In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.


Christians sing to the world that Jesus “paid the price” for us. The question is, who is it that has put a “charge” on us so that Jesus should “pay the price”?  And why can’t we pay our own “price”?
What became of Jesus Christ “post cross?”

Is Jesus Christ in heaven waiting to return to earth, or is Jesus Christ dead, buried and not returning?


  1. Jesus dead, buried no return
  2. Jesus original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement; Jesus and John 3:16
  3. Jesus Return in the Qur’an
  4. Jesus Birth in the Bible and Qur’an
  5. Jesus Word of God
  6. Jesus Son of God
  7. Jesus is God
  8. Jesus Trinity
  9. Jesus In heaven, Christians barred/banned from Jesus
  10. Jesus A Muslim, taught Islam, worshipped Allāh. Allāh different from Yahweh; is Hubal, Molech, moon-God, Satan Jesus Miracles
  1. Jesus Seen in dreams
  2. Jesus And the Comforter

Contrary to Church-teaching there was no crucifixion no resurrection no ascension of Jesus Christ; and there is no return of Jesus Christ.


Jesus unambiguously taught he was sent wholly and solely to the Israelite/Jews and prayed only for them; he taught sinless birth and that eternal life lies in observing the Mosaic Law until the arrival of the Comforter who will then guide into “all truth” and will “abide for ever”:

   -“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matthew 15:24)
-“I pray for them (Jews): I pray not for the world”–(John 17:9)
-“For the Son of man is come to seek and save that (Jews) which was lost”–(Luke 19:10)

   -go not to the Gentiles and the Samaritans, but “to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matthew 10:5-6)
-“Give not that which is holy unto the dogs (non-Jews), neither cast ye your pearls before swine (non-Jews)”–(Matthew 7:6)
-“It is not meet to take the children’s (Jewish’s) bread, and to cast is to dogs (non-Jews)–(Matthew 15:26)
-“Ye (Samaritans) worship ye know not what: we (Jews) know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews”–John 4:22)

   -After relating the parable of the sower to the people, when Jesus was alone with the Israelites they asked him about the meaning of the parable: “You have been given the secret of the Kingdom of God,” Jesus answered. “But the others, who are on the outside, hear all things by means of parables, so that, ‘They may look and look, yet not see; they may listen and listen, yet not understand. FOR IF THEY DID, THEY WOULD TURN TO GOD, AND HE WOULD FORGIVE THEM’”–(Mark 4:9-12.  What a ghastly, horribly, sickening  thing to do. And by God/Son of God. This alone proves that Jesus did not come  to save/die for sinners).

    -Jesus says we are born free of sin (likening little children to the kingdom of God which is free of sin)–(Matthew 18:3; 19:14; Luke 18:16-17)
-Jesus says eternal life lies in observance of the Mosaic Law (until the arrival of the Comforter who will then guide into “all truth”)–(Matthew 19:16-19; 23:1-3; John 14:15-16, 16:12-13).
And Jesus declared he completed his mission of ministering to the Israelite/Jews: “I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do”–(John 17:4).
Since Jesus “finished the work” God gave him to do –which mission as to minister to the Israelite/Jews– why then must Jesus return to earth?

Like his virgin birth, crucifixion, resurrection and ascension are all make-believe; Jesus’ “second coming”/1000-year rule is also make-believe –based on the Church assigning David’s “titles and functions” to Jesus; as David was earthly king the Church tailored Jesus to suit David and consecrated Jesus heavenly king and ruler of future-world:

“David was Israel’s first successful king….
“David became the prototype of an awaited Messiah. As symbol of the Messiah, the return of David, or the coming of David’s “son” stood for the reassertion of the divine rule and presence in history: to judge it, to redeem it, to renew it. David thus became the symbol of a fulfilment in the future, final peace.
In the apocalyptic developments in Judaism that mark the last two pre-Christian centuries, the symbolic rule of David stressed his status as divine mediator. The son of David became more emphatically a heavenly figure, the son of God enthroned to rule over the nations of the world. This was the matrix for the rise of Christianity. The new faith interpreted the career of Jesus by means of the titles and functions assigned to David in the mysticism of the Zion cult, in which he served as priest-king and in which he was the mediator between God and man.”
(Ency. Britannica, 15th, ed; Vol. 5; art. David; Nation Builder, and Messianic symbol, pp. 518, 519. Emphasis added).

Regarding Jesus’ alleged 1000-year reign some time in the future.  The Book of Revelation is said to be a vision given to John by Jesus through an angel with the permission of God–(Revelation 1:1). But the Book of Revelation is not prophecies about a future coming and rule of Jesus:

“Revelation to John appears to be a collection of separate units composed by unknown authors who lived during the last quarter of the first century, though it purports to have been written by John….
Although Christ is clearly the central figure of Revelation, an understanding of the text presupposes familiarity with the Old Testament language and concepts, especially those taken from the books of Daniel and Ezekiel …References to a “thousand years” (ch. 20) have led some to expect that the final victory over evil will come after the completion of some millennium.”
(Ency. Britannica, 15th Edn; Vol. VIII, art. Revelation to John, p. 537. Emphasis added).

   “One of the most pervading and dominant mythological themes to be noted in the New Testament and the writings of the subapostolic church (late 1st–early 2nd centuries) was that of the ages of the world. Derived from Indo-Iranian (or Indo-European) sources and transformed through Jewish concepts of history, the theme of the ages of the world that most influenced Christianity came from the apocalyptic speculation that flourished during the period of the rise of Christianity.
It was Iranian mythological concepts of the ages of the world, translated through Jewish apocalyptic views, that most influenced Christian views of time, history, and man’s ultimate destiny.

…The theme of the ages of the world and its attendant subthemes that came primarily from Iranian mythology were transformed by apocalyptic literature––which flourished in Judaism and then Christianity from about the 2nd century BC to about 2nd century AD––into a historical context, though Zoroastrian had done this in reference to the last age. Indo-Iranian myth was thus historicized through the Judeo-Christian view of historical time as the arena of struggle between good and evil. The four ages of the world in Christianity are: (1) from creation of the world and man to the Fall of man; (2) from the Fall of man to the first advent of Christ; (3) from the first to the second advent of Christ, which includes the 1,000-year reign of Christ and his saints and the Last Judgment; and (4) the creation of a new heaven and a new earth in which those who have chosen the good (i.e., Christ) will live in eternity.” -(Ency Britannica, 15th Edn; Vol. 4, art. Myth and legend from the 1st to the early 2nd centuries, pp. 551-552. Emphasis added).
Now you know!
From earth to eternity, Christianity is bottled in mythology.


  • Jesus says: God is One/Unity (same as Moses. Mark 12:29; Deuteronomy 6:4).
    Christians say: (NO!) God is three Gods in one God and one God in three Gods (Trinity).
  • Jesus says: he was sent to seek and save the Israelite and he prayed only for them not for the world–(Matthew 10:5-6; 15:24; Luke 19:10; John 4:22, 17:9; Mark 4:9-12).
    Christians say: (NO!) Jesus was sent to redeem the world.
  • Jesus says: we are born free of sin (likening little children to the kingdom of God which is free of sin)–(Matthew 18:3; 19:14; Luke 18:16-17. Jesus did not baptize little children to free them of Adam’s sin).
    Christians say: (NO!) we inherited Adam’s “original” sin.
  •   Jesus says: eternal life lies in observance of the Mosaic Law (until the arrival of the Comforter who will then guide into “all truth”)–(Matthew 19:16-19;  John 14:15-16, 16:12-13).
    Christians say: (NO!) eternal life lies in believing that Jesus Christ died for your sin (to believe in the blood/crucifixion of Jesus Christ to free you of Adam’s “original” sin).
  • Jesus says he finished the work God gave Him, which was to minister to the Jews; and that the Comforter will guide into “all truth” and abide “for ever”–(John 14:15-16, 16:12-13. As the Comforter will give “all truth” the Bible devoid of “all truth” is obsolete; and Jesus not giving “all truth” is redundant; though he is to be honored as Muslims honor him with peace and blessings of Allah).
    Christians say: (NO) Jesus is the only way and truth and life and no man cometh to God but by Jesus; Jesus will return in the Last days.

So who will you believe and follow the Church/Christians or Jesus and Allāh God?

                             JESUS “POST CROSS”
What became of Jesus after his alleged crucifixion and resurrection?
Jesus mission was to the “lost sheep of the house of Israel
-“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matthew 15:24);
-“I pray for them: I pray not for the world”–(John 17:9);
-“For the Son of man is come to seek and save that which was lost”–(Luke 19:10).

There were only two of the Twelve Tribes of Israel in Palestine. The other ten Tribes were in the Kashmir/Afghan region. Jesus’ eighteen missing years (from 12-30) from the Gospels were spent ministering to these Tribes. See Khwaja Nazir Ahmad, Jesus in Heaven on Earth, www. Upon his return from the “lost Tribes”, Jesus became embroiled with the Jewish hierarchy who sought to kill him.

Allāh revealed: “And (Jews) planned and Allāh (also) planned. And Allāh is the best of planners. When Allah said: O Jesus, I will cause thee to die and exalt thee in My presence and clear thee of those who disbelieve and make those who follow thee above those who disbelieve to the day of Resurrection.  Then to Me is your return, so I shall decide between you concerning that wherein you differ”–(Qur’an 3:54-55).
Jews planned to kill Jesus; Allāh countered their plan and saved Jesus.

Allāh revealed: “And for their saying: We have killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allāh and they killed him not, nor did they cause his death on the cross, but he was made to appear to them as such. And certainly those who differ therein are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge about it, but only follow a conjecture, and they killed him not for certain: Nay, Allāh exalted him in His presence. And Allāh is ever Mighty, Wise”–(Qur’an 4:157-158).
Jews say they killed Jesus, Christians say Jesus was crucified. Allāh negates both views as conjectures.

Allāh exalting/raising Jesus to Himself does not mean Allāh literally raised Jesus up to Himself; only that Allah took Jesus’ soul to make him appear to be dead. Allāh takes our souls at sleep and at death: “Allah takes (men’s) souls at the time of their death, and those that die not, during their sleep. Then He withholds those on whom He has passed the decree of death and sends the others back”–(Qur’an 39:42). If Allah had given Jesus death on the cross, Jesus would have stayed dead, the dead are not returned–Qur’an 23:100. Compare Eccle-siastes 9:5). Jesus could not be dead and yet “appear” to be dead at the same time.

