Allah-says follow Christianity

In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
DEDICATED TO
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
AND TO
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms
*

If Allah is Hubal and Molech and a pagan moon-God as Christians and others have postulated, then this Hubal and Molech and pagan moon-God has given to the world the best Book in Scriptural history. For the Qur’an contains teachings of past Scriptures and also has teachings not met with in other Scriptures. Thus, the Qur’an consists of, exceeds, and supersedes all other Scriptures.
Moreover, given that to suffer/punish someone else for your satisfaction is sadism, the Christian doctrine of original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement is sadistic. Thus, in contrast to Hubal and Molech and pagan moon-God and Allāh Who forgives ALL sins unconditionally, the Christians’ God, needing the satisfaction of Jesus’ blood to forgive sins, is a sadist.
NB: The God of Moses and of Jesus Who revealed Divine Unity and self-responsibility for sin(s) is NOT the God of Christians. The Christians’ God, Whoever He is, is the God of Trinity, original/inherited sin and vicarious atonement.

PREAMBLE
Reason dictates that since no one can take food to alleviate my hunger, drink to alleviate my thirst, medication to cure my illness and laxative to free my constipation –vicarious refreshment.
Then no one can die to free me of my sin(s); and so says God: “The fathers shall NOT be put to death for the children, NEITHER shall the children be put to death for the fathers: EVERY MAN SHALL BE PUT TO DEATH FOR HIS OWN SIN”–(Deuteronomy 24:16). This decree applies to physical as well as spiritual sins.

All prophets prior to the Prophet Mohammad were for a specific people and their teachings/Scriptures were for a limited period. Since these Scriptures were to be superseded by the Qur’an, there was no point in Allāh God preserving them in their pristine purity.
However, the precepts of these Books that are relevant for all time are enshrined in the Qur’an: “We have not neglected anything in the Book,” “(Mohammad) A Messenger from Allåh, reciting pure pages. Wherein are (all) right books” –(Qur’an 6:38; 98:2-3).
As the Qur’an consists of, exceeds and supersedes all Scriptures and is to “abide for ever” Allāh God has decreed to guard it from corruption as He tells us in His Qur’an 15:9: “Surely We have revealed the Reminder, and surely We are its Guardian”
“The fulfilment of this prophecy is so evident a fact that a hostile writer like Muir admits that “there is probably in the world no other book which has remained twelve centuries (fourteen centuries now) with so pure a text”–(Muhammad Ali’s translation of the Qur’an can be viewed online: www.muslim.org).
There are millions of Muslims who know the Qur’an from memory, which is a safeguard against attempt(s) to ‘corrupt’ it. No other revealed Scripture in the world is completely memorized.

In Islam Muslims are not only with Allāh God and Prophet Mohammad, but are also with all the prophets from Adam to Jesus.
Muslims who convert to Christianity are NOT going to Jesus (they are already with Jesus), they are going to the CHURCH. As shown on this site, Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement are NOT Divine Revelations, they are human assumptions.
Paradise/Heaven lies in following Divine injunctions NOT in following human assumptions.

ALLAH SAYS FOLLOW CHRISTIANITY
Muslims are to be vigilant and learn Islam so they are not lead into lies, falsehood and blasphemy. Obtain a copy of Muhammad Ali’s translation of the Qur’an which can be viewed/downloaded at: www.muslim.org.
Muhammad Ali explains Arabic words/terms, gives a background to verses, and Islamic, Biblical and historical explanations. And his preliminary notes are a King Solomon’s mine of information. Islam is superior to all other religions.
Rationalize for yourself if the following reasons are valid for leaving Islam.
CONTENTS

Laws should not be forcibly compelled on human beings. One should be given freedom to do good or not (meaning that Islam does not allow Muslims to apostatize).
Name of Prophet Mohammad in only 4 places in the Qur’an as opposed to Jesus’ name found in 25 places.
The Qur’an does not list the names of Mohammad’s mother or other relations. Only the name of Mary, mother of Jesus;
Mary was born without original sin, never committed any sin in her life, she was ever virgin. She went to heaven with her physical body. Assumption is written in the Qur’an.
Quran chapter 3 verses 45 to 55 there are 10 points which the Qur’an makes about Jesus.
The Qur’an says Jesus was Messiah etc and performed miracles, ascended and would return, and did not say any such things about Mohammad, thus, Jesus is greater than Mohammad

Since word is not creator and not creation, that is why Christians say the word is son of God. (But Jesus was a black Jew see Jesus-seen in dreams; http://www. angelfire.com/ill/hebrewisrael/printpages/phys.html).
Since God can see without eyes, hear without ears and Since Allāh can hear without ears, talk without tongue and hear without ears therefore God can have a child without a wife.
Qur’an says Jesus is alive and Mohammad is no more. Chapter 10 verse 94 of the Qur’an says to follow Christianity.
John 1:1 says Jesus is word of God, Qur’an says Jesus is word of God. Thus both Quran and Bible is the same.
Whereas Jesus gives power to his believers to become children of God. Allāh calls human beings slaves and Allāh is Master. Master cannot love slave, slave cannot love master.
Qur’an says to fight with non-believers, and to kill one who rejects Islam.

Prophet Mohammad died, we don’t know where he went. In contrast, Christ died and came back. So there is hope for one who dies in Christ, he will come back.
To have eternal life one needs Jesus.
Every religion says the block between God and man is sin. Islam has animal sacrifice for the sin; Hinduism has rebirths; But only in Christianity Jesus himself took man’s sin and his punishment and removed sin from him and made him pure.
The consequence of sin is death. To remove death, Jesus gave his life on the cross.
To partake in Jesus’ body and blood (in the Communion service) is to partake in Jesus’ life.
Jesus/Christianity and the Church and the cross is “love”
Assessment of Christianity and Islam.
*

Laws should not be forcibly compelled on human beings. One should be given freedom to do good or not (meaning that Islam does not allow Muslims to apostatize).

ANSWER:
There are varying degrees in being a Muslim. The first stage is the acceptance of Allāh as God and Mohammad as Messenger of Allāh. After that a person is rewarded according to the number of the ordinances of Islam that he/she observes; for example some people only pray and neglect the other duties; some may pray and fast only and neglect the others; and so on.

Allāh God has given man this freedom of choice:
-“Have We not given him (man) two eyes, and a tongue and two lips, and pointed out to him the two conspicuous ways (of good and evil)? But he attempts NOT the uphill road” (Qur’an 90:8-10)
-“So He reveals to it (the soul) its way of evil and its way of good, he is indeed successful who purifies it, and he is ruined who corrupts it” (Qur’an 91:8-10)
-“Whoever does good it is FOR HIMSELF, and whoever does evil, it is AGAINST HIMSELF” (Qur’an 45:15)

In contrast, it is Christianity (not to be confused with Christ) that does NOT give people a choice. Christianity teaches that we are born with sin –which we inherited from Adam.
To say that God sent us into the world as sinners is to say that we are criminals by nature –that God sent us with two little horns on our forehead and a barbed tail on our behinds (as devils);
And as we are criminal by nature then we are incapable of upholding law –any law; Divine and human. And as we are incapable of upholding any law then, according to this Christian doctrine of “original”/inherited sin, the human laws and courts and punishments are an affront to God and man. We are hopeless pawns in the hands of the Christian God.
And if God did not put this “original” sin onto the progeny of Adam how then is it passed on to mankind? and how can the murder of Jesus free us from this sin?
(See Jesus-inherited sin to ascension).

Unlike Islam which gives man a free choice, (Judaism) and Christianity requires that apostates be killed (details later).
Incidentally, the Gospel of Mark 16:16-18 reports Jesus as saying: “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved…They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them.”
Would baptized Christian like to take up a serpent or drink any deadly thing? Surely, as you claim Jesus is God/Son of God and that the Bible is the Word of God you will have no reluctance or hesitancy to take a live un-milked viper or drink this “deadly thing.” Surely to demonstrate your “Word of God” and trust in your God/Son of God is the highest expression of faith.

It would be scandalous that you and other Christians are not clamoring to honor this “truth” of Jesus. After all, if this “deadly thing” does not hurt you all you all can boast that Jesus spoke the truth. And if you all die, well, you will get to sit with Jesus sooner “on the right hand of God”–(Mark 16:19) (See Christians-drinking deadly thing).

However, before you blindly rush out to give “flesh” to Jesus’ words, be forewarned, Christians who tried to do so “gave up the ghost” (they died! See the Internet).
More pressingly, Jesus did NOT utter these words. These words –Mark 16:9-20 as well as Mathew 28:19 that have Jesus parroting to his disciples to teach all nations “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost– are “forgeries” in the Bible.
And the publisher(s) of the Bible knows they are “forgeries”¹ yet they keep it in the Bible. Why? If they remove it, they would have zero justification for preaching the Bible.

Name of Prophet Mohammad in only 4 places in the Qur’an as opposed to Jesus’ name found in 25 places. Thus the Qur’an gives more preference to Jesus;

ANSWER:
Muslims do not worship Mohammad. Muslims worship Allāh.
And Jesus says only God is to be worshipped, that only God is “good”–(Matthew 19:16-17. Though this portion of the Bible has also been altered, see Bible corrupt & obsolete).

The Qur’an does not give “more preference” to Jesus; Jesus, (like other topics) is mentioned/repeated to remind us that Jesus is not God, he is not son of God (in the Christian sense) but a human who was born, ate, slept and answered the calls of nature as other humans.
Jesus could have been named 1,000 times in the Qur’an, this does not make Jesus God or son of God or vicarious atoner or make him greater than Mohammad; in fact even John the Baptist, as declared by Jesus himself, is greater than Jesus: “Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist”–(Matt. 11:11). Jesus also was born of a woman. (see Jesus-not the greatest).
(Those who charge that Mohammad wrote the Qur’an are to ponder why would Mohammad give “more preference” to Jesus than to himself. See Mohammad-wrote the Qur’an; Qur’an-borrowed from Bible).

The Qur’an does not list the names of Mohammad’s mother or other relations. Only the name of Mary, mother of Jesus; Chapter 3 of Qur’an named “Family of Maryam” and chapter 19 named after Mary.

ANSWER:
(Chapter 3 of the Qur’an is named ”Family of Imran,” not “Family of Maryam”).
So what that a chapter of the Qur’an is named after Mary? She is still a mortal woman who worshipped Allāh God.
Allāh God gave revelation to Moses’ mother–(Qur’an 20:36-39; 28:7), and the Bible says God sent angels to Lady Hajra, Ishmael’s mother, and even promised her that He will give her followers (the Muslims) as numberless as the “stars “ and “sands”–(Genesis 16:7-11; 22:17).
A chapter of the Qur’an is also named after Mohammad (chapter 27); one after Joseph (chapter 12) one after Jonah (chapter 10), and one after Ibrahim/Abraham (chapter14). There is NONE named after Jesus; even though there is a chapter named Cow, Bee, Ant, Spider and Elephant (chapters 2, 16, 27, 29, respectively). Does this mean these insects are greater than Jesus?

What is to borne in mind is, the Qur’an is not a story-book (like the Bible), it is not a treatise on any subject, it recounts the personalities and teachings of past Scriptures and corrects the human insertions (such as Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement, Karma & Reincarnation-fact or fiction? and more than one Creators), extols the greatness and grandeur of Allāh God and gives guidance for our moral, social, intellectual and spiritual upliftment.
The Qur’an was/is only recounting the history/life of Mary.

Qur’an chapter 3 verses 34 onwards says that Mary was born without original sin, never committed any sin in her life, she was ever virgin.
Qur’an 50:23 says she went to heaven with her physical body. Even the Assumption is written in the Qur’an.

ANSWER:
That Mary was born without original sin:
Since Christians believe that sin is transmitted by the male sperm, Mary would have inherited sin from her father. And Jesus would have inherited sin from his mother even if his birth was “virginal.
But Jesus was NOT of virgin birth. Virgin birth is a forgery in the Bible and the word ‘virgin” has been excised from the RSV Bible. (See Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix? Bible corrupt & obsolete).

That Mary was ever virgin.
That Mary gave “virginal“ birth is not borne out by facts. Paul, whom Christians follow more than Jesus, shows that Jesus had a human father:
-“Therefore (David) being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the FRUIT OF HIS LOINS, ACCORDING TO THE FLESH, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne” –(Acts 2:30);
-“Concerning his Son Jesus Christ…which was made of the SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH”–(Romans 1:3);
“Remember that Jesus Christ of the SEED OF DAVID”–(2 Timothy 2:8).
And “seed” is sperm, and “according to the flesh” is male-female union: sexual intercourse.

According to the Bible Hannah’s children are on a higher plane than Jesus. Whereas God sent angel with “word” to Mary, God actually visited Hannah and gave her children; the Bible says that after Eli blessed Elkanah and his wife so they would have children: “And the Lord VISITED Hannah, so that she conceived, and bare three sons and two daughters”–(1 Samuel 2:20-21) Hannah would seem to have given “virgin” birth; and three times over.²

In fact some Christians do not even believe in “virgin birth” of Jesus. Ibn Warraq notes:
“Martin Luther (1483-1546), writing in the sixteenth century, conceded that “We Christians seem fools to the world for believing that Mary was the true mother of this child, and nevertheless a pure virgin. For this is not only against all reason, but also against the creation of God, who said to Adam and Eve, ‘Be fruitful and multiply.’”³

Moreover, “virgin” birth did not originate with Christianity:
“We read nothing of the Madonna and the Child, either in the evangelical record or in the writings of Paul and other apostles. The conception, most assuredly, came from Alexandria to the Western world, where the Mother Goddess with the Child Redeemer Horus had been honoured centuries before the Christian Era, and worshipped under the names of “Our Lady,” “Queen of Heaven,” “Mother Goddess” and so forth –words that were afterwards used in reference to Mary, the Mother Goddess.”
(For reference to this quote and a legion of “virgin” mothers before Mary see Christianity is Paganism Even Jesus’ crucifixion, as you will read, is copied from paganism).

With regards to Isaiah 7;14 which says that Jesus would be born of a “virgin,” the word “virgin” (and others) has been removed from the Bible; it’s true meaning being “young woman.” Ahmed Deedat has shown in his booklet Is the Bible God’s Word? that:

-the word “VIRGIN” in Isaiah 7:14 has been replaced with the phrase “a young woman” in the RSV Bible;
-the word “BEGOTTEN” of “begotten son” of John 3:16, has been “excised;”
-the verse of 1-John 5:7 which speaks of the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost (the Trinity) “has also been scrapped from the RSV” Bible;
-the verses of Mark 16:19 and Luke 24:51 which refer to the Ascension of Jesus were “expunged” but later “restored to the text.”(See foot note #1).

Deedat also notes that while these terms have been “unceremoniously excised” from English Bibles, they are retained in the Bible’s nearly 1500 other languages.
(Such is the Church’s deception and desperation to snare the innocent native into eating the “body” and drinking the mythical “blood” of Christ –SPIRITUAL CANNIBALISM. This is probably the lowest depth of spiritual depravity).
What man would adulterate the Book of God –the very God from Whom he seeks his daily bread; the very God Whom he expects to give him a mansion in heaven? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
And what man of God would knowingly follow and propagate such adulterated doctrines as Divine truths? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
If a “man of God” would lie on his God to whom then will he not lie? (See Bible corrupt & obsolete; Jesus as God).

But Christians have ample examples for their deception to spread their falsehood from Paul and from their God/Son of God, Jesus. Paul made himself into a human chameleon to snare people through guile and craft. (See Allāh and Jesus or Paul).
And from Jesus who advised Christians to:
“Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison”–(Matthew 5:25).
This allowance from Jesus gives Christians an earth-to- heaven hole so big as to accommodate every conceivable lie and deception and for any situation, so much so that Lorne Green’s Battle-Star Galactica and the battle-ship Iowa Jima can sail through at the same time with mega space to spare.
With this permission Christians can even frame an innocent person all the way to the executioner’s needle just so they would not be thrown in jail.
Even the Biblical God engaged in lying to have King Ahab killed in battle. (For more on Jesus and King Ahab see Islam-and lying).

Mary’s Assumption:
There is no place in the Qur’an that says Mary went to heaven with her physical body. And even it had, what is your point? And before Jesus, Enoch and Elijah ascended to heaven, though Jesus says no man hath ascended to heaven–(John 3:13).

Buddha also is said to have ascended to heaven. Some Christians say that St. Germain⁴ ascended to heaven. Which would make it four individuals, not counting Jesus, who ascended to heaven and may be sitting “on the right hand of God.” (It is said that Buddha will return to restore the world to happiness. Buddha and Jesus might have to battle for supremacy. Armageddon all over again).

While some Christians believe in the “Assumption” of Mary –that she went bodily into heaven– others do not believe it. There is nothing explicit in the Gospels to support that Mary went bodily into heaven.
What for?
Like their elevating Jesus to Divine status Christians also elevated Mary to Divine status, “Mother of God.” (How a woman created by God can be “Mother of God” and God be “Son of woman,” go figure. Not even all the slide rules in the universe will be able to help you).

Quran chapter 3 verses 45 to 55 there are 10 points which the Qur’an makes about Jesus.

(i) Jesus is Word of God.
ANSWER:
The Qur’an also says that

Jesus (and his mother) were humans who ate food;
Jesus was messenger only for Jews and he prophesied the coming go the Prophet Mohammad (as the Comforter).
Mohammad “testify” of Christ, as evidenced in the Qur’an, as Jesus says the Comforter would testify of him. We are yet to hear the Holy Ghost “testify” of Christ, never mind the “all truth” he is required to bring.

Jesus never claimed Divinity–(Qur’an 5:109-115).
Jesus wasn’t killed or crucified
Jesus was only a prophet of God
Jesus taught the worship of God: “And when Jesus came with clear arguments, he said:….So keep your duty to Allāh and obey me. Surely Allåh is my Lord and your Lord, so serve Him. This is the right Path”–Qur’an 43:63-64; compare with the Gospel of Mark 12:29; Gospel of Luke 4:8).
Jesus prayed to God for food: “Jesus, son of Mary, said: O Allah, our Lord, send down to us food from heaven which should be to us an ever-recurring happiness to the first of us and the last of us, and a sign from Thee, and give us sustenance and Thou art the Best of the sustainers”–(Qur’an 5:114)
Why do Christians avoid these critical verses on Jesus that show he was only a human/mortal and cling only to the verse that says he was a “word” of God?How then is Jesus God and son of God?

However, Jesus being “word” of God does not make him greater than others. As noted above, Hannah’s children are on a higher plane than Jesus. For whereas God sent angel with word to Mary, God actually visited Hannah and gave her children.
The Bible also shows that “Word” of God is not restricted to Jesus. This is clear where God decreed creation by saying “Let there be…”–(Gen. 1:3-25). Thus, even things are “words” of God.

