{"id":199,"date":"2015-02-25T22:48:28","date_gmt":"2015-02-25T22:48:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/azmi.co\/cust\/ngba-wp\/?page_id=199"},"modified":"2023-02-24T02:20:26","modified_gmt":"2023-02-24T02:20:26","slug":"judaism","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/nogodbutallah.org\/?page_id=199","title":{"rendered":"JUDAISM-NO FUTURE"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the name of All\u0101h,<\/span>
\nthe Beneficent, the Merciful.<\/span>
\nPeace and Blessings of All\u0101h on Mohammad.<\/span>
\nDEDICATED TO<\/span>
\nAll\u0101h\u2013the Glorious and the High,<\/span>
\nLord of the worlds<\/span>
\nAND TO<\/span>
\nMohammad\u2013who brought the world<\/span>
\nto our feet and eternity to our arms.
\n*<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0JUDAISM<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\nWhile Judaism teaches the Unity of God, there is no such Divine doctrine as a \u201cchosen people\u201d to the exclusion of others \u2013it would be an injustice for God to choose people because of their race\/nationality: a factor over which we have no choice.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 As Judaism was Divinely decreed to end upon the advent of the Prophet Mohammad (Genesis 49:10; Deut. 18:15, 18-19) \u201cspiritually the Jewish religion has no future\u201d (See Muhammad Ali\u2019s comm. to Qur\u2019an 17:8, <\/span>2:146; 7:157; 26:192-197; 46:10; www.muslim.org<\/span><\/a>). (It is to be noted that Shiloh<\/i>\u00a0<\/i>prophesied by Jacob, prophet like thee <\/i>(Moses) mentioned by Moses, and the Comforter <\/i>foretold by Jesus are the same one individual known by different names\/titles).<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

SHILOH:<\/span><\/span><\/em> Genesis 49:10 says that power and prophethood shall not depart from Judah until the coming of Shiloh<\/i>:\u00a0<\/i>\u201cThe sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a law-giver from between his feet until Shiloh come; and <\/span>UNTO HIM<\/span> shall the gathering of the people be.\u201d<\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud <\/span>\u2013\u201cthe former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, <\/span>B.D<\/span>., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect\u201d\u2013 <\/span>has explained in his book Muhammad In The Bible<\/i> that this prophecy cannot apply to Moses, David, or Jesus, but that it could relate only to Mohammad because \u201cMuhammad came with military power and the Qur\u2018an to replace the old Jewish worn-out sceptre and the impracticable and old-fashioned law of sacrifices and of a corrupt priesthood.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Prof. Dawud notes that the Jewish \u201cinstitutions\u201d of \u201cRoyal Sceptre and the Prophetical Succession\u201d \u201chave been extinct for over thirteen centuries;\u201d and that \u201cthe tribe of Judah also has disappeared together with its royal authority and its sister \u2013the prophetical succession\u201d<\/i>\u2013 both have been out of existence for the same period of time as the advent of Mohammad.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Thus, \u201cThe Jews are forced to accept one or the other of the two alternatives, namely, either to admit that Shiloh has come already, but that their fore-fathers did not recognize him (All\u0101h God, says they knew, Qur\u2019an 2:146; 26:197)<\/span><\/span>,<\/strong><\/span><\/i> or to accept the fact that there exists no longer a tribe of Judah from which Shiloh will have to descend.\u201d Moreover, the prophecy clearly states that Shiloh \u201cis to be a total stranger<\/span> to the tribe of Judah, and even to all the other tribes,\u201d \u2013the sceptre and the law-giver were to remain with Judah until the arrival of Shiloh. \u201cIf Shiloh be a descendant of Judah, how could those two elements [sceptre and lawgiver] cease to exist in that tribe?