{"id":3617,"date":"2017-12-30T01:54:41","date_gmt":"2017-12-30T01:54:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=3617"},"modified":"2018-01-06T22:21:22","modified_gmt":"2018-01-06T22:21:22","slug":"hinduism-trimurti-is-artificial","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=3617","title":{"rendered":"Hinduism-Trimurti is artificial"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the name of All\u0101h,<\/span>
\n the Beneficent, the Merciful.<\/span>
\n Peace and Blessings of All\u0101h on Mohammad.<\/span>
\n DEDICATED TO<\/span>
\n All\u0101h\u2013the Glorious and the High,<\/span>
\n Lord of the worlds<\/span>
\n AND TO<\/span>
\n Mohammad\u2013who brought the world<\/span>
\n to our feet and eternity to our arms.<\/span>
\n*<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0HINDUISM \u2013TRIMURTI IS ARTIFICIAL<\/span>
\nAccording to Hindus their Godhead consists of three personages \u2013Brahma the Creator, Vishnu the Preserver and Shiva the Destroyer.
\n<\/span>But, like Karma and Reincarnation<\/a>,<\/span> no one seems to know the origin\/source of this Trinity. One Hindu source states:<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the Vedas we do not find any reference to the concept of Trinity. During the Rigvedic period, Vishnu was a minor solar deity,<\/span> while Shiva was almost unknown<\/span>. The Rigvedic hymns speak of Rudra, a fierce god of the skies and thunder, father of Maruts, who was invoked mostly as the healer with wondrous medicines. But we are not sure whether he was in any way connected with the Shiva of later times.
\nIt is quite possible that the concept of Trinity was not a Vedic concept but another from another native religious tradition of the subcontinent, and probably with some minor modifications and name transference, especially in case of Brahma and Vishnu, it was assimilated into the Indian religious tradition. It is now well established beyond doubt that the subcontinent had a number of religious traditions spanning over at least two to three millenniums before the time the Vedic Civilization was firmly established in the North. Contrary to the popular opinion, it was probably not the Vedic culture which prevailed during the progress of Indian civilization, but other traditions which absorbed it and assimilated it into their practices acknowledging, either fully or conditionally, the validity of the Vedas, which gradually gave birth to a complex and diverse tradition that we today identify as Hinduism.\u201d (Color added).\u00a0 \u00a0http:\/\/www.hindu website.com\/hinduism\/hindutrinity.asp<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Apart from there being no reference to the Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva in the Vedas.
\nAs noted \u201cVishnu was a minor solar deity\u201d who is now one of the major Gods of Hinduism. It would be poor cerebration to entertain\u00a0 that God grows in status. And considering that the Creator (Brahma) of the Universe and its Preserver (Vishnu) would need to be established from the onset of creation.<\/p>\n

And while Shiva, the Destroyer, may not be needed until the dissolution of the Universe, his identity would nevertheless have been established so there should not have to be uncertainty if he and Rudra, \u201ca fierce god of the skies and thunder,\u201d are\u00a0 one and the same person.<\/p>\n

Equally significant. Hamlyn notes:
\n\u201cThe Vedas revile worshippers of the phallus, whereas the worship of Shiva in the form of a stone linga <\/em>has long been wide-spread,\u201d and that \u201cFor the great majority of peasants the most important deity is not Vishnu or Shiva, but the village goddess (gramadevata)<\/em>, often called Earth Goddess or Mother, significantly always feminine\u201d\u2013(Man and his Gods encyclopedia of the world\u2019s religions<\/em>, \u00a0p. 175).
\nIt is doubtful the Vedas would \u201crevile worshippers of the phallus\u201d if such worship was of Divine inspiration; considering that Shiva is part of the Triune Godhead.
\nAnd that peasants would look to\u00a0 “gramadevata” <\/em>as “<\/em>the most important deity” if Vishnu and Shiva were\u00a0\u00a0Preserver and Destroyer.<\/p>\n

Cardinal doctrines of a religion re to be clearly expressed; and not left to assumptions.
\n<\/span>As shown, Karma and Reincarnation<\/a> <\/span>are assumed; Krishna<\/a> <\/span>is not God; Yoga<\/a><\/span> is opposed to Divine decree; and, evidently, the Trimurti also has no root in Hinduism.
\nWhereas Hinduism is complexity, mythology and uncertainty. Islam is simplicity, Divinity and certainty:<\/p>\n