{"id":7290,"date":"2026-05-02T01:25:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:25:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=7290"},"modified":"2026-05-02T01:25:08","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:25:08","slug":"palestine-promise-to-jews-or-muslims","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=7290","title":{"rendered":"PALESTINE-PROMISE TO JEWS OR MUSLIMS?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the name of All\u0101h,<\/span>
\nthe Beneficent, the Merciful.<\/span>
\nPeace and Blessings of All\u0101h on Mohammad.<\/span>
\nDEDICATED TO<\/span>
\nAll\u0101h\u2013the Glorious and the High,<\/span>
\nLord of the worlds<\/span>
\nAND TO<\/span>
\nMohammad\u2013who brought the world<\/span>
\nto our feet and eternity to our arms.<\/span>
\n*<\/span>
\nPALESTINE-<\/span>JEWS OR MUSLIMS?<\/span>
\n(See also Al \u2018Aqsa \u2013 Temple Mount or Mosque Mount?<\/span>)<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

CONTENTS<\/span>
\n1. Scriptural Palestine<\/span>
\n2. Political Palestine<\/span>
\n*<\/span><\/p>\n

1. SCRIPTURAL PALESTINE:
\n<\/strong><\/span>After the flood of Noah\u2019s time, Noah\u2019s three sons, Shem, Ham and Japheth, populated various parts of the world\u2013(Genesis 10:1-31).\u00a0 The descendants of Shem, which includes Jews and Muslims, are known as Shemites\/ Semites. Whereas Abraham, Sarah, Isaac (Abraham and Sarah’s son) and Jacob (Isaac\u2019s son) were Semites they were NOT Jews (Jews and Judaism originated from Judah, one of Jacob\u2019s son, shown shortly).
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Jacob, later renamed Israel by God\u2013(Genesis 35:10), had twelve sons who formed the basis for the Twelve Tribes of Israel\u2013(Exodus 1:1-5; Deuteronomy 27:12-13). <\/span>The descendants of each of these twelve sons\/tribe is identified by the head of his respective tribe \u2013for example: the descendants of Judah are called Jews<\/em>; the descendants of Levi are called Levites<\/em>; the descendants of Benjamin are called Benjamites<\/em> or Benjaminites<\/em>\u2026.. And collectively, they are all known as Children of Israel (descendants of Jacob\/Israel).<\/span>
\n\u00a0Thus, whereas all these Twelve Tribes are “Children of Israel\/Jacob”, all “Children of\u00a0 Israel\/Jacob” are not Jews<\/em> or Levites<\/em>, etc.<\/span><\/p>\n

While a Gentile may convert to Judaism <\/em>and he and his son(s) shall receive all the benefits of the religion-(Exodus 12:48\u201349; Ezekiel 47:21\u201323),<\/em> a Gentile cannot become a Jew (of the tribe of Jacob\/Judah). To be a “Jew” one has to be born in the lineage of Jacob\/Judah.
\n<\/span>\u00a0 \u00a0Judaism, <\/em>as religion, is rooted in the House of Judah, the seat of material and spiritual power (kingship and prophethood): “JUDAH, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy father’s children shall bow down before thee….The SCEPTRE shall not depart from Judah, nor a LAWGIVER from between his feet, until Shiloh come and unto him shall the gathering of the people be”-(Genesis 49:8, 10. Shiloh<\/em> will be discussed later).\u00a0<\/span>
\nAside from the fact that no one at present can identify himself as descendant of any of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, the current occupiers of Palestine who call themselves Jews are not Biblical Jews, they are descendants of European converts to Judaism. (Whereas Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are descendants of Noah’s son Shem, Europeans are descendants of Noah’s son, Japheth. They are GENTILES).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Which raises the question, since the current occupiers of Palestine are not<\/strong><\/em> descendants of Jacob\/Judah how then do they claim that Palestine is their “ancestral homeland” when Jacob\/Judah are not their ancestors?<\/span>
\n\u00a0 If one’s ancestor’s abode in a land is the criteria for the descendants to\u00a0 demand statehood in that land, then, the descendants of slaves brought to America can demand statehoods in North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee and Louisiana etc; and the descendants of the Pilgrims that landed at Massachusetts Plymouth Rock in 1620 can return to England and demand statehood.<\/span><\/p>\n

As noted above Jew<\/em> and Judaism<\/em> originated from the prophet Jacob\/Judah. Thus, contrary to popular perception, Abraham, Sarah and Isaac who preceded Jacob, were not Jews or adherents of Judaism.<\/span>
\n\u00a0 By nationality, Abraham and Sarah were Chaldeans\u2013Genesis 11:27, 31, 12:1; 15:7; Isaac was Canaanite\u2013Genesis 20:1; 21:1-3;\u00a0 Jacob also was Canaanite\u2013Genesis 25:21-28. And religiously, Abraham, Sarah, Isaac and Jacob, as all prophets of God, were Muslims1<\/sup>.<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0Jews know that God\u2019s covenant was made with Abraham and Ishmael, so they falsified the Bible \u2013effacing Ishmael\u2019s name from two verses in the Book of Genesis and inserted Isaac\u2019s name in its place, to glorify the Jewish branch of Abraham. (Details later<\/em>).<\/span><\/p>\n

“Palestine in the ancient\u00a0world was part of the region known as Canaan<\/strong>\u00a0where the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah were located. The term `Palestine’ was originally a designation of an area of land in southern Canaan which the people known as the\u00a0Philistines occupied a very small part of.”<\/span>
\n“The area contained the five cities (the Pentapolis) of the Philistine confederacy (Gaza, Ashkelon [Ascalon], Ashdod, Gath, and Ekron) and was known as\u00a0Philistia, or the Land of the Philistines. It was from this designation that\u00a0the whole of the country was later called Palestine by the Greeks<\/strong>.” (Google).<\/span><\/p>\n

Abraham, from whom Jews (not to be confused with present-day occupiers of Palestine) <\/em>and Muslims descended, came to Canaan around 2,000 BC. Canaanite presence in Canaan dates back about 4,000 BC. Palestinians\/Philistines are the Arabized descendants of the Canaanites. Thus, Palestinians presence in Canaan predates that of Abraham, Jews and Muslims.<\/span><\/p>\n

In Genesis 17:8; God says to Abraham: \u201cAnd I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee<\/em><\/strong>\u2026all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession.\u201d (Notably, and significantly, Ishmael also was the \u201cseed\u201d of Abraham. And\u00a0 God\u2019s promise was made with Abraham NOT with the Israelite. And as Prof. \u2018Abdul Ahad Dawud explained, and shown further on, this promise of God to Abraham was fulfilled through the descendants of Ishmael\u2013Muslims NOT Jews.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