Christians say whereas historians say Jesus was killed on the cross, the Qur’an is the only source that denies that Jesus was killed –meaning that Allah is wrong. One cannot deny something that didn’t happen –Allāh did not deny the crucifixion, Allāh enlightened us about it. Jesus only appeared to be dead.
The question is, were these historians present when Jesus was taken from the “cross”? and did they carry out any medical examination to determine that Christ was dead or alive?
Research reveals that Jesus was born between 4-6 BC and “died” between 30-36 AD.

   -Greek historian Josephus Flavius, was born in 37 AD –a year AFTER Jesus’ alleged cruci-fixion. Thus, his evidence is hearsay.
   -Roman (and Pagan) historian Tacitus, a Ro-man senator, was born in 56 AD –twenty years AFTER Jesus’ alleged crucifixion. Thus, his evidence is hearsay.
  -Jewish historian Josephus Flavius (original name, Joseph Ben Matthias) was born in AD 37/38) –one/two years AFTER Jesus’ alleged crucifixion. Thus, his evidence is hearsay.
   -Pliny the Younger, “a lawyer, author, and magistrate of Ancient Rome,” was born in 61 AD –twenty-five years AFTER Jesus’ alleged crucifixion. Thus, his evidence is hearsay.
   -Suetonius, a “Roman biographer and anti-quarian”, was born around 69 AD –about thirty-three years AFTER Jesus’ alleged cruci-fixion. Thus,
his evidence is hearsay.
If a Christian should take such sources to court as proof of Jesus’ crucifixion, Judge Jacob would not blink twice to toss him and his hearsay brief out of his court. Head first.

Paul was not present at the alleged crucifixion. His claim that Jesus Christ was “crucified/resurrected” is his own fabrication. He wrote:
-“Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead ACCORDING TO MY GOSPEL”–(2 Timothy 2:8; Galatians 1:6);
-“And if Christ be not raised, YOUR FAITH IS VAIN; ye are yet in your sins–(1 Cor. 15:17).

   Revealingly, whereas Paul here made Jesus “dead,” he contradicts himself in Hebrews 5:7 where he states about Jesus praying in the Garden of Gethsemane to be spared from death: “Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and WAS HEARD in that he feared.”
God answered Jesus’ prayers and saved him from death.

The only person with Jesus was Joseph of Arimathea; he took Jesus for burial; afterwards women followed him–(Matthew 27:57-61; Mark 15:43-47; Luke 23:50-55; John 19:38).
They must have observed Jesus was alive. For, almost three days later –from Friday afternoon to Monday morning– women took sweet spices to anoint Jesus–(Mark 16:1. Who anoints the dead? And a three-day old dead at that; and when he must have already been decaying, and, in the hot Judean sun, stinketh).

That Jesus did not die on the cross is evidenced by Jesus himself:
-Jesus said his sign would be like Jonas. Jonas was alive in the whale’s belly “three days and three nights”–(Matthew 12:39-40; Jonah 1:17; 2:1-10). If Jesus came to die for sins there was no need for his sign to be like Jonas. If Jesus died his sign would not be like Jonas. Even with the time factor Jesus was not in the tomb three days and three nights. From Friday afternoon to Sunday morning put Jesus in the tomb for two nights –Friday and Saturday– and two days –Friday and Saturday–(Matthew 27:46; 28:1; Mark 15:42; Luke 23:54; John 19:31, 42).

   -Jesus prayed to be spared from death–(Matthew 26:36-44. It is boggling Jesus came to die willingly for the sins of the world and prayed to be saved from this grand glory. And if Jesus is God, God praying to Himself?)

   -prayers of the righteous are always answered–(Psalm 22:24; 34:15-19; John 9:31; Matthew 7:8-9); God always answered Jesus’ prayers–(John 11:41-42).

   -After the alleged “crucifixion” and “resurrection” Jesus had his disciples examine him to verify he was not spirit, but was flesh and bones: a mortal–(Luke 24:38-39). The resurrected “are (spiritualized) as the angels”–(Matthew 22:23-30. Luke 20:34-36). Jesus had flesh and bones –Jesus was human/alive.

As Jesus was praying to be spared from death, an angel of the Lord appeared and strengthened him–(Luke 22:43; assuring him that God would save him. Angel strengthened God?) But Jesus thought God had reneged in his assurance; this is why he lamented, “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”–(Matthew 27:46).
But God did not forsake Jesus, God rendered Jesus unconscious/ comatose (as noted, Allāh removes the souls of men at sleep and at death–Qur’an 39:42) which made Jesus appear to be dead.  This is how Allāh saved Jesus.
In those days no one checked for pulse, if you’re limp you’re dead. Even Pilate was surprised Jesus was dead–(Mark 15:44). By making Jesus appear dead, Allāh saved Jesus’ legs from being broken–(John 19:33), which was a practice to hasten the death of the crucified.

There is scientific proof Jesus did not die on the cross.
In his book Crumbling of the Cross M.A. Faruqui has taken Extracts from the book Jesus Nicht am Kreuz Gestorben (Jesus Did not Die on the Cross) by Kurt Berna, Catholic author and Secretary of a German Research Convent in Stuttgart, W. Germany. Scientific tests on photographs of the Shroud of Turin (the sheet in which Jesus is said to have been placed after he was taken down from the cross) showed that the body in the Shroud was not dead. Which is what Allāh revealed–(Qur’an 4:157).

 The results of the tests were forwarded to the Vatican. In response, then pope, John XXIII, “informed and directed” his subordinates to “believe and to propagate” that man’s complete salvation lies “through the blood” of Christ, and that Jesus’ death is “not essential” for this salvation. Is this anything but papal’s verbal gymnastics? You can read it (pp. 98-109). The Crumbling of the Cross can be obtained/read at How can salvation be through Jesus’ “blood” when there is/was no “blood” of Jesus?

Jesus knew Jews wanted to kill him: “Why go ye about to kill me”–(John 7:19. It is strange Jesus should ask this if he had come to die to fulfill prophecy; and to give his life willingly). But why did Jews want to kill Jesus?  Two reasons:
(1) Jewish clergy believed Jesus’ preaching was dividing the nation which would make the nation vulnerable to Roman domination–(John 11:43-48). Killing Jesus would remove this threat, and as Jesus would be no more his followers will also diminish /die off as noted from Caiaphas:

“And Caiaphas, being the high priest…said unto them…it is expedient for us. that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not. And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation; And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in one the children of God that were scattered abroad. Then they took counsel together for to put him to death. Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews”–(John 11: 49-54).

Notably, that Caiaphas did not speak of “himself” but “prophesied” that Jesus should die, does not mean that Caiaphas was repeating any prophecy that Jesus came to be crucified; all it means is that Caiaphas was speaking not as an ordinary priest but as “high priest” and he has given the judgment/decision that Jesus will be killed to save the nation from Roman domination. The following words “Then they took counsel together for to put him (Jesus) to death” confirm this.

   If Caiaphas knew Jesus would be killed to fulfill prophecy it would have been pointless for him to plot Jesus’ death. Moreover, Caiaphas could not have known the manner, time and place of Jesus’ death and would have been trying to circumvent or competing with Divine decree, which would amount to an absurdity. Also, the speaking about gathering “the children of God that were scattered abroad;” “abroad” could not mean the rest of the world. Jesus hardly had followers outside of his area.

   (2) As noted, the Bible shows Jesus was NOT killed; Jesus said he was NOT killed; and investigative evidence by Christians showed Jesus was NOT killed on the cross/pole.
The other reason Jews wanted to kill Jesus was because of his condemnation of Jewish hierarchy. The Self-Pronouncing Edition of the King James Bible, by The World Publishing Company, 2231 West 110TH Street, Cleveland 2, Ohio, (p.77) notes in its section ‘Bible Dictionary’ under the term ‘scribe’:

“Their familiarity with the law allowed the scribes to take on a role of growing importance in Jewish society –teaching in the synagogues, serving as judges, and becoming members of the Sanhedrin. Jesus refused to accept the mass of detail and the superficial technicalities which they affixed to the law, and He accused them of hypocritical interpretations of the law. For these reasons they opposed His teachings and were one of the groups, as were the Pharisees, that helped to plot His death–(Matt. 5:20; 21:15; Mark 10:33; 14:53; Luke 11:44; 20:46; John 8:3; Acts 4:5; 6:12. Emphasis added).”  Jesus was taken captive not for prophecies or redemption of sins, but because Jewish hierarchy “opposed His teachings.”

Had Jesus not condemn Jewish hierarchy and had Jews not fear Roman domination because of Jesus’ influence on the people, there would have been no talk of Jesus being killed. This is in accordance with Jesus saying he came “to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many”–(Mark 10:45). Jesus came to save Jews; and realizing Jews wanted to kill him to avoid Roman domination, he would need to give himself up than have his followers killed; so he decided to “give his life a ransom for MANY.” Though he prayed to be saved. And was saved. Allāh saved Jesus.

“Post cross” Jesus;  What became of Jesus “post cross”?
Whereas Matthew left Jesus in “a mountain” preaching to his disciples–(Matthew 28:16:20); Mark postulates Jesus went and “sit on the right hand of God”–Mark 16:19); Luke says Jesus was “carried up into heaven”–(Luke 24:51); John ended with Jesus at the “sea of Tiberias” eating fish and bread–(John chapter 21. Either Jesus was one really hungry God or he was in no hurry to get into heaven).

  • (Incidentally, Jesus says to the thief on the cross beside him: “Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in Paradise”–(Luke 23:43). But Jesus contradicts himself when he said that he will be in the earth for three days and three nights–(Matthew 12:39-40). And the “heart of the earth” is not Paradise.
        In fact Jesus not only contradicts himself by first going in the heart of the earth, he did NOT go to heaven “To day” –on the day of his alleged crucifixion– as he told the thief. At least eight days after his alleged resurrection Jesus was with his disciples: “And after EIGHT DAYS again his disciples were within…then CAME JESUS”–(John 20:26); and The Acts said Jesus ascended forty days after the “resurrection”: “he (Jesus) shewed himself alive…being seen of them FORTY DAYS, and speaking of the things….And when had spoken…he was taken up”–(Acts 1:3, 9).    Either Jesus did not know when and “IF” he would be going to heaven or he must have been busy shuttling back and forth between heaven and earth).

But Allāh tells us He gave Jesus and his mother comfort: “And We made the son of Mary and his mother a sign, and We gave them refuge on a lofty ground having meadows and springs”–(Qur’an 23:50).
This luscious place of refuge is shown to be none other than Kashmir –heaven on earth as the poet says. Jesus and his mother clearly must have gone to Kashmir post “cross” where they lived out their remaining years.

