{"id":6169,"date":"2023-02-25T17:09:39","date_gmt":"2023-02-25T17:09:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=6169"},"modified":"2023-03-14T15:39:01","modified_gmt":"2023-03-14T15:39:01","slug":"abraham-which-son-to-sacrifice","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=6169","title":{"rendered":"Abraham-Which son to sacrifice?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the name of All\u0101h,<\/span>
\nthe Beneficent, the Merciful.<\/span>
\nPeace and Blessings of All\u0101h on Mohammad.<\/span>
\nDEDICATED TO<\/span>
\nAll\u0101h\u2013the Glorious and the High,<\/span>
\nLord of the worlds<\/span>
\nAND TO<\/span>
\nMohammad\u2013who brought the world<\/span>
\nto our feet and eternity to our arms.
\n<\/span>*<\/span><\/p>\n

ABRAHAM–WHICH SON TO SACRIFICE?<\/span>
\n<\/span>Which son was Abraham called to sacrifice, Isaac or Ishmael? In whose hands was Palestine\/Holy Land consecrated, Jews or Muslims?
\n<\/span>
\nThat Ishmael,\u00a0 and NOT\u00a0 Isaac, was the son of Abraham’s intended sacrifice is shown in the Bible. Regarding God’s covenant with Abraham, Professor \u2018Abdul Ahad Dawud \u2013the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani BD of the Uniate\/Chaldean Sect\u2013<\/span> explains in his revealing book Muhammad In The Bible<\/i>:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere are three distinct points which every true believer in God must accept as truths. The first point is that Ishmael is the legitimate son of Abraham<\/strong><\/span>, <\/i><\/span>his firstborn, and therefore his claim to birthright is quite just and legal. The second point is that the Covenant was made between God and Abraham as well as his only <\/i>son Ishmael before Isaac was born. <\/i><\/span><\/strong>The Covenant and the institution of the Circumcision would have no value or signification unless the repeated promise contained in the divine words, \u201cThroughout thee all the nations of the earth shall be blessed,\u201d and especially the expression, the Seed \u201cthat shall come out from the bowels, he<\/i><\/strong><\/span> will inherit thee\u201d (Gen. xv. 4). This promise was fulfilled when Ishmael was born <\/i><\/strong><\/span>(Gen. xvi.), and Abraham had the consolation that his chief servant Eliezer would no longer be his heir. Consequently we must admit that Ishmael was the real and legitimate heir of Abraham\u2019s spiritual dignity and privileges.<\/i><\/span><\/strong> The prerogative that \u201cby Abraham all the generations of the earth shall be blessed,\u201d so often repeated\u2013though in different forms\u2013was the heritage by birthright, and was the patrimony of Ishmael<\/span>.<\/i> <\/strong>The inheritance to which Ishmael was entitled by birth-right was not the tent in which Abraham lived or a certain camel upon which he used to ride, but to subjugate and occupy forever all the territories extending from the Nile to the Euphrates<\/span><\/i><\/strong>,<\/span> <\/i>which were inhabited by some ten different nations (Gen. xvii. 18-21). These lands have never been subdued by the descendants of Isaac, but by those of Ishmael<\/span><\/strong>. This is an actual and literal fulfilment of one of the conditions contained in the Covenant.<\/span><\/strong><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

The third point is that Isaac was also born miraculously and specially blessed by the Almighty, that for his people the land of Canaan was promised and actually occupied under Joshua. \u2026.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2026.The Jews have always been jealous of Ishmael because they know very well that in him the Covenant was made and with his circumcision it was concluded and sealed, and it is out of this rancour that their scribes or doctors of law have corrupted and interpolated many passages in their Scriptures.