ISHMAEL is “word” of God to Abraham. The childless Abraham wanted Eliezer to be his heir but God tells him: “And, behold, the WORD of the Lord came unto him (Abraham), saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of tine own bowels shall be thine heir”–(Gen. 15:1-4. And Ishmael was the one who first came out of Abraham’s “bowels.”
ISAAC is “word” of God. After Ishmael was born God promised to give Abraham a son of his barren wife, Sarah: “And God said unto Abraham, as for Sarai (Sarah) thy wife…I will bless her, and give thee a son ALSO of her”–(Gen. 17:15-16. This “ALSO” shows that Ishmael was the heir in lieu of Eliezer. Comp. Qur’an 37:112-113).
JOHN THE BAPTIST is “word” of God. In answer to Zacharias prayer for an heir, an angel appeared to him in the temple: “Fear not, Zacharias: for thy prayer is heard; and thy wife Elizabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John”–(Luke 1:11-13. Comp. Qur’an 3:38-39; 19:1-9).
The COMFORTER⁴ foretold by Jesus is a “word” of God–(John 14:16; 16:13; Qur’an 61:6. See APPENDIX 1).
The PROPHET “like unto me”⁵ foretold by Moses is a “word” of God–(Deuteronomy 18:15, 18-19).
The SHILOH⁶ foretold by Jacob is a “word” of God–(Gen. 49: 10).
The PROPHET MOHAMMAD foretold by all the prophets of the world since the world began is a “word” of God–(Acts 3:21-22; Qur’an 3:81; 26:192-197).⁷Why do you avoid these instances and cling only to the verse that says Jesus was a “word” of God?

Moreover, the words of God are so numerous that “If the sea were ink for the WORDS of my Lord, the sea would surely be exhausted before the WORDS of my Lord were exhausted, though We brought the like of it to add (thereto);” “And if all the trees in the earth were pens, and the sea with seven more seas added to it (were ink), the WORDS of Allāh would not be exhausted. Surely Allāh is Mighty, Wise”–(Qur’an 18:109; 31:27).
“And Mary, the daughter of Amran, who guarded her chastity, so We breathed into him of Our inspiration, and she accepted the truth of the WORDS of her Lord and His Books, and she was of the obedient ones” –(Qur’an 66:12).
Thus everything created must be a “word” of Allāh

If Jesus is Son of God because he is termed “word” of God, and as everything in creation is word” of God, then according to the Christian’s logic even a baboon must be “son of God.”

As noted above, Ishmael is “word” of God to Abraham. And the Bible says God sent angels to Lady Hajra, Ishmael’s mother, and even promised her that He will give her followers (the Muslims) as numberless as the “stars “ and “sands”–(Genesis 16:7-11; 22:17. See APPENDIX II).

Considering that Christianity is 2000 years old and has about 3 billion followers and Islam is 1400 years old (600-2016) and has some 2.1 billion followers, then proportionately Islam has equal number of followers as Christianity –– 3,000,000,000 divided by 2,000 then multiplied by 1400 equals 2, 100,000,000.
And considering that Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement are NOT teachings of Christ, then JESUS DOES NOT HAVE A SINGLE FOLLOWER.
In these doctrines Christians are following the Church and Paul; thus they are factually CHURCHIANS or PAULIANS and their religion is CHURCHIANITY or PAULIANITY. Jesus is only a figurehead in the Church). (See Allāh and Jesus or Paul; Bible corrupt & obsolete).
And considering that Muslims follow Jesus’ teachings that he was a prophet sent only for Jews and that heaven lies in observing the Mosaic Law until the coming of the Comforter/Ahmad (which is another name of Mohammad), then MUSLIMS ARE THE TRUE FOLLOWERS OF JESUS CHRIST).

Moreover, given the conjectures and doubt surrounding Jesus:

whereas some Christians say Jesus is God some say he is only Son of God (and Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God and the Biblical God has a legion of sons and daughters; and according to the Christian that Jesus is son of God because he is termed “word” of God, and as everything in creation is a “word” of God, then according to the Christian’s logic even a baboon is “son of God);
whereas some say there is Trinity some reject Trinity; (And Hinduism has Trinity –Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva– and the pagan Romans had Trinity –Juno, Jupiter and Minerva–; and the Hindu and pagan Trinity preceded Jesus by hundreds of years);
whereas some say Christ died for inherited sin some say he died for committed sin;
whereas some believe Jesus was killed, buried, and raised, “some of the early Christian sects did not believe that Christ was killed on the cross. The Basilidans believed that some one else was substituted for him. The Docetae held that Christ never had a real physical or natural body, but only an apparent or phantom body, and that his Crucifixion was only apparent, not real. The Marcionite Gospel (about A.D. 138) denied that Jesus was born, and merely said that he appeared in human form;”-(Yusuf Ali, Qur’anic comm. 663).
whereas some Christians say Jesus was of virgin birth Paul taught Jesus had human father.

But for Mohammad Jesus Christ may have long since been relegated to the bin of myths and legends.
It was Mohammad who, through Divine Grace, removed the shroud of calumny wrapped around Jesus and his mother, Mary –that Mary was an “adulteress” and Jesus was of illegitimate birth– and appareled them in rubious robes of righteousness; and cleared away the clouds of conjectures shrouding Jesus and sat him elegantly in the celestial spotlight of Divine Truth –of him being human and a prophet of God– and has secured for them the unflagging allegiance of more than two billion Muslims. And counting.
As Islam spirits on. Inexorably. Invincibly. Impregnably. As Divinely decreed. To prevail over all:
“He (Allāh) it is Who sent His Messenger (Mohammad) with guidance and the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religions, though the polytheists are averse”-(Qur’an 9:32-33; 48:28; 61:8-9).
Allaho Akbar!

Incidentally, Jesus is noted as saying: “Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature” (which would include the baboon)–(Mark 16:15; though this verse is a “forgery” in the Bible), and, regarding “the end of the world” Jesus says: “This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and THEN SHALL THE END COME”–Matthew 24:3, 14. Thus, if any nation(s) should ban the Gospel from its land the “end” shall never come).

Even Hinduism is superior to Christianity. Whereas both religions reduce God to “son” of a woman and make woman “mother” of God by placing God in the body of a woman and bring Him out her genital. Unlike Christianity which attributes injustice to God and makes God complicit in murder by shifting Adam’s sin around onto every person and then onto Jesus and having him murdered, Hinduism, does not attribute injustice to God and make Him complicit in murder; Hinduism gives to man an equal and opposite reaction to his action; though this renders God as being mercy-less, see Karma & Reincarnation.

Also, whereas Jesus/Christianity regards non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in “parables” so these metaphorical “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved, Hinduism does not regard non-Jews or non-Hindus as “dogs” and “swine” or preached in parables so they would not understand.
The God or son of God or prophet that regards one sector of humanity as “:dogs” and “swine” and even preach so they would not understand and be saved is the God/son of God/prophet not worthy of honor much less of adoration and worship. Even humans fight against racism and bigotry.

(ii) Jesus is spirit of God.
ANSWER:
Jesus is NOT spirit of God. Jesus was strengthened with the Spirit of God:
“and We gave Jesus, son of Mary, clear arguments and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit”;
“When Allah will say: O Jesus, son of Mary, remember My favour to thee and to thy mother, when I strengthened thee with the Holy Spirit”–(Qur’an 2:87; 5:110).

Allāh also breathed His spirit into all man: “And when thy Lord said to the angels: I am going to create a mortal of sounding clay, of black mud fashioned into shape. So when I have made him complete and breathed into him of My spirit, fall down making obeisance to him –Qur’an 15:28-29; 32:9-10; 38:71-72).
Allāh strengthened Muslims with His Spirit: “Thou wilt not find a people who believe in Allah and the latter day loving those who oppose Allah and His Messenger…..These are they into whose hearts He has impressed faith, and strengthened them with a Spirit from Himself, and He will cause them to enter Gardens wherein flow rivers, abiding therein”–(Qur’an 58:22).

Angel Gabriel is called spirit. The Holy Spirit brought Revelation to the Prophet Mohammad: “Say: The Holy Spirit has revealed it from thy Lord with truth, that it may establish those who believe, and as a guidance and good news for those who submit”–(Qur’an 16:102)
“Say: Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel — for surely he revealed it to thy heart by Allah’s command, verifying that which is before it and a guidance and glad tidings for the believers”–(Qur’an 2:97)
“And surely this is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds. The Faithful Spirit has brought it, On thy heart that thou mayest be a warner, In plain Arabic language”–(Qur’an 26:192-194).
How then Jesus is spirit of God?

To restate, Allāh God said He “strengthened him (Jesus) with the Holy Spirit.” This seems to be in reference to Jesus praying to God in the garden of Gethsemane to be spared from death, “And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, STRENGTHENING him”–Luke 22:42-43).
Incidentally, if Jesus is God who was he praying to and who sent this angel to strengthen him?
If Jesus is “spirit of God’ it would seem pointless to send an angel/spirit to strengthen him. Sending an angel/spirit to strengthen the “spirit of God” would be like sending chetah to strengthen King Kong. (Chetah was the name of the chimpanzee in Tarzan movies).

(iii) Jesus is Messiah
ANSWER:
So what!
The Qur’an also says Jesus is a messenger of Allāh. That Mohammad is a Messenger of Allāh. That Abraham is Friend of Allāh. That Allāh spoke directly with Moses (there is no place where Jesus has spoken directly with God, only that he says “I thank thee that Thou always hearest me; and this is not the same as God speaking directly with Moses).
And there are many messiahs (anointed) in the Bible–(Leviticus 4:3, 6; 6:22; 1Samuel 2:10, 35; 1Chronicles 16:22. See https://www.quora.com/How-many-messiahs-are-there-in-the-Bible):

Incidentally, whereas the Bible states that the Messiah would come from the house of David–(Psalm 132:11; Matthew 12:23; 15:22; 20:30-31; 21:7, 15; Mark 10:47-48; 11:10; Luke 1:69; 18:38-39; John 7:42; Acts 2:29-30; 13:23; 2 Timothy 2:8; Hebrews. 7:14 (David came from the lineage of Judah); Revelation 5:5; 22:16); and that Jesus was the offspring of David:
“Concerning his Son Jesus Christ…which was made of the SEED OF DAVID ACCORDING TO THE FLESH”–(Romans 1:3); “Remember that Jesus Christ of the SEED OF DAVID”–(2 Timothy 2:8).

According to Matthew 22:42-45, When Jesus asked the Jews: whose son they think he is, the Jews replied, “The son of David.”
To which Jesus argued: “How then doth David, in spirit, call him (Jesus) Lord, saying, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thins enemies thy footstool? If David then call him (Jesus) Lord, how is he (Jesus) his son?” (And Jesus never rejected anyone else for addressing him as “son of David”).
That “The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,” Jesus was here quoting Psalm 110 verse one. But this statement by Jesus is not Divine revelation it is Christian’s manipulation.
According to https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/ articles/ answers/jewish-polemics/texts/psalm-110-a-jewish-perspect ive/

“In an attempt to prove the Divinity of the Messiah, Christians misquote Psalm 110:1 as, “The LORD said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies thy footstool,” and verse 4 stating, “You are a priest forever after the manner of Melchizedek.”
Christians assert that this passage proves the plurality of God and that David is attributing qualities to Jesus that he would not attribute to himself. Namely that Jesus is part of a Trinitarian godhead and also the Messiah who replaces the sacrificial system of atonement making intercession forever in a more perfect way than the Levitical priesthood. This latter claim is stated in Hebrews 7:11-28.1
“Psalm 110 was composed in the third person to be sung by the Levites, and thus reflects their point of view, for they would call their king “my master – adoni.” In other words, the Levites are saying that “God spoke to our master (King David). Sit at My right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.”
It was composed at the beginning of David’s reign. When the Philistines heard that Israel had anointed David as king, they came to fight with him, David talks about his reassurance from G-d that He would fight with the Jews against their enemies. As it says:
“He arose and struck the Philistines until his hand was weary and did cleave to his sword and the Lord wrought a great victory that day.”(2 Samuel 23 v.l0)
Sitting at God’s right hand as stated in the beginning of Psalm 110, symbolized God’s victorious protection, as written:
“Thy right hand has supported me” Psalm 18:36
“Thy right hand Oh Lord, is glorious in power” Exodus 13:6
“The right hand of the Lord is exalted; the right hand of the Lord does valiant.” Psalm 118:16
The privilege of sitting at the right hand is also a mark of distinction.” (For full details see: https:// jewsforjudaism.org/ knowledge/ articles/answers/ jewish-polemics/texts/psalm-110-a-jewish-perspective/

To restate. According to Matthew 22:43-45 Jesus denied he was son of David. Yet in the Book of Revelation chapter 22 verse 16 Jesus categorically, unambiguously, and emphatically declares: “I JESUS….I AM THE ROOT AND THE OFFSPRING OF DAVID.”
By fudging the Bible to fit Jesus into their blasphemous mold of Divinity and vicarious atoner, Christians have made their God/Son of God into an idiot. He does not know his origin.
What man would adulterate the Book of God –the very God from Whom he seeks his daily bread; the very God Whom he expects to give him a mansion in heaven? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
And what man of God would knowingly follow and propagate such adulterated doctrines as Divine truths? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
If a “man of God” would lie on his God to whom then will he not lie?

(iv) Jesus spoke when he was two days old.
ANSWER:
Jesus did not speak as a baby in the cradle. This is a euphemism for a young person. And it must be referring to Jesus at the age of twelve speaking with the elders in the temple–(Luke 2: 42-47).

(v) Jesus created a live bird with mud and blew life into it, so the Christian thinks Jesus can give life
(vi) Jesus cured the blind
(vii) Jesus cured the leper
(viii) Jesus gave life to dead people
ANSWER:
With regards to these miracles that Jesus performed the Christian omitted the most crucial part of the verses, the endings, which show that Jesus performed these miracles through the power of God (just as the Bible says that he performed miracles through the power of God–Luke 11:20; John 8:28, 11:42; Acts 2:22).
Here are the verses with the parts omitted by the Christian in red:

“When Allah will say: O Jesus, son of Mary, remember My favour to thee and…..when thou didst determine out of clay a thing like the form of a bird by My permission, then thou didst breathe into it and it became a bird by My permission;
and thou didst heal the blind and the leprous by My permission;
and when thou didst raise the dead by My permission”–(Qur’an 5:110-113; also Qur’an 3:48).
Why did the Christian omit these endings? Isn’t it dishonesty and deception to omit these most crucial part of the verses?

Clearly Jesus performed miracles through the powers of God, Which is corroborated by Jesus himself in the Gospels:

”But if I with the finger of GOD cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you–(Luke 11:20)
Jesus told Martha that she will see God’s glory in his raising Lazarus from the dead, then he prayed to God–(John 11:39:44. If Jesus is God which God was he prating to?).
(Paul) “Jesus of Nazareth, a MAN approved of GOD among you by miracles and wonders and signs WHICH GOD DID by him”–(Acts 2:22)
And Jesus’ supreme classics that he was NOT God:
“The Son can do NOTHING of himself, but what he seeth the father do…I can of mine own self DO NOTHING: as I hear, I judge…” –(John 5:19, 30; John 8:28. How then Jesus is God?)
“All power is GIVEN unto me in heaven and in earth”–(Matthew 28:18). As “all power” was “given” to him, “all power” can be taken from him. And no one can “give” or “take” power from God; be it some or “all.” How then Jesus is God?) (For more proofs Jesus is not God see Jesus as God).

There are others such as Moses and Elijah who performed miracles. Even things like the river Jordan and the pool at Bethesda performed miracles; and Balaam’s jackass spoke to Balaam. (See Miracles).
How then is Jesus God and Son of God because he performed miracles?
And how does Jesus performing miracles through God’s power make him superior to Mohammad or other prophets?

(ix) Jesus went to heaven
ANSWER:
Elijah and Enoch also went to heaven and did not have to die first. And Buddha is also said to have gone to heaven and will come back to restore peace and happiness.

There are Muslims also who believe that Jesus went to heaven. However this is not borne out by closely looking at the verses of the Qur’an (as will be shown shortly).

The Gospel of Mark 16:19 says about Jesus (after the make-believe “crucifixion”) that Jesus “was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.” (Luke pretty much says the same. This verse of Mark as well as the entire ending of Mark chapter 16 (verses 9:20) are “forgeries”⁸ in the Bible; and of which the Bible authorities/publishers are aware.
What man would adulterate the Book of God –the very God from Whom he seeks his daily bread; the very God Whom he expects to give him a mansion in heaven? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
And what man of God would knowingly follow and propagate such adulterated doctrines as Divine truths? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
If a “man of God” would lie on his God to whom then will he not lie?

Probably the most contentious issues among Muslims are the birth, ascension and return of Jesus. But whether Jesus had a father or not, whether he is dead or is alive in heaven and would return are not articles of faith –and no reason for division. Allah will make clear to us wherein we differ–Qur’an 16:92; 39: 46; 42:10.
Our common factors as Muslims are Faith in Allah and Messengership of Mohammad; Prayer, Charity, Fasting and Hajj.
What is significant is that we keep Jesus within the Islamic perspective, which, aside from being Divine Revelation, is a perspective of fact and reason –Jesus is not God, not one in a Trinity, not Son of God, not vicarious atoner for inherited sin. He is only a messenger of Allāh God sent to preach to the Children of Israel and to announce to them the Good News of the coming of the Prophet Mohammad).

Regarding the belief of some Muslims that Jesus went up bodily to heaven. If Christians had not alluded to Jesus’ rising to heaven (now known to be a forgery), it is doubtful that Muslims would have interpreted the Qur’anic verses on Jesus to mean his bodily Ascension to heaven; considering that Allāh says:

“Therein (the earth) shall you live, and therein shall you die, and therefrom shall you be raised”–(Qur’an 7:25). If Jesus went back to Allāh before being “raised” from the earth then he is an exception to this law of Allāh.
Allah says “Every soul must taste of death; THEN to Us you will be returned”–(Qur’an 29:57. Also 21:35). We have to die first, THEN we are returned to Allah. And if Jesus returned to Allah without first having died, then he is an exception to this law of Allah–him having returned to Allah without having died).
Allah tells us that those whom they call upon besides Allah: “Dead (are they). And they know not when they will be raised”–(Qur’an 16:20-21). (And Jesus is one of those called upon besides Allah. And if he is not dead, then he is an exception to this statement of Allah, and knew when he was raised to Allah).
Allah revealed to the Prophet Mohammad that all the prophets before him were men, “Nor did We give them bodies that ate no food, nor were they exempt from death”–(Qur’an 21:7-8). Since Jesus was before the Prophet Mohammad, and if he went up to heaven being “exempt from death,” and has a body not eating food, then he is an exception to this statement of Allāh.
The Prophet Mohammad in his discussion with the Christians of Najran (noted above) said to the Christians: “Don’t you know that our God is alive and will never die and Jesus had to die?” It is to be noted that the Prophet did not say Jesus ‘will have to die’; he said that Jesus “had” to die –meaning that Jesus died.

Clearly Muslims writings were influenced by Christian beliefs.
Allah reveals that He said to Jesus: “O Jesus, I will cause thee to die and exalt thee in My presence….”–(Qur’an 3:54). Muhammad Ali explains:

“Raf ‘signifies raising or elevating, and also exalting or making honourable (T, LL). But where the raf’ of a man to Allah is spoken of in the Holy Qur’an, or in the religious literature of Islam, it is always in the latter sense, for raising a man in his body to Himself implies that the Divine Being is limited to a place. This is made plain by the prayer which every Muslim repeats several times daily in his prayers in the sitting position between the two prostrations: wa-rfa’-ni, meaning and exalt me. Of course no one supposes this prayer to be for the raising of the body to the heavens. Hence even those commentators who are predisposed, having, no doubt, been misled by Christian tradition, to accept Jesus Christ as having been raised alive to heaven, have been compelled to admit that the word raf’ is here used not for raising aloft but for exalting and honouring. And commenting on the words which follow this statement, Rz says: This shows that raf’ here is the exalting in degree and in praise, not in place and direction. The exaltation of Jesus is mentioned here as a reply to the Jews, whose object was to make him die an accursed and ignominious death on the cross.”
“Being exalted in the Divine presence was opposed to being killed on the cross. Deuteronomy 21:23 explains this, for there we have, he that is hanged is cursed of God. If Jesus had died on the cross he would have been accursed; hence the statement made here (Q. 4:157-158)–he was not killed on the cross and accursed, but he was exalted in the Divine presence.” (Comm. #’s 437, 649).