Allāh tells us “(Jesus) will speak to the people when in the cradle and when of old age”–(Qur’an 3:45. “Cradle” is euphemism for “young”; Jesus speaking as a youth is evident from his mixing with the elders of Israel–(Luke 2:42-47). Speaking to people and being “killed” at age thirty-three can hardly qualify as “old age”.
That “old age” refers to Jesus’ supposed return; two thousand years and counting is one heck of an “old age.” Plus, there is the matter of Jesus and his mother being given refuge in this land of meadows and springs –Jesus could not have gone to heaven and be with his mother in this land of meadows and springs.
Muhammad Ali notes in his comm. to Qur’an 23:50: “According to a saying of the Holy Prophet, Jesus lived 120 years (Ibn Kathir, vol. ii, p. 246).

That Jesus went to Kashmir. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad in his book, Jesus in Heaven on Earth, notes on p. 404:
“The Gospels record Jesus age twelve in the temple.   Then about age thirty at the river Jordan. That leaves  approximately seventeen years unaccounted for.
During those so-called lost years, the child “increased         in wisdom and stature,” as Luke wrote. But was it in the carpenter shop at Nazareth?
According to ancient Tibetan manuscripts, Jesus      secretly withdrew from the home of Mary and Joseph at   age thirteen. Young “Issa” joined a merchant caravan.    Destination: India and the Himalayas.

        At Juggernaut, “the white priests of Brahma made him   a joyous welcome. They taught him to read and understand the Vedas, to cure by aid of prayer, to teach, to explain the holy scriptures to the people, and to drive     out evil spirits from the bodies of men.”

-Buddhist scholars documented “The Life of Saint Issa”  two thousand years ago.
-Nicholas Notovitch discovered the long-lost document  in 1887 at the Himis monastery in Ladakh.
-Swami Abhedananda published a Bengali translation of the Himis manuscript in 1929.
-Nicholas Roerich quoted the same verses in a 1929   travel diary of his Asian expedition.
-And in 1939, a beaming lama at Himis presented a set of parchments to Elizabeth Caspari with the words:
                        “These books say your Jesus was here!”

Whether Jesus went to Kashmir or not is immaterial. The Divine truth is Jesus was only a prophet of God sent to minister to the Children of Israel and to give the Good News (Gospel) of the coming of the Comforter, Ahmad/Mohammad–(Qur’an 61:6).


There is no place in the Bible where God says because Adam fell from Divine grace mankind automatically have fallen from Divine grace; and that God sent Jesus to be killed to free man of Adam’s sin.

   Original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement were devised by St(?) Paul.  Paul postulated that Adam’s fall from Divine grace affected all men and Christ was made a blood sacrifice for this sin:

  -“Wherefore, as by one man (Adam) sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned”–(Romans 5:12. This must be the ultimate  in collective blaming/ punishment).
-“For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus : whom God hath set forth to be a propiation through FAITH IN HIS BLOOD, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past…”–(Romans 3:23-25. As shown, there was no “blood” of Christ).
-“Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to MY GOSPEL”–(2 Timothy 2:8; Galatians 1:6). Not according to the Gospel of God or Gospel of Jesus! but according to Paul’s gospel!

Jesus belies original/inherited sin; he taught we are born sinless:  “Except ye be converted and become as little children, ye shall not enter the kingdom of heaven;” “Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God”–(Matthew 18:3;19:14; Luke 18:16-17. If children inherited sin the kingdom of God would be sinful. A person born with sin is not innocent or pure).

   Jesus belies vicarious atonement, he says eternal life lies in observing the Ten Commandments (until the arrival of the Comforter who will then guide into “all truth” and will “abide forever”)–(Matthew 19:16-19; John 14:15-16; 16:7, 12-13).

God belies original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement:  “The father shall NOT die for the children, neither shall the children die for the fathers, but EVERY MAN SHALL DIE FOR HIS OWN SIN”–(Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:20; 2 Chronicles 25:4). If one is not to die for another’s physical sin, much less is one to die for another’s moral and spiritual sin.

Even the original/inherited sin invention is lopsided. The Bible says: “Adam was not deceived but THE WOMAN (EVE) BEING DECEIVED WAS IN THE TRANS-GRESSION”–(1 Timothy 2:14; Genesis 3:6). Man should inherit sin through woman and God should have sent His “only begotten” daughter to die for sin.
That we are born sinful is to say we are criminal by nature –that we are born with two little horns on our foreheads and a barbed tail on our behinds (devils).

Perhaps the most over-abused verse of the Bible is that of the Gospel of John chapter 3 verse 16, which Christians quote like a mindless parrot in their effort to exalt Jesus Christ as vicarious atoner –a “ransom for sins”– to lure uninformed and unthinking people into drinking this mythical blood of Jesus Christ. 

The Gospel of John chapter 3 verse 16 says: “For God so loved the world, that He GAVE His only begotten son that whosoever BELIEVETH in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

How Christians conclude that this verse is about crucifixion of Christ is a “mystery”. This verse by itself is meaningless. This verse is NOT, and could NOT be, about crucifixion. The verse is saying that God “GAVE” (past tense) Jesus; God could not “gave” Jesus as crucifixion when Jesus was NOT yet crucified. God “gave” Jesus something so the people would “believeth” in him. So what did God “gave” Jesus?

To glean the meaning of this verse of John 3:16 it needs to be taken in its context. When taken in its context, from verses 2-15, it shows that Jesus was having a conversation with Nicodemus who concluded that from his miracles Jesus could only be a man from God.

Jesus answered that man must undergo spiritual birth before he can see the kingdom of God. Jesus then compared himself to the brass serpent Moses lifted up in the wilderness; which serpent had the power to preserve the life of those bitten by a snake–(Numbers 21:9), for “as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the son of man be lifted up” –the allusion being, as the serpent had power to preserve life of the afflicted on account of their belief on it, likewise, Jews who believed in his (Jesus’) miracles and accept him as a prophet from God–(John 8:28)–would also be saved: “That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life”–(John 3:14-15). Then came the verse of John 3:16 which, when expressed in the context of this discussion would convey the full meaning of:

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son the power to perform miracles that whosoever believeth in him to be from God through these works of miracles should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

Miracles were necessary because the people believed only in miracles: “Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe” –(John 4:48).

To infer that John 3:16 is about crucifixion is to inject a meaning that is alien to the subject. That Jesus is saying God “gave” him to be “crucified” for sinners and for him to pray pitifully to be spared from this glory and to indict God as having “forsaken” him must be the blackest degree of disgrace (and blasphemy) exampled by a son of God in Scriptural history: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”–(Matthew 27:46). 

A soldier who refuses to fight in an illegal and unjust war is hounded and charged and jailed as a deserter and a disgrace. Consider then, the “son of God” entrusted with the lofty honor of dying for the sins of the world; for him to pray to tears to be spared this glory and to charge God as having forsaken him must be the “Mother” of all disgraces.

According to the Bible Jesus prayed so pitifully in the garden of Gethsemane to be spared from death that “his sweat was as it were great drops of blood;” and he charged God as having “forsaken” him: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”–(Matthew 26:36; Luke 22: 42-44; 27:46). This obliterates Christians’ claim that Jesus gave his life willingly for sinners.

Intriguingly, whereas Matthew has Jesus charging God as having “forsaken” him, Luke 23:34 has Jesus saying: “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.” This must be the acme of absurdity.
Why do “they” need to be forgiven if by killing Jesus they were fulfilling scripture?  Instead of asking God to “forgive” them, Jesus should have beseech God to give “them” mansions in His house.

No Divine Scripture has taught, and no prophet of God can be shown to have taught, the dark, despicable doctrines of original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement.   


Who is greater, Allāh or Jews? Since Allah is greater, and since He sent Jesus to minister onto the Jews, no one can prevent Jesus from fulfilling this mission.
Regarding Jesus’ return, there are three verses of the Qur’an that seem to give rise to this belief and in which there are differences between translators; these differences are shown in bold type; and those in agreement in italics:

Qur’an 43:61  (The first verse of Jesus’ alleged return).
   -(Yusuf Ali) “And (Jesus) shall be a sign (for the coming of) the Hour (of Judgment): Therefore have no doubt about the (Hour), but follow ye Me: this is a Straight Way

   -(Muhammad Ali): And this (revelation) is surely knowledge of the Hour, so have no doubt about it and follow me. This is the right path.”

   -(Malik Ghulam Farid): “But, verily, he was a sign of the Hour. So entertain no doubt about it, but follow me. This is the right path.” Which is the correct translation?
Ghulam Farid states that “the pronoun “hu” in “inna hu” (of the Arabic text) may refer either to Jesus or to the Qur’an.”

But how to know which one the Qur’an is referring to? To know what the verse is referring to, we have to investigate the subject matter of this section (section 6).
Section 6 of chapter 43 begins: “When (Jesus) the son of Mary is held up as an example, behold, thy people raise a clamour thereat (in ridicule)!”–(Qur’an 43:57. Yusuf Ali).
Ghulam Farid and Muhammad Ali are in agreement; except the verse begins with “And” –“And when Jesus….is held up”).

   While Jesus seems to be the subject of this section he is not the subject. He is only used as an example, as noted in the verse.    For, as the people opposed Jesus, similarly the Prophet Mohammad is opposed. And that the prophecies that Jesus made regarding the coming of another Comforter/Ahmad–(John 14:16; Qur’an 61:6) and that the kingdom of God shall be taken from the Jews and given to another nation–(Matthew 21:43) were now being manifested with the advent of the Prophet Mohammad and the Qur’an; (that this was the Hour marking the end of prophethood to the Jews, so “follow me, (Mohammad), this is a straight way”–43:61).
The topic of this section is about the Qur’anic revelation as noted by the italicized words in the above verse (43:61) in which the Prophet is commissioned to tell the disbelievers, “follow ye me; this is a straight way.

   (a) In Yusuf Ali there is no agreement between ‘Jesus shall be a Sign of the coming of the Hour’ and “follow ye me; this is a straight way’. That “Jesus SHALL BE a Sign” is speaking about the future, whereas “follow ye me; THIS IS a straight way” is speaking about the present. People cannot follow Mohammad using a future event (the return of Jesus) as proof of his mission.
(b) In Muhammad Ali there is agreement between the statements that “THIS REVELATION is surely knowledge of the Hour” (when prophethood to the Jews would end, and which is now ended) so “follow me. THIS IS the right path.”
   (c) Also in Ghulam Farid there is agreement between the statements that “he (Jesus) WAS a sign” (ending prophethood to the Jews) and “follow me THIS IS the right path.

