In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.
SENATOR JAMES INHOFE–CASE FOR ISRAEL.
U.S. Senator James Inhofe gave seven reasons why Jews are justified in kicking Palestinians out from their lands and to erect “Israel.” Senator James Inhofe’s reasons are so puerile and pathetic a clown would weep. The Senator’s material is taken from the Internet.
(RESPONSE: So what? Palestinians’ have a “presence” in Canaan/Palestine thousands of years before Jews. For certain, “digs” in America would reveal “Red Indians” presence for hundreds if not thousands of years before Europeans; will you give America back to the Indians or give them half of the U.S.? Do it! If a black-American’s “dig” on your property should unearth “presence” of his “slave” ancestor that predates yours, it is highly doubtful you give this black-American half of your land.
(RESPONSE: Britain had the arrogance and audacity to promise away part of Palestine to Jews yet she battled the Irish for thirty grueling years than yield one farthing’s worth of territory for Irish Sovereignty. (2) Jews were dispossessed by the Romans in accordance with Divine decree, as prophesied by no less a personality than Jesus (the Christians God and son of God): “Behold, your house is left desolate unto you,” “Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles,” and “The kingdom of God shall be taken from you (Jews), and given to a nation (Muslims) bringing forth the fruits thereof”–(Matthew 23:38; Luke 21:24; Matthew 21:43). The favor of God is not a family heritage or social privilege that one (Jews) can lay claim to at whim. If historical presence is any criteria for repossession of land then the Natives of North, South and Central Americas are to be given the lands from which they have been dispossessed (in which event Senator Inhofe and family would have to vacate their home and return to, wherever); and the descendants of slaves and the other races in America can return to their fore-parent’s land of origin and claim ownership to their places of residency. (2) Britain was giving the Jews a homeland in Uganda, why did they not take it? Because Jews covet Arab/Muslim-Palestine; and were scheming since the 1800’s to kick Palestinians out of their land and fill it with Jews. And they were made to occupy Palestine through American diplomatic thuggery at the United Nations (which it is certain you are aware of).
3. Agricultural development. Inhofe argues that Israel has been “able to bring more food out of a desert environment than any other country in the world.”
(RESPONSE: Superb! Then you (and your supporters) would have no qualms in airlifting Jews from Palestine and settle them in Nevada so they can make your desert “bloom.” Or you could pay to ship Jews to Siberia or the Arctic to make the ice “bloom;” or settle them in Africa where they can alleviate famine, after all to save one life is like saving the whole world –imagine the credit to themselves given the number of lives they would save in Africa, in less than a year they would be able to weave themselves a magic carpet to heaven. This would also end the Palestinian-Jewish conflict. (2) Palestinians were making the desert “bloom” hundreds if not thousands of years before Jews ever had scent of Palestine. Let the Christian Bible commentator tell it, speaking about the discovery of “The Tell el-Amarna Letters”: “A most valuable discovery which throws light on the history of Palestine BEFORE THE HEBREW CONQUEST….They show that Palestine was inhabited by AGRICULTURAL PEOPLE AND CITY DWELLERS by 1400 B.C. and that they were HIGHLY CIVILIZED and POSSESSED MUCH WEALTH” (there is no report of Palestinians scheming to steal other people’s lands)–(Self-Pronouncing Edition, Holy Bible, section, The Archaeology of the Bible, p. 20. Emphasis added). If the ability to produce “more food” is justification to kick people out of their country, India has the right to swallow up all the third world countries, perhaps even Canada and America, and stock them with Hindustanis.
4. Humanitarian concerns. Inhofe argues that due to the extent of their persecution – he cites Russia – and their slaughter – during World War II by the Nazis – the Jews are entitled to a homeland, and that this is not an unreasonable demand.
(RESPONSE: It was not Arabs/ Muslims that “persecuted” Jews. Let Russia or Europeans or the Nazis give Jews a place in their country for a homeland. Europeans can give Jews someplace in Europe; or Senator Inhofe and America – which is 100-times bigger then Palestine– can give Jews New York, California or Texas for their homeland. PALESTINIANS ARE NOT TO SUFFER FOR EUROPE’S SHAME!