Those who believe that Jesus was raised bodily must consider if flesh and blood can enter into the Kingdom of Heaven. (As shown in Jesus-birth the Prophet Mohammad’s ascension to heaven was not physical).

Further. Allah tells us that Jesus “will speak to the people when in the cradle and when of old age”–(Qur’an 3:45). Meaning that Jesus will begin his mission as a youth, as the Gospel shows–(Luke 2: 42-47); and until late in life.
According to the Gospel Jesus’ mission ended when he was only about 33 years old. These 33 years cannot be taken to be “an old age.” If this “old age” is taken to be at the time of Jesus’ supposed return, when he would be over 2,000 thousand years old, this would be a tremendous “old age”–whether he has aged physically or not.

But what became of Jesus after he was saved from death on the cross? Allah tells us in the Qur’an: “And We made the son of Mary and his mother a sign, and We gave them refuge on a lofty ground having meadows and springs”–(Qur’an 23:50). But where is this “lofty ground having meadows and springs”, as Allah says?
“Jerusalem, Egypt, Palestine or Damascus, which are the names suggested (for this “lofty ground having meadows and springs”), do not answer the description, which applies exactly to the valley of Kashmir”, states Muhammad Ali, who went on to note that:

“Part of the lost ten tribes of Israel is also traced to Kashmir, where a large number of towns and villages bear the names of the towns and villages of Palestine. The presence of a tomb known as the tomb of Nabi (i.e., the prophet), or ‘Isa (i.e., Jesus), or Yuz Asaf, in the Khan Yar street in the capital of Kashmir, lends additional support to this theory.”
And, this verse, where Allah gave Jesus and Mary “refuge on a lofty ground having meadows and springs”–(Qur’an 23:50), “tells us that, being delivered from the hands of his enemies, he was given shelter at some other place, and the description of that place, as indicated in this verse, along with the fact that Kashmir has a tomb, which every available evidence shows to be the tomb of Jesus himself, leads us to the conclusion that Kashmir is the land referred to in this verse.”

Muhammad Ali also notes from Ibn Kathir that: “According to a saying of the Holy Prophet (Mohammad), Jesus lived 120 years” (IK, vol. ii, p. 246)”–(Qur’anic comm. 1723).
It is reasonable that Jesus living to 120 years is the “old age” to which Jesus lived, as mentioned in the Qur’an 3:45. And his speaking at this “old age” was to this “Part of the lost ten tribes of Israel” which “is also traced to Kashmir.” (See Jesus-18 missing years).

(x) Jesus is still alive and he will come again.
ANSWER:
Regarding Jesus’ second coming, there are three verses of the Qur’an that seem to give rise to this belief–Qur’an 4:157-158 and 43:61.
And in which there are differences in translation between translators; these differences are shown in bold type; and those in agreement, in italics:

First, Qur’an 43:61
(Yusuf Ali) “And (Jesus) shall be a sign (for the coming of) the Hour (of Judgment): Therefore have no doubt about the (Hour), but follow ye Me: this is a Straight Way”
(Muhammad Ali): And this (revelation) is surely knowledge of the Hour, so have no doubt about it and follow me. This is the right path.”
(Malik Ghulam Farid): “But, verily, he was a sign of the Hour. So entertain no it doubt about it, but follow me. This is the right path.
Which is the correct translation?

Ghulam Farid states that “the pronoun “hu” in “inna hu” (of the Arabic text) may refer either to Jesus or to the Qur’an.” But how to know which one the Qur’an is referring to? To know what the verse is referring to, we have to investigate the subject matter of this section (section 6).

Section 6 of chapter 43 begins with the verse: “When (Jesus) the son of Mary is held up as an example, behold, thy people raise a clamour thereat (in ridicule)!” (Qur’an 43:57). (Yusuf Ali. Ghulam Farid and Muhammad Ali are in agreement; except that the verse begins with “And” –“And when Jesus…. is held up”).
While Jesus seems to be the subject of this section he is not the subject. He is only used as an example, as noted in the verse.
For, as the people opposed Jesus, similarly the Prophet Mohammad is opposed. And that the prophecies that Jesus made regarding the coming of another Comforter/Ahmad–(John 14:16; Qur’an 61:6)–and that the kingdom of God shall be taken from the Jews and given to another nation–(Matt. 21:43)–were now being manifested with the advent of the Prophet Mohammad and the Qur’an; (that this was the Hour marking the end of prophethood to the Jews, so “follow me, (Mohammad), this is a straight way”–43:61).

The topic of this section is about the Qur’anic revelation as noted by the italicized words in the above verse (43:61) in which the Prophet is commissioned to tell the disbelievers, “follow ye me; this is a straight way.”

(a) In Yusuf Ali’s translation there is no correlation between ‘Jesus shall be a Sign of the coming of the Hour’ and “follow ye me; this is a straight way’. That “Jesus SHALL BE a Sign” is speaking about the future, whereas “follow ye me; THIS IS a straight way” is speaking about the present. People cannot be expected to follow me (Mohammad) using a future event (the return of Jesus) as proof of his mission.

(b) But in Muhammad Ali’s translation there is agreement between the statements that “THIS REVELATION is surely knowledge of the Hour” (when prophethood to the Jews would end, and which is now ended) so “follow me. THIS IS the right path.”

(c) And also in Ghulam Farid’s translation there is agreement between the statements that “he (Jesus) WAS a sign” (ending prophethood to the Jews) and “follow me THIS IS the right path.”

Secondly, Qur’an 4:157
Qur’an 4:157 speaks about the Jews boasting of having killed Jesus. But Allah says “they killed him not, nor crucified him, But so it was made to appear to them. ….”.
Malik Ghulam Farid states: “Two different views prevailed among the Jews regarding Jesus’ alleged death by Crucifixion. Some of them held that he was first killed and then his dead body was hung on the cross, while others are of the view that he was put to death by being fixed to the cross. The former view is reflected in The Acts 5:30…The Qur’an refutes both these views by saying, they slew him not, nor did they bring about his death on the cross. The Qur’an rejects the slaying of Jesus in any form, and then proceeds to deny the particular way of killing by hanging on the cross. It does not deny that Jesus was hung on the cross; it only denies his death on it.”–(Comm. 699).
And Muhammad Ali notes: “The words ma salabu-hu (of the Arabic text) do not negative Jesus’ being nailed to the cross; they negative his having expired on the cross as a result of being nailed to it. Salb is a well-known way of killing (T, LA). Salabu-hu means he put him to death in a certain well-known manner (LL).”–(Comm. 645).

To restate, Qur’an 4:157 speaks about the Jews boasting of having killed Jesus. But Allah says “they killed him not, nor crucified him, But so it was made to appear to them. ….”.
And verse 158 says: “God RAISED him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise”–(Yusuf Ali translation).

Yusuf Ali translated the verse as: “God RAISED him up unto Himself; and God is Exalted in Power, Wise.”
Malik Ghulam Farid translated the verse as: “Allah EXALTED him to Himself. And Allah is Mighty, Wise.”
Muhammad Ali translated it as: “Allah EXALTED him in His presence. And Allah is ever Mighty, Wise.”

Does Allah being “Mighty, Wise” in reference to Him raising up Jesus bodily to Himself, or is it in reference to Him frustrating the plan of the Jews to kill/crucify Jesus? And is Allah raising up Jesus a physical elevation or a spiritual elevation?
Ghulam Farid in his commentary on this verse states:

“The Jews exultingly claimed to have killed Jesus on the cross and thus to have proved that his claim to be a Divine Prophet was not true. The verse along with the preceding one contains a strong refutation of the charge and clears him of the insinuated blemish and speaks of his spiritual elevation and of his having been honoured in the presence of God. There is absolutely no reference in the verse to his physical ascension to heaven. It only says God exalted him towards Himself which clearly signifies a spiritual exaltation, because no fixed abode can be assigned to God.” (Comm. 700. Emphasis added).

That Allah exalted Jesus in “His presence” does not mean that Allah made Jesus equal with Him in power or in position, but that instead of him being made into a “curse” Allah conferred honor onto him.
If Allah raised Jesus physically to “Himself” then Allah must be on a heaven lower than Abraham; for, the Prophet Mohammad, on his Mi’raj, is said to have met Jesus on a lower heaven than Abraham, who was said to be “on the sixth heaven”–(Bokhari Vol. 1, # 345. And Bokhari Vol. 4, # 640 notes that Jesus was on the third heaven. This would seem to mean, if Allāh raised Jesus literally to Himself, that Allah is on the third heaven. Unless He sent Jesus lower).

Notably. According to the Bible Elias also returned to earth in the form of John the Baptist –John the Baptist was “in the power and spirit” of Elias (Luke 1:17; Matthew 11:11-14; 17:10-13). (Is John the father of Jesus, see Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix?).

Jesus’ alleged second return is believed to be tied in with the letting loose of Gog and Magog–(Qur’an 18:94 -100; 21:96). But as Muhammad Ali explained, this prophecy of the Gog and Magog has already been fulfilled–(Qur’anic comm. 1523, 1524a, 1525, 1525a). (See Armageddon, Gog & Magog; Jesus-second coming). For a full discussion on Jesus see Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix?).

Regarding Jesus’ dubious return to earth Jehovah’s Witnesses infer in their book Mankind’s Search For God, (p. 353-354) that Jesus came in 1914 though his coming was an “invisible presence;” they wrote:

“In the investigation of God’s Word, those Bible students were keenly interested in the prophecies of the Christian Greek Scriptures related to “the end of the world” and to Christ’s “coming.” (Matthew 24:3, KJ). By turning to the Greek text, they discovered that Christ’s “coming” was, in fact, a ‘pa.rou.si’a,’ or invisible presence. Therefore, Christ had given his disciples information about the evidence of his invisible presence in the time of the end, not a future visible coming. Along with this study, those students had a keen desire to understand the Bible’s chronology in relation to Christ’s presence. Without understanding all the details, Russell (founder of the JW) and his associates realized that 1914 would be a crucial date in human history ….There was a sense of urgency to the activity of those Bible students prior to 1914. They believed that their preaching activity would culminate in that year, and therefore they felt they should expend every effort to help others to know “this good news of the kingdom.””

If Christ came in 1914 he really brought “sword” and “fire” rather than “peace”:
-“Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword;”
-“I am come to send fire on the earth;”
-“Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division”–(Matthew 10:34; Luke 12:49, 51. World War I produced a holocaust of carnage; not to mention World War II, and other wars on to this day. (See Jesus-no peace and joy; Jesus-Prince of peace).

Jesus had no knowledge if he was going to heaven. Jesus says “If I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me”–(John 12:32). For the man who is confident he is going to heaven it is queer Jesus should say “If” I be lifted up instead of ‘after’ I be lifted up or ‘when’ I be lifted up.

Jesus told one of the thieves being crucified: “Verily I say unto thee, TODAY shalt thou be with me in paradise,”–(Luke 23:43). But not only was Jesus not killed/crucified as proven in Jesus-inherited sin to ascension, Jesus did not go to paradise “To day”: at least eight days after his alleged resurrection he was with his disciples–(John 20:26); the Acts said Jesus ascended FORTY DAYS AFTER the “resurrection”–(Acts 1:3, 9).
And according to the Apostle’s Creed, “Jesus Christ…was crucified, died, and BURIED, DESCENDED TO HELL, and on the THIRD DAY rose again from the dead, ascended to the heavens….”–(Ency. Britannica, (1981), Vol. I, p.452).
Thus, Jesus (the Christians’ God and son of God) not only did not know “if” he was going to heaven he did not even know when he will be going. (Poor thief!)

In fact, not only did Jesus not know “if” and “when” he will be going to heaven, but by his own pronouncement seems he was “in danger of hell fire;” he says: “whoever shall say Thou fool shall be in danger of hell fire”–(Matthew 5:22); yet he calls the Jews “fools”–(Matthew 23:17, 19; Luke 24:25).

Jesus says: “I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself”–(John 14:2-3).
Here again, Jesus, like his uncertainty in going to heaven, is not certain “if” he is going to prepare a place for his followers. And as Jesus has not yet returned, all those Christians who died and will die before his alleged return will not get taken.

As to Jesus saying that if he be lifted up that he “will draw all men unto” him. It is clear that in the two thousand years since Jesus is alleged to have gone to heaven and is sitting “on the right hand of God” that he has not drawn “all men” unto him; there are tens of millions of atheists and non-Christians the world over who have died or are still living who do not believe in him, or accept him as God or son of God or vicarious atoner.
This would seem to suggest that, either Jesus did not utter those words or his words are not true or that he was not “lifted up from the earth.”

Jesus also said “Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom’–(Matthew 16:28. Jesus here contradicts himself when he said, “I go to my Father, and ye see me no more”–John 16:10. Why then are Christians scanning the Jerusalem sky for Jesus?)
Unless “Son of man” in the above verse is some other than Jesus, these people would not be able to “see” Jesus if his “coming” would be “invisible.”
Also, Jesus is here speaking to people in his own lifetime –standing “here.” It must be the “miracle of the ages” that for two thousand years since Jesus’ departure these “some standing” people are yet living, waiting for Jesus; and would “see” him though he would be “invisible.”
(The Christian’s Heaven/Paradise is B-O-R-I-N-G, anyway –reading past-time stories and watching the lion eats hay/grass like the cow. This would be a cruel joke on the lion, unless he/it is outfitted with dentures of molars and bicuspids for stripping and grinding hay and his system is redesigned for processing hay instead of raw meat.).

Moreover, apart from Jesus’ uncertainty as to whether he is going to heaven and prepare a place for his followers and coming back. God did not send Jesus to the Black and the White and the Brown and the Yellow and the Red, Jesus was a messenger sent by God wholly and solely Jesus-only for Jews.

In contrast to Jesus’ uncertainty as to whether he is going to heaven and prepare a place for his followers and coming back.
The Prophet Mohammad tells us clearly that Allāh has already prepared Gardens and mansions for us. All we need do is believe in Allāh and do good deeds and Paradise is ours –as easy and simple as that; no uncertain trip to heaven and back and no vague promises.
And the promise of Allāh is ever true–(Qur’an 19:60-61; 31:8-9; 39:20; 61:12). Muslims have assurance of heaven here and now–(Qur’an 4:124; 33:35; 36:56; 41:8; 43:70; 46:15-16; 52:17; 64: 9).
(Please note: when checking Qur’anic references please check a few verses before or after those we have listed. We have used mostly Muhammad Ali’s translation of the Qur’an though some references are taken from a list based on Yusuf Ali’s translation).

Jesus will come again:
ANSWER:
Jesus completed his mission as he declared: “I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do–(John 17:4. And the work God gave Jesus was for him to preach to the Jews. See Jesus-only for Jews).
As Jesus “finished” his work there is no need for him to return. Jesus’ return is the Church’s teaching based on ancient mythology.

In contrast to Jesus’ teaching that he was only a prophet sent to the Jews and that paradise lies in following the Mosaic Law (till the Comforter arrives), Christians tailored Jesus into the suit of Divinity, vicarious atoner; judge, redeemer, renewer of the world; and “mediator between God and man.” Britannica notes:

“David was Israel’s first successful king….
David became the prototype of an awaited Messiah. As symbol of the Messiah, the return of David, or the coming of David’s “son” stood for the reassertion of the divine rule and presence in history: to judge it, to redeem it, to renew it. David thus became the symbol of a fulfilment in the future, final peace.
In the apocalyptic developments in Judaism that mark the last two pre-Christian centuries, the symbolic rule of David stressed his status as divine mediator. The son of David became more emphatically a heavenly figure, the son of God enthroned to rule over the nations of the world. This was the matrix for the rise of Christianity. The new faith interpreted the career of Jesus by means of the titles and functions assigned to David in the mysticism of the Zion cult, in which he served as priest-king and in which he was the mediator between God and man.”⁹

Clearly, Christians cut Jesus to fit David according to their imaginations. Whereas God made David an earthly king, Christians try to make Jesus a heavenly king. And to effect this, Christians consigned Jesus to the bed of celibacy,¹⁰crowned him with Divinity, made him scapegoat for non-existent inherited sin, and consecrated him ruler of the future-world.

Regarding Jesus’ alleged 1000-year reign some time in the future on which Christians “pin their hope” to sit with Jesus. The Book of Revelation, is said to be a vision given to John by Jesus through an angel with the permission of God–(Revelation 1:1). But the Book of revelation is not prophecies about a future coming and rule of Jesus. Encyclopaedia Britannica notes:

“Revelation to John appears to be a collection of separate units composed by unknown authors who lived during the last quarter of the first century, though it purports to have been written by John…..
Although Christ is clearly the central figure of Revelation, an understanding of the text presupposes familiarity with the Old Testament language and concepts, especially those taken from the books of Daniel and Ezekiel
…References to a “thousand years” (ch. 20) have led some to expect that the final victory over evil will come after the completion of some millennium.”¹¹

“One of the most pervading and dominant mythological themes to be noted in the New Testament and the writings of the subapostolic church (late 1st–early 2nd centuries) was that of the ages of the world. Derived from Indo-Iranian (or Indo-European) sources and transformed through Jewish concepts of history, the theme of the ages of the world that most influenced Christianity came from the apocalyptic speculation that flourished during the period of the rise of Christianity.
…It was Iranian mythological concepts of the ages of the world, translated though Jewish apocalyptic views, that most influenced Christian views of time, history, and man’s ultimate destiny.
…The theme of the ages of the world and its attendant subthemes that came primarily from Iranian mythology were transformed by apocalyptic literature––which flourished in Judaism and then Christianity from about the 2nd century BC to about 2nd century AD––into a historical context, though Zoroastrian had done this in reference to the last age. Indo-Iranian myth was thus historicized through the Judeo-Christian view of historical time as the arena of struggle between good and evil. The four ages of the world in Christianity are: (1) from creation of the world and man to the Fall of man; (2) from the Fall of man to the first advent of Christ; (3) from the first to the second advent of Christ, which includes the 1,000-year reign of Christ and his saints and the Last Judgment; and (4) the creation of a new heaven and a new earth in which those who have chosen the good (i.e., Christ) will live in eternity.”¹²

Note well these Christian apocalyptic writings are not Divine revelations. They are Christian inventions that are based on the “mythology” of other people(s). The imageries in the Book of Revelation are either echoes from Old Testament writings or Christian imaginations.
Even if Jesus was to return a million times yet this would not make Jesus God or son of God or one in a Trinity with God or vicarious atoner or that mankind inherited sin from Adam. These doctrines of Christianity are lies, falsehood, and blasphemy.¹³(For Jesus’ alleged return prophesied in the Book Revelation see Jesus-1000-year rule).
While mythology may have its purpose in certain areas of life, the road to God needs no human embellishments or inventions.

In His Qur’an Allāh has given us guidance. Allāh created us to live a term on earth and He furnished us with clear instructions on what is good and what is evil; then we die and are returned to him; followed by the Resurrection and Judgment and our destination to Paradise or Hell according to our belief and deeds.
Mohammad is the only world Prophet! Mohammad having brought “all truth” which will abide with us “forever,” no prophet, old or new, is needed. After Mohammad there is the Resurrection and Judgment!
Equally significant, the Prophet Mohammad is reported to have said in his farewell Sermon on the Mount that after him NO prophet will come.