Qur’an 4:157-158  (The second verse of Jesus’ alleged return).
Qur’an 4:157 speaks about the Jews boasting of having killed Jesus. But Allah says “they killed him not, nor crucified him, But so it was made to appear to them. ….”.

Ghulam Farid states: “Two different views prevailed among the Jews regarding Jesus’ alleged death by Crucifixion. Some of them held that he was first killed and then his dead body was hung on the cross, while others are of the view that he was put to death by being fixed to the cross. The former view is reflected in The Acts 5:30…The Qur’an/Allah refutes both these views by saying, they slew him not, nor did they bring about his death on the cross.
The Qur’an/Allah rejects the slaying of Jesus in any form, and then proceeds to deny the particular way of killing by hanging on the cross. It does not deny that Jesus was hung on the cross; it only denies his death on it”–(Comm. 699).

   Muhammad Ali notes: “The words ma salabu-hu do not negative Jesus’ being nailed to the cross; they negative his having expired on the cross as a result of being nailed to it. Salb is a well-known way of killing….Salabu-hu means he put him to death in a certain well-known manner…”–(Comm. 645).

To restate, Qur’an 4:157 speaks of Jews boasting of having killed Jesus. But Allah says “they killed him not, nor crucified him, But so it was made to appear to them. ….”.
And verse 158 says:  

   -Yusuf Ali translated the verse as: “God RAISED him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise.”
-Ghulam Farid translated the verse as: “Allah EXALTED him to Himself. And Allah is Mighty, Wise.”
-Muhammad Ali translated it as: “Allah EXALTED him in His presence. And Allah is ever Mighty, Wise.”

Does Allah being “Mighty, Wise” in reference to Him raising up Jesus bodily to Himself or is it in reference to Him frustrating the plan of the Jews to kill/crucify Jesus? And is Allah raising up Jesus a physical elevation or a spiritual elevation?
The verse does not state that Jesus physically ascended to heaven. That it was a spiritual raising/exaltation is gleaned from the fact that “no fixed abode” can be assigned to Allāh.

   If Allah raised Jesus physically to “Himself” Allah must be on a heaven lower than Abraham; for, the Prophet on his Mi’raj, met Jesus on a lower heaven than Abraham, who was said to be “on the sixth heaven”–(Bokhari Vol. 1, # 345. And Bokhari Vol. 4, #640 notes that Jesus was on the third heaven. This would seem to mean, if Allāh raised Jesus literally to Himself, Allah is on the third heaven. Unless He sent Jesus lower).

Allāh exalting/raising Jesus to Himself does not mean Allāh literally raised Jesus up to Himself; only that Allāh took Jesus’ soul to make him appear to be dead, thus saving him from being killed/crucified.
Allah exalting Jesus in “His presence” does not mean Allah made Jesus equal with Him in power or position, but instead of Jesus being made a “curse” Allah conferred honor onto him.

Qur’an 4:159  (The third verse of Jesus’ alleged return).
 Qur’an 4:159 states:
   -Yusuf Ali translates: “And there is none of the People of the Book but MUST believe in HIM before HIS death; and on the day of Judgment he (Jesus) WILL be a witness AGAINST them (the People of the Book)”
-Muhammad Ali translates: “And there is none of the People of the Book but will believe in THIS (that Jesus was crucified/ accursed was divine/of illegitimate birth and atoner for sins) before HIS death; and on the day of Resurrection HE (Jesus) Will be a witness AGAINST them [the People of the Book].”

-Ghulam Farid translates: “And there is none among the People of the Book but will continue to believe in IT (crucifixion and atonement) before HIS (the people of the Book) death, and on the Day of Resurrection HE (Jesus) shall be a witness AGAINST them.”

   (a) The first question is, who is the “HIS” referring to in the statement “before HIS death” –is it referring to Jesus’ death or the death of the People of the Book?
(b) The second question is, which is the correct translation, is it that they “must believe in HIM (Jesus)”, or they “will believe in THIS (that Jesus was either crucified for original/ inherited sin or died the death of an accursed, or that he was divine as Christians believe or of illegitimate birth as Jews believe)?

Regarding the first question, (a). If the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) MUST believe in Jesus (as him being only a messenger of God) before HIS death, whether it be Jesus’ death or their own, Jesus could not be a “WITNESS AGAINST THEM” seeing that they would have believed in him. Jesus cannot be a witness AGAINST those who believe in him. If anything Jesus has to be a witness “FOR” them.
And if the “emphatic form “must believe” (in Jesus) “denotes more a question of duty than of fact,” it cannot be said that “AND” Jesus will be a witness “AGAINST” them; it should say “OR” Jesus will be a witness against –meaning that they must believe in Jesus OR he (Jesus) will be a witness against them.

   In Qur’an 5:116-117 Allah says when He will ask Jesus if he taught people to take him and his mother as gods, Jesus will answer he had no right to teach what he was not instructed to “and I was a witness of them so long as I was among them, but when Thou didst cause me to die Thou wast the Watcher over them.”
This statement by Jesus could not refer to Jesus’ death after his alleged Second coming. If the Jews and Christians would have to accept him as only a messenger of Allāh after this alleged second coming there would be no question of Allah being a Watcher over the Jews and Christians after Jesus’ death –they would already be believers. Moreover, if this statement refers to Jesus’ second coming it would imply that the Jews and the Christians would have reverted to their false beliefs a second time, even after Jesus returned to them and taught them the truth about himself as being only a messenger.

Regarding the second question (b) as to which is the correct translation. It would seem that Muhammad Ali’s translation (as well as Ghulam Farid’s) is the correct one. For, both Christians and the Jews believe in “THIS” –that Jesus was either crucified, or “is an accursed of God” because he died from hanging–(Deuteronomy 21:23). Or that he is divine or of illegitimate birth.
And as Allāh tells us both these views are false beliefs, then and only then can Jesus be “WITNESS AGAINST THEM” (against the Jews and the Christians for their false beliefs –the former making Jesus illegitimate, the latter making Jesus divine).

That Jesus would return to “break the cross, kill the pig and abolish the Jizya tax”–(Bokhari Vol. 3, #656).
The pig is a scavenger; and if Jesus kill the pigs then the earth would have one less “cleaner.” Would Jesus be able to kill all the pigs in every place?
If killing the pig is a metaphor then “cross” and “jizya” in the hadith would also be metaphorical. What is metaphorical “jizya” and how is it abolished?
If killing pig and breaking cross are metaphors (meaning to expose uncleanness and falsehood in religion), Prophet Mohammad did this 1400 years ago.

   Regarding Jesus abolishing the “Jizya,” the explanatory note to this saying of the Prophet–(Bokhari Vol. 3, #656)–says: “The Jizya (which) is a tax imposed on non-Muslims who would keep their own religion rather than embrace Islam, will not be accepted by Jesus (peace be on him), but all people will be required to embrace Islam and there will be no other alternative.”
If “all people will be required to embrace Islam and there will be no other alternative,” this would be compulsion. But Allah says there is no compulsion in religion–(Qur’an 2:256; 6:107; 9:6; 10:99-100; 17:7; 18: 6, 29; 42:15; 50:45; 76:3; 109:1-6); and in 10:99 He says: “And if thy Lord had pleased, all those who are in the earth would have believed. Wilt thou then force men till they are believers?”
   The jizya, which is a law of Allah, cannot be abolished when there might be Jews and Christians in a Muslim state who would not believe Jesus to be Jesus. The Qur’anic law is for all time. To the Resurrection.

   Prophet Mohammad is reported to have said in his farewell Sermon that after him NO prophet will come. To resend Jesus as lower than a “prophet” is to demote him.
Jesus’ alleged return seems to be tied in with Gog and Magog–(Qur’an 18:94-100. Muhammad Ali has shown that the prophecy of Gog and Magog has already been fulfilled. His translation of the Qur’an can be viewed/downloaded at:


Unless he was unawares of the manner of his birth –though this would be strange for God/Son of God– there is not a single instance where Jesus claims to be of miraculous birth (or immaculate conception) as proof of his mission. Neither did his mother ever made such a claim –not even to save him from “crucifixion.”

It is well-known that the word “virgin” of Isaiah 7:14 is an incorrect translation of the Hebrew word almah/halmah; the correct translation being “young woman” not “virgin”.
A young woman is not necessarily a “virgin” (and an old/older woman can be “virgin”).

Paul taught Jesus had a father:
-(a) “Therefore (David) being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the FRUIT OF HIS LOINS, ACCORDING TO THE FLESH, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne”–(Acts 2:30);
-(b) “Concerning his Son Jesus Christ…which was made of the SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH”–(Romans 1:3);
-(c) “Remember that Jesus Christ of the SEED OF DAVID”–(2 Timothy 2:8). And “seed” is sperm, and “according to the flesh” is sexual intercourse.
Clearly, Jesus was a metaphorical son of God. And a METAPHORICAL son cannot die for LITERAL sin(s).
(John Dominic Crossan in his book The Essential Jesus–Original Sayings and Earliest Images, Published by Harper San Francisco, A Division of Harper Collins Publishers, p.34, shows a baptizing scene with John the Baptist with Jesus as a young child).

Allāh says Jesus is the Messiah–(Qur’an 3:44): who came from the House of Judah/David–(Matthew 1:1-6; Luke 1:27; 3:31-34; Revelation 5:5). Jesus could not be from the house of David from his mother’s side because Mary was of the house of Levi/ Imran–(Exodus 4:14; Luke 1:5, 36; Qur’an 3:34; 19:28).
If Jesus was born through virgin birth/immaculate conception he could not have been of the house of David because his mother was not of the lineage of David but of the lineage of Levi.
Thus: If Jesus is the Messiah he could not be of virgin birth/ immaculate conception. And if Jesus was of virgin birth/ Immaculate conception he could not be the Messiah.
Jesus stated in unambiguous terms: “I am the root and the offspring of David”–(Revelation 22:16). And when the angels brought the news of Jesus’ birth to Mary, the angel told her that God will give Jesus the throne of “his father David”–(Luke 1:32).

Muhammad Ali has explained Mary being called “sister of Aaron” and “woman of Imran.” MA’s translation of the Qur’an can be viewed/ downloaded at
The other factor is the Annunciation–(Qur’an 3:44-46). The angels tell Mary Allāh will give her a son; Mary replied: “How can I have a son and man has not touched me.” To which “He said: “Even so; Allāh creates WHAT He pleases. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, Be, and it is.”