God says He had chosen the earlier<\/u><\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>Children of Israel because they were a \u201choly people,\u201d that He \u201cloved\u201d them, and because He \u201cwould keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers\u201d\u2013(Deuteronomy 7:6, 8; 10:15).
\n<\/span>These earlier<\/strong><\/em> Israelites whom God \u201cloved\u201d were those preceding liberation from Pharaoh, as the later<\/strong><\/em> liberated ones from the time of their leaving Egypt were provocative, stiff-necked, and rebellious: \u201cRemember, and forget not, how thou provokedst the Lord thy God<\/strong><\/em> to wrath in the wilderness: from the day that thou didst depart out of the land of Egypt, until ye came unto this place, ye have been rebellious against the Lord<\/strong><\/em>\u201d\u2013(Deuteronomy 9:7; 31:27. And Exodus 33:3; Isaiah 65:2-3).<\/span>
\n\u00a0These later<\/u><\/em><\/strong> Israelite were also \u201cprovocative\u201d \u201crebellious\u201d \u201ctreacherous\u201d \u201ctransgressor,\u201d and an \u201cimpudent children and stiff-hearted\u201d\u2013(Isaiah 65:2-3; Jeremiah 5:11, 23; Ezekiel 2:3-4; Hosea 5:3-7).<\/span><\/p>\n

God\u2019s promise was NOT<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>made to the LATER<\/em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>Israelite who were stiff-necked, rebellious, and provocative\u2013(Exodus 33:3; Deuteronomy 9:7; 31:27; Isaiah 65:2-3).<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0God’s grace upon the later<\/u><\/em><\/strong> Israelite was dependent upon them keeping His commandment:<\/em><\/strong> \u00a0<\/em>\u201cWherefore it shall come to pass, if you hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them<\/em>,<\/strong> that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he sware unto thy fathers<\/em><\/strong>\u201d\u2013(Deuteronomy 7:12. (One of this commandment was for them to follow the prophet like Moses, the Prophet Mohammad, details later).<\/span><\/p>\n

To emphasize, these descendants of Abraham to receive God’s favor, refer to his early <\/em><\/strong>descendants who were righteous \u2013Isaac, and Jacob. These descendants are NOT <\/em><\/strong>the later<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>Israelite descended from the Twelve Tribes of Jacob\/Israel that are described by God as being \u201cstiff-necked\u201d and \u201crebellious.\u201d<\/span>
\nThese later<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>Children of Israel\/Jacob\u2019s twelve sons being made to inhabit Canaan\/Palestine under Joshua\u2013(Joshua 6:21; 12:1-24) was only incidental: incidental through God fulfilling his promise to<\/strong><\/em><\/span> Abraham and his early <\/em><\/strong>descendants Isaac and Jacob; as evidenced by God Himself Who told the later <\/em><\/strong>Israelites that after they are brought into the land of the wicked nations that:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cSpeak not in thine heart\u2026saying, For my righteousness the Lord hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the Lord doth drive them out from before thee<\/em><\/strong>\u2026.and that he may perform the word which the Lord sware unto thy fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. <\/em><\/strong>Understand therefore, that the Lord thy God giveth thee not this good land to possess it for thy righteousness; for thou art a stiffnecked people.<\/em><\/strong>\u2026from the day that thou didst depart out of the land of Egypt, until ye came unto this place, ye have been rebellious unto the Lord<\/em>.<\/strong>\u201d (Deuteronomy 9:4-7).<\/span><\/p>\n

As clearly shown, God\u2019s covenant was made with Abraham for Isaac and Jacob not<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>with the Children of Israel\/Jacob. These later <\/em><\/strong>descendants of Abraham (i.e. of the Twelve Tribes of Jacob\/Israel) were made to inhabit Palestine despite their \u201cstiffnecked\u201dness and \u201crebellion\u201d and \u201cprovocation\u201d only so that God could fulfill His word to Abraham and his early<\/em><\/strong> descendants who were the righteous <\/em>ones.<\/span>
\nAnd as noted, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were Muslims. God’s promise for Palestine to be an “everlasting” possession was made to MUSLIMS!<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

That Allah gave Jews Palestine for an inheritance is stated in the Qur’an: “And We made the people who were deemed weak to inherit the eastern lands and the western ones which We had blessed. And the good word of thy Lord was fulfilled in the Children of Israel giving Jews to inherit the holy land to fulfill His promise”\u2013(Qur\u2019an 7:137).<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0Allah fulfilled His promise to Abraham by having the later<\/strong><\/em> Israelite “inherit” the land. However, Jews having \u201ceverlasting\u201d possession of Palestine was contingent upon them following the Prophet Mohammad, as stated in verse 157 (Qur’an 7:157):<\/span>
\n\u201cThose who follow the Messenger-Prophet, the Ummi<\/em>, whom they find mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel.<\/strong><\/em> He enjoins them good and forbids them evil, and makes lawful to them the good things and prohibits for them impure things, and removes from them their burden and the shackles which were on them. So those who believe in him and honour him and help him, and follow the light which has been sent down with him<\/strong><\/em> \u2014 these are the successful.<\/em><\/strong>\u201d<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0Clearly, upon the arrival of Prophet Mohammad, Jews were\/are mandated by Allah to follow him, at which time Jews would become Muslims and the continuing of the inheritance WITH THE DESCENDANTS OF ISHMAEL to the Resurrection.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Jews being commanded to follow Prophet Mohammad is mandated in the Bible. God said to Moses: \u201cThe Lord thy God will raise up unto thee (Israelites) a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren<\/em>, like unto me (Moses); unto him ye shall hearken,\u201d \u201cI\u2026will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I WILL REQUIRE IT OF HIM\u201d\u2013(Deuteronomy 18:15, 18-19. More on this later).<\/span><\/p>\n

Jews having lost possession of Palestine for whatever reason -Jerusalem was destroyed around 580 BC and in 70 AD- Jews have no recourse to Palestine in the name of God.<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0Aside from the fact that ancient Jews were given possession of Palestine only so that God could fulfill His promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, this possession of Palestine was only for a temporary period.<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0Jesus foretold, Jews would lose possession: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate”-(Matthew 23:23-38. This was a scant 35 years before Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD).<\/span>
\nEven if present-day occupiers of Palestine were Jews (descendants of Jacob\/Judah) yet they would have no claim to Palestine, Divine or other.<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0It was NOT God who gave “Jews” Palestine in 1947\/48, it was America and the League of Nations that gave “Jews” Palestine!<\/span> (Shown in chapter 2).<\/span><\/p>\n