(RESPONSE: This is perhaps the most asinine of Senator Inhofe’s reasons. Birds of a feather, as the saying goes. Jews could have voted with America just the same from their homeland in Uganda. You seem elated that so-called “Israel” is voting with America “more than any other country in the world,” but it would serve your soul well to remember your Bible/God, which you are adept at quoting: “KEEP THEE FAR FROM A FALSE MATTER; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked. And thou shalt TAKE NO GIFT: for the gift blindeth the wise, and perverteth the words of the righteous”–(Exodus 23:7-8).
6. Israel acts as an effective roadblock to terrorism. In this part of his speech, Inhofe refers to four wars which Israel has fought and won (as of the date of his speech, dated 2002): “The 1948 War of Independence, the 1956 Sinai campaign, the 1967 Six Day War, and the 1973 Yom Kippur War.” And he states that “In all four cases, Israel was attacked. They were not the aggressor … In regard to their effectiveness, they are great warriors. They consider a level playing field being outnumbered 2-to-1.” He also states at this point that, “One of the reasons I believe the spiritual door was opened for an attack against the United States is that the policy of our government has been to ask the Israelis, and demand it with pressure, not to retaliate in a significant way against the terrorist strikes that have been launched against them.” 
(RESPONSE: If there was no theft of Palestine there would be no need for a “roadblock to terrorism;” moreover, it is not “terrorism” to boot out the occupier, it is heroism! If it is terrorism to fight the occupier/transgressor then Canada (repelling American aggression in 812), France (fighting German occupation), the Allies of World War II (heaving Germany from France), Britain (voyaging half way round the globe in 1982 to unseat Argentina from the “disputed” Falklands Island), and America (forcing Cuba to dismantle its Russian missile-base in 1962) must all be “terrorists.” (2) These “four wars” were all initiated by America and the Jews, for their stealing/occupying Arab/Muslim Palestine. To take up arms to reclaim what was stolen from you is not “attack” it is “justice.” (2) That Jews are “great warriors” and “consider a level playing field” are laughable. Jews have modern weaponry and are armed to their noses whereas Arabs have third and second rate armaments –especially in the case of Hamas and Hezbollah as evidenced in Jewish massacre in Gaza and South Lebanon. Give the Arabs/Muslims equity in armaments and we’ll see how “great warriors” Jews are not. To “provoke” Arabs so you could have an excuse to “smash them” and to have a military policy to “attack Arab civilians en masse” are hardly “great” warring that allows “a level playing field.” More like cowardice and turkey-shoot.
Incidentally, Pharaoh not only believed he was a “great warrior” he believed he was God; and Goliath had a gigantic sword and thought he was invincible. Inevitably, Pharaoh’s army perished before Moses’ staff and Goliath fell from David’s pebble and his sword was used to decapitate him. (3) Jews schemed to dispossess Palestinians of Palestine and America stole it through diplomatic thuggery at the U.N. and gave it to them, and you yet want Jews to bomb Palestinians to hang on to what is not theirs, and even bomb them unrestrainedly, and you call this “spiritual”?
Whether we call Him Ishwar, Eli, Yahweh, Allāh, Atnatu or Manitou, one by one the arrogant butchers of Palestine (and of the world) are returned to God to toast for their crimes. The magnificence of it is, in the Court of Allāh God there is no diplomatic immunity, no legal technicality, no hung-jury/no mistrial; no bribery; no one to “pressure” or bring “coercion and duress” on; and no godfather to shield behind his coat –in fact, the godfather would be hustling for a skirt for himself to hide behind– you did the crime, or was involved in it, you toast the time. And considering that one Divine day is equal to a thousand human years, even if the maximum time spent in Hell is twelve months, in Divine terms that would be 365,000 human years. You’re well crisped!
7. Biblical references. Inhofe states, “I believe very strongly that we ought to support Israel, and that it has a right to the land, because God said so.”