Significantly, is the “He” in “Even so; Allāh creates WHAT He pleases,” referring to Allāh or to the angel who did the speaking? And are the words “Even so; Allāh creates WHAT He pleases. When He decrees a matter, He only  says to it, Be, and it is,” are these the words of Allāh speaking directly to Mary now, or, knowing the power of Allāh, are they the words of the Angel(s)?
Notably, Allāh is only recounting what transpired between Mary and the Angels when they gave His message to her. In any event, had Mary not protested, the words “Even so; Allāh creates WHAT He pleases. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, Be, and it is.” might not be present, and no assumption of virgin birth would be made. However:

The statement, “Even so; Allāh creates WHAT He pleases” is to be understood against the Angels saying that Allāh will give Mary a son; it is not to be understood against Mary’s objection “How can I have a son and man has not touched me.”
The verse says Allah creates “WHAT”–son or daughter– it did not say Allah creates “HOW”– with or without a man/husband.
Allāh’s decree is that it was His plan to send Jesus, not that Jesus would be fatherless. “Be, and it is” does not mean that the thing Allah decrees will manifest instantaneously or without a process; it only means that when Allah decrees a thing no one or nothing can thwart/prevent it from coming into being.

   If Allāh created Jesus without a father, this would be in contradiction that Jesus is/was the Messiah for, as noted above, the Messiah came form the house of David/Judah whereas Mary was of the house of Levi/Aaron.
To emphasize. If Jesus is the Messiah he could not be of virgin birth/immaculate conception. And if Jesus was of virgin birth/ immaculate conception he could not be the Messiah.

The question may be asked, why did Allāh not give the name of Jesus’ father?
Allah naming Jesus’ father, it is doubtful Christians would believe. Instead of the name of Jesus’ father, Allāh has given us what no rational mind would deny; He calls us to reason: “How could He have a son when He has no consort”?–(Qur’an 6:102). Whoever Jesus’ father is he could not be God. This effectively and categorically demolishes the Christian claim that Jesus is “begotten son”/ “son” of God.

Had Christians not attribute virgin birth to Jesus, it is doubtful Muslims would have interpreted the Qur’anic verse on Jesus’ birth to be of virginal/immaculate conception. This Christian ascription to Jesus gave rise to Jewish calumnizing Jesus as “bastard” and his mother, Mary, as “adulteress.”
Khwaja Nazir Ahmad has detailed the episode that led to Jesus being denigrated “bastard” and Mary “adulteress” in his book Jesus in Heaven on Earth, pp.114-115; this book can be obtained from


The Gospel of John 1:1-5 says: “In the beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
Aside from “Jesus” not named here. These are the words of JOHN. And there is NO mention of the “Holy Ghost”, the third party of the Trinity. Moreover, Jesus cannot be God and Son of God –one cannot be his-self and also be his son.
Luke, who had “PERFECT understanding of ALL things from the VERY FIRST” says Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God–(Luke 1:3, 35). That Luke was grossly ignorant about Jesus being “word”/God and becoming “flesh” is not surprising.
Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din notes that this “Word” of John was absorbed from the ink of Philo who lived and wrote 100 years before this “John”–(The Sources of Christianity, pp. 76-77. obtainable from

Jesus is “a” word from Allāh–(Qur’an 3:44). “Word” is not exclusive to Jesus. The words of Allāh are so numerous that if all the trees were pens, and the sea with seven more seas added to it were ink, to write the words of Allāh, they would be exhausted before the words of Allāh would be exhausted–(Qur’an 31:27; 18:109. Also 6:34, 10:64, 66:12). Everything created must be “word” of Allāh.
Jesus as “word” means “promise,” as Allāh promised Mary to give her a son–(Qur’an 3:45; Luke 1:26-32). Others also are “word” of God:

   -Ishmael is “word” of God–(Genesis 15:1-4.
-Isaac is “word” of God–(Genesis 17:15-16).
-John the Baptist is “word” of God–(Luke 1:11-13. Qur’an 3:38-39; 19:1-9).
The Bible also shows that every created thing is a “word” of God: “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light….–(Genesis 1:3-25).
If Jesus is Son of God because he is termed ‘word” of God as one Christian asserts, then a baboon also is son of God and brother of Jesus.


Jesus cannot be both God and Son of God. A man cannot be both himself and his son.
Mark 1:1 referring to Jesus as “the Son of God”, the Gideons New American Standard Bible, 1985, and Good News Bibles; say, respectively, in foot-note: “Many mss. omit, the Son of God,” and “Some manuscripts do not have the Son of God.”

Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God. Luke who had “PERFECT understanding of ALL things from the VERY FIRST” says: “That holy thing (Jesus) which shall be born of thee (Mary) shall be “CALLED” the Son of God”–(Luke 1:3, 35).

To restate: That Luke was grossly ignorant about Jesus being “word”/God becoming “flesh” is not surprising. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din notes that “Word” of John was absorbed from the ink of Philo who lived and wrote 100 years before this “John” of the Gospel–(The Sources of Christianity, pp.76-77. See

Son of God is only an epithet of honor: “the Lord came unto Nathan, saying, Go and tell my servant David….I will be his father, and he shall be my son”–(2 Samuel 7:4, 5, 14). The Biblical God has a jungle of sons and daughters:

   -Adam is son of God–(Luke 3:38)
-Solomon is son of God–(1 Chronicles 28:6)
-David is begotten son of God–(Psalm 2:7)
-Israel is son of God, even His “first-born”–(Exodus 4:22)
-All the sons of God shouted for joy–(Job 38:7)
-Ephraim is “firstborn” of God–(Jeremiah 31:9)
-Children of Israel are sons of God–(Hosea 1:10)
-Righteous are sons of God–(Romans 8:14; 1 John 3:1-2)
-Peacemakers are children of God–(Matthew 5:9)
-Jesus empowered others to become sons of God”–(John 1:12)
-Seems Satan also is son of God–(Job 1:6)
-Sons of God also came and took human daughters for sex:
“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives all of which they chose”–(Genesis 6:1-2. Seemingly, there are no daughters in the Biblical heaven, or they are not “fair”: they must all be dark-sinned).

To emphasize. Clearly, Jesus was a metaphorical son of God. And a METAPHORICAL son cannot die for LITERAL sin(s).


If Jesus is God, God foretold his own birth. Astounding!
If Jesus is God, God predicted his death and resurrection. Astounding! Though “the dead know not anything” and “there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave”–(Ecclesiastes 9:5, 10. The dead that “know not anything”, even if he be God, cannot resurrect himself).
Jesus/God dying and raising is reminiscent of Tammuz (Ezekiel 8:14), the Babylonian and Assyrian god of vegetation, identified with “Osiris of Egypt, Adonis in Syria and Phoenicia, and Attis in Greece” who was “killed and rose again”.

As Luke 1:35 clearly states, Jesus is only CALLED son of God. Much less is Jesus God. If Jesus was God:

   -God would need to eat “Butter and honey” in order to “know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”–(Isaiah 7:14-15. This is preposterous).

   -If Jesus is God, man would do greater works than God: “He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and GREATER works than these”–(John 14:12).

   -If Jesus was God, God would have ascended to himself: “I ascend to…my God, and your God”–(John 20:17).

   -If Jesus was God, God would have prayed to himself; “forsaken” himself; thanked, heard and worshipped himself –(Matthew 26:39; 27:46; Luke 10:21; John 11: 41; 4:22).

   -If Jesus was God, God could NOT have heard the truth from God: “But now you seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, WHICH I HAVE HEARD OF GOD”–(John 8:40).

   -If Jesus was God he would have known Elijah and Enoch ascended to heaven: “no man hath ascended up to heaven–(John 3:13). “Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven”–(2 Kings 2:1, 11); “Enoch was translated that he should not see death”–(Hebrews 11:5; Genesis 5:22-24).

   -If Jesus was God he would have been able to do things of himself: “I can of mine own self do nothing”–(John 5:30).

   -Luke 2:52 states: “Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with GOD and MAN.” It is gross absurdity that God needs to increase in wisdom and stature and to find favor with man. If Jesus is God, God would be finding favor with Himself.

   -If Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one; Elisabeth could not be filled with the Holy Ghost: the Holy Ghost was in Mary’s womb and with Zacharias–(Luke 1:41-43, 67).

Apart from the fact that Jesus prayed to and called on God –such as in the Garden of Gethsemane, when raising Lazarus and from the cross– Jesus clearly denies he is God and good, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is God”–(Matt.  19:17; Mark 10:18.
Thus, from Jesus’ own mouth Jesus is NOT God). Notably, this saying of Jesus in Matthew 19:17; Mark 10:18, has been altered.

The first quote in the following is from the “Self-Pronouncing Edition” Bible published by The World Publishing Company, Cleveland; 2, Ohio; the second is from “The Gideons” (New American Standard Bible, 1985) published by The Lockman Foundation, La Habra, California. Bold words show alteration; underlined words are not in the Gideons Bible:

   (1) “one came (to Jesus) and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he (Jesus) said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is God: but…”
(2) “one came to Him (Jesus) and said, “Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may obtain eternal life? And He said to him, “Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but…”
(Even the forgery is clumsy: who better is there to tell or to ask “what is good” than God or “Son of God”).

If God came as man to teach man, this Christian God was a miserable failure. Because the people to whom He came rejected Him to the point of nailing Him to a “pole” and made Him into a “curse”–(Deuteronomy 21:23; Galatians 3:13).

   If God came as man to have experience as man, he was an even bigger failure. Because (1) as he did not come as woman, he does not know about being a woman, (2) as he was not married, he does not know the joys of sex (3) as he did not come as other creatures, he has no experiences as them (in which event Hinduism’s Lord Krishna who came as everything is greater than this Christian God, Jesus. God is Omniscient, He does not need to come as anyone/anything to gain knowledge).

   That God came as man to pay “for the “faults” of His creatures as one pope postured, God belies this belief/claim:
“The father shall NOT die for the children, neither shall the children die for the fathers, but EVERY MAN SHALL DIE FOR HIS OWN SIN”–(Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:20; 2 Chronicles 25:4).
  If one is not to die for another’s physical sin, much less is one to die for another’s moral and/or spiritual sin.


There is no place in the Bible where God says “I am God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Ghost/Spirit.” Trinity did not originate with Christianity.
Hindus have Trinity –Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. Romans had Trinity –Juno, Jupiter and Minerva. And the Africans’ are also said to have/had Trinity –Ausar (Abel), Aset (Cain) and Heru (child).