PALESTINE CONSECRATED:
\nThe claim that Palestine was consecrated in the hands of Jews 3,000 years ago is Jewish grandstanding<\/span>.<\/span>
\nAside from the fact that, religiously, Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac and Jacob were MUSLIMS (those who submit to the will of God; and there was no Jew at that time: Jew and Judaism came from Judah, one of the twelve sons of Jacob, and the religion of Judaism began with the Mosaic Law\/Ten Commandments brought by Moses). Palestine was not consecrated in the hands of Isaac (Jews); Palestine was consecrated in the hands of Ishmael (Muslims).\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\nProfessor \u2018Abdul Ahad Dawud \u2013the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani\u2013 explains in his revealing book Muhammad In The Bible<\/em>:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere are three distinct points which every true believer in God must accept as truths. The first point is that Ishmael is the legitimate son of Abraham, his firstborn, and therefore his claim to birthright is quite just and legal. The second point is that the Covenant was made between God and Abraham as well as his only <\/em>son Ishmael before Isaac was born. <\/em>The Covenant and the institution of the Circumcision would have no value or signification unless the repeated promise contained in the divine words, \u201cThroughout thee all the nations of the earth shall be blessed,\u201d and especially the expression, the Seed \u201cthat shall come out from the bowels, he<\/em><\/strong> will inherit thee\u201d (Gen. xv. 4). This promise was fulfilled when Ishmael was born (Gen. xvi.), and Abraham had the consolation that his chief servant Eliezer would no longer be his heir. Consequently we must admit that Ishmael was the real and legitimate heir of Abraham\u2019s spiritual dignity and privileges. The prerogative that \u201cby Abraham all the generations of the earth shall be blessed,\u201d so often repeated \u2013though in different forms\u2013 was the heritage by birthright, and was the patrimony of Ishmael. The inheritance to which Ishmael was entitled by birth-right was not the tent in which Abraham lived or a certain camel upon which he used to ride, but to subjugate and occupy forever all the territories extending from the Nile to the Euphrates<\/em><\/strong>, <\/em>which were inhabited by some ten different nations (Gen. xvii. 18-21). These lands have never been subdued by the descendants of Isaac, but by those of Ishmael<\/em><\/strong>. <\/em>This is an actual and literal fulfilment of one of the conditions contained in the Covenant.<\/span><\/p>\n

The third point is that Isaac was also born miraculously and specially blessed by the Almighty, that for his people the land of Canaan was promised and actually occupied under Joshua. \u2026.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2026.The Jews have always been jealous of Ishmael because they know very well that <\/em>in him<\/em><\/strong> the Covenant was made and with his circumcision it was concluded and sealed, and it is out of this rancour that their scribes or doctors of law have corrupted and interpolated many passages in their Scriptures.<\/em> To efface the name \u201cIshmael\u201d<\/em><\/strong> from the second, sixth, and seventh verses of the twenty-second chapter of the Book of Genesis and to insert in its place \u201cIsaac,\u201d<\/em> and to leave the descriptive epithet \u201cthy only begotten son\u201d is to deny the existence of the former and to violate the Covenant made between God and Ishmael -(at no time was Isaac Abraham’s only son-NGBA). <\/span><\/strong><\/em>It is expressly said in this chapter by God: \u201cBecause thou didst not spare thy only begotten son, I will increase and multiply thy posterity like the stars and the sands on the seashore,\u201d which word \u201cmultiply\u201d was used by the Angel to Hagar<\/em> in the wilderness: I will multiply thy offspring to an innumerable multitude, and that Ishmael \u201cshall become a fruitful man\u201d<\/em>\u00a0<\/em>(Gen. xvi. 12. It is Muslims whose numbers are<\/em> \u201clike the stars and the sands on the seashore\u201d<\/em>\u2013Gen. 22:17, NGBA<\/em>). Now the Christians have translated the same Hebrew word, which means \u201cfruitful\u201d or \u201cplentiful\u201d from the verb para <\/em>\u2013identical with the Arabic wefera<\/em>\u2013 in their versions \u201ca wild ass\u201d! Is it not a shame and impiety\u00a0<\/em>to call Ishmael \u201ca wild ass\u201d whom God styles \u201cFruitful\u201d or \u201cPlentiful\u201d? \u201d(pp.30-32. Italics\/Emphasis\/color added).\u00a0 Man can alter Scripture, man cannot alter decree of God.<\/span>
\n
\n<\/strong>(That Jews “effaced” Ishmael’s\u00a0 name and inserted Isaac’s name in its place, as noted by Prof. Dawud. Perhaps it is because of this adulterating of the Bible that the prophet Jeremiah said:\u00a0 \u201cHow can you say, \u2018We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us\u2019? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie<\/em>\u201d\u2013Jeremiah 8:8).<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0As shown, the Covenant was made between God and Abraham as well as his only <\/em>son, Ishmael. The reason Palestine was not given to Ishmael’s early<\/em><\/strong> descendants as possession seems obvious. Doing so would have bypassed Abraham’s Judaic branch, resulting in God not fulfilling His promise to Jacob.<\/span>
\nAlso, power and prophethood were to remain with the House of Judah until the appearance of Shiloh (Prophet Mohammad, shown shortly), at which time the descendants of Ishmael will have everlasting ownership of not only Palestine but all the territories of the Middle-east.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

That Ishmael, and not Isaac, was the son Abraham offered in his intended sacrifice is also borne out by All\u0101h God in His Qur\u2019an: Abraham prayed for an heir and is given a son; then he had a vision about him sacrificing this son\u2013(Qur\u2019an 37:100-111), and AFTERWARDS <\/em><\/strong>Abraham was promised Isaac as stated in verses 112-113: \u201cAnd We gave him the good news of ISAAC<\/em><\/strong>, a prophet, a righteous one. And We blessed him (Abraham) and Isaac.\u201d Muslims who say that the Qur\u2019an is not clear about which son was the intended sacrifice are to study the Qur\u2019an carefully.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As Prof. Dawud pointed out above, all the territories of the Middle-east is the Divine bequeath to Ishmael\/Muslims. Also shown is that Jews inheriting Palestine was incidental to God fulfilling His promise to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and for a temporal period.<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0This Divine bequeath to Ishmael\/Muslims to possess all the territories of the Middle-east for an everlasting heritage is also echoed by the prophets Jacob, Moses and Jesus. Briefly:<\/span><\/p>\n

SHILOH:\u00a0 Genesis 49:10 says that power and prophethood shall not depart from Judah until the coming of Shiloh<\/em>:\u00a0<\/em>\u201cThe sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a law-giver from between his feet until Shiloh come; and UNTO HIM shall the gathering of the people be.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud \u2013\u201cthe former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect\u201d\u2013 has explained in his book Muhammad In The Bible<\/em> that this prophecy cannot apply to Moses, David, or Jesus, but that it could relate only to Mohammad because \u201cMuhammad came with military power and the Qur\u2018an to replace the old Jewish worn-out sceptre and the impracticable and old-fashioned law of sacrifices and of a corrupt priesthood.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Prof. Dawud notes that the Jewish \u201cinstitutions\u201d of \u201cRoyal Sceptre and the Prophetical Succession\u201d \u201chave been extinct for over thirteen centuries;\u201d and that \u201cthe tribe of Judah also has disappeared together with its royal authority and its sister \u2013the prophetical succession\u201d<\/em>\u2013 both have been out of existence for the same period of time as the advent of Mohammad.<\/span><\/p>\n

