the word of an honoured Messenger, And it is not the word of a poet. Little is it that you believe!  Nor the word of a soothsayer. Little is it that you mind! It is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds. And if he had fabricated against Us certain sayings, We would certainly have seized him by the right hand,  Then cut off his heart’s vein. And not one of you could have withheld Us from him. And surely it is a Reminder for the dutiful.”
This clearly shows that verses 44-46 are used as Divine proof against the disbelievers that Mohammad was NOT a fortune-teller or poet but a Messenger of Allāh God. (The Biblical equivalent to this topic will be shown later which shows that Jesus was/is the biggest fake in Scriptural history).

Regarding the Hadiths on the poisoned sheep:

  • A Jewess came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) with poisoned mutton and he took of that what had been brought to him (Allah’s Messenger). (When the effect of this poison were felt by him) he called for her and asked her about that, whereupon she said: I had determined to kill you. Thereupon he said: Allah will never give you the power to do it. He (the narrator) said that they (the Companion’s of the Holy Prophet) said: Should we not kill her? Thereupon he said: No. He (Anas) said: I felt (the affects of this poison) on the uvula of Allah’s Messenger. (Muslim Vol. 3, #5430).
  • Narrated ‘Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O ‘Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.” (Bukhari Vol. 5, #713. As stated, it is not uncommon for people to feel the pain in their later years for an injury sustained in early life. Or to occasionally feel it)..
  • A Jewess presented him (Prophet Muhammad) at Khaibar a roasted sheep which she had poisoned. The Apostle of Allah ate of it and the people also ate. He then said: Lift your hands (from eating), for it has informed me that it is poisoned. Bishr b. al-Bara b. Ma’rur al-Ansari died. So he (the Prophet) sent for the Jewess (and said to her): What motivated you to do the work you have done? She said: If you were a prophet, it would not harm you; but if you were a king, I would rid the people of you. The Apostle of Allah then ordered regarding her and she was killed. He then said about the pain of which he died: I continued to feel pain from the morsel which I had eaten at Khaibar. This is the time when it has cut off my aorta.-(Abu Dawud Vol. 3, #4498.
    (Note well the Prophet’s statement: “it has informed me that it is poisoned.” Clearly. the killed sheep could not have informed the Prophet. If Allāh had sent the Jewess to “cut the Prophet’s aorta” it is not reasonable that Allāh would inform the Prophet the meat was poisoned. And,  as the Prophet did not die, this proves he is NOT FALSE).
  • (The background to this poisoned sheep event is necessary). Muhammad Husayn Haykal states: “Jewish acquiescence in their fate under the dominion of Islam did not take place at one and the same time or immediately after their military defeat, for they were exceedingly resentful and full of hatred for their Muslim fellows.
    Zaynab, daughter of al-Harith, and wife of Sallam ibn Mishkam, cooked a goat and presented it to Muhammad after the peace treaty with Khaybar and Jewish-Muslim relations returned to normal. Muhammad sat down at the table with his companions to eat of this Jewish prepared food. Taking the first mouthful, he realized the taste was strange. Bishr ibn al Bara’ had the same realization and could hardly swallow the first mouthful.
    As he threw his away, the Prophet said: “I have a premonition that this dish is poisoned.” He then called Zaynab and questioned her, and she confessed. In defense of herself, she said to the Prophet: “You know what has befallen my people at your hand, and you can appreciate my resentment and hatred. In pondering the whole event, I arrived at the conclusion that if you, the source of all evil, were a king like other kings, then to put an end to your life would bring peace to me and my people. If, on the other hand, you are a true prophet, then surely you would find out that the food was poisoned and you would not eat.” (The Prophet did find out proving he is/was a TRUE PROPHET).
    The one mouthful which Bishr ate was fatal to him. The chroniclers disagree regarding the fate of Zaynab. Most of them agree that the Prophet appreciated her defense, forgave her, and sympathized with her loss of father and husband. Others relate that she was killed in revenge for the life of Bishr.”–(The Life of Muhammad, pp. 372-373).
    Evidently, this woman wanted to kill the Prophet for her personal grievance but Allāh protected the Prophet from her scheme. And the Prophet, being human and subjected to human frailties, felt the effect of the poison in later life. (Though it is not stated what poison the woman used, it is not uncommon for people to experience the effect of poison long after the poison had entered the body –see the Internet).