<\/i> <\/strong><\/span><\/span>To efface the name \u201cIshmael\u201d<\/i><\/strong>\u00a0<\/i><\/span>from the second, sixth, and seventh verses of the twenty-second chapter of the Book of Genesis and to insert in its place \u201cIsaac,\u201d<\/span><\/i><\/strong> and to leave the descriptive epithet \u201cthy only begotten son\u201d is to deny the existence of the former and to violate the Covenant made between God and Ishmael<\/span>. <\/i><\/strong>It is expressly said in this chapter by God: \u201cBecause thou didst not spare thy only begotten son, I will increase and multiply thy posterity like the stars and the sands on the seashore,\u201d which word \u201cmultiply\u201d was used by the Angel to Hagar<\/span><\/i><\/strong> in the wilderness: I will multiply thy offspring to an innumerable multitude, and that Ishmael \u201cshall become a fruitful man\u201d<\/i><\/strong><\/span>(Gen. xvi. 12. It is Muslims whose numbers are<\/span> \u201clike the stars and the sands on the seashore\u201d\u2013<\/span>(Gen. 22:17<\/span><\/span>). Now the Christians have translated the same Hebrew word, which means \u201cfruitful\u201d or \u201cplentiful\u201d from the verb para <\/i>\u2013identical with the Arabic wefera<\/i>\u2013 in their versions \u201ca wild ass\u201d! Is it not a shame and impiety<\/span><\/i><\/strong>\u00a0<\/i>to call Ishmael \u201ca wild ass\u201d whom God styles \u201cFruitful\u201d or \u201cPlentiful\u201d? \u201d(pp.30-32. Italics\/Emphasis\/color added).
\n<\/span>Man can alter Scripture(s),\u00a0<\/i>man cannot alter decree of God.<\/i><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

That Ishmael, and NOT Isaac, was the son Abraham offered in his intended sacrifice is also borne out by All\u0101h in His Qur\u2019an: Abraham prayed for an heir and is given a son; then he had a vision about him sacrificing this son\u2013(Qur\u2019an 37:100-111), and AFTERWARDS <\/i><\/strong><\/span>Abraham was promised Isaac as stated in verses 112-113: “<\/span>And We gave him the good news of<\/em> ISAAC<\/i><\/strong>, a prophet, a righteous one. And We blessed him (Abraham) and Isaac.\u201d<\/span>
\nAll\u0101h blessing Abraham as Muhammad Ali explains: \u201cAbraham and Isaac are spoken of distinctly to show that by blessing Abraham is here meant blessing his descendants through Ishmael.\u201d
\n<\/span>Muslims who say that the Qur\u2019an is not clear about which son was the intended sacrifice are to study the Qur\u2019an carefully.<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Palestine is the moral, social, historical, and spiritual heritage of Palestinians and all Muslims:<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 -Morally<\/i><\/span>: Palestinians are the descendants of the natives. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 -Socially:<\/i><\/span> a country is not dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the \u201cother\u201d (a country forced into dividing because two races militate against each other is not the same as Jewish intent to create a state based on perceived (baseless) gift from God, or because they desire their own state (the Sikhs and the Gypsies of Europe should petition the UN for their respective State in India and Europe, if only to test the integrity of the UN).\u00a0 <\/span>T<\/span><\/span>hose who do not wish to live with the \u201cother\u201d must leave.
\n<\/span>\u00a0 \u00a0If ownership to a piece of land constitutes the right to secede from the whole, or if a country is dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the \u201cother,\u201d or along <\/span>sectist, racial, and theological lines, or for want of their own state <\/span>many a country might now be standing in rumps. <\/span><\/p>\n

-Historically<\/i><\/span>: Palestinians history in Palestine predates that of Jews \u2013Jewish sovereignty in Palestine was for a mere sixty years, two thousand years ago.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0-Spiritually:<\/i><\/span> Palestine is the spiritual heritage of Palestinians and all Muslims as noted above by <\/span><\/span>Professor \u2018Abdul Ahad Dawud.