Thus, \u201cThe Jews are forced to accept one or the other of the two alternatives, namely, either to admit that Shiloh has come already, but that their fore-fathers did not recognize him (All\u0101h says they knew, Qur\u2019an 2:146; 26:197),<\/strong><\/em> or to accept the fact that there exists no longer a tribe of Judah from which Shiloh will have to descend.\u201d Moreover, the prophecy clearly states that Shiloh \u201cis to be a total stranger to the tribe of Judah, and even to all the other tribes,\u201d \u2013the sceptre and the law-giver were to remain with Judah until the arrival of Shiloh. \u201cIf Shiloh be a descendant of Judah, how could those two elements [sceptre and lawgiver] cease to exist in that tribe?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Shiloh \u201ccould not be a descendant of any of the other tribes either, for the sceptre and the lawgiver were for all Israel, and not for one tribe only. This observation explodes the Christian claim as well. For Jesus is a descendant of Judah \u2013at least from his mother\u2019s side.\u201d It is clear from the above that \u201cthe Jews are vainly expecting the coming of another Shiloh, and that the Christians are obstinately persisting in their error in believing that it was Jesus who was intended by Shiloh.\u201d (Muhammad in the Bible<\/em>, pp. 54-58).<\/span><\/p>\n

PROPHET LIKE MOSES:\u00a0 God said to Moses: \u201cThe Lord thy God will raise up unto thee (Israelites) a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren<\/em>, like unto me (Moses); unto him ye shall hearken,\u201d \u201cAnd I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren<\/em>, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him\u201d\u2013(Deuteronomy 18:15, 18).<\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 A brother\/brethren is \u201ca male who has the same parents as another or has one parent in common with another\u201d\u2013(Webster\u2019s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary<\/em>; brother). Ishmael and Isaac had one common parent, Abraham. Thus, their children \u2013Arabs and Israelites\u2013 are \u201cbrethren\u201d of the other. Mohammad is the prophet like Moses.<\/span><\/p>\n

Further, God said about this prophet like Moses, \u201cI\u2026will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I WILL REQUIRE IT OF HIM\u201d (\u201cI Myself will call him to account\u201d as The Jewish Publication Society of America <\/em>has it)\u2013(Deut. 18:18-19).<\/span>
\nThe Qur\u2019an \u2013which begins \u201cIn the name of All\u0101h God\u201d\u2013 is the \u201cwords\u201d which God put into the mouth of the Prophet Mohammad through the Angel Gabriel. And as God says, whosoever does not follow Mohammad that person will have to answer to Him for his\/her disobedience\/rejection.(See Jesus-like Moses<\/a><\/span>).<\/span><\/p>\n

Jewish expectation of a coming Messiah to redeem them in the last days has no Divine foundation: \u201cThe Old Testament never speaks of an eschatological messiah \u2013one inaugurating the last times\u2013 and even the \u201cmessianic\u201d passages containing prophecies of a future golden age under an ideal king never use this term. Nevertheless, many modern scholars hold that Israelite messianism grew out of beliefs connected with kingship\u2026With the declining national fortunes of Israel, whose political kingdoms were conquered or even abolished by the great empires (Assyria, Babylonia, etc), the notion developed of the eschatological messiah-king.\u201d2<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

Deuteronomy 32:43 which says: \u201cPraise his People, O Nations: For he will avenge the blood of his servants. He will render vengeance against his adversaries and make expiation for his land and his People,\u201d this does NOT refer to future nations; it is about the nations at the time of the many \u201cites\u201d kingdoms that Joshua would exterminate, so God can keep His Word to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob\u2013(Deut 7:6, 8, 12; 10:15). This is stated in 32:49, where God showed Moses the land of Canaan: \u201cand behold the land of Canaan, which I give unto the Children of Israel for a possession.\u201d<\/span>
\nThis blessing was tied in to Jews following Mohammad as stated in the next chapter that says:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAnd this is the BLESSING, wherewith Moses\u2026blessed the Children of Israel before his death. And he said, The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them<\/em>\u201d\u2013<\/strong>(Deuteronomy 33:1-2).<\/span><\/p>\n

If Sinai and Seir refer to Moses and Jesus, respectively, \u201cMount Paran is not found in any other country except Arabia, Makkah being located in its valley\u201d3\u00a0<\/sup>and refers to Mohammad; the ten thousand saints is the number of followers the Prophet Mohammad had upon his triumph at Makkah, and the fiery law is the Holy Qur\u2019an.<\/span>
\nMOHAMMAD IS THE BLESSING GOD GAVE TO JEWS<\/span>. Jews salvation lie in them accepting: \u2018There is no God but All\u0101h; Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Jews accepting Mohammad will not only fulfill their covenant4<\/sup> with God, it will legitimize them being in Palestine, as they will now be Muslims. It would also remove their past sins and secure for them Jannah: “Say: O My servants who have sinned against their souls, despair not of the mercy of Allah; surely Allah forgives all sins. He is indeed the Forgiving, the Merciful”-(Qur’an 39:53).\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

COMFORTER:<\/em> Jesus told the Jews: \u201cThe kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof\u201d\u2013(Matthew 21:43).\u00a0 Christians might be apt to claim that this prophecy of Matthew 21:43 relates to them. This is fanciful. Christians are not following Christ. As shown, Christians are following the Church -Trinity, original\/inherited sin and vicarious atonement (for details see Home).
\n<\/a><\/span>
\nJesus foretold the coming of \u201canother\u201d Comforter who will guide us into \u201call truth\u201d: \u00a0\u201cAnd I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you forever;\u201d \u201cHowbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth\u201d-(John 14:16; 6:13). Jesus also says this \u201canother\u201d Comforter will \u201ctestify of\u201d and \u201cglorify\u201d him\u2013(John 15:26; 16:14). Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. \u2013\u201cthe former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect\u201d\u2013 points out:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Comforter \u2013the Spirit of Truth\u2013 spoken of by Jesus was no other than Muhammad himself. It cannot be taken as the Holy Ghost, as the Church theology says. \u201cIt is expedient for you that I go away,\u201d says Jesus, \u201cfor if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you, but if I depart I will send him unto you\u201d (John 16:7). The words clearly show that the Comforter had to come after the departure of Jesus, and was not with him when he uttered these words. Are we to presume that Jesus was devoid of the Holy Ghost if his coming was conditional on the going of Jesus: besides, the way in which Jesus describes him makes him a human being, not a ghost. \u201cHe shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear that he shall speak\u201d (John 16:13). Should we presume that the Holy Ghost and God are two distinct entities and that the Holy Ghost speaks of himself and also what he hears from God? The words of Jesus clearly refer to some messenger from God. He calls him the Spirit of Truth, and so the Qur\u2018an speaks of Muhammad, \u201cNay, he has come with the Truth and verified the apostles\u201d (Qur\u2019an 37:37). (Muhammad In The Bible, <\/em>p. 6).<\/span><\/p>\n