\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Shiloh \u201ccould not be a descendant of any of the other tribes either, for the sceptre and the lawgiver were for all Israel, and not for one tribe only. This observation explodes the Christian claim as well. For Jesus is a descendant of Judah \u2013at least from his mother\u2019s side.\u201d It is clear from the above that \u201cthe Jews are vainly expecting the coming of another Shiloh, and that the Christians are obstinately persisting in their error in believing that it was Jesus who was intended by Shiloh.\u201d (Muhammad in the Bible<\/i>, pp. 54-58). <\/span><\/p>\n

(Jesus was no ruler and no lawgiver. Jesus commanded his followers to obey the Scribes and Pharisees and to follow the Commandments brought by Moses [until the coming of the Comforter, Mohammad, who will guide into \u201call truth\u201d and \u201cabide for ever\u201d]<\/span> in order to attain eternal; life\u2013Matthew 23:2-3; 19:16-19. Mohammad was king and lawgiver. See Jesus-Comforter<\/span><\/a>). <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 That this prophecy about Shiloh<\/i> has already been fulfilled is evident from the fact that present-day Jews could hardly identify themselves with the tribe of Judah or any of the Twelve Tribes Of Israel (which are no longer in existence); in fact Jews may be the descendants of the \u201cKhazar\u201d \u2013an eighth century Turkish tribe\u2013 <\/span>that converted to Judaism; the large majority of existing Jews is of \u201cEastern European\u201d ancestry. (See Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe<\/i>). Shiloh cannot come in the future to or from Judah or any of the other tribes of Israel when they do not exist.
\nThat Biblical Jews, and Jesus, were black or dark-skinned see<\/span>\u00a0Jesus-seen in dreams<\/a>; http:\/\/www.angelfire. com\/ill\/hebrewisrael\/printpages\/phys.html<\/a><\/span>).<\/span><\/p>\n

PROPHET LIKE MOSES:<\/span><\/em><\/span>\u00a0 God said to Moses: \u201cThe Lord thy God will raise up unto thee (Israelites) a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren<\/span><\/i>, like unto me (Moses); unto him ye shall hearken,\u201d \u201cAnd I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren<\/span><\/i>, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him\u201d\u2013(Deuteronomy 18:15, 18).<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 A brother\/brethren is \u201ca male who has the same parents as another or has one parent in common with another\u201d\u2013(Webster\u2019s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary<\/i>; brother). Ishmael and Isaac had one common parent, Abraham. Thus, their children \u2013Arabs and Israelites\u2013 <\/span>are \u201cbrethren\u201d of the other. Mohammad is the prophet like Moses. <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/span>Further, God said about this prophet like Moses, \u201cI\u2026will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. <\/span><\/span>And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, <\/span><\/span>I WILL REQUIRE IT OF HIM<\/span><\/span>\u201d (\u201cI Myself will call him to account\u201d<\/span> as The Jewish Publication Society of America <\/i>has it)\u2013(Deut. 18:18-19).<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 The Qur\u2019an \u2013which begins \u201cIn the name of All\u0101h God\u201d\u2013<\/span> is the \u201cwords\u201d which God put into the mouth of the Prophet Mohammad through the Angel Gabriel. And as God says, whosoever does not follow Mohammad that person will have to answer to Him for his\/her disobedience\/rejection.(See <\/span>Jesus-like Moses<\/span><\/a>)<\/span>.