(RESPONSE: Perhaps there are Christians who “believe(d) very strongly” and think they have a “right” to support Hitler to kill Jews for their killing the Son of God (and even God). (2) God also says in the Bible, Jews are “stiffnecked, treacherous, and that He will scatter them and have them enslaved by the Babylonians (and as already noted from Jesus, have them “trodden” on by the Gentiles and dispossessed of the kingdom of God): “For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness; their throat is open sepulcher; they flatter with their tongue. Destroy thou them, O God; let them fall by their own counsels; cast them out in the multitude of their transgressions; for they have rebelled against thee;” “Therefore the Lord heard this, and was wroth; so a fire was kindled against Jacob, and anger also came up against Israel; because they believed not in God, and trusted not in his salvation”–(Psalms 5:9-10; 78:21-22); “The word of the Lord also came unto me (Ezekiel), saying, Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house…Therefore, thou son of man, prepare thee stuff for removing…And I did so as I was commanded….they (the rebellious Israelites) shall remove and go into captivity. And the prince that is among them…My net also will I spread upon him, and he shall be taken in my snare: and I will bring him to BABYLON…And they shall know that I am the Lord, when I shall scatter them among the nations, and disperse them in the countries”–(Ezekiel 12:1-15). In which event the Babylonians and Romans were “fulfilling Scripture.” How then does “Israel” “has a right to the land” of Palestine “because God said so” when God dispossessed them of it? God did not promise to give Jews Palestine twice, much less to those who engage in wrongdoing and who may not even be Jews (descendants of Jacob/Israel) but rather descendants of converts to Judaism. God warns: “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain”–(Exodus 20:7). (See Anti-Semitism; Judaism).
“In a Senate speech, Inhofe said that America should base its Israel policy on the text of the Bible:
I believe very strongly that we ought to support Israel; that it has a right to the land. This is the most important reason: Because God said so. As I said a minute ago, look it up in the Book of Genesis. It is right up there on the desk. In Genesis 13:14–17, the Bible says: The Lord said to Abraham, “Lift up now your eyes, and look from the place where you are northward, and southward, and eastward and westward: for all the land which you see, to you will I give it, and to your seed forever. . . . Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it; for I will give it to thee.” That is God talking.
(RESPONSE: How do you know it is God talking? For centuries the Bible was transmitted orally, and has been “tampered” with. (See BIBLE CORRUPT & OBSOLETE). Significantly, Ishmael and his descendants, the Arabs, are also “seed” of Abraham. In fact, God’s promise to Abraham in Genesis 17:8 “I will give unto thee (Abraham), and to thy seed after thee…all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession” could only refer to the “seed’ of Abraham through ISHMAEL because only the seed of Ishmael, Arabs, are plentiful as “the stars and the sands on the seashore” –whereas world Jewry totals a meager 14 million, Arabs are a staggering 420 million (thirty times more than Jews; even if we discount Arabs who are Christians and atheists: though it is incomprehensible that Arabs are Christians and atheists considering that, apart from the fact that Christianity is a fake religion, no religion can be shown to be superior to, or equal with, Islam, and the atheist cannot disprove the existence of God: Allāh God has proven His existence in the Qur’an, with its prophecies, teachings on science, and inimitability–.and if we factor in Ishmael’s spiritual “seed” (Muslims worldwide) Abraham’s Ishmaelic “seed” is a boggling billion-plus. And counting. As Islam spirits on. Inexorably. Invincibly. Impregnably. As Divinely decreed. To prevail over all religions, even though the enemy hates it–(Qur’an 9:33; 48:28; 61:9): Further, if God’s covenant with Abraham was for the Jews, Jews would have had no need to “efface” Ishmael’s name in certain places of the Bible and insert Isaac. (Details further on).
The Bible says that Abraham removed his tent and came and dwelt in the plain of Mamre, which is in Hebron, and built there an altar before the Lord. Hebron is in the West Bank. It is at this place where God appeared to Abram and said, “I am giving you this land — the West Bank”. This is not a political battle at all. It is a contest over whether or not the word of God is true.
(RESPONSE: Sure the Word of God is true. The question is, is the Bible all “Word of God”? No! The Bible itself testifies it is not all Word of God: “How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us’? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie”–(Jeremiah 8:8. New American Standard Bible, 1985 edition). However, God’s promise was given to Abraham NOT to Jews/ Israelites. And, as stated, ISHMAEL/ARABS also are from Abraham.
Regarding Senator Inhofe’s belief “That America should base its Israel policy on the text of the Bible: “ (RESPONSE: Superb! Then, as shown, America has no alternative but to return Palestine to Palestinians.
In March 2002, Inhofe also made a speech before the U.S. Senate that included the explicit suggestion that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were a form of divine retribution against the U.S. for failing to defend Israel. In his words: “One of the reasons I believe the spiritual door was opened for an attack against the United States of America is that the policy of our Government has been to ask the Israelis, and demand it with pressure, not to retaliate in a significant way against the terrorist strikes that have been launched against them.” ”
(RESPONSE:If this attack was “divine retribution” why do you not vociferate against America flying as far away as Yemen chasing after and to kill al-Qaeda (and killing hundreds if not thousands of innocent people including women, children, and even babies, blowing them into bits and pieces)? Surely, these “soldiers of God” that were sent as “divine retribution” against America are to be protected at all costs. And even honored with the Purple Heart medal.