The Christian Trinity is made up Father (God the Father) Son (God the Son) and Holy Ghost (God the Holy Ghost). Whereas Catholics say the Trinity consists of THREE DISTINCT persons, Orthodoxy says God is both THREE and ONE.
Logically, God could not be “father” before creation, nor “son” before He spoke, and neither “Holy Ghost” before He gave life–(Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect–Muhammad In The Bible, p. 15).
According to Christians only some 6,000 years ago God created, making God Father–(Genesis 1:1-25); and spoke, making God Son–(Genesis 1:26) and gave life, making God Holy Ghost–(Genesis 2:7). Thus, from Everlasting to Everlasting, there was no Trinity in Godhead until Christians invented Trinity. According to Christians, God/Trinity is only six thousand years old.

Trinity was invented by the Church 324 years AFTER Christ. Encyclopaedia Britannica explains:
“Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Sheema of the Old Testament: “Hear. O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deut. 6:4). The earliest Christians, however, had to cope with the implications of the coming of Jesus Christ and of the presence and power of God among them –i.e. the Holy spirit whose coming was connected with the celebration of the Pentecost. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were associated in such New Testament passages as the Great Commission: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19. As shown Matthew 28:19 is a forgery in the Bible-NGBA) and   in the apostolic benediction: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all” (II Cor. 13:14. This is the word of PAUL not word of God or Jesus; as shown later Paul was  a self-admitted liar and forger of his own gospel-MSI). Thus, the New Testament established the basis for the doctrine of Trinity. (Note: it is the New Testament that “established  the basis” for Trinity, not Jesus or God-NGBA).

   The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies. Initially, both the requirements of monotheism inherited from the Old Testament and the implications of the need to interpret the biblical teaching to Greco-Roman paganism seemed to demand that the divine in Christ as the Word, or Logos, be interpreted as subordinate to the Supreme Being. An alternative solution was to interpret Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three modes of the self-disclosure of the one God but not as distinct within the being of God itself. The first tendency recognized the distinctness among the three, but at the cost of their equality and hence of their unity (subordinationism); the second came to terms with their unity, but at the cost of their distinctness as “persons” (modalism). It was not until the 4th. century that the distinctness of the three and their unity were brought together in a single orthodox doctrine of one essence and three persons.

   The Council of Nicaea in 325 stated the crucial formula for that doctrine in its confession that the Son is “of the same essence [homoousios] as the Father,” even though it said very little about the Holy Spirit. Over the next half century, Athanasius defended and refined the Nicene formula, and, by the end of the 4th. Century….the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since”–(15th Ed; Vol. X, art; Trinity, p. 126. Emphasis added).
Understand now why for two thousand years Christians are wandering and groping in darkness and misunderstanding and confusion as to whom Jesus is and his mission?

Trinity (which some Christians viewed as being from “satan”) was invented 324 years AFTER Christ. And is based on Jesus telling his followers to preach in the “name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”–(Matthew 28:19) which  verse, as well as Mark 16:9-20, are exposed as “forgeries” in the Bible. And footnoted in the Gideons and Good News Bibles.
Evidently, Trinity is based on Christian assumption/invention. And clearly, a religion that utilizes the human brain to formulate Divine doctrines is a false/fake religion.

Revealingly. In these verses of Mark 16:19-20 Jesus tells his followers: “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.… They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them”–(Mark 16:16-18).
Even if these verses were not “forgeries” it is doubtful sensible Christians (“baptized” or not) would take up (un-milked) venomous snakes or drink a lethal dose of deadly poison to substantiate this assurance of their God/son of God, Jesus.
(If taking up serpents and drinking deadly thing is metaphorical, as one Christian apologist tried to whitewash, then those “that believeth and is baptized” must also be metaphorical. What is a metaphorical “deadly thing” that one drinks?)

The other Trinity-inspired verse, 1 John 5:7 which states: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one”, these NOT the words of Jesus. This verse was created some 800 years AFTER Christ. (See Internet). (The Gideons (New American Standard Bible, 1985), and Good News Bible do not carry this verse of 1 John 5:7).

Since Trinity has no Divine foundation, Christians’ verbalastics to prove Trinity is futile.
In trying to explain Trinity, Christians are trying to explain the non-existent. And in trying to Divinize Trinity, Christians are trying to legitimize profanity.

Christians say Trinity consists of God (Father) Son (Jesus) and Holy Ghost (who has no name). But as shown Jesus is NOT “Son” of God.

   To restate: Mark 1:1 referring to Jesus as “the Son of God”, the Gideons (New American Standard Bible, 1985) and Good News Bibles; say, respectively, in footnote: “Many mss. (manuscripts) omit, the Son of God,” and “Some manuscripts do not have     the Son of God.” And Luke, who had “PERFECT understanding of ALL things from the VERY FIRST” says Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God–(Luke 1:3, 35).
Since Trinity needs a “Son” of God and as there is NO actual “son” of God then ipso facto THERE IS NO TRINITY!

   And as “son” of God is needed to die for Adam’s (or “original”) sin, and as there is NO son of God, then there is no vicarious atonement either. A METAPHORICAL son cannot die for LITERAL sin.
Thus, Christianity self-destructs like a soap bubble.
The edifice of Christianity so laboriously conceived and built for two thousand years COLLAPSES INTO A HEAP OF RUBBISH.


Whereas Muslims are ridiculed for having “virgins” in heaven. Even “Sons of God” craved sex:
“And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and DAUGHTERS were born unto them, That the SONS OF GOD saw the daughters of men that they were FAIR; and they TOOK THEM WIVES OF ALL WHICH THEY CHOSE….the sons of God CAME INTO THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN, and they bare children to them”–(Genesis 6:1-4).

Jesus said there are many mansions in the House of God and promised: “I go to prepare a place for you. And IF I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself”–(John 14:2-3).
As Jesus has not yet returned, those people to whom he spoke, all that died and will die before his alleged return will not get receive/taken.

Jesus said: “Verily I say unto you, There be some STANDING HERE, which shall NOT TASTE DEATH, TILL THEY SEE the Son of man coming in his kingdom’–(Matthew 16:28).
Jesus not only contradicts himself when he said, “I go to my Father, and ye SEE ME NO MORE”–(John 16:10); but it must be the “miracle of the ages” that for two thousand years since Jesus’ departure these “some standing” people are yet living and scanning the Palestinian sky, waiting “here” (there) for Jesus.

Whereas Jews and Christians do not seem to have knowledge about what their heaven is like –and this is not surprising since the Mosaic Law was to become obsolete upon the advent of Mohammad in which case now “spiritually the Jewish religion has no future;” and as Jesus did not give “all truth” which Mohammad brought– and whereas the Muslim Paradise is criticized as one of sensuality, Christians depict heaven as a picturesque landscape of people laxing and reading, and the lamb and wolf nesting together (Isaiah 11:6-7, “the wolf also shall dwell with the lamb…and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.
   This would be a cruel joke on the lions or they would have to be outfitted with dentures of incisors and molars for stripping and grinding hay, and have their systems redesigned to process and evacuate hay. Such a heaven can only be B-O-R-I-N-G. Even from a “mansion” window.

Small wonder the Christian is obsessed with Mohammad’s “particularly active sex life,” and the gardens of “virgins” Muslims will have. The Christian is jealous to boot.

Even if Jesus went to heaven, the mansions would be only for 144,000 JEWISH MALE “virgins”. The Book of Revelation (7:4-8; Matthew 19:28) states that 144,000 MEN –consisting of 12,000 from each of the TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL– will sit with Jesus in the next life judging the Twelve Tribes of Israel.
That only Jews will be judging with Jesus is not strange. Jesus clearly declared he was sent only to Jews. Thus, the hundreds of thousands of missionaries the Christian Foreign Mission has plying non-Jewish communities to snare uninformed natives into drinking the mythical blood of Christ is a stark transgression outside of Jesus’ jurisdiction.

Regarding this 144,000 JEWISH MEN it is said:  “The 144,000 people stood before the throne….They are the men who have kept themselves pure by NOT having SEXUAL RELATIONS with WOMEN; they are VIRGINS”–(in the words of Gideons: “These are the ones who have not been DEFILED WITH WOMEN, for they are CELIBATES”–(Revelation 14:1-4).
Thus, woman, even though she be married to the man “defiles” him. Paul makes the matter clearer that but for avoiding “fornication,” “It is GOOD for a man NOT to touch a woman”–(1 Corinthians 7:1-2); why is it good for a man “not to touch a woman?”
Because “He that is UNMARRIED careth for the things that belong to the LORD, how he may please the LORD: But he that is MARRIED careth for the things that are of the WORLD, how he may please his WIFE”–(1 Cor. 7: 32-33). In other words, when a man takes a wife his caring for God is compromised by his caring for his wife –she causes him to be “defiled.” One who defiles has no place in heaven.

According to Christianity, sexual contact with a woman “defiles” the man spiritually. No volume of literary gymnastics can flip this fact over. These 144,000 virgins are physical virgins who were “not defiled” by physical women, and as they were not married and thus had no “wifely” constraints they devoted their lives to the pursuit of the spiritual, and were the true followers of Jesus who, as the Gospels show, lived a life of celibacy.
From the Biblical perspective, unless the Christian man is a JEW and VIRGIN he is barred from Christ. And whether the Christian woman is Jew or not and whether she is virgin or virgin-less, she is banned from the Christian heaven.

While the punishment of Hell is not everlasting the rewards of heaven is a gift from Allah God never to end–(Qur’an 11:108; 15:45, 48). And whereas punishment is equal to the crime, the reward for doing good is manifold–(Qur’an 6:161. Bokhari, Vol. 1, # 40). There is nothing scandalous about having pleasure in paradise. This –having peace and joy– seemingly, is the desire and goal of every religionist. However, heavenly bliss is not a pleasure of the body.

   However, as sex in marriage is Divinely lawful on the earthly plain there is no difficulty if it should be allowed in the spiritual plain. Carnal pleasure in the conjugal bed is a form of worship of God–(Genesis 1:28. Qur’an 25:54; 16:72; 24:32). The ignorant revile this blessed union as vulgar.

What is to be remembered is that the verses of the Qur’an are of literal and allegorical meanings. There are several descriptions of the “Garden(s)” in the Qur’an. These descriptions are not to be taken literally. Allah God says in Qur’an 32:17: “And no soul knows what delights of the eyes is kept hidden for them, as a reward for their (good) deeds.”

   The Prophet Mohammad is reported to have said: Allah says, I have prepared for My righteous servants that which  no eye has seen and no ear has heard, and which the heart of man cannot conceive–(Bokhari Vol.’s 4:467; 6:302-303; 9:589). The things of earth and in heaven are the same in NAME only.