The Qur’an says Jesus was Messiah etc and performed miracles, ascended and would return, and did not say any such things about Mohammad, thus, Jesus is greater than Mohammad

ANSWER:
Jesus’ miracles, ascension and return have been dealt with above.

Jesus greater than Mohammad:
ANSWER:
If your father gave your brother certain privileges he did not give you, would this make your brother greater than you?
That Jesus was greater than Mohammad:

The greatest man must be certain in knowledge. Whereas Mohammad was certain about his knowledge, that he knows only what Allāh reveals to Him–(Qur’an 6:50; 7:187-188; 21:109).
Jesus was not certain of his knowledge; he says: “no man hath ascended up to heaven”–(John 3:13); yet “Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven”–(2 Kings 2:1, 11); and “Enoch was translated that he should not see death…God had translated him”–(Heb. 11:5; Gen. 5:24). Jesus said “if I be lifted up from the earth”–(John 12:32); if Jesus had knowledge he should have said “after” or “when” I be lifted up. Jesus said no man hath seen God, but many saw God –Jacob (who even wrestled with God), the elders of Israel, and Isaiah–(John 5:37; Gen. 32:24-30; Ex. 24:9-11; Isaiah 6:1-5). Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must be certain of his mission. Mohammad was certain of his mission, to deliver the message of Allāh–(Qur’an 3:19).
Jesus was not certain about his mission. Initially, Jesus says he came only to the Jews, that he prayed only for them–(Matt. 15:24; John 17:9); ordered his disciples not to go to the Gentiles and Samaritans, and viewed non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine”–(Matt. 10:5-6; 7:6; 15:26); and said he finished the work, which was to preach to the Jews–(John 17:4; Luke 4:43). Yet, after the alleged crucifixion he is said to have instructed his disciples to go and “teach all nations”–(Matt. 28: 19). Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.
The greatest man must be aware of his status. Mohammad was aware of his status: he was only the Messenger of Allāh sent to the world–(Qur’an 7:158; 34:28; 48:29).
Jesus was not certain of his status. First, in response to the Jews, Jesus says he will give them a “sign” similar to that of Jonas: as Jonas was (alive) in the whale’s belly for three days and three nights, he would be (alive) in the heart of the earth for three days and three nights–(Matt. 12:39-40; Jonah 1:17; 2:1-10. If Jesus had died, his “sign” would not be as Jonas). Then, Jesus said he will be “betrayed and crucified”–(Matt. 26:2). Yet, after the alleged crucifixion Jesus told his “terrified” disciples he did not die, that he was not a resurrected person and therefore was not spirit: “Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have” –(Luke 24:39). Jesus is clearly saying he was not a spirit, not a resurrected person, but a living human being with “flesh and bones.” Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must demonstrate the highest act of mercy. Mohammad forgave thousands of his captives upon his victory at Makkah; Jesus had no captives to forgive.
Jesus never prayed for the forgiveness of the deceased: he tells people to let their dead bury the dead–(Matt; 8:22). Mohammad not only prayed for the deceased Muslim, but prayed for the idolater; saying: “if I knew that if I asked forgiveness for him more than seventy times, he would be forgiven, I would ask it for more times than that”–(Qur’an 9:84, 113. Bokhari Vol. 6, # 193, 194). Such is the expanse of the mercy and magnanimity of this wonderful man Mohammad. Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.
The greatest man must show the best examples. Mohammad did not curse any tree –barren or fruitful. Mohammad did not fill “swine” (or any other creature) with “devils” and caused their deaths. -Jesus tells others to let the dead bury dead, but he resurrected Lazarus (which is hypocritical)–(Matt. 22:39; John 11:43-44);
-Jesus tells others to love their neighbor, but labels non-Jews “dogs” and “swine” (which is hypocritical)–(Matt. 22: 39; 7:6);
-Jesus enjoins honor to parents, but dishonors his mother (which is hypocritical)–(Matthew 19:19; 12:46-50. Mohammad taught us paradise lies at the feet of mothers);
-Jesus tells others to bless them that curse you, but he cursed a helpless fig tree and ridiculed the Jews as “vipers” and an “evil and adulterous generation” (which is hypocritical)–(Matt. 5:44; Mark 11:12-21; Matt. 12:34, 39);
-Jesus tells others to turn the other cheek but instructs his associates to sell their garments and buy swords (which is hypocritical)–(Matt. 5:39; Luke 22:36); -Jesus tells others to love their enemies and to forgive seventy-times seven, but ordered that his enemies be brought and slain, and that he came not to send peace but a sword (which is hypocritical)–(Matt. 5:44; Luke 19:27; Matt. 10:34);
-Jesus tells others to pray for them that despise you and persecute you, but he upbraided the peoples of Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum for not accepting his miracles and reforming–(Matt, 5:44; 11:20-24); and instead of praying for the Jews, he ridiculed them as “generation of vipers;” “evil and adulterous generation;” as “fools” and “blind guides”–(Matt. 12: 34, 39; 23:16-17, 24);
-Jesus, the Christian’s “God”/son of God, knowing the disastrous effects of alcohol as it thrusted Lot into incest with his daughters, not to mention its detriment to health, made water into wine to increase (and even spread) drunkenness and whatever evil and distresses accompanies it–(John 2:1-11).
Conversely, Mohammad taught the idolatrous Arab, and the world; forgave his enemies, agonized over their disbelief and prayed for the rejecters of God–(Qur’an 18:6; 9:84; 113-114; Bokhari Vol. 6; # 194, 197); admonished us against, and abstained from, intoxicants; and his impeccable conduct earned him the coveted title al-Amin–the Truthful. Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must teach the best social, moral and spiritual precepts.
While Jesus, as prophet of God, is expected to give moral teachings many, as the Bible teaches, lose their luster when viewed through the luminous lens of logic.
Christians are not allowed to seek justice or retaliate: Christ says, “resist not evil;” give the other cheek; give the plaintiff our cloak along with our coat in settlement, go an extra mile with the compeller (though he booted his compellers out the Temple–(Matthew 5:39-41. No intelligent woman (or man) would give her daughter to be violated after she was; or give hidden fortune to a thief, or give more to the plaintiff than is due; or allow herself to be pummeled if she has a means of defense).
And if one is to “resist not evil,” give the other cheek, go with the compeller, and give more to the plaintiff in all situations and under all conditions, then the Allies of World War II should have let Hitler become Emperor of Europe; Britain should not have sailed halfway around the globe to unseat Argentina from the Falklands Island but should have thrown in England or Scotland along to the Argentines; and America should have let the 9/11 attackers have a blast all over the U.S. Contrast this to Mohammad who taught through the Qur’an that there are times to give the other cheek and times to take an eye in return.
Jesus advises: “Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison”–(Matthew 5:25. Wonder what Nelson Mandela, modern anti-Apartheid icon, would say about this dictum: he may have saved himself thirty years jail; and his brother-in-cause, Steve Biko, may be alive; and South Africa may still be in “prison”–Apartheid).
So, for fear of imprisonment, a Christian must agree to frame an innocent man for murder and send him to the gallows. The Christian nations that acquiesced to or supported German invasion were only following Jesus’ precept to “agree” with their “adversary.” And Christian individuals who handed Jews over to the Germans should be honored for obeying Jesus to “agree” with their adversary. (Perhaps this is why the Vatican was silent during Hitler’s reign, for fear of violating Jesus’ decree to agree with the adversary. As noted, Jesus taught to bring his enemies who did not want him to rule and slay them, and that he who is not with him is against him; perhaps these also are reasons why the Vatican was silent when “Christian” Europe was being purged of Jewish presence).
In contrast, Mohammad/Allāh requires us to give justice even it be against one-self or parents, to aid not in sin and aggression, nor let hatred incite us to transgress–(Qur’an 4:135; 5:3).
Jesus taught his followers, as the birds and the lilies and grass do not toil yet they survive as God takes care of them, so: “Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on…for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you”–(Matthew 6:25-34). Whereas God does provide for the birds and the lilies and the grass (and whereas the lilies and grass have no mobility and if water is not given to them they will die) the worm and berries do not go to the bird: the bird has to take flight and even battle other birds for the worm and berries.
By telling man to pray only and leaving it all to God to send him groceries through hand-outs, the Christian’s “God”/son of God is teaching man to be loafers and mendicants.
Contrast the Christian’s “God”/son of God with the exhortations of Allāh and His noble Messenger, Mohammad: Allāh tells us everything in the heavens and the earth were created for our benefit and urges us to seek knowledge to put them to our service; and after we finish offering our prayers to go into the land and seek of His bounties. And His magnanimous Messenger informs us we have a duty to Allāh, ourselves, families, and community. Earning bread honestly is a part of righteousness.
Jesus says the “meek” shall inherit the earth (meek, may also be atheists; though it seems odd atheists should inherit the earth); and, “Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” So if you are not “meek,” and righteous but not “persecuted” you get nothing–(Matthew 5:5, 10).
Contrastingly, Mohammad taught us that the “meek” as well as the rich and poor who believe in Allāh and do good works shall inherit the “kingdom of heaven.” Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.
The greatest man must not be partial. Instead of teaching non-Jews, Jesus refers to them as “dogs” and “swine;”–(Matt. 7:6; 15:26); here we have the Christians’ “God” branding His own creation, who had no say in their race and not charged with a sin, as “dogs” and “swine;” and the Christians’ son of God labeling his Father’s creation “dogs” and “swine.”
Whereas, Mohammad taught even the idolatrous and announced that he is the universal Messenger of God–(Qur’an 9:6; 7:158; 21:107; 34:28). Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must have done the most for the down-trodden –Woman, Slave, and Orphan.
The Biblical Jesus spent his ministry performing miracles, teaching his followers to be fishers of men, and doling out absurd teachings. (As noted above under precepts).
The Jewish Law (which Jesus followed) that puts Woman under the rulership of her husband and relegates her daughter into servitude was “unfavorable” to her. Christianity sunk her deeper into the pit of hopelessness: its doctrine of inherited sin and Woman is the transgressor saw her “as an evil but necessary appendage, and she received the worst treatment of all from Christianity.” (See Christianity-women).
In contrast Mohammad/Islam liberated woman and gives her rights alongside man from birth to Paradise. (See Islam-women). Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must give “all truth.” Jesus admittedly did not give “all truth.”Mohammad did. (The world is still waiting to hear “all truth” from the Holy Ghost.). Thus, Jesus was not the greatest man. Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must bring the “everlasting gospel”. Jesus did not bring this Gospel.
Mohammad brought the “everlasting gospel” –the Qur’an, which contains “all truth” that are needed for our moral, social, intellectual and spiritual upliftment.
As the everlasting Gospel was yet to come the Bible and Jesus could not be the last Book or last man to come; neither could Jesus be the only way and truth to God: this last Book (Qur’an) which has “all truth” and this last man (Mohammad) that brought it are the only way and truth to God. (There is no wisdom in following a man, Jesus, who did not bring “all truth”). Moreover, as the everlasting Gospel came, the Bible is now rendered OBSOLETE and Jesus REDUNDANT. (See Bible corrupt & obsolete; Jesus-redundant no ransom). Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

The greatest man must be sinless¹⁴Allāh says if we love Him we must follow Mohammad–(Qur’an 3:30), and Whoever obeys the Messenger obeys Allāh–(4:80): Allāh would not have man follow a sinner. The Prophet purified others of sin–(2:129, 151; 3:163; 9:103; 62:2. Jesus also says to follow Mohammad/Comforter). As prophets speak and act only according to Allāh’s command they could not have sinned–(21:27).
Whereas Mohammad was sinless, according to the Bible, Jesus, the Christians’ God and son of God, sinned:
-Jesus loaded swine with devils causing them to drown and owners to suffer loss of property–(Matt. 8:28-33. Mark 5:13);
-Jesus ordered the slaughter of even the “ox” and “ass” of the Hittites etc; so that Jews could occupy their lands–(Deuteronomy 7:1-2. Josh 10:40; 12:6); and inspiring Samson to incinerate “three hundred foxes”–(Judge. 15:4).
The Christians’ God, Jesus, committed the sin of hypocrisy:
-Jesus says leave the dead to bury the dead, but he resurrected Lazarus and the widow’s son–(Matt. 8:22; John 11:43-44; Luke 7:12-15);
-Jesus says bless them that curse you, but he cursed a helpless fig tree; it is a sin to curse a thing that has no control over itself–(Matt. 5:44; Mark 11:12-21);
-Jesus says love your enemies and forgive seventy times seven, but he ordered his enemies be slain–(Matt. 5:44; 18:22; Luke 19:27);
-Jesus says love your neighbor, but he labels people “dogs” and “swine”–(Matt. 22: 39; 7:6);
-Jesus says honor parents, but he disowns his mother, which is not only hypocrisy but sin–(Matt. 19:19; 12:46-50. Mary could not have been guilty of neglecting God so that Jesus should dishonor her; Mary was chosen over all women because she was “highly favoured” by God, and “blessed”–(Luke 1:28);
-Jesus says give the other cheek but commanded his followers to sell their garments and buy swords–(Matt. 5:39; Luke 22:36);
-Jesus says go another mile with your compeller, but he boots the bird-sellers and money-changers out of the temple–(Matthew 5:41; 21:12);
-Jesus told his disciples he sends them “as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves,” but he took off for Ephraim when he found out the “wolves” were plotting to kill him (though he had power to lay down his life and take it up again)–(Matthew 10:16. John 11:53-54).
-The Christians’ God, Jesus, also lied/deceived, telling his followers: “Go ye up unto this feast, for my time is not yet full come,” “But when his brethren were gone up, then went he also up unto the feast, not openly, but as it were in secret”–(John 7:8-10. Jesus could not have changed his mind. As “God,” he would be Omniscient and would know when he would be going).
Contrast this Jesus to Mohammad who was not only al-Amin –the truthful– he used his resources to free slaves; preached and build a community in the day and spent half his night in worship of God; and preached clearly giving mercy and forgiveness equally to all. If anyone needed to be forgiven of sin it is not Mohammad. Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.
The greatest man must have the most numerous life’s experiences:
-Mohammad was a husband and father; Jesus was not (as far as the Gospels tell us).
-Mohammad was a businessman; Jesus was not.
-Mohammad was a soldier and general; Jesus was not.
-Mohammad was a ruler and statesman; Jesus was not.
-Mohammad was a diplomat; Jesus was not.
-Mohammad was a conqueror; Jesus was not.
-Mohammad was a judge and administrator; Jesus was not.
-Mohammad was a “mercy” (forgiving his inveterate enemies of twenty years upon his triumph over them at Makkah), Jesus was not (Jesus had no captives nor was he in a position to forgive others; praying for the forgiveness of others or asking God to forgive them is not the same as one actually forgiving his captives) (For more see Jesus-not the greatest). See also Jesus or Mohammad-best system). Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

What description did Jesus give about Heaven/Paradise? None!
We have to ask Mohammad. (All Jesus said was that there are many mansions in his Father’s house: John 14:2. And as shown above Jesus did know where he was going).
What description did Jesus give about Hell? None!
We have to ask Mohammad. (All Jesus said was that Hell was an “everlasting fire” that “never shall be quenched” in which there will be “wailing and gnashing of teeth”: Matt. 18:8; Mark 9:43; Matt. 13:42. Though Islam teaches that Hell is not forever –it is proportional to the degree of one’s sin: Qur’an 11:107; 78:21-26. See Muhammad Ali comm. on these verses).
What did Jesus say about: the origin of life? Nothing!
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 21:30).

What did Jesus say about sperm and conception? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 22:5; 23:12-14).
What did Jesus say about the fetus and its development in the womb? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 22:5; 39:6).
What did Jesus say about women’s menstruation? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad-(Qur’an 2:222).
What did Jesus say about adoption? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 33:4-5; Bokhari Vol. 5, #335).
What did Jesus say about child custody? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 2:233; Abu Dawud Vol. 2, #2269-2270).
What did Jesus say about intoxicants and gambling? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 2:219; 5:90).
What did Jesus say about man being created into different tribes, colors and languages? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 30:22; 49:13).
What did Jesus say about how milk is produced in cattle? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 16:66).
What did Jesus say about bees making honey? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–Qur’an 16:68-69).
What did Jesus say about the sun and moon and orbits? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad.-(Qur’an 21:33; 36:40).
What did Jesus say about the moon’s light? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 10:5; 25:61; 71:16).
What did Jesus say about particles smaller than atom? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 10:61).
What did Jesus say about the formation of rain clouds? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 30:48; 35:9).
What did Jesus say about the formation of the universe? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 41:11).
What did Jesus say about the mountains stabilizing the earth? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 16:15; 31:10).
What did Jesus say about salt and sweet water? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 25:53; 55:19-20).
What did Jesus say about the expansion of the universe? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 51:47).
What did Jesus say about space travels? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 15:14-15; 55:33).
What did Jesus say about there being more than one world? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 1:1; 56:77-80).
What did Jesus say about the existence of living-beings on other planets? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 19:93-95; 42:29).
What scientific signs did Jesus foretell at the approaching doomsday? None.
We have to ask Mohammad –the Sun will fold up–(Qur’an 81:1); Stars will fall, become dust-colored (lose light)–(Qur’an 81:2); The heaven will look like molten copper; red hide–(Qur’an 70:6-8; 55:37); Ocean will boil–(Qur’an 81:6; 82:3); The Sun and Moon will join together–(Qur’an 75:8-9). (See Qur’an-science). (All Jesus spoke about was wars and famine; and there were wars and famine long before Jesus was born; and he taught absurd doctrines).
What did Jesus say about the months? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 9:36).
What did Jesus say about the sun and moon and the computation of time? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 2:189; 6:96; 10:5).
What did Jesus say about the stars and guidance? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(Qur’an 6:97).
What did Jesus say about diseases and their cures? Nothing.
We have to ask Mohammad–(For several cures taught by the Prophet see Bokhari, Vol. 7).
For matters in all facets of life we have to ask the Comforter who guided us into “all truth”– Mohammad. Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

Mohammad brought the “everlasting gospel” –the Qur’an, which contains “all truth” that are needed for our moral, social, intellectual and spiritual upliftment.
As the everlasting Gospel was yet to come the Bible and Jesus could not be the last Book or last man to come; neither could Jesus be the only way and truth to God.
This last Book (Qur’an) which has “all truth” and this last man (Mohammad) that brought it are the only way and truth to God. (There is no wisdom in following a man, Jesus, who did not bring “all truth”).
Moreover, as the everlasting Gospel came, the Bible is now obsolete and Jesus redundant. Thus, Jesus was not greater than Mohammad.

Jesus was Messiah, and performed miracles (by the power of God, don’t forget; and others, as well as things, performed Miracles); but Jesus was in no way superior to Mohammad.
While Jesus, like other prophets, was righteous and honorable, the greatest man who walked the earth and in all facets of life is MOHAMMAD. (For more on Jesus and Mohammad see Jesus or Mohammad-greatest, Pastor Dr. James Mc Donald

(Bearing in mind that the Qur’an says Jesus is “word” of God). Since word is not creator and not creation, that is why Christians say the word is son of God

ANSWER:
This is what Christians say; what does God say?
And God has a legion of sons and daughters. David is even “begotten” son of God. And Jesus is only CALLED son of God. (Jesus mostly spoke in metaphors. Christians toss Jesus’ literal sayings into the trash basket and take his figurative expressions literally to substantiate their belief that Jesus is God).

As noted, everything in creation is a “word” of Allāh, thus according to Christian logic a baboon also is “son of God.”