With warped mentalities shaping nations any wonder the world is wobbly like drunken rats.
That God gave Abraham Palestine: God’s promise was made with Abraham NOT with the Jews/Israelites: “And I will give unto thee (Abraham), and to thy seed after thee…all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession”–(Genesis 17:8). Ishmael was also the “seed” of Abraham. This promise of God to Abraham was fulfilled through the descendants of Ishmael –Muslims not Jews– who were made to inherit all the territories of the Middle East as noted by Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect.” (Shown later).
God says He had chosen the earlier Children of Israel because they were a “holy people,” that He “loved” them, and because He “would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers” –(Deut. 7:6, 8; 10:15). These earlier Israelites were those preceding liberation from Pharaoh, as the liberated ones from the time of their leaving Egypt were provocative, stiff-necked, and rebellious who “provokedst the Lord” and “have been rebellious against the Lord”–Deut. 9:7; 31:27. And Ex. 33:3; Isaiah 65:2-3.
The later Israelites also were “provocative,” “rebellious,” “treacherous,” “transgressor,” and an “impudent children and stiffhearted,”–Isaiah 65:2-3; Jer. 5:11, 23; Ezek. 2:3-4; Hosea 5:3-7).
Nor was God’s promise made for the children of those who killed the prophets of God, lost the kingdom of God, and on whose head was poured all the righteous blood from Abel to Zacharias son Barachias, and whose house is cursed into desolation–(Matt. 23:31; 21:43; 23:31-38);
These later Children of Israel/Jacob’s twelve sons being made to inhabit Canaan/Palestine under Joshua–(Joshua 6:21; 12:1-24) was only incidental: incidental through God fulfilling his promise to Abraham and his early descendants Isaac and Jacob. This is evidenced by God Himself Who told the later Israelites that after they are brought into the land of the wicked nations that:
“Speak not in thine heart…saying, For my righteousness the Lord hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the Lord doth drive them out from before thee…and that he may perform the word which the Lord sware unto thy fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Understand therefore, that the Lord thy God giveth thee not this good land to possess it for thy righteousness; for thou art a stiffnecked people. …from the day that thou didst depart out of the land of Egypt, until ye came unto this place, ye have been rebellious unto the Lord.”–(Deut. 9:4-7).
As clearly shown God’s covenant was made with Abraham for Isaac and Jacob NOT with the Children of Israel/Jacob. These later descendants of Abraham (i.e. of the Twelve tribes of Jacob/ Israel) were made to inhabit Palestine despite their “stiff-neckedness” and “rebellion” and “provocation” only so that God could fulfill His word to Abraham and his early descendants who were the righteous ones.
That God’s decree was not for the later Israelites to have everlasting possession of the Holy land is gleaned from the fact that, as already noted, God decreed to have these Israelites dispossessed and enslaved by the Babylonians, and have their city overtaken by the Gentiles as Jesus said. Moreover these Jews did not fulfill their covenant with God to follow the prophet like Moses, whom their Fathers knew to be the Prophet Mohammad.
“Wherefore it shall come to pass, if you hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he sware unto thy fathers”–(Deut. 7:12).
“The Lord thy God will raise up unto thee (Israelites) a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me (Moses); unto him ye shall hearken….I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in his mouth (and the words of the Qur’an were put into the mouth of the Prophet Mohammad by God through the Angel Gabriel). And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I WILL REQUIRE IT OF HIM”(“I Myself will call him to account” as The Jewish Publication Society of America has it)–(Deut. 18:15, 18-19).
Unlike Jews who lost their land through Divine decree, the dispersion of the Palestinians was not through Divine decree or natural cause(s): “the dispersion of the Palestinians was not a fact of nature but a result of specific force and strategies”1 by Jews and America.
“By direct order of the White House, every form of pressure, direct or indirect, was brought to bear by American officials upon those countries outside the Moslem world, that were known to be either uncertain or opposed to Partition.”” And “James Forrestal, then U.S. Secretary of Defense, wrote: “The methods that had been used to bring coercion and duress on other nations in the General Assembly bordered closely on scandal.””2 (No Court of Justice would view as one’s legal property an item acquired through “pressure” and/or “coercion and duress.” Where are the Muslim, and other just individuals, legal brains to challenge this illegally-created Zionist entity in the World Court?)