 It is doubtful that one would honestly prefer the Christian  heaven of reading past-time stories and watching lions stripping hay.
(Or prefer the Hindu heaven of roaming the heavens –as the soul which is “one ten thousandth part of the upper portion of the hair point in size”– for 3.11 trillion years gathering knowledge (and forgetting it) and to return to earth, possibly as sub-humans, for some four billion years dwelling in lowly conditions; or of herding “surabhi cows” with Lord Krishna in Krsnaloka–(Swami Prabhupada, Bhagavad-Gita, As It Is, 2:17 comm; Swami Dayananda Saraswati, Light Of Truth, pp. 141, 285, 301; Bhagavad-Gita, As It Is, 10:28).

It is doubtful that one would honestly prefer such heavens over the Muslim heaven of joys beyond comprehension –of mansions; splendorous Gardens with rivers, springs, and fountains; magnificent companions; dressed in fine garments of silk and lounging on couches of velvet feeding on luscious fruits and savoring delicious drinks from goblets of gold and silver in an eternity of bliss in the presence of our Lord.

 And the Muslim Paradise is for male and female:
   -“Surely the owners of the Garden are on that day in a happy occupation. They and their wives are in shades, reclining on raised couches”–(Qur’an 36:56)

-“Enter the garden, you and your wives being made happy”–(Qur’an 43:70)

   -“And those who believe and whose off-spring follow them in faith –We unite them with their offspring and We shall deprive them of naught of their work. Every man is pledged for his work”–Qur’an 52:21)
-“And whoever does good deeds, whether male or FEMALE, and he (or she) is a believer –these will enter the Garden, and they will NOT be dealt with a whit unjustly”–Qur’an 4:124)

   -“Surely the men who submit and the women who submit, and the believing men and the believing women, and the obeying men and the obeying women, and the truthful men and the truthful women, and the patient men and the patient women, and the humble men and the humble women, and the almsgiving men and the almsgiving women, and the fasting men and the fasting women, and the men who guard their private parts and the women who guard, and the men who remember Allah much and the women who remember­ –Allah has prepared for THEM FORGIVENESS AND A MIGHTY REWARD”–(Qur’an 33:35).

Any wonder then that even in the face of our adversity and suffering Muslims still laugh and smile: “And you hope from Allāh what they hope not”–(Qur’an 4:104).
Māshā-Allāh! Alhamdo-lillāh!


No prophet prior to Mohammad has given the name of a religion to follow or claimed to be the last to come.  The prophets Jacob, Moses and Jesus spoke of another teacher to come.
Regardless of whatever one calls himself –Hindu, Jew, Christian ….– every person is a Muslim. Allāh created us to serve Him–(Qur’an 51:56).
One who serves/submits to God is a Muslim. There are two orders of Muslims: Muslims by Compulsion and Muslims by  Choice:

  -The sun and the moon and the planets all follow prescribed paths in their own orbit, and traverse within a given time. When two parts hydrogen combine with one part oxygen water is formed –they cannot form any other compound.  Thus they are submitting to, or are being obedient to the law accorded them –or under compulsion.
   -The seed of a plant must go through various stages between its germination and fruition. Each part must manifest in its’ proper sequence –it must develop root and stems before it can sprout leaves; and blossom and flower before it can bear fruit.  Thus, they are following or being obedient to the laws accorded them –or under compulsion.
    In fact, all things exist on laws. From the microscopic atom to the gigantic orb, everything is under the governance of some principle:  “Glorify the name of thy Lord, the Most High! Who creates, then makes complete, And Who measures, then guides”–(Qur’an 87:1-3; Also 25:2; 54:49).

Similarly, we ourselves are subjected to laws to which we have no choice but to submit, e.g.
   -when sperm is united with ovum conception results

-we are subjected to hunger, thirst, and death
-if we eat anything sugary we have no choice but to taste sweetness, and if we eat anything acid we have  no choice  but to taste sourness (unless we have a defect in taste)
   -when something is detonated we have no choice but to hear an explosion (unless we have a defect in hearing)
   -if we look at the sky, unless we have a defect of the eye, we have no choice but to see blue. We cannot dictate to our senses. Thus we are Muslims by compulsion: submitting to Allāh without choice.

We are Muslims by choice in that we are given a free will to choose between right and wrong, to live a life of good or evil; to believe in Allāh or not.  It is because of this freedom to choose that we will be called on to account for our deeds.

Jesus declares he is a MUSLIM (one who submits to God):
-“My meat is to do the will of HIM (God) that SENT me and to finish HIS work”; “I came…not to do mine own will, BUT THE WILL OF HIM THAT SENT ME”–(John 4:34; 6:38).
-“I seek NOT MY OWN WILL, but the WILL OF THE FATHER…If I bear witness of myself, my witness is NOT TRUE”–(John 5:30-31); “My doctrine is not mine, BUT HIS THAT SENT ME”–(John 7:16).
-“HE (God) gave me a commandment, WHAT I SHOULD SAY, AND WHAT I SHOULD SPEAK”–(John 12:49).
 The Christian’s God/Son of God was a MUSLIM.

Jesus taught Islam (submission to God):
-“if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP THE COMMAND-MENTS”; “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: ALL therefore WHATSOEVER they bid you observe, that OBSERVE AND DO”–(Matthew 19:17-18; 23:2-3).
-“except your RIGHTEOUSNESS shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN” –(Matthew 5:20).
-“And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you FOR EVER;” and “guide you into ALL TRUTH”–(John 14:15-16; 16:13).

 Islam and Muslims are Divinely-designated terms and are as old as the heavens and earth. Islam only became known as such in the Seventh-century with the advent of Prophet Mohammad:
“Then He (Allāh) directed Himself to the heaven and it was a vapour, so He said to it and to the Earth: Come both, willingly or unwillingly. They both said: We come willingly”–(Qur’an 41:11. We ‘come willingly’ or we submit to your command–Islam.

   Islam, peace, submission to God, was given to prophets before Mohammad–(Qur’an 42:13). Whereas all prophets were given “Islam” as needed for their respective people and time, Allāh perfected Islam/religion to the Judgment and completed His favor to man through Prophet Mohammad: “This day have I perfected for you your religion and completed My favor to you and chosen for you ISLAM as a religion”–(Qur’an 5:3).

Christians claim that Allāh is not the same God as Yahweh, the God of the Bible. It is strange that Christians are trying to find fault with Allāh/Islam, whereas in contrast they do not know the name of the God they follow. The name Christians commonly used for God is Jehovah. But Jehovah does not exist. God said His names are “I AM” and “JEALOUS”–(Exodus 3:14; 34:14). In Hebrew God is known as El, Elohim. Why are Christians not addressing God as “I AM” and “JEALOUS”?

Christians also use the name “Yahweh”. But “Yahweh” can hardly be said to be the name of God. (Jesus called out to “ELI”–Matthew 27:46). No Christian or Jew knows the name of their God. They just put vowels to the Jewish consonants YHWH.

It is said that Jews considered the name of God too Holy to articulate, so they referred to God as YHWH. After a time the name of God was forgotten. Later, vowels were added to YHWH to produce a name.

Christians and Jews use the same Old Testament. If Allāh is a different God from that of Christians because Muslims do not accept Jesus as God or son of God or vicarious atoner, Christians may as well throw their Bibles into the fire, because Jews not only reject Jesus as God, son of God, and vicarious atoner and maybe even as prophet of God but regard him as “bastard,” and regard his mother, Mary, the Christian’s Mother of God, as “adulteress.”
Prophet Mohammad, through Allāh’s Qur’an, repudiated these “Jewish calumnies” against Jesus and his mother. And to know Mohammad is reviled as being the antiChrist.

That Allāh and the God of the Bible are the same. If Christians knew their Bible in the original Hebrew they would know that “Allāh is the same ancient Semitic name of the Supreme Being who revealed and spoke to Adam and all the prophets”–(Professor Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect– Muhammad in the Bible, pp. 12-13).

Allāh dates back to “earliest Semitic writings” which appeared from “30th century BCE”. No wonder Christian-Arabs know no other God but “Allāh” –which name predates the Christian-invented Trinity in 324 After Christ.

However. That Allāh is not the same God as that of Christians, in one respect this is an accurate view. Allāh is the God:
-Who WAS NOT in the belly of a woman and came out her vagina/menstrual passage
-Who DID NOT suck the “paps” of a woman
-Who WAS NOT circumcised
-Who WAS NOT pinned in diapers
-Who DID NOT need to eat butter and honey in order to know to choose good and avoid evil
-Who DID NOT urinate and defecate
-Who DID NOT put Adam’s sin onto others
-Who DID NOT need human blood to forgive sins. (Not even self-respecting humans charge/kill the innocent for the guilty).

   The God that charges/executes the innocent for the guilty is a God that is not worthy of adoration.
The God of Adam and Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Mohammad is NOT the God of Christians.
The God of Christians is the God of Trinity and original/ inherited sin and vicarious atonement. The Church/Paul!

Allāh is the proper name of God.

If Allāh is a contraction of al (the) and ilāh (God) as Christians postulate. Then, as “the” refers to someone or something that is unique or exists as only one at a time <~Lord>” as Webster’s (1976) define. Muslims rest our case: either way –al-ilāh (the God) or Allāh (One God)– the “only one” true God is ALLĀH!

In claiming that “ilah” is a different God from “Allāh”, it is obvious that Christians confuse the usage of the word “Ilah” with “Allāh”. In the Qur’an the word “ilah” (God) is used as the generic “God”: “And your God (Ilah) is one God (ilah); there is no God (ilah) but He! He is the Beneficent, the Merciful”–(Qur’an 2:163 and other places in the Qur’an).

Whereas “ilah” is used for the generic “God,” “Allāh” is used to denote the name of God:
   -“Surely I am Allāh, there is no God (ilah) but I, so serve Me, and keep up prayer for My remembrance”–(Qur’an 20:14).