The Christian doctrine of Trinity says that Godhead consists of God (father) Son (Jesus) and Holy Ghost. How could Jesus be Son of God before God spoke?
As Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– points out in his revealing book Muhummed In The Bible, p. 15:
“The Christians….make the Creator a divine father and His word a divine son; and also, because He breathed life into His creatures, He is surnamed a divine Spirit, forgetting that logically, He could not be father before creation, nor “son” before He spoke, and neither “Holy Ghost” before He gave life.” (Color added).

Significantly, as shown in item #4 under “Mary a virgin,” the verse of the Bible alluding to Trinity has been junked from the Bible. So much for Christian’s claim that the Bible is “all’ word of God.

Also, it is intriguing that if Jesus is son of God that he would command his disciples to not tell anyone. After Peter replied to Jesus that he was “the Christ, the son of the living God,” Jesus commended his disciples, “to tell no man that thing”-(Matthew 16:13-20; Luke 9:18-21).

Rather than being son of God Jesus was merely a human. A Jew. And a black man/Jew at that. That Biblical Jews, and Jesus, were black or dark-skinned see Jesus-seen in dreams; http://www.angelfire.com/ill/hebrewisrael/ printpages/phys.html.

Since God can see without eyes, hear without ears and Since Allāh can hear without ears, talk without tongue and hear without ears therefore God can have a child without a wife.

ANSWER:
Allāh seeing, hearing and speaking without organs could not be equated with Him having a son in the Christian sense as Christians claim Jesus is “begotten” son of God; and to beget (fatherhood) necessitates the animal function of sex; and as Allāh has no consort how rightly then Allāh says: “How could he have a son when He has no consort?”
In fact Allāh has condemned this Christian blasphemy in the strongest terms:

“And they say: The Beneficent has taken to Himself a son. Certainly you make an abominable assertion! The heavens may almost be rent thereat, and the earth cleave asunder, and the mountains fall down in pieces, That they ascribe a son to the Beneficent!
And it is not worthy of the Beneficent that He should take to Himself a son. There is none in the heavens and the earth but comes to the Beneficent as a servant”–(Qur’an 19:88-94).
“They say: Allāh has taken a son (to Himself). Glory be to Him! He is the Self-sufficient. His is what is in the heavens and what is in the earth. You have no authority for this. Say you against Allāh what you know not? Say: Those who forge a lie against Allāh will not succeed”–(Qur’an 10:68-69).

Qur’an says Jesus is alive and Mohammad is no more. Chapter 10 verse 94 of the Qur’an which says, “If you have any doubt in this Qur’an which I give you, go and read the Bible or ask the people, those who read the Bible. The truth is already revealed in that” says to follow Jesus/Christianity. thus. it is Allāh who converts him to Christianity.

ANSWER:
This verse needs to be read in its context, from verse 93 to 95, which we will show shortly.

By following Mohammad one is already following Jesus. As both Jesus and Mohammad taught that Jesus was a messenger sent only for Jews; that eternal life lies in following the Ten Commandments until the arrival of the Comforter/Ahmad who will guide into “all truth” and will “abide for ever.”
(As shown on this site, Jesus as God, “begotten” Son of God; Trinity and inherited sin and vicarious atonement are NOT Divine revelations or taught by Jesus. These doctrines by the Church/Christians are ASSUMED. And heaven lies in following clearly defined Divine injunctions NOT in following human assumptions and conjectures).

It is preposterous to claim:

that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh says the Qur’an is the best message
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh declares Trinity and Divinity of Jesus as blasphemy
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh denies inherited sin and vicarious atonement
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh rejects the Christian belief of son of God as a heinous assertion
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh has rejected the doctrine of Mariolatry (worship of Mary, the Christian’s “Mother of God”).
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh revealed that the Christian son of God belief is paganism–(see Christianity is Paganism).
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that the Church/Christianity is antiChrist
that Allāh/Qur’an directs one to follow the Bible and converts to Christianity seeing that Allāh says that only Islam is acceptable to Him.

In fact, given that Jesus taught he was only for Jews and that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law until the arrival of the Comforter/Mohammad –all of which are echoed in the Qur’an– Christians would not be following and preaching Trinity, Godhood of Jesus, “begotten” Son of God, inherited sin and vicarious atonement, which are anathema to Jesus and God; the apostate would be following and preaching Islam.
Moreover, no religion can be shown to be superior to, or equal with, Islam. Islam is superior to all other religions.

Regarding the claim that chapter 10 verse 94 of the Qur’an: “If you have any doubt in this Qur’an which I give you, go and read the Bible or ask the people, those who read the Bible. The truth is already revealed in that” says to follow Jesus/Christianity. As stated, to understand the meaning of this verse reading from verse 93-95 is required. Here are the three verses:

(verse 93) “And certainly We lodged the Children of Israel in a goodly abode and provided them with good things. Then they differed not till the knowledge came to them. Surely thy Lord will judge between them on the day of Resurrection concerning that in which they differed.” (This verse speaks about the early Israelites/Jews who were given the Holy Land).

(verse 94) “But if thou art in doubt as to that which We have revealed to thee, ask those who read the Book before thee. Certainly the Truth has come to thee from thy Lord, so be not thou of the doubters.” In this verse Allāh is telling the Israelites/Jews who lived in Arabia that if they doubt the Qur’an for them to ask their older generation “those who read the Book before thee.” (The Prophet was never “in doubt” as to what was revealed to him). The ending words of the verse, Certainly the Truth has come to thee from thy Lord, so be not thou of the doubters” clearly shows that the Qur’an is to be followed. This alone obliterates the apostate’s claim that Allāh/Qur’an “converted” him to Christianity. The next verse makes the matter even clearer:

(verse 95) “And be not of those who reject the messages of Allåh, (for) then thou wilt be of the losers.” This verse needs no comment to belie the apostate’s claim that Allāh/Qur’an “converted” him to Christianity.
How then does the Qur’an says to follow Christianity?

It may be added here that in doubting the Qur’an the Jews were doubting the Divine Messengership of Mohammad. Though they know that Mohammad’s advent –as the Shiloh, and prophet like Moses; and Jesus mentioned him as Comforter– was foretold in the Bible. As Allāh pointed out

“Those whom We have given the Book recognize him (Mohammad) as they recognize their sons. And a party of them surely conceal the truth while they know”–(Qur’an 2:146)
“And surely this (Qur’an) is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds. The Faithful Spirit has brought it. On thy (Mohammad’s) heart that thou mayest be a warner, In plain Arabic language. And surely the same (Qur’an) is in the Scriptures of the ancients. Is it not a sign to them that the learned men of the Children of Israel know it?–(Qur’an 26:192-197)
(For prophecies about the Prophet Mohammad’s advent in the Bible that the Jews knew about see Judaism).

There is another proof that belies the claim that Allāh/Qur’an says to follow Jesus/Christianity.
As noted in item 5,(ii), it is claimed that “Jesus is spirit of God.”
And as we have shown, the Spirit brought the Qur’an to the Prophet Mohammad. And as Christian say Godhead is made up Father, Son and Holy Ghost/Spirt, Then Jesus (as the Spirit) is the one who gave the Qur’an to Mohammad.
And in the Qur’an this “Jesus/spirit” rejects Divinity of Jesus, Mariolatry, Divine sonship, inherited sin and vicarious atonement and says the Qur’an is the Best message.
Thus for “Jesus/spirit” to turn around and tell one to go back and follow these doctrines and the Bible which he (as spirit/“God”) says has been adulterated, and in which he declared that he is redundant, this Christian’s Jesus/spirit/God seems to have been suffering from “serious mental health issues” (see Critic on Mohammad’s sex life; women; Qur’an, item #3). (Please note: this is not to denigrate Jesus. It is only a comment on Christian’s claim and false belief).

In his translation of the Qur’an Muhammad Ali has explained Arabic words/terms and has given a background to verses and explanations from Islamic, Biblical and historical sources. His translation of the Qur’an cane be viewed/downloaded at: www.muslim. org. Educate yourselves When you follow others blindly you make them your “god.” Allāh God reveals:

“They (Christians) take their doctors of law and their monks for lords besides Allāh, and (also) the Messiah, son of Mary. And they were enjoined that they should serve one God only — there is no god but He. Be He glorified from what they set up (with Him)!–(Qur’an 9:31, 34).
To which Muhammad Ali notes:

“It is related in a hadith that, when this verse was revealed, ‘Adi ibn Hatim, a convert from Christianity, asked the Holy Prophet as to the significance of this verse, for, he said, we did not worship our doctors of law and monks.
The Holy Prophet’s reply was: Was it not that the people considered lawful what their priests declared to be lawful, though it was forbidden by God.
Hatim replied in the affirmative. That, the Prophet said, was what the verse meant (Tirmidhi, 44:9; IJ).
Muslims who accord a similar position to their pirs or saints are guilty of the same error.”

Do not be like Christians who make their leaders “gods,” considering as “lawful’ Trinity, Divinity of Jesus, “begotten” Sonship of God, inherited sin and vicarious atonement.
Blind faith and human inventions Are no passport to Paradise!

John 1:1 says Jesus is word of God, Qur’an says Jesus is word of God and Bible says Jesus is word of God, Thus both Quran and Bible is the same.

ANSWER:
The Gospel of John 1:1-5 says: “In the beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” (There is NO mention of the third party of the Trinity, the “Holy Ghost”).
This verse of John does NOT say Jesus is word of God, this is assumed. “Word” could very well have been Satan before his fall or Solomon who in the Book of Proverbs, which he, Solomon wrote:
“The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his works of old. I was set up from EVERLASTING, from the BEGINNING, or ever the earth was. When there were no depths, I WAS BROUGHT FORTH, when there were no fountains abounding with water. BEFORE the mountains…the hills…nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world. When he prepared the heavens I WAS THERE…For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the Lord”–(Proverbs 8:22-35).

To restate John 1:1: “In the beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
That the Word was “with God” and the Word “was God” is the same as saying God was with God. The word could not be with God and yet be God. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din notes:

“The term word, used in St. John, which stands for the Greek word Logos, is an in-adequate rendering. In all his writings Philo speaks of Logos,–a philosophic conception of later growth and a development of the “Idea of Plato,” in his theory of Emanation. It does not mean Word; it conveys “Thought as well as expression.” Plato, when dealing with the subject, spoke of something –as the first thing in creation that may be styled “Reason or Wisdom”– the first product of Herbert Spencer’s “First Intelligent Cause.”
Notably, Philo “lived and wrote all this one hundred years before the writers, whosoever they may be, of that Gospel.” (The Sources of Christianity, pp. 76-77).

Jesus made it crystal clear he is not God: “Why callest thou me good? there is NONE good but one, that is GOD”–(Matt. 19:17; Mark 10:18). Jesus not only denies he is God, he denies he is good.

-If Jesus was God, then, as noted, God would need to eat “Butter and honey” in order to know to choose in order to “know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”–(Isaiah 7:14-15)
-If the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one, Elisabeth could not be filled with the Holy Ghost as the Holy Ghost was in Mary’s womb, and was also with Zaccharias–(Luke 1:41-43, 67).

-If Jesus was God “All power” could not be “given” to him–(Matt. 28:18. God gave Himself “all power”?). As “all power” was “given” to him, “all power” can be taken from him. And no one can “give” or “take” power from God; be it some or “all.”
-If Jesus is God, man would do greater works than God–(John 14:12).

-If Jesus was God, God would have ascended to himself: “I ascend to…my God, and your God”–(John 20:17).
-If Jesus was God, God would have led himself into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil–(Matthew 4:1).
-If Jesus was God, God would have sent himself to the Jews–(John 6:38; 17:3).

-If Jesus was God, God would have prayed to himself; “forsaken” himself on the cross; thanked himself; heard himself; and worshipped himself–(Matt; 26:39; 27:46; Luke 10:21; John 11: 41; 4:22).
-If Jesus was God he could NOT have heard the truth from God: “But now you seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, WHICH I HAVE HEARD OF GOD”–(John 8:40).

-If Jesus was God, God would have known that fig was not in season–(Mark 11:12-13).
-If Jesus was God, God would have known the day and hour of future events–(Mark 13:32).
-If Jesus was God, God would have known the identity of the woman “having an issue of blood” who touched his garment–(Luke 8:43-46).

-If Jesus was God, God would have known that Elijah and Enoch ascended to heaven–(John 3:13; 2 Kings 2:1, 11; Hebrews 11:5).
-If Jesus was God, God would have been able to do things of himself–(John 5:30).
-If Jesus was God, the pure (and impure) have already seen God–(Matt. 5:8).

-If Jesus was God, God was made into a “curse”–(Galatians 3:13; Deuteronomy 21:23).
-If Jesus was God he would have the attributes of God, such as “Omniscience” and “Omnipotence” and Omnipresence which he clearly had not.
-If Jesus was God he would not have said it was GOD who made male and female; he would have said “I” made them: “But from the beginning of the creation GOD made them male and female”–(Mark 10:6).

-God said that Jesus is His son–(Matt. 3:17; Heb. 5:5), Jesus could not be God; a person cannot be both himself and his son.
-If the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one person, then Jesus cannot give the Holy Ghost to his disciples–(John 20:22).
-Father, Son, and Holy Ghost could not be one when the son, Jesus, did only what God instructed him to do–(John 5:30-31; 6:38; 17:4; Matt. 15:24). (The instructed is not synonymous with the instructor).

-Jesus could not be God when he was subjected to God–(1 Cor. 15: 27-28).
-Jesus was NOT Emmanuel, he was only NAMED Emmanuel–(Matt. 1:23).
-Jesus cannot be God, for Jesus was on LAND, and the Spirit DESCENDED on him, and (God’s) voice came from HEAVEN–(Matt. 3:16-17).

-John 1:1 says “the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” But the “Word” could not be WITH God and still be God.
-If the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one, when the Son was killed all three of them died; and as all three died, Jesus could not have been resurrected because the dead cannot resurrect itself. Since all three died the universe is without a God (?).
-If Jesus is God, God is sitting on his own right hand–(Mark 16:19).

-If Jesus was God because “All power” is given to him and he was “worshipped” by the two Mary’s and by his eleven disciples though “some doubted” him–(Matt.28:18, 9, 17), then Pharaoh and the idols and items of nature worshipped in olden times by the tens of thousands of pagans –if not millions through the ages, as compared to the few who worshipped Jesus– Pharaoh and these idols and items, according to Christian logic, must also be “Gods.” And these idols and items were not given any “power” yet they drew such lofty honor as to be worshipped.

This Christian’s “God” must have fickle-minded worshippers that “some doubted” him and “all forsook him and fled”–(Mark 14:50). But Jesus told the devil only God is to be worshipped and served: he did not say “I” am to be worshipped and served–(Matthew 4:10).

To restate: Jesus made it clear that he is not God when he says (Matt. 19:17; Mark 10:18): “Why callest thou me good? there is NONE good but one, that is GOD.” Jesus not only denies that he is God, he also denies that he is good.

As noted “word” of Allāh God is not restricted to Jesus. Jesus as “word” means “promise,” as Allāh had promised Mary to give her a son–(Qur’an 3:45; Luke 1:26-32).
Everything in creation is a “word” of Allāh God. But Christians have attached an unGodly connotation to this “Word” of God; they make “word” into God and Son of God and as Holy Ghost (Trinity).
Encyclopaedia Britannica notes:

“Trinity, the doctrine of God taught by Christianity that asserts that God is one in essence but three in “person,” Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Sheema of the Old Testament: “Hear. O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deut. 6:4). The earliest Christians, however, had to cope with the implications of the coming of Jesus Christ and of the presence and power of God among them –i.e. the Holy spirit whose coming was connected with the celebration of the Pentecost. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were associated in such New Testament passages as the Great Commission: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19) and in the apostolic benediction: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all” (II Cor. 13:14). Thus, the New Testament established the basis for the doctrine of Trinity.

The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies. Initially, both the requirements of monotheism inherited from the Old Testament and the implications of the need to interpret the biblical teaching to Greco-Roman paganism seemed to demand that the divine in Christ as the Word, or Logos, be interpreted as subordinate to the Supreme Being. An alternative solution was to interpret Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three modes of the self-dis-closure of the one God but not as distinct within the being of God itself. The first tendency recognized the distinctness among the three, but at the cost of their equality and hence of their unity (subordinationism); the second came to terms with their unity, but at the cost of their distinctness as “persons” (modalism). It was not until the 4th. century that the distinctness of the three and their unity were brought together in a single orthodox doctrine of one essence and three persons.

The Council of Nicaea in 325 stated the crucial formula for that doctrine in its confession that the Son is “of the same essence [homoousios] as the Father,” even though it said very little about the Holy Spirit. Over the next half century, Athanasius defended and refined the Nicene formula, and, by the end of the 4th. Century, under the leadership of Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus (the Cappadocian Fathers) the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since.”–(Vol. X, art; Trinity, p. 126. Emphasis added.

Understand now why two thousand years after Christ Christians are wandering in “darkness and misunderstanding” and confusion as to who Jesus is and his mission?
Christians try to explain the non-existent.

No wonder Jews in 1400’s Vienna chose to be roasted in the Christian inferno than desecrate their Holy Sheema and kiss the useless and unGodly crucifix.–(In Vienna, “hundreds of Jews were burned alive in 1421 for refusing to convert to Christianity.”¹⁵For all their “rebellion” and “stiffnecked(ness),” for all their hypocrisy and straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel, as Jesus needled them–(Matthew 23:23-24), Allāh God must be well-pleased with these Viennese Jews for staying true to, and not violate, the sanctity of His Godhead and justice.

John 1:12 says that if anyone accepts Jesus, Jesus will give them power to become children of God.
In all the verses of Qur’an Allāh calls human beings slaves and Allāh is Master. Master cannot love slave, slave cannot love master.
As Jesus referred to God in Aramaic as “Father,” God is the Christian’s “daddy,”

ANSWER:
So Jesus regards those who believe in him as children of God. What does Jesus regard those who do not accept him –“dogs” and “swine,” isn’t this worse than being called “slaves.”

The Arabic word ‘abd means slave or servant depending on its application. Muslims are not slaves of Allah God. A servant has the choice of leaving the employ of his master, but a slave does not have this choice.
Allah created us, shows us the path of evil and righteousness and gives us the choice to mould our destiny.
Commentators on the Qur’an are incorrect in using “slave(s)” for Muslims in their translations.
Islam abolished slavery. See Islam-slaves/slavery.

Also, Allah does not require Muslims to beg Him for a thing We are to ask Him: “and ask protection for…”–(Qur’an 40:55; 47:19); and to pray to Him: “and say: My Lord…” –(Qur’an 17:24, 80; 18:24; 20:114; 40:60).

That Master cannot love slave, slave cannot love master.
But Muslims “Master,’ Allāh God, loves us as He reveals in His Qur’an:
-Allāh bestows Love on the righteous; 19:96;
-Allah cast Love over Moses, 20:39;
-Allāh is full of Loving-kindness; 85:14;
-Allāh is Merciful, Loving-kind; 11:90;
-Allāh Loves; 2:195, 222; 3:76, 134, 146, 148, 159; 5:14, 45, 96; 9:4,7, 108; 49:10; 60:8: 61:4;
-Allāh Loves those who fight in His cause, 61:4;
-Allah puts Love and mercy between men and women, 30:21;
-If you do Love Allah, follow me, Allah will Love you/forgive your sins, 3:31;
-It may be that Allah may grant Love between you and your enemies, 60:7.