\n<\/span>Jewish expectation of a coming Messiah to redeem them has no Divine foundation. <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Old Testament never speaks of an eschatological messiah \u2013one inaugurating the last times\u2013 and even the \u201cmessianic\u201d passages containing prophecies of a future golden age under an ideal king never use this term. Nevertheless, many modern scholars hold that Israelite messianism grew out of beliefs connected with kingship\u2026When the vicissitudes of actual reality and the careers of particular historic kings proved more and more disappointing, the messianic kingship ideology was projected onto the future. With the declining national fortunes of Israel, whose political kingdoms were conquered or even abolished by the great empires (Assyria, Babylonia, etc), the notion developed of the eschatological messiah-king.\u201d1<\/span><\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Elias, whom Jews are expecting, already returned, as John the Baptist, as Jesus says\u2013(Matt. 11:11-14; 17:10-13, If John is not Elias, Jesus, the Christian\u2019s God\/Son of God, is wrong<\/span>). <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Deuteronomy 32:43 which says: \u201cPraise his People, O Nations: For he will avenge the blood of his servants. He will render vengeance against his adversaries and make expiation for his land and his People,\u201d<\/span> does NOT refer to future nations but to the nations at the time of the many \u201cites\u201d kingdoms that Joshua would exterminate, so God can keep His Word to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob\u2013(Deut 7:6, 8, 12; 10: 15). This is stated in 32:49, where God showed Moses the land of Canaan: \u201cand behold the land of Canaan, which I give unto the Children of Israel for a possession.\u201d <\/span>This blessing was tied in to Jews following Mohammad as stated in the next chapter that says: <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAnd this is the <\/span>BLESSING<\/span>, wherewith Moses\u2026blessed the Children of Israel before his death. And he said, The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them\u201d\u2013<\/strong>(Deut. 33:1-2). <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span>If Sinai and Seir refer to Moses and Jesus, respectively, \u201cMount Paran is not found in any other country except Arabia, Makkah being located in its valley\u201d2<\/span> <\/sup>and refers to Mohammad; the ten thousand saints is the number of followers the Prophet Mohammad had upon his triumph at Makkah, and the fiery law is the Holy Qur\u2019an.
\nMOHAMMAD IS THE BLESSING GOD GAVE TO JEWS<\/span>.<\/span><\/strong><\/span>
\nJews salvation lies in them accepting: \u2018There is no God but All\u0101h; <\/span>Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

COMFORTER:<\/span><\/span><\/em> (While Jews do not believe in Jesus). <\/span>Jesus foretold the coming of \u201canother\u201d Comforter who will guide us into \u201call truth\u201d: \u00a0<\/span>\u201cAnd I will pray the Father, and He <\/span>shall give you another Comforter that <\/span>he may abide with you forever;\u201d <\/span>\u201cHowbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, <\/span>is come, he will guide you into all truth\u201d-(John 14:16; 6:13).<\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 Jesus also says this \u201canother\u201d Comforter will \u201ctestify of\u201d and \u201cglorify\u201d him\u2013(John 15:26; 16:14).
\nProf. Abdul Ahad Dawud <\/span>B.D. \u2013\u201cthe former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect\u201d\u2013 <\/span>points out:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe Comforter \u2013the Spirit of Truth\u2013 spoken of by Jesus was no other than Muhammad himself.<\/span> It cannot be taken as the Holy Ghost, as the Church theology says. \u201cIt is expedient for you that I go away,\u201d says Jesus, \u201cfor if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you, but if I depart I will send him unto you\u201d (John 16:7). The words clearly show that the Comforter had to come after the departure of Jesus, and was not with him when he uttered these words. Are we to presume that Jesus was devoid of the Holy Ghost if his coming was conditional on the going of Jesus: besides, the way in which Jesus describes him makes him a human being, not a ghost. \u201cHe shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear that he shall speak\u201d (John 16:13). Should we presume that the Holy Ghost and God are two distinct entities and that the Holy Ghost speaks of himself and also what he hears from God? The words of Jesus clearly refer to some messenger from God. He calls him the Spirit of Truth, and so the Qur\u2018an speaks of Muhammad, \u201cNay, he has come with the Truth and verified the apostles\u201d<\/span> (Qur\u2019an 37:37). (Muhammad In The Bible, <\/i>p. 6).\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0 Jesus says the Comforter will not speak of himself but what he hears-(John 16:13), which is the same as God informing Moses about Him raising up a prophet like Moses putting His words into “this” prophet’s\u00a0mouth (as noted above).\u00a0 The words God put into the mouth of the prophet like Moses and the words the Comforter heard from God is the Qur\u2019an<\/span><\/a>\u2013(Qur\u2019an 53:3-5).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