“On 9th April 1948, the Irgun Zwei Leumi led by Menachem Beigin (who later became a Prime Minister of Occupied Palestine)….attacked the small Arab village of Deir Yassin near Jerusalem. An account of this barbaric massacre was given by Jacques de Reynier, the Chief Delegate of the International Red Cross, who was able to reach the village and witness the aftermath of the massacre: “Three hundred persons” he said, “were massacred…. without any military reason or provocation of any kind; old men, women, children, newly-born were savagely murdered with grenades and knives by Jewish troops of the Irgun, entirely under the control of their chiefs….Menachem Beigin said “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.” (Massacring defenseless old men, women, children and newly-born a “victory”?). Unashamed of their deed and unaffected by world condemnation, the Zionist forces, using loud-speakers, roamed the streets of the cities warning Arab inhabitants “The Jericho road is still open,” they told Jerusalem Arabs– “Fly from Jerusalem before you are killed, like those in Deir Yassin.”3
“We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country [the total area was about 6 percent] we bought the lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal [Dayan’s own village] arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat–in the place of Jibta, [Kibbutz] Sarid –in the place of Haneifs, and Kefar Yehoshua–in the place of Tell Shaman. There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.”(Moshe Dayan).4
Regarding this systematic destruction of Arab villages, Prof. Edward Said notes: “Professor Israel Shahak, who reckons almost four hundred villages were thus eliminated, has said that these villages were “destroyed completely, with their houses, garden-walls, and even cemeteries and tombstones, so that literally a stone does not remain standing, and visitors are passing and being told that “it was all desert.’””5
(Prof. Said also notes similar destruction in the West Bank and Gaza after the “Israeli occupation” in 1967; and that by “August 1971, 16,212” Palestinians houses were “demolished”).
“Not only did the Israelis refuse to allow the return of the (Palestinian) refugees to their homes, but they consummated the tragedy by seizing all their property in one of the greatest acts of plunder in modern history. The confiscation of Arab land was not confined to the holdings of the refugees but extended to the 200,000 Palestinians who remained in their homes in 1948, by a series of extraordinary laws and regulations of legalised robbery. These included “The Land Acquisition Law,” “The Abandoned Areas Ordinance, 1949,” “The Absentee Property Regulations, 1948” and others a. The injustices, to which the Arabs in Israel were subjected, went far beyond the expropriation of their farms and property, and included flagrant infringement upon their basic human rights and civil liberties. Derek Tozer, a British correspondent, writing in The American Mercury, stated: The official policy of the Government (of Israel) is unequivocal. Arabs, like Jews in Nazi Germany, are officially ‘Class B’ citizens, a fact which is recorded on their identity cards””b. William Zukerman, Editor of the Jewish Newsletter, said “a more flagrant case of discrimination is hard to find even in the annals of the chauvinistic twentieth century.c””6
Ilan Pappe notes in his scholarly presentation, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, the ruthless methods “employed” “to forcibly evict” the native Palestinians were “large-scale intimidation; laying siege to and bombarding villages and population centres; setting fire to homes, properties and goods; expulsion; demolition; and finally, planting mines among the rubble to prevent any of the expelled inhabitants from returning;” and that at the end of their “mission” which took “six months” to complete: “more than half of Palestine’s native population, close to 800,000 people, had been uprooted, 531 villages had been destroyed, and eleven urban neighborhoods emptied of their inhabitants.” (pp. xii, xiii).
No one in the world –no King or Queen or Prince or pauper or President or Prime Minister or Foreign minister or Senator or doctor or lawyer or Rabbi or Reverend or teacher or writer or student or peasant or American or British or French or Canadian or Russian or Jew or anyone else– would accept such an ignominious scheme and not challenge it in every way open to him and her. Yet Palestinians are forced to accept the fate that no one in the world would accept.
“Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs… Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home”―Mahatma Gandhi.
“I imagine that if I were a Palestinian of the right age, I would, at some stage, have joined one of the terror organizations.”-Ehud Barak, Israeli general, and Prime Minister 1999–2001. (Internet).
“What cause have we to complain about their fierce hatred to us? For eight years now, they sit in their refugee camps in Gaza, and before their eyes we turn into our homestead the land and villages in which they and their forefathers have lived.”– Moshe Dayan, Israeli general, 1956. (See: Israeli Apartheid and Terrorism) (Internet).