The most profound expression of Allāh’s “love” and compassion as expressed in His Qur’an (39:53) is not to be met with in any other Book that claims to be from God:
“Say, O My servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allāh; surely Allāh forgives all sins. Verily, He is Most Forgiving, Ever Merciful.”
Imagine the expanse of love and mercy and compassion of Allāh Who needs nothing from us to implore us in such loving compassionate terms to forgive us our sins. And without need for some “satisfaction;” least of all, human blood.

Allāh as “Master” does not mean a master-slave relationship as in human relations. What it means is that Allāh being the Creator, Controller and Disposer of all affairs, He has to confer with no one. He is the Absolute in Power. Regardless of one’s righteousness, if Allāh should consign him/her to hell who is there that can intercede or oppose Him? No one!

The Christian may call God father/daddy and regard himself as child/son of God. But here is what his Bible says:

Jesus says in Matthew 6:24: “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon.” Clearly God is “master.”
“Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ”–(Matthew 23:10). Clearly, Christ is “master.”
Jesus did not rebuke Judas for calling him Master–(Matthew 26:25
Jesus did not rebuke Peter for calling him Master–(Mark 9:5; Luke 9:33).
Jesus did not rebuke a lawyer for calling him Master–(Luke 10:25)
Jesus did not rebuke the person for calling him “Good Master” (he only rebuked him for calling him good”)–(Matthew 19:16-17).
Jesus was commonly known and addressed as “Master”–(John 11:28).
And Jesus not only requires that he be called “Master” but “Lord” as well. After washing his disciple’s feet, Jesus said to them: “Ye call me Master and Lord: and ye say well; for so I am. If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another’s feet”–(John 13:12-14. That Jesus washed their feet is irrelevant, the point is Jesus was “Master”).
Paul refers to God as ‘master”: “Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal; knowing that ye also have a master in heaven”–(Colossians 4:1. Notably, Paul did not regard Jesus as God).

In the Bible God refers to the Israelite as servants: “For unto me the Children are servants; they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt; I am the Lord your God”–(Leviticus 25:55)
And the Bible sanctions slavery, and even allows enslaving of one’s own children:

“Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy bondmen and bond maid. Moreover, of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And ye shall take them as AN INHERITANCE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AFTER YOU, TO INHERIT THEM FOR A POSSESSION; THEY SHALL BE YOUR BONDMEN FOREVER”–(Leviticus 25:44-46)
“If a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants”–(Exodus 21:7; Nehemiah 5:5).
“I will sell your sons and your daughters into the hand of the children of Judah, and they shall sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off: for the LORD hath spoken (and you say Jesus is Lord/God this is what Jesus will do; your God, JESUS, DEALS IN SLAVERY: a SLAVE TRADER–(Joel 3:8).
(Regarding this slavery in the Bible one Christian apologist tried to deny it by saying that selling a person is grounds for execution and he quotes Exodus 21:6 which says: “He who kidnaps a man, whether he sells him or he is found in his possession, shall surely be put to death” (his reference).
This is Christian crockery. The verse clearly shows this is about “kidnapping” whereas the injunction from God is not about kidnapping and possession and trying to sell a person).

And Paul recognizes the legality of this baneful institution (which Christ had nothing to say about) as he enjoined kind treatment to slaves:

“Servants, be OBEDIENT to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with FEAR AND TREMBLING, in singleness of your heart, AS UNTO CHRIST ”
“Servants OBEY IN ALL THINGS your masters, according to the flesh, not with eye-service, as menpleasers; but in singleness of heart, fearing God”–(Ephesians 6:5; Colossians 3:22; 1 Timothy 6:1; Titus 2:9; 1 Peter 2:18. Note well: as the text shows these are not ordinary “servants” like a maid and butler who are free to leave their master’s employ.
And as only Christians honor Christ as God/son of God, Christians are to bondage their fellow Christians.
“Masters, give unto your servants that which is just and equal; knowing that ye also have a master in heaven” –(Colossians 4:1).
Christians may have tamed the tone of their Scripture to suit modern culture but reason dictates that a “servant’ does not have to serve his master with “fear and trembling”).

As stated, Jesus may have referred to God as “Father” but in his most desperate moment he bared his soul to Eli the name of God in his Hebrew mother tongue: “ELI, ELI, lama sabachthani? That is to say, My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?”–(Matthew 27:46).

Whereas Jesus prayed to, called on, and worshipped God; Christians are praying to, calling on, and worshipping Jesus. And Jesus declared he was a Muslim and taught Islam.

Moreover whereas Catholics (and most Christians) make effigies of “Jesus” and bow to it, God clearly and unambiguously and emphatically forbid such act:
“Thou shalt not make unto thee ANY graven image, or any likeness of ANYTHING that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water beneath the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself, nor serve them”–(Exodus 20:4-5).

That Immediately I said I need Jesus because I want to be a child of God. Then I began to call my God, daddy.
ANSWER:
You can call God whatever you like, Trinity (which associates partners to God and is polytheism) and inherited sin and vicarious atonement (which attributes injustice to God, and doubly, and makes God complicit in murder) will not make you a son/child of God.
As shown on this site these doctrines have no Divine foundation, no prophetic foundation, no logical foundation and are repugnant to reason. (See Christianity-lies, evil, hate).

Incidentally, the Christian’s “daddy” (and as he says Jesus is God, his “daddy,” Jesus) had bears eat his mischievous children, and he punished and killed his “children,” (the Christian’s brothers and sisters) for their parents’ “whoredoms” and stoned to death His daughters (the Christian’s sisters) who do not bleed on their wedding night:

“And he (Elisha) went up from thence to Bethel…there came forth LITTLE CHILDREN…and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up thou BALD HEAD…And he (Elisha) turned back, and looked at them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth TWO SHE BEARS out of the wood, and TARE FORTY AND TWO CHILDREN of them” –(2 Kings 2:22-24).
(God told the Israelite who were “murmuring” against him): “your children shall wander in the wilderness forty years, and bear your whoredoms, until your carcases be wasted in the wilderness”–(Numbers 14:27-33).
“But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father’s house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you”–(Deuteronomy 22:20-21). (Considering that not all virgins bleed on being deflowered on having sex –and some girls do not have a hymen or the membrane is not as thick as that of other girls, and that the hymen can be ruptured by activities other than sex such as gymnastics and horseback riding, or by manual/self-stimulation– many innocent maidens may be wrongfully stoned to death. And as Christians say Jesus is God, this is what Jesus ordered).

In the Qur’an it is stated 18 times to fight with non-believers, and is written in some places to kill the one who rejects Islam.

ANSWER:
If I should get a dollar for every time I hear it uttered that Islam says to fight non-believers I should be able to live like a maharajah.

From day one of his mission Mohammad was persecuted, besieged, target of assassination attempt; forced into exile, pursued and warred upon.
Christians and other critics invariably refer to Qur’an 2:191 and 9:29 for proof of their charge. Here are the verses in context:

2:190: “And fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you but be not aggressive. Surely Allah loves not the aggressors.”
This verse clearly shows that Muslims were allowed to fight only a defensive war against those who first took up arms against Muslims. This is made even clearer in Qur’an 22:39 which states: “Permission (to fight) is given to those on whom war is made because they are oppressed.”

2:191: “And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from where they drove you out, and persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it; so if they fight you (in it), slay them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.”
This verse clearly refers only to those who fight Muslims; not to all disbelievers everywhere.

2:192: “But if they desist, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”
This verse makes it even clearer that not all disbelievers everywhere are to be killed, and for fighting to be stopped if the disbelievers cease fighting, as shown in the words “But if they desist, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful” to them.

2:193: And fight them until there is no persecution, and religion is only for Allah. But if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.”
This verse makes the matter clearer yet that only oppressors are to be fought against as shown in the words “But if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.”

Again, 2:193 states: “And fight them until there is no persecution, and religion is only for Allah. But if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.”
That “religion is only for Allah” is further proof that Islam does not force religion onto any one. (Compare with Qur’an 22:40 where Muslims are even to fight on behalf of non-Muslims, and as shown elsewhere Muslims fought on behalf of Christians against the Romans)
This alone obliterates the critics charge and is sufficient proof that Islam is not only a religion of peace but that Islam is dedicated to peace.

Regarding Qur’an 9:29: “Fight those who believe not in Allåh, nor in the Last Day, nor forbid that which Allåh and His Messenger have forbidden, nor follow the Religion of Truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgement of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.” Muhammad Ali explains:

“The last word on the wars with the idolaters of Arabia having been said, this verse introduces the subject of fighting with the followers of the Book. Though the Jews had for a long time assisted the idolatrous Arabians in their struggle to uproot Islam, the great Christian power, the Roman Empire, had only just mobilized its forces for the subjection of the new religion, and the Tabuk expedition followed, which constitutes the subject-matter of a large portion of what follows in this chapter. As the object of this Christian power was simply the subjection of the Muslims, the words in which their final vanquishment by the Muslims is spoken of are different from those dealing with the final vanquishment of the idolatrous Arabians. The Qur’an neither required that the idolaters should be compelled to accept Islam, nor was it in any way its object to bring the Christians into subjection. On the other hand, the idolaters wanted to suppress Islam by the sword, and the Christians first moved themselves to bring Muslim Arabia under subjection. The fate of each was, therefore, according to what it intended for the Muslims. The word jizyah is derived from jaza, meaning he gave satisfaction, and means, according to LL, the tax that is taken from the free non-Muslim subjects of the Muslim Government whereby they ratify the compact that ensures them protection; or, according to AH, because it is a compensation for the protection which is guaranteed them, the non-Muslim subjects being free from military service.

The phrase ‘an yad-in has been explained variously. The word yad (lit., hand) stands for power or superiority, the use of the hand being the real source of the superiority of man over all other animals, and the apparent meaning of the phrase is in acknowledgement of your superiority in protecting their lives, etc. (AH). It may also be added that the permission to fight, as given to the Muslims, is subject to the condition that the enemy should first take up the sword, Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you (2:190). The Holy Prophet never overstepped this limit, nor did his followers. He fought against the Arabs when they took up the sword to destroy the Muslims, and he led an expedition against the Christians when the Roman Empire first mobilized its forces with the object of subjugating the Muslims. And so scrupulous was he that, when he found that the enemy had not yet taken the initiative, he did not attack the Roman Empire, but returned without fighting. Later on, however, the Roman Empire, like the Persians, helped the enemies of Islam and fomented trouble against the newly established Muslim Kingdom, as a result of which both these empires came into conflict with the Muslims and, notwithstanding the fact that both the Persians and the Romans were very powerful nations with unlimited resources and strong military organizations, and that they both tried at one and the same time to subjugate Islam, the result was what is predicted here in clear words — they were both reduced to a state of subjection by an insignificant nation like the Arabs.”

Had the enemies not militated to annihilate Muslims they would not have been “reduced to a state of subjection.”
Whereas striving with the “sword” is necessary to overcome aggression, occupation and oppression, striving with the Qur’an is known as the “great” Jihad –Jihad kabiran, (Qur’an 25:52). (See Islam-Jihad & Jihad Watch)

Prophet Mohammad’s duty was not to kill anyone. Had the disbelievers not first take up the sword to annihilate Mohammad and Muslims, there would have been no retaliation from Mohammad.
Whereas the Qur’anic Message is universal –and as have been proven that Islam is superior to all other religions in which event reason would dictate that mankind should follow this one set of Divine/Qur’anic law– that Prophet Mohammad’s duty was only to deliver the Message of the Qur’an and NOT enforce it is cemented in the following verses from Allāh:

“thou art not one to compel them. So remind by means of the Qur’an him who fears My warning”–(Qur’an 50:45).
“And if thy Lord had pleased, all those who are in the earth would have believed, all of them. Wilt thou then force men till they are believers?”–(Qur’an 10:99);
“And say: Truth is from your Lord; so let him who please believe, and let him who please disbelieve”–(Qur’an 18:29);
“There is no compulsion in religion”–(Qur’an 2:256. More on this verse later);
And obey Allāh and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away. the duty of Our Messenger is only to DELIVER (the message) clearly”–(Qur’an 64:12; also 3:19; 5:92, 99; 13:7, 40; 16:82; 24:54; 29:18; 46:35).
“Tell those who believe to forgive those who fear not the days of Allåh that He may reward a people for what they earn. Whoever does good it is for himself, and whoever does evil, it is against himself; then to your Lord you will be brought back”–(Qur’an 45:14-15).

In contrast to the Qur’an, the Bible commanded its adherents to wipe out even the ox and the ass and everything that breathes to occupy their lands; and to even take little virgin girls as sex slaves:

“When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it…thou shalt SMITE THEM, and UTTERLY DESTROY THEM, thou shalt MAKE NO COVENANT with them, NOR SHOW MERCY UNTO THEM”–(Deuteronomy 7:1-2. See Josh. 12:1-6).
“So Joshua SMOTE ALL THE COUNTRY of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and ALL THEIR KINGS: HE LEFT NONE remaining, but UTTERLY DESTROYED ALL THAT BREATHED, as the LORD GOD of Israel commanded…And all these kings and their land did Joshua take at one time, because the LORD GOD of Israel fought for Israel;”
“And they UTTERLY DESTROYED ALL that was in the city, both MAN AND WOMAN, YOUNG AND OLD, AND OX, AND SHEEP, AND ASS, with the EDGE OF THE SWORD”–(Joshua 10:19, 24, 26, 40-42; 6:21. Read Numbers 21:24, 35; chapter 31; Deuteronomy 20:16-17; Judges 1:1-7; Joshua chapters 10-12; 1 Sam. 15:2-3).

“Then the Lord spake unto Moses, saying…And they warred against the Midianites, as the Lord commanded Moses, and they slew ALL THE MALES ….And they brought the CAPTIVES and the prey and the spoil to Moses, and Eleazar …And Moses said unto them…Now therefore kill every MALE among the LITTLE ONES (of the captives), and kill EVERY WOMAN who hath known man by lying with him (to know which woman and girls were virgins Moses and/or the soldiers must have had to physically examine/finger them), but ALL THE WOMEN CHILDREN, that have not known a man by lying with him (virgin girls) KEEP ALIVE FOR YOURSELVES….And the BOOTY, being the rest of the prey which the men of war had caught was 675,000 sheep, 72,000 cattle, and 61,000 asses, and of WOMEN that had not known man by lying with him (virgin girls), were 32,000. And the half, which was the portion of them that went out to war, was 337,500 sheep; 36,000 cattle, 30,500 asses, and 16,000 persons (virgin girls.….the men of war had taken SPOIL (BOOTY), EVERY MAN FOR HIMSELF.”–(Numbers chapter 31).
(Surely, these 16,000 young “virgin” girls who were “booty’ were taken by the “warriors” not for ploughing fields. And the 320 given to the Levite priests could have hardly been for “altar”-girl service. And as Christians say Jesus is God, then according to this ex-Imam and Christians it was Jesus who commanded that these little virgin girls be taken as sex slaves). (See Christianity-sex slaves & prepubescent girls).

And Jesus counseled the murder of enemies who did not want it to rule over them and bequeathed to the world a legacy of fire and sword and division:

“I am come to send FIRE on the earth”–(Luke 12:49).
“Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth, Nay; but rather DIVISION: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; and the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law”–(Luke 12:51-53).
“For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me”–(Matthew 10:35-37).
“Think NOT that I am come to send peace on earth: I came NOT to send peace, but a SWORD”–(Matthew 10:34).
“If any man come to me, and HATE NOT his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple”–(Luke 14:26).
“He that is not with me is against me” (and a person can be neutral)–(Matthew 12:30).
“But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me” (though the enemies might not militate against him, Jesus here advocates murder)–(Luke 19:27).
If these sayings of Jesus in Matthew 12:30 and Luke 19:27 were to be implemented more than five billion people of the world that do not accept Jesus as Divine and vicarious atoner, as Christians say he was, would be slaughtered.

And as Christians say Jesus is God, Jesus was instrumental in the bloodiest episodes in Scriptural history: Jesus was complicit in all the wars and killings –from Moses, Joshua, Saul, Gideon, David, to Solomon–where not even the “ox, and sheep, and ass” were spared the “edge of the sword.”
After all, the Christians’ God/Jesus “is a man of war”: “The Lord is a man of war: the Lord is his name”–(Exodus 15:3).
Jesus also caused the death of innocent “swine”–(Matt. 8:28-32).

Unlike Mohammad who was persecuted, target of assassination attempt etc; and forced into war and whose fighting was restricted to the cessation of persecution (and Muslims reason for fighting is to be within the same parameters). Jesus did not suffer the conditions as Mohammad and he yet ordered that his enemies who did not want him to rule over them be brought and slain. And this undoubtedly was the motivation for Christians to undertake their murderous Crusades, so much so that as Muhammad Husayn Haykal points out:

“From the dawn of Christianity until today (20^th century) every country of the world has been soaked with blood in the name of Jesus Christ….The Crusades were launched and their fires fanned by Christians, not by Muslims. For hundreds of years, one army after another rolled out of Europe in the direction of the Muslim Orient to fight, to destroy, and to shed blood. In every case, the popes who claimed to be the vicars of Jesus Christ, blessed and encouraged these armies and hurried them to Jerusalem and other destinations.” (The Life Of Muhammad, p. 213).

For the entire duration of his 22-year mission Mohammad had to defend himself and followers against inveterate enemies bent on annihilating him.

In contrast, Jesus was not persecuted, besieged, target of assassination attempt, forced into exile, pursued and forced into war as Mohammad was; yet Jesus sends fire and sword and division to earth and division in the family. Imagine the carnage if Jesus was subjected to the situations as Mohammad.

Compared to the blood shed in Mohammad’s wars and campaigns (which would have been the result of Jesus’ legacy to the world), Jesus’ sword and fire was the all-time blockbuster of blood and gore; Jesus gift to mankind is manifested in:

-rampage by Genghis Khan
-murderous Crusades by his “vicars”
-two World Wars
-Italy savaging Libya
-Germany holocausting Jews

-Jews more than seven decades of inhumanities against Palestinians
-France genocide in Algeria
-Russia’s razing of Grozny –plus
-India-China war(s)
-India-Pakistan wars

-Vietnam war
-Korean war
-war in Nicaragua
-the Allies invasion and war on Iraq –twice.
-America bombing Benghazi

-Serbia frolicking in Bosnia
-Rwandan genocide
-civilian slaughters in Cambodia, China, Philippines, Argentina, mass killings in America
-Daesh/Isis raging in the Middle-east
-carnage in Syria and Libya.
-Myanmar/Burma’s pogroms of Rohingya Muslims.

Jesus “fire and sword” list seems to be like the “song without end.’ And the world is not yet ended.

Islam is such a peaceful religion that Muslims are to make peace even in the face of possible deception by the enemy:
“And fight with them until there is no more persecution, and all religions are for Allah”
“And if they incline to peace, incline thou also to it…And if they intend to deceive thee, then surely Allah is sufficient for thee…”
“So if they withdraw from you and fight you not and offer you peace, then Allah allows you no way against them”–(Qur’an 8:39; 61-62; 4:90).
Muslims could not lay down their arms and “incline to peace” if Islam had required the annihilation of all non-Muslims.
Islam is the “abode of peace”–(Qur’an 10:25).

For over twenty grueling years Mohammad was persecuted, besieged, target of assassination attempt, forced into exile, pursued, and warred on. Yet upon his triumph over his inveterate enemies he forgave them:
“It is related that the Prophet took hold of the two sides of the gate of the Ka’ba on the day of the conquest of Makkah and said to the Quraish: How do you think I should treat you? They said: We hope for good, a noble brother and the son of a noble brother. Then he said: I say as my brother Joseph said: “No reproof be against you this day” (Rz).”
No inquisition. No incrimination. No confession. No rancor. Only lofty words of benevolence and nobility–“No reproof be against you this day.”¹⁶It is doubtful that Mohammad would have forgiven these disbelievers if Allah/Islam had required that all disbelievers, and everywhere, be killed.