\n<\/span>Contrary to Jewish grandstanding,
\nPalestine was consecrated in the hands of MUSLIMS! Had Muslims heed Allah and His noble Messenger, Palestine would not be under Jewish occupation. Palestine can yet be reclaimed, see<\/span> Islam-sectism among Muslims<\/a>.<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As Prof. Dawud pointed out above, Jews “effaced” Ishmael’s\u00a0 name from a number of verses and inserted Isaac’s name in its place to glorify the Jewish\u00a0 branch of Abraham. Perhaps it is becasue of this adulterating of the Bible that the prophet Jeremiah said:\u00a0 \u201cHow can you say, \u2018We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us\u2019? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie<\/em><\/strong>\u201d\u2013(Jeremiah 8:8).\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

If Jews wanted a home only they would have taken
\n<\/i>the land Britain offered them in Uganda.
\nBut Jews covet Palestinians’ heritage; just as
\nthey covet Ishmael’s Divine “covenant” .
\n<\/i><\/span>(See <\/span><\/span>Palestine<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span>).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

~~~<\/span>Palestine<\/span>~~~<\/span><\/em><\/span>
\nTimeless!<\/span><\/em><\/span>
\nCelestially Ours!
\n<\/span><\/em><\/span>WE -MUSLIMS- BELONG!
\nForever Justice! Forever Palestine!
\n<\/span><\/i><\/span>Vive la Palestine libre!<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span>
\nAazaad Philistine Zindaabaad!<\/span><\/i><\/span>
\nTahyaa Philistine al-hura!<\/span><\/i><\/span>
\nLong live free Palestine!<\/span><\/span><\/i><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Muslims who acquiesce to this foreign domination of Palestine is a traitor to All\u0101h and a traitor to His noble Messenger; a traitor to the Muslim community and traitor to himself\/herself-(Qur\u2019an 48:10; 2:190-191; 8:72-73; 60:9; 42:39-41). Such Muslims are to begin formulating their excuse for when they face All\u0101h on Judgment Day to answer for his\/her betrayal. (See <\/span><\/span>Palestine<\/span>).<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 <\/span>
\n***<\/span>
\n<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

CHRISTIAN MANIPULATION OF MUSLIMS:<\/span> One Christian quarter, using some Muslims uncertainty as to which son was the intended sacrifice, tried to manipulate Muslims into accepting Jesus as “blood sacrifice” for sins. The Christian notes John the Baptist (Yahya in the Qur\u2019an) calling Jesus the \u201cLamb of God\u201d who takes away the sin of the world, claiming that this was a reference to God\u2019s provision for Abraham.\u00a0<\/span>
\n\u00a0 \u00a0The Christian also notes the Book of Hebrews stating that \u201cwithout the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sin\u201d (Hebrews 9:22). And he asks Muslims\u00a0 to\u00a0 \u00a0“recognize that just as God ransomed Abraham and his son, God has also provided a ransom for us -a momentous sacrifice in Christ, for their Passover Lamb, who has been sacrificed for us (1 Corinthians 5:7). That Jesus is a lamb without blemish and capable of washing us white as snow (1Peter 1:19. Though Paul says Jesus was made lower than the angels and was also made a “curse”-Hebrews 2:9; Galatians 3:13.<\/em><\/span> Clearly, one who is a “curse” cannot be said to be “without blemish and capable of washing us white as snow.”<\/em> In fact, a “curse” one is a candidate for Hell. God made Jesus a “curse” just so He could forgive man for Adam’s sin? All the millions who died between Adam and Jesus died without being forgiven? Which end are Christians thinking with. Why did God not sacrifice Adam to begin with -God could have had the people from Nod “crucify” Adam).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

–That John the Baptist<\/span> referred to Jesus as the \u201cLamb of God\u201d who takes away the sin of the world-(John 1:29). This is amusing! But<\/span> <\/span>in Matthew 11:2-3 he (the Baptist) sent his servants to ask Jesus:\u00a0\u201cArt thou he (the other prophet1<\/sup><\/span>) that should come, or do we look for another?\u201d
\n<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0 If John knew that Jesus was the \u201cLamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world\u201d how is it that John did not know if Jesus was the other prophet or not? (Notably, Jesus could not be God\/son of God and also this other \u201cprophet\u201d).<\/span><\/span>
\nSince John the Baptist, a prophet and the greatest man born,2<\/sup><\/span> and who was with Jesus, is confused as to who Jesus was and his mission, is it any wonder that Christians, who are ordinary mortals and far removed from Jesus, are for two thousand years wandering in \u201cdarkness and misunderstanding\u201d and confusion as to who Jesus is and his mission? (Details further on).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

–That Hebrews 9:22 says,<\/span> \u201cwithout the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sin\u201d.