“The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was “given” by a foreign Power to another people for the creation of a new State. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their number have increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty? It is abundantly clear that the refugees have every right to the homeland from which they were driven, and the denial of this right is at the heart of the continuing conflict. No people anywhere in the world would accept being expelled en masse from their own country; how can anyone require the people of Palestine to accept a punishment which nobody else would tolerate?”-Bertrand Russell.(See: Bertrand Russell’s Last Message). (Internet).
Palestine is the moral, social, historical and spiritual heritage of Palestinians and all Muslims:
-Morally: Palestinians are the descendants of the natives. (Present-day Jews are not descendants of Jacob, see Anti-Semitism. Palestinians inhabited Canaan/Palestine eons before Abraham arrived there).
-Socially: a country is not dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the “other”(a country forced into dividing because two races militate against each other is not the same as Jewish intent to create a state, or because they desire their own state; the Sikhs and the Gypsies of Europe should petition the UN for their respective State in India and Europe, if only to test the integrity of the UN); those who do not wish to live with the “other” must leave. If ownership to a piece of land constitutes the right to secede from the whole, or if a country is dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the “other,” or along sectist, racial, and theological lines, or for want of their own state, many a country might now be standing in rumps.
-Historically: Palestinians history in Palestine predates that of Jews –Jewish sovereignty in Palestine was for a mere sixty years, two thousand years ago.(If Jews only wanted a homeland they would have taken it in Uganda where the British was giving them. But Jews covet Arab/Muslim-Palestine; and have been scheming since the 1800’s to boot us out and fill Palestine with Jews. Significantly, it was the Muslim Salahuddin Ayyube –the majestic and legendary Saladin– who brought Jews back to Jerusalem from where they were barred by their Christian brothers-in-Scripture. And this is how Zionist Jews repay Muslims’/Arabs’ benevolence and love –with hatred, intrigue, terrorism, massacre, expulsion, occupation/usurpation and more than sixty years of torture, humiliation, and barbarism–they devour the Muslim hand that fed them!
-Spiritually: as in the Bible (noted below by Prof. Dawud). Allāh, the God of Justice and Goodness, would not take Palestine from the believing Palestinians and give it to a stiffnecked and rebellious people, most of whom are faithless, treacherous, transgressors, on whom His curse is upon, whom He has declared to subject to severe torment to the day of Resurrection, and who have lost the kingdom of God–(Exodus 33:3; Deut. 9:7; 31:27; Isaiah 65:2-3; Matt. 21:43; 23:31-38. Qur’an 2:88-89; 2:100; 5:13; 5:81; 2:88-89; 7:167).
Regarding the Palestinians/Muslims spiritual heritage of Palestine, Professor ‘Abdul Ahad Dawud –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– explains in his revealing book Muhammad In The Bible:
“There are three distinct points which every true believer in God must accept as truths. The first point is that Ishmael is the legitimate son of Abraham, his firstborn, and therefore his claim to birthright is quite just and legal. The second point is that the Covenant was made between God and Abraham as well as his only son Ishmael before Isaac was born. The Covenant and the institution of the Circumcision would have no value or signification unless the repeated promise contained in the divine words, “Throughout thee all the nations of the earth shall be blessed,” and especially the expression, the Seed “that shall come out from the bowels, he will inherit thee” (Gen. xv. 4). This promise was fulfilled when Ishmael was born (Gen. xvi.), and Abraham had the consolation that his chief servant Eliezer would no longer be his heir. Consequently we must admit that Ishmael was the real and legitimate heir of Abraham’s spiritual dignity and privileges. The prerogative that “by Abraham all the generations of the earth shall be blessed,” so often repeated –though in different forms– was the heritage by birthright, and was the patrimony of Ishmael. The inheritance to which Ishmael was entitled by birthright was not the tent in which Abraham lived or a certain camel upon which he used to ride, but to subjugate and occupy forever all the territories extending from the Nile to the Euphrates, which were inhabited by some ten different nations (Gen. xvii. 18-21). These lands have never been subdued by the descendants of Isaac, but by those of Ishmael. This is an actual and literal fulfilment of one of the conditions contained in the Covenant.
The third point is that Isaac was also born miraculously and specially blessed by the Almighty, that for his people the land of Canaan was promised and actually occupied under Joshua. ….