NEW JERUSALEM:\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/span>\u00a0 As noted above, Moses informed his people: “The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, <\/span><\/em>and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them\u201d\u2013(Deut. 33:1-2).\u00a0 <\/span>The only Prophet to come with ten thousand saints is Mohammad, and mount Paran is located in the valley of Makkah.<\/span><\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 That the new \u201cJerusalem\u201d is Makkah. Jesus says: \u201cAnd no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he (Jesus) that came down from heaven, even the son of man which is in heaven\u201d\u2013(John 3:13).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 \u201cSon of man\u201d is Barnasha<\/i> in Hebrew. If Jesus is the \u201cSon of God\u201d who came down from heaven and the \u201cson of man\u201d was yet in heaven (to come), who is this son of man?<\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud <\/span>\u2013\u201cthe former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect\u201d\u2013 <\/span>has shown in his book Muhammad In The Bible <\/i>that \u201cSon of Man\u201d as mentioned by Jesus refers to the Prophet Mohammad. And has explained this prophecy to show that <\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe new Jerusalem is none other than Mecca, for it is in a southern country, its two hills, the \u201cMarwa\u201d and \u201cSapha,\u201d bear the same names as those of Moriah and Zion, of the same root and signification but originally earlier. \u201cIrushalem\u201d or \u201cUrshalem\u201d of old becomes a city of \u201cLight and Peace.\u201d It is for this reason, too, that Mecca as the seat of the sacred ka\u2019aba became the \u201cQibla\u201d \u2013the direction towards which the Muslims turn their faces at prayer. Here every year tens of thousands (millions now) <\/span><\/i>of pilgrim from all Muslim countries (and around the world) <\/i>assemble, visit the Holy Ka\u2019aba, offer sacrifices, and renew their fidelity to All\u0101h and promise to lead a new life worthy of a Musulman. Not only Mecca, but also Medina and the territory surrounding them, has become sacred and inviolable, and forbidden to any non-Muslim man or woman! It was in fulfilment of his vision of Idris or Enoch, too, that the second Khalipha, Omar, rebuilt the Sacred Mosque at Jerusalem on the hill of Moriah, on the spot of the Temple of Solomon! All these marvellously prove that the vision was seen by a Seer inspired by God, who saw the Muslim events in a far-distant future. Could Rome or Byzantium claim to be the New Jerusalem? Can the Pope or any schismatic Patriarch claim to be the Apocalyptic White Bull with two large horns? Can Christianity claim to be the Kingdom of Peace (Islam = \u201cShalom\u201d) while it makes Jesus and the Holy Ghost coeval and consubstantial with the Absolute One God? Most decidedly not.
\nIn those chapters dealing with the Kingdom of Peace, the Messiah is called Son of Man, but in the description of the Last Judgment which follows at the end of this Reign of Islam or Peace he is called \u201cSon of Woman\u201d and \u201cSon of God,\u201d and made to share with God in the Judgment of the World. It is admitted by all scholars that these extravagant and foolish statements are not <\/i>of Jewish origin but belong to the Christian imaginations, inserted and interpolated by them.
\nThe other Apocalypses, those which bear the names of Moses, Baruch, Ezra, the Jubilees, and the Oracula Sibylliana, should be studied impartially, for it is then that they, like those of Daniel and Enoch, will not only be understood but also prove to be fulfilled in Muhammad and Islam.\u201d (pp. 257-263). (See also Islam-is Baca Makkah?<\/a>)<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 God sending a Messiah to redeem Jews would
\n-contradict His decree that power and prophethood would be taken from the Israelites who are to follow Shiloh;
\n-contradict His sending a prophet like Moses whom the Israelites are to follow;<\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 -contradict His sending the Comforter who will give \u201call truth\u201d and \u201cabide for ever\u201d whom Christians are to follow;<\/span>
\n\u00a0\u00a0 -contradict His taking His kingdom from Jews and giving it to another people\u2013(Matthew 21:43);<\/span><\/p>\n

-contradict His decree that<\/span><\/p>\n