Unlike nations that are transgressors, oppressors, occupiers and aggressors and yet seek to crush their victims (and even fly half to distant lands to kill those who are considered a threat to them), Mohammad was no transgressor no oppressor no occupier no aggressor; and his enemies were in his yard.

Whatever measures Mohammad took to safeguard himself and followers from extermination Mohammad was fully justified. No honest critic or individual would state otherwise.
The only sword that Islam wields is the sword of truth and justice:

“THEY (Muhummed’s critics) SEE FIRE INSTEAD OF LIGHT, UGLINESS INSTEAD OF GOOD. THEY DISTORT AND PRESENT EVERY GOOD QUALITY AS A GREAT VICE. IT REFLECTS THEIR OWN DEPRAVITY…THE CRITICS ARE BLIND. THEY CANNOT SEE THAT THE ONLY ‘SWORD’ MUHAMMAD WIELDED WAS THE SWORD OF MERCY, COMPASSION, FRIENDSHIP AND FORGIVENESS –THE SWORD THAT CONQUERS ENEMIES AND PURIFIES THEIR HEARTS. HIS SWORD WAS SHARPER THAN THE SWORD OF STEEL.”¹⁷

That it is written in some places to kill the one who rejects Islam.
ANSWER:
If any Christian can show in the Qur’an where it is written to kill one who rejects Islam I will become a Christian; and as they cannot show then they are to become Muslims. This is an open challenge! (See Islam-apostasy).

As noted on our Home page the Qur’an was revealed over a period of about twenty-three years.
Unless and until he received Divine revelation in a matter the Prophet Mohammad followed the Torah/Bible, which requires honor killing, death for apostasy, blasphemy and parental abuse, homosexuality and adultery.
The Qur’an abrogates these laws of Judaism and Christianity. (This is what the Qur’an refers to when it speaks of abrogation–Qur’an 2:106; it does not mean, as erroneously believe, that one verse of the Qur’an abrogates another verse. See Muhammad Ali’s comm. to Qur’an 2:106: www.muslim.org).
And Hadith/Sayings of the Prophet Mohammad are to be understood as to the time frame in which they were given –whether it was before or after revelation on the subject. The Prophet governed according to the Qur’an–(Qur’an 10:15; 21:45; 46:9; 53:3-4).
Also even in the lifetime of the Prophet sayings were forged in his name.

In contrast to the Qur’an, it is Christianity (and Judaism) that requires death for apostasy and other UnGodly acts:

(Apostasy): Those who “secretly” entice another to follow an unknown God are to be stoned to death:
“And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the Lord your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt….If thy brother…entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers…thou shalt surely kill him”–(Deuteronomy 13:5-16).
“If there be found among you…man or woman…. And hath gone and served other gods, and worshiped them, either the sun or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded …..Then thou shalt bring forth that man or that woman …and shalt stone them with stones, till they die”–(Deuteronomy 17:2-5).

A “stubborn and rebellious son” is to be stoned to death–(Deuteronomy 21:18-21).
(Honor killings): Married damsel without the “token of virginity” is to be stoned to death: “But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father’s house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you”–(Deuteronomy 22:20-21).
A virginal damsel who lies with a man other than her “betrothed,” both are to be stoned to death–(Deuteronomy 22:23-24).
A witch is to be put to death–(Exodus 22:18).
Who curses his father or mother is to be put to death–(Leviticus 20:9).
Punishment for adultery is death–(Leviticus 20: 10-12; Deut. 22:22).
Homosexuals are to be put to death–(Leviticus 20:13. Christians are consecrating them vicars of Christ; and they expect to sit with Jesus “on the right hand of God,” wherever that is).
A man who takes a “wife and her mother,” both shall be burnt with fire–(Leviticus 20:14).
Who commits bestiality is to be put to death–(Leviticus 20:15-16).
(Blasphemy): “And the Israelitish woman’s son blasphemed the name of the Lord, and cursed ….And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying…let all that heard him lay their hands upon his head, and let all the congregation stone him.…And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death”–(Leviticus 24:11-16, 23).
The adulteress is to be stoned–(John 8:3-5. Regarding the Christian claim that Jesus abolished stoning for adultery see Jesus and the adulteress).

Christians may not be enforcing these laws of God, but heir Scripture/God demands it; and heaven lies in obeying Scripture/God.
Incidentally, whereas Christians do not honor their God by enforcing these laws of the Bible; in contrast, Muslims, ironically, enforce laws that are not required by Islam –stoning women for adultery (though the man with whom she committed adultery is never heard of), honor killing; killing for apostasy, blasphemy and homosexuality & lesbianism.

Prophet Mohammad died, people buried him, and afterwards we don’t know where he went. One who believes in him and die I don’t know where I will go.
In contrast, Christ died and came back. So there is hope for one who dies in Christ, he will come back. Because Jesus very clearly said: I am going to my Father’s house, there are so many rooms, I will arrange a room for you then I will come back to take you (John 14:3). It is happiness to know Jesus is arranging a big bungalow for him there.

ANSWER:
These have already been dealt with in #5, items ix and x.

That Jesus is arranging a big “bungalow” in heaven for this man.
As shown on this site, Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement are not Divine doctrines.
Christ clearly declared that he was sent only to Jews and prayed only for them, and he regarded non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in parables so these “dogs” and ‘swine” would not understand and be converted and saved; and he taught that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law until the arrival of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and will “abide for ever.”
Thus, those who follow Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement are not followers of Christ; and therefore they have nothing –no mansion or “bungalow” not even a tent– to receive from Christ.
The only thing they will have is “wailing and gnashing of teeth” in Hell.

To have eternal life one needs Jesus.

ANSWER:
But Jesus said to have eternal life you are to observe the Mosaic Law –Ten Commandments– until the coming of the Comforter who will then guide you into “all truth” and “abide for ever.”

Jesus did not say that eternal; life lies in following Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement.
And as eternal life lies in the Ten Commandments and the Comforter then neither you nor anyone else need Jesus; by his own words Jesus is redundant. Thus, no one needs Jesus.
Everyone needs God –whether we call Him Eli, Ishwar, Yahweh or Allāh.
And as God’s favor to man was completed, and man’s religion was perfected, through the Prophet Mohammad, those who know about Mohammad/Islam and desires to go to heaven have no choice but to follow Mohammad –to bend his/her knees to Allāh: to There is no God but Allāh, Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh.

According to the Bible Jesus prayed so pitifully in the garden of Gethsemane to be spared from death that “his sweat was as it were great drops of blood;” and he charged God as having “forsaken” him: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”–(Matthew 26:36; Luke 22: 42-44; 27:46).
This not only obliterates Christians’ claim that Jesus gave his life willingly for sinners, but to charge God as having forsaken him must be the blackest degree of disgrace (and blasphemy) ever exampled by a son of God in Scriptural history; the “Mother” of all disgraces.
Intriguingly, whereas Matthew has Jesus charging God as having “forsaken” him, Luke 23:34 has Jesus saying: “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.” This must be the acme of absurdity. Why do “they” need to be forgiven if by killing Jesus they were fulfilling scripture?
Instead of asking God to “forgive” them, Jesus should have beseech God to give “them” mansions in His house.

Every religion says the block between God and man is sin. Islam has animal sacrifice for the sin; Hinduism has rebirths; But only in Christianity Jesus himself took man’s sin and his punishment and removed sin from him and made him pure and can surrender him to God. So Jesus is savoir, he’s a perfect man. Because human is man, our savior should be a man, And Jesus is perfect God.

ANSWER:
If Jesus is God how then is Jesus a man?
There is no animal sacrifice as expiation for sins in Islam. Muslims sacrifice animals for food and in commemoration of the Prophet Ibrahim/Abraham in his trial to sacrifice his then only son, Ishmael.

Allāh does not need blood, most of all human blood, as the Christian’s God, to forgive sins. Allāh forgives all sins unconditionally, as He revealed to the Prophet Mohammad to convey to the world:
“Say: O My servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allāh; surely Allāh forgives ALL SINS. Verily, He is Most Forgiving, Ever Merciful”–Qur’an 39:53).
This verse is evidence that in Islam there is no “block” between Allāh God and man.

In contrast, belief in the Divinity of Jesus, inherited sin and vicarious atonement are NOT Divine revelations but human inventions.
Christians neglect Jesus’ clear teachings that he was sent only for Jews and follow assumptions and inventions that he was Divine and vicarious atoner.
Christians put their souls into the hands of a womb-God and are mired in blasphemy and heading for Hell:
“But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath NEVER forgiveness but is in danger of ETERNAL DAMNATION”–(Mark 3:29).
And damnation is Hell! which is the “everlasting fire” that “never shall be quenched;” the “furnace of fire” in which there shall be “wailing and gnashing of teeth”–(Matt. 10:28; 18:8; Mark 9:43; Matt. 23:14, 33; 13:42).

The consequence of sin is death. To remove death, Jesus gave his life on the cross. To have this life one must always be a Catholic.

ANSWER:
That the consequence of sin is death came from the pen of Paul who was a self-admitted liar and forger of his own gospel and who subverted the teachings of Jesus and made himself into a human chameleon to snare people into worshipping his pagan son of God, Jesus. (See Allāh and Jesus or Paul)

Surely, if sin came through the man’s sperm Mary would have inherited this sin from her father; and passed it on through her ovum –which is part of her body and in which she conceived Jesus– to Jesus. (As shown there was no “virgin” birth).

That God did not make man to live forever and that Adam suffered SPIRITUAL death –that is, they were deprived of Divine grace– is confirmed by God. After Adam and Eve had eaten from the forbidden tree,
“God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and TAKE ALSO OF THE TREE OF LIFE, and eat, AND LIVE FOR EVER: Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the garden of Eden”–Gen.3:22-23).
God being afraid Adam would live forever (and even after giving Adam death) shows that God would not have been able to kill, or have control over, Adam.

If Adam was given life “for ever” he could not have “died” from eating from the forbidden tree –life “for ever” and “death” are contradictions. (Seems absurd God made Adam to live forever when He was afraid Adam would live forever)
The consequence of sin is not death; the consequence of sin is Hellfire. (For more on this see Christianity-man made to live forever; Christianity is Paganism).

Israelite used to sacrifice their children to appease the fire-god Molech–(Leviticus 18:21; 2 Chronicles 28:3).
Now Christians say their God sacrificed His son to appease Himself (because their “God” is incapable of forgiving sin without the need for human blood).
Who is more barbaric, the Israelite or the Christian “God”?

In contrast to the Christian “God” Who is devoid of mercy and needed to have a man killed in order to forgive sins. Allāh the Glorious and the High in His infinite mercy and grace, to restate, implores us in loving compassionate terms through His noble Messenger, Mohammad, to convey to the world (Christians included):
“Say: O My servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allāh; surely Allāh forgives ALL SINS. Verily, He is Most Forgiving, Ever Merciful”–Qur’an 39:53).

Jesus states categorically, unambiguously and unequivocally:

“salvation is of the Jews” (non-Jews take note)–John 4:22. Also Luke 19:10).
“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matthew 15:24). “I pray for them (Jews): I pray not for the world”–(John 17:9).
“For the Son of man is come to seek and save that (Jews) which was lost”–(Luke 19:10. Compare with Matthew 10:5-6; 15:24; 18:11).
“If thou wilt enter into life keep the commandments” (of Moses)–(Matthew 19:16-19);
“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: ALL therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do”–(Matthew 23:2.).
“If you love me, keep my commandments. And I will send another Comforter who will guide you “into ALL truth,” and will “abide FOR EVER”–(John 14:15-16).

But Christians toss these clear teachings of Jesus into the trash box and hammer up all kinds of namby-pamby constructions around Jesus’ figurative expressions to prop up their lies, falsehood and blasphemous beliefs –Trinity, Jesus is God, “begotten” Son of God, inherited sin and vicarious atonement.

Clearly, Adam did NOT bring “death” into the world. The consequence of sin is not death. The consequence of sin is Hell-fire.

To partake in Jesus’ body and blood (in the Communion service) is to partake in Jesus’ life.

ANSWER:
(This is no cynicism or insult). Christians can eat the body and drink the blood of Christ –spiritual cannibalism– from now till the Resurrection the only place it will get them is eternal damnation: Hell!

(Putting aside the fact that the Christian Communion among other practices are traced to Paganism).
Jesus says that he came to “give his life a ransom for many,” and urged his disciples to “Take, eat; this is my body…this is my blood of the new testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins”–(Matthew.20:28; 26:28).
That Jesus was “ransom” and remitter of sins only for his disciples/apostles is clearly stated in Luke 22:14-20, 30: “This cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for YOU (his apostles) ….That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel”

(Apart from the fact that Jesus’ dying for the remission of his disciples’ sin is a contradiction of his teaching that eternal life lies in observing the Mosaic law, until the coming of the Comforter who will then guide into all truth’ and ‘abide for ever”).
For which “sin” did Jesus die (though as shown he did not die on the cross).
No one knows!
Thus we have the Christian cow-dance: some saying Christ died for inherited sin (though there is no teaching from God or Jesus that God loaded Adam’s sin onto fetuses and then transferred onto Jesus) and some saying Christ died for committed sin, arguing, rightly, that your father being a millionaire does not make you a millionaire.
Though both guesstimations are wrong.
For as shown (and the Vatican was given proof from their own Christian investigators, that) the body in the shroud of Turin, which is believed to be the body of Christ after the so-called crucifixion, was “not a dead body.” Even the Gospel, as shown in Jesus-redundant no ransom, proves that Jesus was not killed on the cross.
Hence we have

“St. Paul had thought of and adopted the doctrine of Jesus Christ having died on the Cross and being resurrected afterwards, and this became the confirmed doctrine of the Christian Church.
But the investigations made about the imprints of Christ’s body on the Shroud put the Church in difficulties.
Pope John XXIII had made a proclamation on 30 June 1960, which was printed in an issue of the Vatican newspaper, Osservator Romano dated 2nd July 1960, under the title “Complete Salvation through the Blood of Jesus Christ,” in which the Pope informed and directed all the Catholic Bishops to believe and to propagate that the complete salvation of the human race lies through the blood of Jesus Christ, and that the death of Jesus Christ is not essential for this purpose.” (M.A. Faruqui, The Crumbling of the Cross, pp. 98-109. Emp. added. See Jesus-redundant no ransom).
(Even if Jesus was killed for sins he would have been “ransom” only for Jews, as his mission was wholly and solely to his people, JEWS).

As stated, Jesus saying he is “ransom” and remitter of sins contradicts his saying that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law.
Jesus made it clear that he came to call his people JEWS, to repentance and forgiveness:

-“I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to REPENTANCE” (NOT to belief in inherited sin and vicarious atonement/ crucifixion)–Matt. 9:13. This is how Jesus [and all prophets] saved his people from their sin, by calling them to repentance);

-“I say unto you, there is JOY in the presence of the angels of God over one SINNER that REPENTETH”–(Luke 15:10).

-“For I say unto you, that except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven”–(Matthew 5:20);

-“If thou wilt enter into life keep the commandments” –(Matthew 19:16-19);

-“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: ALL therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do”–(Matt. 23:2. Scribes and Pharisees do not teach inherited sin, vicarious atonement, and crucifixion).

-“And when ye stand praying, FORGIVE, if ye have anything against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may FORGIVE you your trespasses, But if you do NOT forgive, NEITHER will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses”–(Mark 11:25-26; Luke 17:3-4).

-“When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven …FORGIVE US OUR SINS; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but DELIVER US FROM EVIL”–(Luke 11:2-4).

-“I tell you…except ye REPENT, ye shall all likewise perish”–(Luke 13:3, 5).

-“The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation (of Jews) and shall condemn it: because they REPENTED at the preaching of Jonas; and behold, a greater than Jonas is here” (that is to say, the people of Jonas repented but Jews do not repent even though Jesus who is greater than Jonas is preaching to them)–(Matthew 12:41).

It was Paul who grafted the pagan doctrine of Son of God onto Jesus’ head. Paul was a self-admitted liar and forger of his own gospel who subverted Jesus’ teaching and made himself into a human chameleon to snare pagans through craftiness and guile into worshipping Jesus as son of God–(see Allāh and Jesus or Paul).

Muslims who have apostatized from Islam, while you are alive you have the grand opportunity to return to Allāh/Islam.
Even if you do not want to observe any of the tenets of Islam you should not hold in worship anyone but Allāh. There is no religion superior to, or equal with, Islam. Islam is superior to all other religions.

The Church doctrines of Jesus as Trinity; Jesus as God; Jesus as Son of God; inherited sin and vicarious atonement are not Divine revelations or taught by Jesus.
To repeat, these doctrines are blasphemy and lead into hell-fire; as Christ says: “But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath NEVER forgiveness but is in danger of ETERNAL DAMNATION”–(Mark 3:29).
And damnation is Hell! which is the “everlasting fire” that “never shall be quenched;” the “furnace of fire” in which there shall be “wailing and gnashing of teeth”–(Matt. 10:28; 18:8; Mark 9:43; Matt. 23:14, 33; 13:42. Those who do not have teeth shall bear it on their gums).

The Divine truth is Jesus was only a prophet of God sent wholly and solely only for Jews and
“There is no God but Allāh;
Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh!”

Jesus/Christianity and the Church and the cross is “love”

ANSWER:
The most overblown individual in the world is Jesus Christ –a mortal and zealous Jewish tribal prophet catapulted into Godhood, blood Redeemer and king of future world.
The most over-abused verse of the Bible is that of the Gospel of John 3:16, which Christians use to sell Jesus as vicarious atoner to the uneducated and unthinking; and which crowns Jesus Christ as the blackest degree of disgrace in Scriptural history. (See. Jesus-for God so loved the world.
And the most fallacious claim is that Jesus loves us, which is obliterated by Jesus himself. In fact, as the Gospels show, Jesus was a hate-monger and destructor. And as Christians say Jesus is God then Jesus was the biggest war-monger in Scriptural history:
“The Lord is a man of WAR: the Lord is his name”–(Exodus 15:3).
Jesus even gave orders to burn the daughter who commits “whoredom”–(Genesis 38:24; Leviticus 21:9). (See Jesus-loves us, God is love; Jesus-no peace and joy).

Apart from the fact that the Church/Christianity is an enemy to knowledge and is brutally and rabidly misogynistic (see Christianity-women) and that the only reason the Church does not now wield the “blade” is because she holds no sway in the land (see Jesus or Mohammad-best system).
That Jesus/Christianity and the Church and the cross is “love” must be the biggest joke in creation:

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to love your enemies and forgive seventy times seven but he ordered his enemies be slain it is hypocrisy)–(Matthew 5:44; 18:22; Luke 19:27);

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to bury the dead whereas he resurrected Lazarus, the widow’s son, and Jairus’ daughter (it is hypocrisy)–(Matt. 8:22; John 11:43-44; Luke 7:12-15; 8:41, 49-55).

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to not judge others whereas he put the blood of the prophets murdered by the Jewish fathers onto the head of the Jews and consigned them to the greater damnation of hell, (it is hypocrisy)–(Matt. 7:1; 23:14, 33-38).

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to bless them that curse you but he cursed a helpless fig tree; (it is not only hypocrisy but it is a sin to curse a thing that has no control over itself)–(Matt. 5:44; Mark 11:12-21).