\nThis is NOT the words of God or Jesus.<\/span> This is the manufacture of Paul, the author of Hebrews. Paul was a self-admitted liar who forged his own Gospel and made himself into a human chameleon to sell his fake religion; Paul is the one who devised the doctrines of original\/inherited sin and vicarious atonement. (See <\/span>Allah and Jesus or Paul).<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

–That 1 Corinthians 5:7 says<\/span> that God has also provided a ransom for us -a momentous sacrifice in Christ, for their Passover Lamb, who has been sacrificed for us.
\nCorinthians I (and II) is also the writing of Paul. As noted in Allah and Jesus or Paul,\u00a0<\/a>when Paul saw that the Jews would not accept Jesus he introduced the doctrine of\u00a0 “son of God” to entice the pagans; pagans had a load of sons of god; accepting Jesus as another son of God was not difficult. That Jesus is NO “son of God” see\u00a0 <\/span>Home. item #8).<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

–That 1 Peter 1:19 says<\/span> that Jesus is a lamb without blemish and capable of washing us white as snow (1Peter 1:19).
\nPeter was a disciple\/apostle of Jesus on whom Jesus promised to build his church-(Matthew 16:18). Yet a scant\u00a0 five verses later Jesus labeled Peter a “satan”: “<\/span>But He (Jesus) turned and said to Peter, \u201cGet behind Me,<\/span>\u00a0Satan!<\/span>\u00a0You are<\/span> an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men\u201d -(Matthew 16:23)<\/span>.
\nAs Jesus’s church is built by “satan”, any wonder for two thousand years Christians are wandering in darkness and misunderstanding as to who Jesus was and his mission?
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u25cfWhereas some Christians say that Jesus is\u00a0 God some say he is only Son of God, \u00a0Whose belief is right?<\/span> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u25cfWhereas some Christians say that there is Trinity some say Trinity as a \u201csenseless God-dishonoring doctrine\u201d that can come only from the mind of \u201cSatan the Devil.\u201d Who is right? <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u25cfWhereas some Christians say that Christ died for original\/inherited sin some say he died for committed <\/i>sin (arguing, rightly, that your father being a millionaire does not make you a millionaire). Whose belief is true?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u25cfWhereas some Christians believe Jesus was killed, buried, and raised, \u201csome of the early Christian sects did not believe that Christ was killed on the cross. The Basilidans believed that some one else was substituted for him. The Docetae held that Christ never had a real physical or natural body, but only an apparent or phantom body, and that his Crucifixion was only apparent, not real. The Marcionite Gospel (about A.D. 138) denied that Jesus was born, and merely said that he appeared in human form.”-(Yusuf Ali, Qur’anic comm, #663. <\/span>And these Christians being closer in time to Jesus would know better than modern-day Christians).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u25cfWhereas some Christians say Jesus was of \u201cvirgin\u201d birth some say he was not. Ibn Warraq notes in his book Why I Am Not A Muslim<\/i>: \u201cMartin Luther (1483-1546), writing in the sixteenth century, conceded that \u201cWe Christians seem fools to the world for believing that Mary was the true mother of this child, and nevertheless a pure virgin. For this is not only against all reason, but also against the creation of God, who said to Adam and Eve, \u2018Be fruitful and multiply.\u2019\u201d\u201d<\/span><\/span> p. 144. For a refutation of Ibn Warraq\u2019s book see <\/span>Why I am not a Muslim-Ibn Warraq.\u00a0<\/a><\/span> Notably “virgin” birth is a forgery in the Bible; see <\/span>Jesus birth in Bible & Qur’an).<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Jesus takes away the sin of his people in that he calls them to repentance and forgiveness in which event their sins are forgiven (S<\/span>ee<\/span> Jesus-saves\/savior<\/a><\/span>).