Jesus says the Comforter will not speak of himself but what he hears-(John 16:13), which is the same as God informing Moses about Him raising up a prophet like Moses putting His words into “this” prophet’s mouth (as noted above).\u00a0 The words God put into the mouth of the prophet like Moses and the words the Comforter heard from God is the Qur\u2019an<\/a>\u2013(Qur\u2019an 53:3-5).<\/span>
\n\u00a0 (As noted, Jesus said that the Comforter “will guide you into all truth\u201d. Thus, the Bible, devoid of “all truth”, the Bible is OBSOLETE; and Jesus, not giving “all truth”, JESUS IS REDUNDANT -though he, as all prophets, is to be honored with ‘peace and blessings of Allah’<\/em> as Muslims honor him. It is the Comforter<\/a>\u00a0Mohammad, who is now the only name, way, truth and life, and no man cometh to God but by him, Mohammad).\u00a0<\/span>
\nJews and Christians can reject Mohammad but Jews and Christians cannot refute Mohammad’s claim to Divine Dispensation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Whereas the Israelite was given Palestine for a temporary possession about the 12th. Century BC -and which possession lasted for about “sixty years”. Whether the current occupiers of Palestine are of the House of Judah or are foreigners in the tent of Judaism, their claim to 20th Century Palestine as a Divine gift has NO Divine basis.<\/span><\/p>\n