….The Jews have always been jealous of Ishmael because they know very well that in him the Covenant was made and with his circumcision it was concluded and sealed, and it is out of this rancour that their scribes or doctors of law have corrupted and interpolated many passages in their Scriptures. To efface the name “Ishmael” from the second, sixth, and seventh verses of the twenty-second chapter of the Book of Genesis and to insert in its place “Isaac,” and to leave the descriptive epithet “thy only begotten son” is to deny the existence of the former and to violate the Covenant made between God and Ishmael. It is expressly said in this chapter by God: “Because thou didst not spare thy only begotten son, I will increase and multiply thy posterity like the stars and the sands on the seashore,” which word “multiply” was used by the Angel to Hagar in the wilderness: I will multiply thy offspring to an innumerable multitude, and that Ishmael “shall become a fruitful man” (Gen. xvi. 12. It is Muslims whose numbers are “like the stars and the sands on the seashore”–(Gen. 22:17). Now the Christians have translated the same Hebrew word, which means “fruitful” or “plentiful” from the verb para –identical with the Arabic wefera– in their versions “a wild ass”! Is it not a shame and impiety to call Ishmael “a wild ass” whom God styles “Fruitful” or “Plentiful”?” (pp. 30-32. Emphasis/color added).
Man can alter Scripture(s), man cannot alter decree of God.
Justice demands that every grain of sand of Palestine be returned to Palestinians. In the annals of modern history no people has suffered so much and for so long as Palestinians have suffered, and continue to suffer. As one (seemingly Jewish) individual agonized on the Internet, (quoting from memory): ‘If you have a heart you will cry for the Palestinians.’
This is not a Palestinian struggle, this is not an Arab struggle, this is not a Muslim struggle, this is a human struggle for truth and justice –no one would expect any less for himself or herself.
If there is any cause on which to immortalize our names it is the cause of the Palestinians! Rise up, world!
Vive le Palestine libre!
Azad Philistine Zindabad!
Ashat Philistine Hurra!
Long live free Palestine!
1. Said, Edward W. The Question of Palestine, p.58.
2. Zayid, Ismail, Palestine, A Stolen Heritage, pp. 10, 11.
3. Zayid, Ismail, Palestine–A Stolen Heritage, pp. 11-12.
Regarding this massacre at Deir Yassin, Ismail Zayid here quotes from the 1951 publication of Menachem Beigin’s book The Revolt, Story of the Irgun: “Menachem Beigin said “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.” However, the “Revised Edition” titled The Revolt and published 1983 by W.H. Allen, London, does not have these words by Beigin: “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.” Page 164 of this Revised Edition says in its footnote that this massacre at Deir Yassin was an “Arab…propaganda to smear the Irgun.…. The “Dir Yassin Massacre” lie is still propagated by Jew-haters all over the world.”
But the Deir Yassin massacre could not be “a lie” when: (1) Beigin, the leader of the Irgun, himself is said to have declared that there was a massacre: “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.” (2) there was an eyewitness to the aftermath of this massacre: “An account of this barbaric massacre was given by Jacques de Reynier, the Chief Delegate of the International Red Cross, who was able to reach the village and witness the aftermath of the massacre.” (3) There is a historical account of this massacre: Britannica, probably the world’s most recognized source of reference and accurate recorder of history states that there was a massacre: “The Irgun stormed and captured the village of Deir Yassin and massacred much of the population.” (4) Dov Joseph, a prominent Israeli, called the Deir Yassin massacre “deliberate and unprovoked attack.”
(Reflectively, when anyone denies the “holocaust” or speak against it they are hauled before the judge; labeled “Jew hater” and “anti-Semite.” But there was no outcry against these deniers of the Deir Yassin massacre: no one was hauled into court, or labeled “Arab hater” or “anti-Arab.” Perhaps when discussion(s) about the Revisionist(s) of history are conducted, Beigin’s statement on this massacre at Deir Yassin should be on the agenda).
4. Said, Edward W, The Question of Palestine, p. 14.
5. Said, Edward W, The Question of Palestine, p. 14.
6.Ismail Zayid, Palestine A Stolen Heritage, p. 15. a. Peretz, Don, Israel and the Palestine Arabs, Washington 1958, pp. 95-96, 152, 172; b. American Mercury Magazine, August 1957; c. Jewish Newsletter, June 1959. See The End of faith-Sam Harris item #13.