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to pray for them that despise you and persecute you, but he upbraided the peoples of Chorazin, Bethsaida, and Capernaum for not accepting his miracles and reforming, and instead of praying for the Jews, he ridiculed them as “generation of vipers;” “evil and adulterous generation;” as “fools” and “blind guides”(it is hypocrisy)–(Matt, 5:44; 11:20-24; 12:34, 39; 23:16-17, 24).

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to give the other cheek but he commanded his followers to sell their garments and buy swords, (it is hypocrisy)–(Matt. 5:39; Luke 22:36);

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to go another mile with your compeller but he boots his compellers –the bird-sellers and money-changers– out of the temple, (it is hypocrisy)–(Matt. 5:41; 21:12).

-It is not love for Jesus to tell people to not bear false witness but also says to quickly agree with your adversary lest you are thrown in jail –and which agreement with your adversary may include bearing false witness which could have an innocent person executed– (it is contradictory and even hypocrisy)–(Matt. 20:18; 5:25).

While as prophet of God, Jesus gave Divine teachings, those as recorded in the Gospels are, as noted above, restricted only to his people and for his term, and are not be taken blanketly for all times and international application.

In contrast to Jesus, Mohammad gave practical shape to this “love”:
-Mohammad forgave his rabid enemies of twenty-three years; prayed for his dead enemy; and would have prayed “seventy-times seven” if it would have brought him forgiveness–(Qur’an 18:6; 9:84; 113-114; Bokhari Vol. 6; # 194, 197).

-Mohammad extricated Woman from the bog of degradation and sat her aloft on the throne of honor and left her nothing for which to strive;

-Mohammad liberated the Slave from the shackles of servitude and placed in his grasp the scepter of regality;

-Mohammad raised the Orphan from the dust of despair and sat him on the cushion of hope.

Mohammad is the only Benefactor woman, slave and Orphan have known. It is Mohammad, a Divine mercy to all, as he demonstrated, who loves us –and he gave God’s message clearly to all.
There is none in history to equal Mohammad’s love, mercy, tolerance, and forgiveness. There never will be.

That Allāh raised messengers in every nation and gave them guidance–(Qur’an 5:48; 10:47); this alone not only proves that Islam is the religion of love but establishes Islam to be superior to all other religions; as no other sacred Book can be shown to have such a universal doctrine.

And the expanse of Allāh’s love is indelibly engraved is His declaration that He has ordained mercy on Himself–(Qur’an 6:12; 7:156)) and in His invitation to forgive us our sins: “Say, O My servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allāh; surely Allāh forgives all sins. Verily, He is Most Forgiving, Ever Merciful”–Qur’an 39:53).

As the Qur’an notes these sublime themes about Jesus which you accept –giving life to a bird of clay, speaking as an infant, is word of God– which are not found in the Bible, and as Jesus taught the same doctrines that Allāh revealed –that Jesus was a messenger to the Israelite, he performed miracles though the power of Allāh and foretold the coming of the Comforter/Ahmad– why then abandon the Qur’an and follow Christian assumptions and invented doctrines –Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement?
Is this wisdom?

Assessment of Christianity and Islam:
In summary. Christianity is:

Trinity –God growing in the womb (and of a woman He created), coming out the vagina and getting circumcised (making God unclean: Job 25:4); and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15).
(And Hinduism has Trinity –Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva– and the pagan Romans had Trinity –Juno, Jupiter and Minerva–; and the Hindu and pagan Trinity preceded Jesus by hundreds of years);

Son of God –attributing the animal function of sex to God; as “fatherhood” requires the union of sperm and ovum; (and Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God-Luke 1:35); and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15). (And Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God and the Biblical God has a legion of sons and daughters; and according to the Christian that Jesus is son of God because he is termed “word” of God, and as everything in creation is a “word” of God, then according to the Christian’s logic even a baboon is “son of God).

Inherited sin –God loading a man’s (Adam’s) sin onto innocent, helpless and morally and mentally non-competent babies and worldwide for 5,000 years now and will continue to do so to the Resurrection (which attributes injustice to God)
Vicarious atonement –God shifting sin(s) around from Adam to everyone then from everyone onto Jesus, and having blameless and innocent Jesus killed for the sin of Adam/others (which attributes more injustice to God and makes God complicit in murder).

If reason is the factor that separates us from, and elevates us above, the animals shouldn’t our judgment be based on reason? And if our judgment is not based on reason haven/t we degraded ourselves lower than the beast –seeing that they do not have the capacity to reason and we have this capacity and do not utilize it?

If we govern our secular life by reason shouldn’t we also govern our spiritual life by reason? The answer is given in Isaiah chapter 1 verse 18 of the Bible:
“Come now, and let us REASON together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool”–(Isaiah 1:18);

Like a person on a journey would need to have his route clearly mapped out else instead of arriving at his destination at Kennedy Airport he ends up at Kennedy Space Centre (Cape Canaveral). Cardinal doctrines of a religion, since they make the difference between Heaven and Hell, are to be clearly expressed

As the cardinal doctrines of Islam –Unity/Purity of Allāh God, Prayer, Zakaat/Charity, Fasting and Hajj– are clearly expressed in the Qur’an by Allāh God; it would be expected that the cardinal doctrines of Christianity be clearly expressed and not left to the muddled mind of assumptions and conjectures.

Since Christianity (not God) teaches that God made man to live forever but Adam eating the forbidden fruit brought death into the world which is a contradiction to Allāh God’s revelation that He created death and life as a trial for us, it is absurd to say that the Qur’an says to follow Christianity.
The loading of another man’s (Adam’s) sin onto man could not be a fair trial but is a monumental and grotesque injustice.
Since Christianity teaches that God has a son (and Jesus is only “CALLED” Son of God, and God has battalions of sons and daughters) and Allāh God denies having a son which are contradictions, it is absurd to say that the Qur’an says to follow Christianity.
Since Christianity teaches that Jesus was killed/crucified which contradicts Allāh God’s revelation that Jesus was not killed/crucified (and research has proven this), it is absurd to claim that the Qur’an says to follow Christianity.
Since Christianity teaches that Godhead consists of three personnages –Father, Son and Holy Ghost– which is a contradiction of Allāh God’s declaration that Trinity is blasphemy, it is absurd to claim that the Qur’an says to follow Christianity.
(With all the evidence against Trinity –Scriptural (lack of), historical and logical– yet Christians hold to this “senseless God-dishonoring doctrine…(which) could have originated only in one mind, and that the mind of Satan the Devil.”

If sin is a voluntary transgression against a known law of God by a morally responsible person; where is the voluntary transgression by the fetus/baby for him/her to have sin? (moreover, a fetus/baby that is morally and intellectually non-competent).

And as woman is the transgressor –she being deceived by Satan and eaten the fruit and then gave it to man– sin should have been inherited through woman’s ovum and not through man’s sperm.
In which event the Christian God should have sent His only “begotten” daughter to die for this alleged “original”/inherited sin.

Sin is not a physical factor. Sin is not a biological or genetical factor that can be transmitted/transferred from one person to another.
How then is this non-substance transmitted/ transferred into Adam’s (and all men’s) sperm and from one person to another?

“Sin is an acquisition, and not a heritage.” Sin is an acquisition acquired by committing an unGodly act.

To say that God sent us into the world as sinners is to say that God sent us with two little horns on our forehead and a barbed tail on our behinds (as devils); that we are criminal by nature.
And as we are criminal by nature then we are incapable of upholding law –any law; Divine and human.
And as we are incapable of upholding any law then, according to this Christian doctrine of “original” sin the human laws and courts and punishments are an affront to God and man. We are hopeless pawns in the hands of the Christian God.

And if God did not put this “original” sin onto the progeny of Adam how then is it passed on to mankind? and how can the murder of Jesus free us from this sin?

Whereas all that Muslims need do is ask Allāh for forgiveness and do good deeds which give us our passport to Paradise.
The Christians’ God have an innocent man murdered and then require man to be baptized and believe in this monumentally gruesome injustice.

And if a baby is still-born or dies before he/she is baptized/Christened –sprinkled with water (which is charm) accompanied by the farcical phrase “In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost/Spirit” (and there is no place where Jesus uttered these words and as shown Matthew 28:19 in which these words are attributed to Christ, is a forgery in the Bible)– these poor souls are denied burial in consecrated grounds and condemned to Hell.
Such is the fate of the morally and intellectually non-competent infant in the eyes of Christianity.

But this is not Christ’s teaching, who clearly says that we are all born sinless:
“Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God”–(Luke 18:16-17).
If children inherited sin, the kingdom of God would be sinful –a person born with sin is not innocent or pure.
Who then will you believe and follow –the Church/ Christianity or Jesus and Allāh?

Allāh loves us.
Allāh wants to guide us.
Allāh wants us to be pure.
Allāh wants us to have a life in Paradise.
Islam is the Oneway to
Heaven/Paradise.

In “changing tracks” -from Islam to Christianity- this Muslim has changed from heaven to hell.

APPENDIX I
Christians do not know what or who the Holy Ghost is. Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– points out: “The Holy Spirit, in all the Christian literature of diverse languages, has not a fixed gender. He, she, it, are all commonly used as the personal pronouns for the Holy Ghost;” And

“The Comforter –the Spirit of Truth– spoken of by Jesus was no other than Muhammad himself. It cannot be taken as the Holy Ghost, as the Church theology says. “It is expedient for you that I go away,” says Jesus, “for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you, but if I depart I will send him unto you”(John 16:7). The words clearly show that the Comforter had to come after the departure of Jesus, and was not with him when he uttered these words. Are we to presume that Jesus was devoid of the Holy Ghost if his coming was conditional on the going of Jesus: besides, the way in which Jesus describes him makes him a human being, not a ghost. “He shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear that he shall speak” (John 16:13). Should we presume that the Holy Ghost and God are two distinct entities and that the Holy Ghost speaks of himself and also what he hears from God? The words of Jesus clearly refer to some messenger from God. He calls him the Spirit of Truth, and so the Qur‘an speaks of Muhammad, “Nay, he has come with the Truth and verified the apostles” (Qur’an 37:37). (Muhammad In The Bible, p. 6).

APPENDIX II
Regarding God’s covenant with Abraham about his sons Ishmael and Isaac, Professor ‘Abdul Ahad Dawud –the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect– explains in his revealing book Muhammad In The Bible:

“There are three distinct points which every true believer in God must accept as truths. The first point is that Ishmael is the legitimate son of Abraham, his firstborn, and therefore his claim to birthright is quite just and legal. The second point is that the Covenant was made between God and Abraham as well as his only son Ishmael before Isaac was born. The Covenant and the institution of the Circumcision would have no value or signification unless the repeated promise contained in the divine words, “Throughout thee all the nations of the earth shall be blessed,” and especially the expression, the Seed “that shall come out from the bowels, he will inherit thee” (Gen. xv. 4). This promise was fulfilled when Ishmael was born (Gen. xvi.), and Abraham had the consolation that his chief servant Eliezer would no longer be his heir. Consequently we must admit that Ishmael was the real and legitimate heir of Abraham’s spiritual dignity and privileges. The prerogative that “by Abraham all the generations of the earth shall be blessed,” so often repeated–though in different forms– was the heritage by birthright, and was the patrimony of Ishmael. The inheritance to which Ishmael was entitled by birthright was not the tent in which Abraham lived or a certain camel upon which he used to ride, but to subjugate and occupy forever all the territories extending from the Nile to the Euphrates, which were inhabited by some ten different nations (Gen. xvii. 18-21). These lands have never been subdued by the descendants of Isaac, but by those of Ishmael. This is an actual and literal fulfilment of one of the conditions contained in the Covenant.

The third point is that Isaac was also born miraculously and specially blessed by the Almighty, that for his people the land of Canaan was promised and actually occupied under Joshua. ….
….The Jews have always been jealous of Ishmael because they know very well that in him the Covenant was made and with his circumcision it was concluded and sealed, and it is out of this rancour that their scribes or doctors of law have corrupted and interpolated many passages in their Scriptures. To efface the name “Ishmael” from the second, sixth, and seventh verses of the twenty-second chapter of the Book of Genesis and to insert in its place “Isaac,” and to leave the descriptive epithet “thy only begotten son” is to deny the existence of the former and to violate the Covenant made between God and Ishmael. It is expressly said in this chapter by God: “Because thou didst not spare thy only begotten son, I will increase and multiply thy posterity like the stars and the sands on the seashore,” which word “multiply” was used by the Angel to Hagar in the wilderness: I will multiply thy offspring to an innumerable multitude, and that Ishmael “shall become a fruitful man” (Gen. xvi. 12. It is Muslims whose numbers are “like the stars and the sands on the seashore”–(Gen. 22:17). Now the Christians have translated the same Hebrew word, which means “fruitful” or “plentiful” from the verb para–identical with the Arabic wefera–in their versions “a wild ass”! Is it not a shame and impiety to call Ishmael “a wild ass” whom God styles “Fruitful” or “Plentiful”?” (pp. 30-32. Italics/Emphasis added).
What man would adulterate the Book of God –the very God from Whom he seeks his daily bread; the very God Whom he expects to give him a mansion in heaven? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
And what man of God would knowingly follow and propagate such adulterated doctrines as Divine truths? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
If a “man of God” would lie on his God to whom then will he not lie?

NOTES

Regarding the Ascension of Jesus, Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din points out in his book Open Letters To The Bishops of Salisbury & London, (pp. 31-32):

“The concluding eleven verses of St. Mark-(16:9-20) and the well-known verse of St. Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are forgeries, an admitted addition to the ancient MSS (manuscripts). The fact was discovered by the first translator of the Bible into English and they made a marginal note in their version of the Bible which continued for some time. But we do not find the said note in any of the copies now published by the said society (Foreign Mission Society). Is it fair and honest to keep others in darkness as to the true value of the contents of the Bible? The reader must know that concluding portion of St. Mark and the verse in St. Matthew are spurious and a subsequent addition. But I am afraid the Foreign Mission would not allow the correction. It would tell against their very Mission, if they eliminate the verse from St. Matthew; they lose the only pillar that supports the structure of the Trinity. No other verse in the whole Scripture speaks of it. The said eleven verses of St. Mark are the only justification for the existence of the Foreign Mission. You, as well as I, know, my Lord, that the call to Jesus came solely and wholly from Judaism. He came only to gather the scattered sheep and would not give the children’s bread to the dogs, the world beyond the Israelites. The Foreign Mission is a mere trespass on lands forbidden by the Master. It transcends the limit marked by Jesus. Throughout his life the Gentiles and others did not concern him: they were the swine. Then came the make-believe Resurrection, and they say the Master changed his mind as to his mission and ordered it to be carried to the four corners of the world (indicating that he was unsure of his mission), but this all depends upon the questionable verses of St. Mark, and hence their retention in the Bible. St. Matthew is no authority on this point. The word “nations” there is a mistranslation and a wrong substitute for “the tribes”–the rest of the Jewish tribes scattered all over the world. This being the case, the Mission cannot afford to eliminate the verses from their version, nor will they put marginal notes, as did the old versions, to show the true nature of the verses. It would weaken the cause and show the futility of their status, since in carrying on evangelical work in the non-Christian world they are acting against the express admonition of the Master. It may be that reasons other than religion are at the back of it all, and goading their activities, but decency, if not religion, assuredly demands the publishing of things as they are.” (Even if Jesus had said to teach the Gospels to all nations, yet this would not make Jesus Divine of vicarious atoner).
What man would adulterate the Book of God –the very God from Whom he seeks his daily bread; the very God Whom he expects to give him a mansion in heaven? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
And what man of God would knowingly follow and propagate such adulterated doctrines as Divine truths? Is such a man Divine messenger or Devil’s disciple?
If a “man of God” would lie on his God to whom then will he not lie?

Read Samuel chapter 2 verses 1-21 paying attention to verses 19 and 20, which seem to show a similarity between Hannah and Mary.

Why I am not a Muslim, p. 144.
4. The “I Am movement” –a religious movement in the U.S. which “begun in the 1930s by Guy Ballard” and “his wife, Edna,” and named after God who told Moses that His name is I AM (Ex. 3:14)– “essentially taught that the power of the Mighty I Am was available to individuals through many Ascended Masters, the principal ones being Jesus and St. Germain. The Ascended Masters spoke through their special representatives on earth, the Accredited Messengers, who were Edna and Guy Ballard and their son, Donald.”–(Ency, Brit; 15^th Ed; Vol. V; art. I Am Movement, p. 263).

Thus according to the “I Am movement” Jesus was NOT God but only a prophet or servant of God.
(Note, St. Germain is said to have ascended to heaven; which would make it four individuals who ascended to heaven: St. Germain:
-Elijah–(2 Kings 2:1, 11),
-Enoch–(Hebrews 11:5; Genesis 5:24),
-Jesus–(Mark 16:19: “the Lord…was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God;” though the verses about Jesus’ Ascension etc; are shown to be “forgeries” in the Bible. Yet Jesus says no man hath ascended to heaven–(John 3:13).
The Zoroastrian’s Arta/Artay Viraf is said to have ascended to heaven. Buddha is said to have ascended to heaven and will return to restore the world to happiness.
If Buddha and Jesus were to return to lord the world the two might have to battle for supremacy.

The Prophet Mohammad is the prophet like Moses (See Jesus-like Moses).
The Prophet Mohammad is the Shiloh (See Mohammad-and Moulood; also Judaism.

Jesus could not be the fulfillment of this prophecy; Jesus foretold the coming of another Comforter after him who will guide into “all truth” and “testify” of Christ–(John 14:16; 16:13; 15:26). Mohammad testify” of Christ, as evidenced in the Qur’an, as Jesus says. We are yet to hear the Holy Ghost “testify” of Christ, never mind the “all truth” he is required to bring.
The Holy Ghost is not the Comforter, the Holy Ghost was before, during, and after Jesus and there is no evidence of even a scrap of “all truth” that the Comforter is to bring.
In fact, Christians do not even know what gender the Holy Ghost is: “The Holy Spirit, in all the Christian literature of diverse languages, has not a fixed gender. He, she, it, are all commonly used as the personal pronouns for the Holy Ghost”–Prof. ‘Abdul-Ahad Dawud (the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani), Muhammad in the Bible, p. 190 f/n).

See note #1.
Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th, ed; Vol. 5; art. David; Nation Builder, and Messianic symbol, pp. 518, 519. Highlight added.
See Jesus-had a wife.
Ency. Brit. 15^th Edn; Vol. VIII, art. Revelation to John, p. 537.
Ency Brit. 15^th Edn; Vol. 4, art. Myth and legend from the 1st to the early 2nd centuries, pp. 551-552.
See Christianity-lies, evil, hate
Those who charge that Mohammad sinned. The word “istaghfara is explained as meaning he sought of God covering or forgiveness or pardon.” Thus the word means not only to overlook a wrong committed, but also to guide us from committing a sin: and the latter is the significance in which the word is used in these verses–M. Ali, comm. to Qur’an 40:55. Please read the entire comm. M.A’s translation of the Qur’an can be viewed/downloaded at: www.muslim.org.

In Vienna, “hundreds of Jews were burned alive in 1421 for refusing to convert to Christianity”–Toronto Star,Sat; Sept; 8, 2007; p. AA2;Pontiff shows…by Tracy Wilkinson.
“No reproof be against you this day”–(Qur’an 12:92) were spoken by Joseph to his brothers who had cast him into a well and told their father that a wolf had devoured him.
Pandit Gyanandra Dev Sharma Shastri, at a meeting in Gorakhpur, [India]. 1928. Quoted in Ahmed Deedat, Muhummed The Greatest, p. 37. (Emphasis added).