To press the matter further.
This woman’s reason for feeding poisoned sheep to the Prophet was because the Prophet killed her husband and father. So if her father and husband were not killed or if she did not seek revenge THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO POISONED SHEEP AND THE PROPHET’S AORTA WOULD NOT BE CUT.
Evidently, there is NO relation between this woman’s poisoned sheep and Allāh’s declaration to cut the Prophet’s aorta if he should forge a saying.
The critics claim that Allāh cut Mohammad’s aorta because Mohammad forged a saying making Mohammad a false Prophet is baseless.

Needless to say, after this “poisoned sheep” incident Prophet Muhammad continued to live a healthy and active life; including his triumph at Makkah two years before his death. Also Allāh gave Mohammad revelation to Mohammad about two months before his death by telling us (Qur’an 5:3) “This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion” which shows Mohammad had successfully completed the Divine mission.

It is poor cerebration to conclude that Allāh would continue to give Mohammad revelation if Mohammad had fabricated saying against Him –what would Allāh do if Mohammad fabricated more sayings, cut another of Mohammad’s aorta? A murderer does not have to fear being hanged for committing additional murders; regardless of how many murders he cannot be executed more than once. 

Considering the severing of one’s aorta results in instant death –“Death occurs immediately after traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta 75%–90% of the time since bleeding is so severe, and 80–85% of patients die before arriving at a hospital.”1–  Mohammad must be a “God” to withstand this onslaught and live for some four years after his jugular was severed and even fight wars and enjoy his wives.
If the poison took three/four years to kill Mohammad while it took the life of his companion at the time of eating it, this must be another miracle of Mohammad, which Jesus, the Christians’ God and Son of God, was not able to equal.
(See Mohammad-and Abi Sarh whom the critics love to quote to support their Mohammad-is-false Prophet madness).
“And say: The Truth has come and falsehood vanished. Surely falsehood is ever bound to vanish” –Qur’an 17:81).

Prophet Mohammad never took revenge for anything that was done against him–(Bokhari Vol. 8, #777; Abu Dawud Vol. 3, #4767). Whereas Mohammad forgave the woman for trying to kill him (and she was executed for the death of Bishr) there are critics who try to castigate Mohammad for the woman being executed.
These critics must be the biggest clowns in creation.
This woman not only tried to assassinate Mohammad –and because her husband and father were killed for waging war against Mohammad to annihilate Mohammad– and left Mohammad in pain to the end of his life, her action resulted in the death of another individual.

And these critics want Mohammad to toss the woman a bouquet?  These critics are to go and utter threats of death to their Prime Ministers –never mind assaulting or trying to assassinate him– and see what will be done to them.   

To restate, Allāh God revealed in His Qur’an 69:44-46, “And if he (Mohammad) had fabricated against Us certain sayings, We would certainly have seized him by the right hand, Then cut off his heart’s vein.”
The Book of Deuteronomy 18:20-22 state: “But the prophet which shall presume to speak a word in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die”. (New International Version has it: “But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death”).
And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.”

Given that God says “The father shall NOT die for the children, neither shall the children die for the fathers, but EVERY MAN SHALL DIE FOR HIS OWN SIN”–(Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:20; 2 Chronicles 25:4).
Whereas Jesus says his blood is shed “for many for the remission of sins”–(Matthew.20:28; 26:28). Clearly, this saying of Jesus is a stark contradiction of what God says.

Thus according to Deuteronomy 18:20-22 this saying of Jesus was a saying “which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously.” Thus, according to Christian theology Jesus was a “false” prophet.

Also whereas Jesus speaking about himself says “The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men:  And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again”–(Matthew 17:22-23). But Jesus was NOT killed (did not die on the cross). Thus, this saying of Jesus was a saying “which the Lord hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously.” Thus, according to Christian theology Jesus was a “false” prophet.
In contrast to Mohammad who is/was Divine Messenger. Jesus, based on  Christian theology, JESUS IS/WAS THE BIGGEST FAKE IN SCRIPTURAL HISTORY.