-“So We sent among them a messenger from among them, saying: Serve Allāh — you have no God (ila) other than Him” –Qur’an 23:32)
-“Praise be to Allāh, the Lord (Rabb–Nourisher unto perfection) of the worlds, The Beneficent, the Merciful, Master of the day of Requital”–(Qur’an 1:1-3)

-“I am Allāh, the Seeing. (This is) a Book which We have revealed to you (Mohammad that you may) bring forth men, by their Lord’s (Rabb’s) permission, from utter darkness into light to the way of the Mighty, the praised One”–(Qur’an 14:1)
-“Say (to them, Mohammad): If you love Allāh, follow me: Allāh will love you, and grant you protection from your sins. And Allāh is Forgiving, Merciful”–(Qur’an 3:30)
-“So keep your duty to Allāh as much as you can”–Qur’an 64:16)
-“Then are they sent back to Allāh, their Master, the True one”–(Qur’an 6:62)

-“That is because Allāh, He is the Truth, and He gives life to the dead, and He is Possessor of power over all things, And the Hour is coming, there is no doubt about it; and Allāh will raise up those who are in the graves.  And among men is he who disputes about Allāh without knowledge, and without guidance, and without an illuminating Book. Turning away haughtily to lead men astray from the way of Allāh. For him is disgrace in this world, and on the day of Resurrection We shall make him taste the punishment of burning”–Qur’an 22:6-9).

As noted, Allāh dates back to “earliest Semitic writings” which appeared from “30th century BCE”.
Whether the Qur’an refers to the Creator as ‘ilah” (God) or “Allāh” it means that He/God is the one universal God, ALLĀH!
“Praise be to Allāh, the Lord of the worlds”-(Qur’an 1:1).


The greatest miracle must stand the ravages of time. Apart from the fact there is no physical evidence to support Jesus performed miracles. False Christs, Moses, Elijah, Elisha, Joshua, the river Jordan, the pool at Bethesda, and a brass serpent performed miracles–(Matthew 24:24; Exodus 7:10; 1 Kings 17:17-23; 2 Kings 4:32-36; 13:20-21; Joshua 10:12-13; 2 Kings 5:9-14; John 5:2-4; Numbers 21:8-9); and Balaam’s ass spoke to Balaam–(Numbers 22:28, 30).
Prophet Mohammad gave us the living miracle, the Qur’an –evidenced by its material on science and its prophecies– which is ever present to verify. (See Apostate Prophet-Qur’an poor science).


It is intriguing that in life Jesus considered Gentiles “dogs” and “swine” and preached in parables to keep them out of heaven, and now in death he is coming as phantom to them in dreams.
(Satan comes in dreams to lead people astray; the only person Satan cannot impersonate is Prophet Mohammad–Bokhari Vol. 8, #217; Vol. 9, #123.
   The Prophet was white-skinned and straight-haired–Vol. 1, #63; Vol. 4, #758, 766-767; Vol. 7, #799-800. He matted/braided his hair–Vol. 2, #613; #783; and also cut it short–Vol. 2, #787-788).

Considering that Trinity and original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement are NOT Divine doctrines but ridicule and denigrate God. If it was Jesus people saw in dreams, then clearly Jesus was impressing on them to keep his commandments–(John 14:15-16), and follow the Comforter who brought “all truth” and will abide “for ever”MOHAMMAD. (See next item).


Jesus says: “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you forever” and  “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth” (John 14:16; 16:13).

In consonance with Jesus’ prophecy, Allāh reveals in Qur’an 61:6: “And when Jesus, son of Mary said: O Children of Israel, surely I am the Messenger of Allāh to you, verifying that which is before me of the Torah and giving the good news of a Messenger who will come after me, his name being Ahmad” (Ahmad is another name of Mohammad).

Christians suffer intense labor pains trying to prove that Mohammad is not the Comforter, arguing that the verse refers to the Comforter as “spirit”. But “Spirit of truth” is a euphemism for one who is truthful –like one being termed lion-hearted meaning he is brave. And the Prophet was honored, even by his rabid enemies, as al-Amin, the truthful; (even Jews seemed to seek his judgment–Qur’an 5:42-43, see M. Ali comm.).

The Holy Ghost/Spirit is not the Comforter. The Holy Ghost was already here, before, during, and after Jesus–(Luke 1:41, 67; 2:25; 3:22; John 20:22; Acts 2:4; 8:17; 11:15; 19:6); but he, she, or it did not bring any gospel or speak with a loud voice.

Jesus says: “It is expedient for you that I go away, for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you, but if I depart I will send him unto you”–(John 16:7).
This not only shows that the Comforter had to come after Jesus’ departure. But if the Comforter was the Holy Ghost, this would presume that Jesus was devoid of the Holy Ghost for Jesus to “send” him/it.

Comforter could not be Spirit. As Jesus was one Comforter and man, this “another” Comforter must also be man. Jesus describes the Comforter as human: “He shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear that shall he speak” (John 16:13).
If the Comforter is the Holy Ghost, this would presume that God and the Holy Ghost are two distinct beings that the Ghost should speak of himself and also what he hears from God.
Jesus saying that the Comforter will not speak of himself but what he hears, is the same as God informing Moses about Him raising up a prophet like Moses and “will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him”–(Deuteronomy 18:18). The words God put into the mouth of the prophet like Moses and the words the Comforter heard from God is the Qur’an–(Qur’an 21:45; 53:3-5. If Jesus is God, God put His words into His own mouth).

Jesus says the Comforter “shall testify of me” and “shall glorify me”–(John 15:26; 16:14). There is no record of the Holy Ghost testifying of and glorifying Jesus. Mohammad did; testifying to Jesus’ status as prophet of God and repudiating the “Jewish calumnies” against him and his mother. (Read the Qur’an).

Jesus says the Comforter will guide us into “all truth.” The Qur’an is the Book of “all truth” that is needed for our moral, social, material and spiritual upliftment. The Qur’an consists of teachings of past prophets that are applicable to all time and contains teachings that are not met with in past Scriptures. Thus, Qur’an consists of, exceeds, and supersedes all other Scriptures.

“Nothing have We omitted from the Book (Qur’an)” “explaining all things” “A Messenger from Allāh, reciting pure pages, Wherein are (all) right books” -(Qur’an 61:6; 6:38; 12:111; 16:89; 5:48; 98:2-3).
Muslims do not have to show the Spirit’s name is Mohammad to prove Mohammad is the Comforter. Muslims have proven it.

Invitation to Christians: In the 2000 years since Jesus promised to send the Comforter, go find out the name of this “Spirit”; and show the “all truth” he brought and where he “testify” of and “glorify” Jesus and come back and tell us Muslims Mohammad is not the Comforter.

Christians can reject Mohammad, Christians cannot refute Mohammad’s claim to Divine Dispensation.
In his book Muhammad In World Scriptures Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi has “adduced 3000 incontrovertible arguments and signs proving the truthfulness of the Holy Prophet (Mohammad) and his Divine mission.” (Check out Read also Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud –the former Rev. David Benjamin Keldani– Muhammad In The Bible. While Mohammad was foretold in previous Books Mohammad does not need past Scriptures to substantiate his status; the Qur’an –with its prophecies (that already manifested), scientific teachings (already verified) and the Qur’an’s inimitability–(Qur’an 2:23; 10:38; 11:13; 17:88; 52:33-34)– is Mohammad’s proof.

The following are teachings taught only by the Comforter, Mohammad:
-Mohammad gave vivid descriptions of heaven/paradise. The Qur’an is replete with these descriptions of heaven/ paradise. (All Jesus said was that there are many mansions in his Father’s house–John 14:2)

   -Mohammad gave vivid descriptions of Hell. (All Jesus said was that Hell was an “everlasting fire” that “never shall be quenched” in which there will be “wailing and gnashing of teeth”–Matthew 18:8; Mark 9:43; Matthew 13:42). Islam teaches that Hell is not forever but is proportional to the degree of one’s sin–(Qur’an 11:107; 78:21-26).

   -Mohammad taught about the origin of life–(Qur’an 21:30).

   -Mohammad taught about sperm and conception–(Qur’an 22:5; 23:12-14).

   -Mohammad taught about the fetus and its development in the womb–(Qur’an 22:5; 39:6).

   -Mohammad taught about women’s menstruation-(Qur’an 2:222).

   -Mohammad taught about adoption–(Qur’an 33:4-5; Bokhari Vol. 5, #335).

  -Mohammad taught about child custody–(Qur’an 2:233; Abu Dawud Vol. 2, #2269-2270).

   -Mohammad taught about intoxicants and gambling–(Qur’an 2:219; 5:90).

   -Mohammad taught about man being created into different tribes, colors and languages–(Qur’an 30:22; 49:13).

   -Mohammad taught about how milk is produced in cattle–(Qur’an 16:66).

   -Mohammad taught about bees making honey–Qur’an 16:68-69).

   -Mohammad taught about the sun and moon and orbits-(Qur’an 21:33; 36:40).

  -Mohammad taught about the moon’s light (moon is a reflector of the sun’s light)–(Qur’an 10:5; 25:61; 71:16).

   -Mohammad taught about particles smaller than atom–(Qur’an 10:61).

 -Mohammad taught deep seas have internal waves–Qur’an 24:39-40). This is another modern discovery by scientists using “special equipment and submarines”–(A Brief Illustrated Guide to Understanding Islam, pp. 20-21.

   -Mohammad taught about the formation of rain clouds–(Qur’an 30:48; 35:9).

   -Mohammad taught about the formation of the universe–(Qur’an 41:11).

  -Mohammad taught about the mountains stabilizing the earth–(Qur’an 16:15; 31:10).

   -Mohammad taught about salt and sweet water in the sea–(Qur’an 25:53; 55:19-20).

   -Mohammad taught about space travels–(Qur’an 15:14-15; 55:33).

   -Mohammad taught about there being more than one world–(Qur’an 1:1; 56:77-80).

  -Mohammad taught about the existence of living-beings on other planets–(Qur’an 19:93-95; 42:29).

  -Mohammad taught about the approaching doomsday –the Sun will fold up–(Qur’an 81:1); Stars will fall, become dust-colored (lose light)–(Qur’an 81:2); The heaven will look like molten copper; red hide–(Qur’an 70:6-8; 55:37); Ocean will boil–(Qur’an 81:6; 82:3);  Sun and Moon will join together–(Qur’an 75:8-9).

   -Mohammad taught about the months–(Qur’an 9:36).

 -Mohammad taught about the sun and moon and the computation of time–(Qur’an 2:189; 6:96; 10:5).

   -Mohammad taught about stars and guidance–(Q. 6:97).

   -Mohammad taught about diseases and cures–(Bokhari, Vol. 7).

For all matters of life we have to ask the Comforter who guided us into “all truth” and will “abide for ever”–MOHAMMAD!

Peace and blessings of Allāh be upon you, O Mohammad.
I bear witness there is no God but Allāh;
And I bear witness Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh!
Subhān Allāh!
Alhamdo lillāh!
Allāho Akbar!