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Jesus clearly declared he was sent only to Jews; he prayed ONLY for them (Jews); he regarded non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in parables to keep these “dogs” and ‘swine” out of heaven -(See Jesus-only for Jews<\/a><\/span>). But Christians toss Jesus and his clear teachings onto the dung heap, and for two thousand years are suffering tremendous labor pains to give birth to their phantom three-headed Church-baked womb-god Jesus\/trinity and hammering up all manner of inane contraptions to prop him up. (see\u00a0<\/span> Home<\/a> item #10).\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Divine truth is, Jesus was a prophet sent to minister only to Jews and give them the Good Tidings\/News of the coming of the Comforter who will guide them into “all truth” and will “abide for ever”<\/span>\u00a0\u201cAnd I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever;\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cWhen he, the Spirit of truth (the Comforter), is come, he will guide you into ALL TRUTH\u201d\u2013(John 14:15-16; 16:13).<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As the Comforter will give \u2018all truth\u201d and \u201cabide for ever\u201d\u00a0the Bible, devoid of \u201call truth,\u201d the\u00a0Bible is obsolete<\/a><\/span>;\u00a0and as Jesus did not give \u201call truth\u201d and will not \u201cabide for ever\u201d\u00a0Jesus is redundant<\/a><\/span>;\u00a0\u00a0NO ONE NEEDS JESUS (though he, as all prophets of God, is to be honored with “peace and blessings of God” as Muslims honor him).<\/span><\/span>
\nJesus is no longer the only name, and way, life, truth and resurrection;\u00a0THE COMFORTER MOHAMMAD IS NOW\u00a0the only name, the way, the life, the truth, and the resurrection for all people.
\n<\/span>And this Comforter<\/a><\/span>\u00a0as Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. \u2013\u201cthe former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect\u201d\u2013<\/span> has shown in his revealing book Muhammad in the Bible<\/em> is the Prophet\u00a0 Mohammad.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Jesus says you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free (from lies, falsehood, and blasphemy).<\/span> And the Divine truth is, Jesus was a prophet of God\u00a0and \u201cTHERE IS NO GOD BUT ALL\u0100H; MOHAMMAD IS THE MESSENGER OF ALL\u0100H!\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Muslims are to seek knowledge, educate ourselves, and be vigilant not to be deceived by sneaky Christians.
\n\u00a0 \u00a0Sadly there are Muslims who have turned their backs on Allah to ape the Christians and kiss the useless and unGodly crucifix and drink the mythical blood of Jesus Christ and eat his body<\/span> -SPIRITUAL CANNIBALISM!
\n\u00a0 \u00a0You “ex-Muslims” (as you like to proudly announce yourselves)<\/span> have the grand opportunity while you are alive to repent and return to Allah. When you die<\/span> -and no one knows when he\/she will die- this grand opportunity evaporates like dewdrop in Hell.<\/span> And you as the fuel! <\/span><\/span>~~~<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 NOTES:<\/span>
\n1.<\/span> The Jews were expecting the second coming of Elias and another prophet to come\u2013John 1:21. This other prophet is the one mentioned by Moses in Deuteronomy 18:15, 18-19; this \u201cprophet\u201d is the Prophet Mohammad. See Judaism-no future.<\/a><\/span><\/span>
\n2.<\/span>\u00a0Luke 7:28.
\n<\/span>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 *<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/section>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the name of All\u0101h, the Beneficent, the Merciful. Peace and Blessings of All\u0101h on Mohammad. DEDICATED TO All\u0101h\u2013the Glorious and the High, Lord of the worlds AND TO Mohammad\u2013who brought the world to our feet and eternity to our arms. * ABRAHAM–WHICH SON TO SACRIFICE? Which son was Abraham called to sacrifice, Isaac or […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6169","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6169"}],"version-history":[{"count":29,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6169\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6242,"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6169\/revisions\/6242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}