That Jesus did NOT die on the cross is evidenced by the Bible including Jesus himself:

  • prayers of the righteous are always answered–(James 5:16; Psalm 22:24; 34:15-19; John 9:31; Matthew 7:8-9);
  • God always answered Jesus’ prayers–(John 11:41-42).
  • Jesus prayed to be spared from death: “Then saith he (Jesus) unto them (disciples), My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me. And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt;” “and his sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground”–(Matthew 26:38-39; Luke 22:44);
  • Jesus prayers to be spared death were answered: “(Jesus) Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared”-(Hebrews 5:7).
    Allāh God says about Jesus: “they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them”–(Qur’an 4:157). Jesus only seemed dead. This is how God answered Jesus’ prayers and saved him. Obviously Jesus went into a coma. In those days no one checked for pulses, if you’re limp you’re dead.
  • Jesus said his sign would be like Jonas, as Jonas was alive in the whale’s belly so he shall be–(Matt. 12:39-40; Jonah 1:17; 2:1-10; if Jesus came to die for sins there was no need for his sign to be like Jonas’); if Jesus was killed/crucified his sign would not have been like Jonas’.
    Even if we take Jesus’ sign to refer to time (three days and three nights) rather than to status (that he would be alive) he is unlike Jonas. Jesus’ alleged crucifixion was on Friday afternoon and alleged resurrection on Sunday morning (Jewish Sabbath is on Saturdays); this would put Jesus in the earth two nights and one and a half days –Friday and Saturday nights, and half-a-day Friday and all day Saturday.
    Jesus told the thief on the cross beside him, “To-day shalt thou be with me in Paradise”–Luke 23:43. If Jesus went to Paradise “To day” (the day of his alleged crucifixion) he could not have gone into the earth: Paradise is not in the earth!.
  • After the alleged crucifixion and resurrection Jesus had his disciples examine him to verify he was not spirit, as the resurrected is, but was of flesh and bones: a mortal–(Luke 24:38-39). The resurrected “are (spiritualized) as the angels”–(Matthew 22:23-30. Luke 20:34-36). Jesus had flesh and bones: he was HUMAN.
  • The Apostles treated the news of Jesus’ resurrection as “idle tales”–(Luke 24:11. If the crucifixion and resurrection were prophecies, it is doubtful the Apostles would have treated the resurrection as “idle tales”).
  • Christian scientific investigation also shows that the body in the Shroud of Turin (which is believed to be the body of Christ) was not a dead body (For more see Christianity-inherited sin, crucifixion, ascension).

Even if Mohammad had fabricated a saying/verse against Allāh and Allāh had cut Mohammad’s aorta for it, yet this would not make the Bible superior to the Qur’an. Moreover, from Jesus’s own mouth the Bible is obsolete and Jesus is redundant.

Even if Mohammad had fabricated a saying/verse against Allāh and Allāh had cut Mohammad’s aorta for it, yet this would not make Christianity superior to, or equal with, Islam.
Trinity  –which puts God in the belly of a woman He created, brings God out the woman’s vagina and circumcises God’s foreskin making God less “clean” than Adam and Eve (Astaghferullah!)– was invented by the Church 300 years after Christ.
And original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement –which have God commit the injustice of loading Adam’s sin onto billions of innocent, helpless and morally and mentally non-competent babies; and have God committing more injustice and complicit in the murder of innocent Jesus as scapegoat for Adam’s sin– were devised by Paul (whom Christians crown with sainthood).

In fact, since a sadist suffers another person to gain some satisfaction, and as Christianity suffers children with Adam’s sin and needs satisfaction from the crucifixion of Jesus to forgive sins, original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement may be equated with sadism.
Arguably, Christianity stands on sadistic doctrines.


1.Traumatic aortic rupture, also called traumatic aortic disruption or transection, is a condition in which the aorta, the largest artery in the body, is torn or ruptured as a result of trauma to the body. The condition is frequently fatal due to the profuse bleeding that results from the rupture. Since the aorta branches directly from the heart to supply blood to the rest of the body, the pressure within it is very great, and blood may be pumped out of a tear in the blood vessel very rapidly. This can quickly result in shock and death. Thus traumatic aortic rupture is a common killer in automotive accidents and other traumas,[1] with up to 18% of deaths that occur in automobile collisions being related to the injury.[2] In fact, aortic disruption due to blunt chest trauma is the second leading cause of injury death behind traumatic brain injury.[3][4]
Aortic rupture can also be caused by non-traumatic mechanisms, particularly abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.”