TO RESTATE: Jews having possession of Palestine was contingent upon them following Prophet Mohammad. Jews are mandated by Allah to follow Prophet Mohammad in the Bible and Qur’an, at which time Jews would become Muslims and the continuing of the inheritance to the Resurrection. Jews accepting Mohammad will not only fulfill their covenant with God, it will legitimize them being in Palestine, as they will now be Muslims. It would also remove their past sins and secure for them Jannah. (See Judaism-no future<\/a><\/span>).\u00a0<\/span>
\nAll the territories of the Middle-east were\/are Divinely bequeathed to Muslims for an “everlasting” possession.<\/span><\/p>\n

~~~Palestine~~~<\/span><\/strong>
\n<\/em><\/span>Timeless!<\/em><\/span><\/span>
\nCelestially Ours!<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Muslims who acquiesce to this foreign domination of Palestine is a traitor to All\u0101h, a traitor to the Messenger of All\u0101h; a traitor to the Muslim community and traitor to himself\/herself.\u00a0 Such Muslims are to begin formulating their excuse for when they face All\u0101h on Judgment Day to answer for his\/her betrayal.5<\/sup><\/span>
\n(See also Al \u2018Aqsa \u2013 Temple Mount or Mosque Mount?)<\/a><\/span>
\n<\/em>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0*<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. POLITICAL PALESTINE
    \n<\/span>In the year 1190 A.C. (After Christ), three years after he defeated the Christian Crusades at Jerusalem,\u00a0 Salahuddin Ayyub (known in the West as Saladin) invited Jews back to Jerusalem from where they were banned by the Christians. For centuries Jews and Muslims lived together until Zionism appeared.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Theodor Herzl, who is regarded as Father of Zionism, sketched out his shameless schematic for the dispossession of the native Palestinians:<\/span>
    \n“We shall have to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it any employment in our own country. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.”7<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

    Joseph Weitz’s malevolent manifesto:<\/span>
    \n\u201c\u2026after the [Second World] war the question of the land of Israel and the question of the Jews would be raised beyond the framework of \u201cdevelopment\u201d; amongst ourselves. It must be clear that there is no room for both peoples in this country.<\/em>….If the Arabs leave the country, it will be broad and wide-open for us. And if the Arabs stay, the country will remain narrow and miserable. When the War is over and the English have won, and when the judges sit on the throne of Law, our people must bring their petitions and their claim before them; and the only solution is Eretz Israel, or at least Western Eretz Israel, without Arabs. There is no room for compromise on this point! <\/em>The Zionist enterprise so far, in terms of preparing the ground and paving the way for the creation of the Hebrew State in the land of Israel, has been fine and good in its own time, and could do with \u201cland-buying\u201d\u2013but this will not bring about the State of Israel; that must come all at once….and there is no way besides transferring the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer them all<\/em>; except maybe for Bethlehem, Nazareth and Old Jerusalem, we must not leave a single village, not a single tribe<\/em>. And the transfer must be directed to Iraq, to Syria, and even to Transjordan….And only with such a transfer will the country be able to absorb millions of our brothers, and the Jewish question shall be solved, once and for all. There is no other way out.\u201d8
    \n<\/sup><\/span>
    \nChaim Herzog announced about Palestinians: \u201c\u2026I am not prepared to consider them (Palestinians)<\/em> as partners in any respect in a land that has been consecrated in the hands of our nation for thousands of years. For the Jews of this land there cannot be any partners.\u201d9 <\/sup>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

    From their own declarations, since the nineteenth century Jews have been scheming to kick Palestinians off their land and populate it with Jews. And, with the help of American diplomatic thuggery at the then League of Nations (present-day United Nations) in 1947, Jews kicked Palestinians out of their homes, land and country. (Zionist Jews devour the Muslim hands that liberated them from Christians).<\/span><\/p>\n

    Like many other Muslim countries, Palestine was part of the Muslim Khilafat <\/em>(Union) (the Ottoman Empire) based in Turkey.<\/span>
    \n\u201cIn 1915, Great Britain encouraged the Arabs to join with her against Turkey, promising them independence after the war,\u201d as noted by Ismail Zayid, but after Turkey was defeated the British proved treacherous, making what was known as the Sykes-Picot agreement in which Britain and France would carve up between themselves \u201cthe Arab countries and part of Turkey.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

    To capitalize on Jewish influence in the Bolshevik party and keep Russia on Britain\u2019s side in the war, Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary, in November 1917, informed Lord Rothschild, a British Jew and banker, that: \u201cHis Majesty\u2019s Government views with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people\u2026\u201d10<\/sup>\u00a0 But Britain reneged on her promise. The result was Jewish \u201cterrorism\u201d directed against the British. Eventually, the British gave up its mandate over Palestine.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Shortly \u201cafter 1945\u201d the American Government, under President Harry Truman, took the lead in the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine. To acquire the two-thirds majority of votes in the UN needed to partition Palestine, Ismail Zayid\u00a0<\/em>notes in his Palestine A Stolen Heritage <\/em>(p.11):<\/span><\/p>\n

    \u201cSumner Welles affirmed: \u201cBy direct order of the White House, every form of pressure, direct or indirect, was brought to bear by American officials upon those countries outside the Moslem world, that were known to be either uncertain or opposed to Partition.\u201d\u201d<\/span>
    \nAnd <\/em>\u201cJames Forrestal, then U.S. Secretary of Defense, wrote: \u201cThe methods that had been used to bring coercion and duress on other nations in the General Assembly bordered closely on scandal.\u201d\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

    “”Aranha” refers to Osvaldo Aranha, a Brazilian diplomat. As president of the U.N. General Assembly, Aranha lobbied strongly on behalf of the Zionist movement (a settler colonialist<\/a>\u00a0Jewish nationalist political movement that called for the creation of the state of Israel). He delayed the vote on resolution 181 by two days in order to give the U.S. and other pro-Israel countries more time to pressure U.N. member states to vote for the plan.\u00a0Scholar Fred Khouri<\/a><\/span> writes that, in these two days:<\/span>
    \n“The United States and Zionists led the lobbying efforts of the pro-partition forces. The delegates, as well as the home governments, of Haiti, Liberia, Ethiopia, China, the Philippines, and Greece were swamped with telegrams, telephone calls, letters, and visitations from many sources, including the White House, congressmen, business corporations, and other fields of endeavor. As a result of these tremendous official and nonofficial pressures, Haiti, Liberia, and the Philippines finally agreed to vote for partition.”11<\/sup>\u00a0<\/span>
    \nNo Court of Justice would view as one\u2019s legal property an item acquired through \u201cpressure\u201d and\/or \u201ccoercion and duress.\u201d (Where are the self-respecting legal brains to challenge this rape of Palestine in the World Court?)<\/span><\/span>
    \nPerhaps Sikhs can test the integrity of the United Nations for their independent homeland in India, using the Partition of Palestine as precedent. So can the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) for a homeland in the Philippines; the Uighurs for a homeland in China and African-Americans for a homeland in America.<\/span><\/p>\n

    It is doubtful these leaders would accept part of their country wrested from them and given to a disgruntled sector of their society for an independent homeland.<\/span><\/p>\n

    At the time of the Partition of Palestine, Jews were only about 34 percent of the population and owned less than six percent of land. Yet the Plan gave Jews 56 percent of land and Palestinians 43 percent and one percent as International quarter.<\/span>
    \nSome Jews have the arrogance and audacity to point out that whereas Jews accepted the Plan, Palestinians rejected the Plan?\u00a0 Why would Jews reject this Crown Jewel of a scheme that gave them more than half of Palestine? Why should Palestinians accept this barefaced thievery of their country?<\/span>
    \nNo one in the world\u00a0\u2013No King or Queen or Prince or pauper or President or Prime Minister or doctor or lawyer or Rabbi or teacher or writer or student or peasant\u2013\u00a0would accept such an ignominious scheme and not challenge it in every way open to him and her. Yet Palestinians are forced to accept the fate that no one in the world would accept.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Those who criticize and condemn the Palestinians for fighting occupation and theft of their lands must give half of their property to the homeless and half of their country to the natives or ethnic sector for their State; they must suffer what the Palestinians have suffered and endure what the Palestinians are enduring and accept what the Palestinians are forced to accept.\u00a0\u00a0
    \n<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0 \u00a0(The odd sentiment has been expressed, why go back to 1948 [when the UN \u2018stole\u2019 Palestine and gave it to the Jews]. If Jews can go back two thousand years to \u2018God gave us this land\u2019 as justification to dispossess the Palestinians of their homes, lands, and country, certainly Palestinians can go back sixty years to assert their right to Palestine. In fact, Palestinians can go back four thousand years, seeing that their presence in Palestine predates the Jews).<\/span><\/p>\n

    It is charged that Palestinians did not make a counter-offer (to the Partition Plan). This is the most laughable of all absurdities. Why must Palestinians make concessions to pacify Jewish sentiments for statehood?<\/span>
    \n\u00a0 \u00a0(Why did Britain, the instigator of the theft of Palestine, through her Balfour Declaration in 1917, not make concessions to Northern Ireland and give it statehood, rather than fight pounds, shillings, pence and farthings for thirty grueling years to hold on to it? Why did Britain not make concessions and give Jews England, Ireland. Scotland or Wales for their homeland?<\/span>
    \n\u00a0 \u00a0Why did America, the facilitator of the theft of Palestine, not make concessions and give Jews New York, California, Texas, Florida or Washington for their homeland?<\/span>
    \n\u00a0 \u00a0Let’s see the Britishers and the Americans swallow this bit of unpalatable morsel their governments have been trying to force-feed the fearless and forbearing Palestinians for more than seven torturous decades now.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

    A country is not dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the \u201cother\u201d or because they desire their own state. If past or present ownership to a piece of land constitutes the right to secede from the whole, or if a country is dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the \u201cother,\u201d or dissected along sectist, racial and theological lines, or for want of their own state, many a country might now be standing in rumps.\u00a0Whoever does not wish to live with the \u201cother\u201d must leave! Zionist Jews are to leave Palestine!<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

    If Palestinians\/Arabs manifesto is to drive out the occupiers of their land they are fully justified.<\/span>
    \n\u2013If Palestinians is terrorist for fighting to liberate their lands, Britain is terrorist for sailing halfway around the globe to unseat the Argentines from the disputed <\/em>Falklands Island!<\/span>
    \n\u2013If Palestinians is terrorist for fighting to liberate their lands, America and coalition is terrorist for driving Iraq out of Kuwait!\u00a0 (Though Kuwait was a part of Iraq before it was carved out by the British in 1921).<\/span>
    \n\u2013If Palestinians is terrorist for fighting to liberate their lands, the Allies of World war II must be the biggest terrorist for booting Germany out of France and preventing Hitler from becoming Emperor of Europe!<\/span>
    \n\u2013If Palestinians is terrorist for fighting to liberate their lands, Canada must be terrorist for fighting American takeover in 1812!<\/span><\/p>\n

    Palestinians\/Muslims have every right and all rights and the Highest authority -the Divine Authority- to reclaim our stolen lands: “And drive them out from where they drove you out” -(Qur’an 2:191).<\/span><\/span>
    \nThe Occupied (Palestinians) has the right to fight by whatever means and whatever methods available; man has no right to edict judgment against them: this judgment is only for All\u0101h.<\/span><\/p>\n

    STEALING MORE PALESTINIAN LANDS:<\/span>
    \nProf. Edward Said notes as \u201cGeneral Gur put it in May 1978, official Israeli military policy has been to attack Arab civilians en masse\u201d-(The Question of Palestine<\/em>, p.224).\u00a0<\/span>
    \n\u00a0 \u00a0Following the Partition of Palestine in 1947. Jewish terrorists\u00a0 massacred the villagers of Deir Yassin in 1948. Ismail Zayid notes in his Palestine\u2013A Stolen Heritage <\/em>(pp. 11-12):<\/span><\/p>\n

    \u201cOn 9th April 1948, the Irgun Zwei Leumi led by Menachem Begin (who later became a Prime Minister of Occupied Palestine) <\/em>\u2026.attacked the small Arab village of Deir Yassin near Jerusalem. An account of this barbaric massacre was given by Jacques de Reynier, the Chief Delegate of the International Red Cross, who was able to reach the village and witness the aftermath of the massacre: \u201cThree hundred persons\u201d he said, \u201cwere massacred\u2026.without any military reason or provocation of any kind; old men, women, children, newly-born<\/em><\/strong> were savagely murdered with grenades and knives by Jewish troops of the Irgun, entirely under the control of their chiefs.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Dov Joseph, one time Governor of the Israeli sector of Jerusalem and later Minister of Justice, called the Deir Yassin massacre \u201cdeliberate and unprovoked attack.\u201d Arnold Toynbee described it as comparable to crimes committed against the Jews by Nazis. But \u201cMenachem Begin said \u201cThe massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin<\/em>.<\/strong>\u201d (Massacring defenseless old men, women, children and newly-born, and to steal their homes and lands, is a \u201cvictory\u201d?).<\/em><\/span> Unashamed of their deed and unaffected by world condemnation, the Zionist forces, using loud-speakers, roamed the streets of the cities warning Arab inhabitants \u201cThe Jericho road is still open,\u201d they told Jerusalem Arabs\u2013 \u201cFly from Jerusalem before you are killed, like those in Deir Yassin.\u201d (Italics\/emphasis added.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

    That Palestinians were terrorized into fleeing their homes, Britannica<\/em>: \u201cThe Irgun stormed and captured the village of Deir Yasin and massacred much of the population, terrorizing the Arab villagers<\/em><\/strong>, who began a mass exodus from Palestine.\u201d (15th<\/sup> Edn; Vol. 17, p. 960. Italics\/emphasis added.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

    “In 1948,\u00a0about 450 Palestinian villages\u00a0were razed to the ground\u00a0by Israeli forces and about 770,000 people \u2013 including about 20,000 Jews expelled by Arab militias from Hebron, Jerusalem, Jenin, and Gaza \u2013 were evicted in a matter of few days\u00a0and then forcibly denied the return. Some of them fled out of fear, often after witnessing the tragic fate of their relatives and friends.<\/span>
    \nA case in point is the mass expulsion of Palestinians from the towns of Lydda and Ramle in July 1948, which accounted for one-tenth of the overall Arab-Palestinian exodus. Most among the 50,000-70,000\u00a0<\/sup>Palestinians that were expelled from the two cities did so following an official expulsion order signed by the then commander of the Harel Brigade, Yitzhak Rabin: \u201cThe inhabitants of Lydda\u201d,     Rabin clarified<\/a>,<\/span> \u201cmust be expelled quickly without attention to age\u201d. Several hundreds of them died during the exodus from exhaustion and dehydration.”12<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

    Ismail Zayid notes in his Palestine A Stolen Heritage<\/em>:<\/span>
    \n\u201cNot only did the Israelis refuse to allow the return of the (Palestinian) refugees to their homes, but they consummated the tragedy by seizing all their property in one of the greatest acts of plunder in modern history. The confiscation of Arab land was not confined to the holdings of the refugees but extended to the 200,000 Palestinians, who remained in their homes in 1948, by a series of extraordinary laws and regulations of legalized robbery. These included \u201cThe Land Acquisition Law,\u201d \u201cThe abandoned Areas Ordinance, 1949,\u201d (\u201cAbandoned\u201d or kicked out?)<\/em><\/span> \u201cThe Absentee Property Regulations, 1948\u201d and others.” (p.15. (You are refused entry into your country then you are called an \u201cAbsentee\u201d. Only in Occupied Palestine).<\/em><\/span>
    \n<\/em><\/span>
    \nProfessor Edward Said gives a chilling account of this Jewish barbarity in his The Question of Palestine <\/em>(pp. 105-106):<\/span>
    \n\u201cUntil 1966, the Arab citizens of Israel were ruled by a military government exclusively in existence to control, bend, manipulate, terrorize, tamper with every facet of Arab life from birth virtually to death.<\/strong><\/em> After 1966, the situation is scarcely better, as an unstoppable series of popular riots and demonstrations testify; the Emergency Defense Regulations were used to expropriate thousands of acres of Arab lands,<\/strong><\/em> either by declaring Arab property to be in security zone or by ruling lands to be absentee property (even if, in many cases, the absentees were present \u2013a legal fiction of Kafkaesque subtlety). Any Palestinian can tell you the meaning of the Absentee\u2019s Property Law <\/strong><\/em>of 1950, the Land Acquisition Law<\/strong><\/em> of 1953, the Law for the Requisitioning of Property in Time of Emergency<\/strong><\/em> (1949), the Prescription Law<\/strong><\/em> of 1958.”<\/span><\/p>\n

    Ilan Pappe, \u201cIsraeli historian,\u201d notes in his revealing book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, <\/em>that the methods \u201cemployed\u201d \u201cto forcibly evict\u201d the native Palestinians were \u201clarge-scale intimidation; laying siege to and bombarding villages and population centres; setting fire to homes, properties and goods; expulsion; demolition; and finally, planting mines among the rubble to prevent any of the expelled inhabitants from returning;\u201d and that at the end of their \u201cmission\u201d which took \u201csix months\u201d to complete: \u201cmore than half of Palestine\u2019s native population, close to 800,000 people, had been uprooted, 531 villages had been destroyed, and eleven urban neighborhoods emptied of their inhabitants.\u201d (pp. xii, xiii).<\/span><\/p>\n

    On October 29, 1956, Jewish border guards murdered 49 (including one unborn)\u00a0 Arab peasants, men, women and children, of Kafr Qasim for violating a curfew of which they were unawares.<\/span>
    \nAnd as Edward Said notes in his The Question of Palestine<\/em> (p.106), “the officer in charge of the operation was brought to trial, found guilty, and then punished with a fine one piaster (less than one cent).”\u00a0 (The lives of forty-nine Arab children and adults, including one pregnant woman, are worth less than one cent. Adolf Hitler, Rudolf Hess and Josef Mengele should be so blessed. No disrespect to self-respecting Jews).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

    From 1931 to 1946 Jewish numbers in Palestine increased a whopping nearly 500,000 <\/strong>\u2013to 31%<\/strong> of the population, leaving the Palestinians at 69%<\/strong>. This dramatic increase of Jews to Palestine was due to the effort of the Zionists who made every effort to settle illegal refugee Jews<\/strong> fleeing Nazi persecution in Palestine: \u201cThe Zionists took every action to prevent the settlement\u00a0 of the Jewish survivors of the Nazi horrors in America or elsewhere, and, capitalising on the world\u2019s sympathy for the survivors, flooded Palestine with illegal immigrants\u201d-(Ismail Zayid, Palestine A Stolen Heritage<\/em>, p. 10).<\/span><\/p>\n

    Arabs are charged as being \u201cenemies\u201d of Jews. But Arabs do not occupy Jewish lands (and stealing more lands). Zionist Jews are the ones occupying Arab lands (and stealing more and more Arab lands).<\/span>
    \nIt is ZIONIST JEWS who are the “Amaleks”\/enemies of Arabs.<\/span><\/p>\n

    Jewish General, Moshe Dayan: \u201cWe came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country [the total area was about 6 percent] we bought the lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal [Dayan\u2019s own village] arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat\u2013in the place of Jibta, [Kibbutz] Sarid \u2013in the place of Haneifs, and Kefar Yehoshua\u2013in the place of Tell Shaman. There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population. [Ha-Aretz<\/em>, April 4, 1969.\u201d 13<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

    In the annals of modern history no people has suffered so much and for so long as Palestinians have suffered and continue to suffer for seven torturous decades now.
    \nIf there is any cause on which to immortalize our names it is the cause of the Palestinians. Justice demands that very grain of sand of Palestine stolen in 1947 be returned to Palestinians!<\/span><\/span>
    \n\u00a0(See also     Al \u2018Aqsa \u2013 Temple Mount or Mosque Mount?<\/span>)<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

    ************************************************<\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 NOTES\/REFERENCES<\/span><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. All prophets were Muslims. Allah revealed in Qur\u2019an 42:13:\u00a0\u201cHe has made plain to you the religion which He enjoined upon Noah and which We have revealed to thee (Mohammad), and which We enjoined on Abraham and Moses and Jesus.\u201d (For more on this, see All people are Muslims).<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n
    2. Ency Brit;<\/em>15th Edn; Vol; 11; Art; Judaism; p. 1018.<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din, Introduction to the Study of the Holy Qur\u2019an<\/em>, p. 67.<\/span><\/li>\n
    4. Jews broke covenant with God: “And certainly All\u00e5h made a covenant with the Children of Israel, and We raised up among them twelve chieftains. And All\u00e5h said: Surely I am with you. If you keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate and believe in My messengers and assist<\/em><\/strong> them<\/em><\/strong> and offer to All\u00e5h a goodly gift, I will certainly cover your evil deeds, and cause you to enter Gardens wherein rivers flow. But whoever among you disbelieves after that, he indeed strays from the right way. But on account of their breaking their covenant We cursed them and hardened their hearts.<\/strong><\/em> They alter the words from their places and neglect a portion of that whereof they were reminded. And thou wilt always discover treachery in them excepting a few of them \u2014 so pardon them and forgive. Surely All\u00e5h loves those who do good (to others)”-(Qur’an 5:12-13).<\/span>The Bible: “In Shittim…the people began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab. And they called the people unto the sacrifices of their gods: and the people did eat and bowed down to their gods. And Israel joined himself unto Baal-Peor, and the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel\u201d-(Numbers 25:1\u20133).<\/span>
      \n\u201cThe Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from one end of the earth even unto the other … And among those nations thou shalt find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy foot have rest; but the Lord shall give thee there a trembling heart, and failing of eyes, and sorrow of mind\u201d (Deuteronomy 28:64, 65).<\/span>
      \nAnd Jesus:<\/span>
      \nWoe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,<\/span>
      \nAnd say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.<\/span>
      \nWherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.<\/span>
      \nFill ye up then the measure of your fathers.<\/span>
      \nYe serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?<\/span>
      \nWherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:<\/span>
      \nThat upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.<\/span>
      \nVerily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.<\/span>
      \nO Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!<\/span>
      \nBehold, your house is left unto you desolate” -(Matthew 23:23-38).<\/span><\/li>\n
    5. Muslims who acquiesce to this foreign domination of Palestine is a traitor to All\u0101h, a traitor to the Messenger of All\u0101h; a traitor to the Muslim community and traitor to himself\/herself.\u00a0 <\/span>
      \n-\u201cThose who swear allegiance to thee (Mohammad) do but swear allegiance to All\u0101h. The hand of All\u0101h is above their hands. So whoever breaks (his faith), he breaks it only to his soul\u2019s injury.<\/strong><\/em> And whoever fulfils his covenant with All\u0101h, He will grant him a mighty Reward\u201d\u2013(Qur\u2019an 48:10).<\/span>
      \n-“A Muslim is a brother of another Muslim. So he should neither oppress him nor hand him over to an oppressor.\u00a0 And whoever fulfilled the needs of his brother, Allah will fulfil his needs\u2013(Bokhari Vol. 9, #83).<\/span>
      \n-\u201cYour blood (lives), your properties are as sacred to one another like the sanctity of this Day (Eid al-Adha<\/em>) of yours, in this town (Makkah<\/em>) of yours, in this month (Dhul Hijjah<\/em>) of yours. You shall meet your Lord and He will ask about your deeds. Beware! Don\u2019t go astray after me by striking the necks of one another\u201d<\/strong><\/em>\u2013<\/strong>(Bokhari Vol. 9, #539).<\/span>
      \n-\u201cAll\u0101h forbids you not respecting those who fight you not for religion, nor drive you forth from your homes, that you show them kindness and deal with them justly. Surely All\u0101h loves the doers of justice.\u00a0 All\u0101h forbids you only respecting those who fight you for religion, and drive you forth from your homes and help (others) in your expulsion, that you make friends of them; and whoever makes friends of them, these are the wrongdoers\u201d<\/strong><\/em>\u2013(Qur\u2019an 60:8-9).<\/span>
      \n\u201cand drive them out from where they drove you out\u201d\u2013(Qur\u2019an 2:191).<\/span><\/li>\n
    6. Edward W. Said, The Question Of Palestine<\/em>, p. 13.<\/span><\/li>\n
    7. Edward Said, The Question of Palestine,<\/em> p. 99-100. Emphasis and brackets are Said\u2019s. \u201cRed\u201d color added.<\/span><\/li>\n
    8. Noam Chomsky, Pirates and Emperors, Old and New, International Terrorism in the Real World, <\/em>p. 11.<\/span><\/li>\n
    9. Ency. Brit<\/em>. 15th<\/sup> Edn, Vol 1, Balfour, Vol 17, p. 937e. See also Ismail Zayid, Palestine A Stolen Heritage<\/em>, p. 9.<\/span><\/li>\n
    10. https:\/\/www.salon.com\/2015\/11\/30\/u_n_voted_to_<\/a>partition_palestine_68_years_ago_in_an_unfair_plan_made_even_worse_by_israels_ethnic_cleansing\/;<\/span> PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 30, 2015.<\/span><\/li>\n
    11. Lorenzo Kamel, ‘The Palestinian refugees and the \u2018monologue of the century\u2019, https:\/\/www.aljazeera. com\/<\/a>opinions\/2019\/6\/24\/the-palestinian-refugees-and-the-monologue-of-the-century. 24 Jun 2019.<\/span> (Color added).<\/span><\/li>\n
    12. Edward Said, The Question of Palestine, <\/em>p. 14.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      In the name of All\u0101h, the Beneficent, the Merciful. Peace and Blessings of All\u0101h on Mohammad. DEDICATED TO All\u0101h\u2013the Glorious and the High, Lord of the worlds AND TO Mohammad\u2013who brought the world to our feet and eternity to our arms. * PALESTINE-JEWS OR MUSLIMS? (See also Al \u2018Aqsa \u2013 Temple Mount or Mosque Mount?) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7290","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7290"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7290\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7299,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7290\/revisions\/7299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}