Allah And Jesus Or Paul

Share

In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
DEDICATED TO
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
AND TO
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms

*

ALLĀH AND JESUS, OR PAUL?
“every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;
but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit”
(Matthew 7:17)

Jesus’ status and mission as he declared, and as confirmed by Allāh, God, was that God sent him wholly and solely to the Children of Israel and to foretell the coming of the Comforter who will guide them into “all truth” and will “abide forever”: 

   -“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel; “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever;” “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth”–(Matthew 15:24; John 14:16; 16:13).

   –“And when Jesus, son of Mary said: O Children of Israel, surely I am the messenger of Allāh to you…and giving the good news of a Messenger who will come after me, his name being Ahmad (Ahmad being another name of the Prophet Mohammad)–(Qur’an 61:6). 

   And Jesus taught that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic law until the coming of the Comforter and that he finished his work of preaching to the Jews. How then did Jesus become the only “begotten” Son of God to die for sin inherited from Adam? And from where did this “inherited sin” come?

   Allāh informed us in his Qur’an that the Christian belief of Son of God was an imitation of paganism: “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allāh; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allāh. These are the words of their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before. Allāh’s curse be on them! How they are turned away!”–(Qur’an 9:30).

   Muhammad Ali notes: “We are here told that the Christian doctrine that Jesus Christ was the son of God was borrowed from earlier pagan people. Recent research has established the fact beyond all doubt. In fact, when St. Paul saw that the Jews would on no account accept Jesus Christ as a messenger of God, he introduced the pagan doctrine of sonship of God into the Christian religion, so that it might become more acceptable to the pagans.”

   Paul was not God or prophet of God. Paul was a self-admitted liar; who forged his own gospel; introduced the pagan doctrine of ‘Son of God’ into the Christian religion, who was uncertain whether he had the Holy Spirit with him and gave his own judg-ment; snared people into following his teachings through guile and craft; committed gross blasphemy by saying God made Jesus, the Christian’s God and Son of God, into a “curse” and “lower” than the angels (strangely Christians praise Jesus in their hymn/carol as “king” of the angels whereas Paul says Jesus was made lower than the angels); preached crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus; condemned the everlasting Divine Covenant of circumcision and the law of “works” that Jesus upheld and exhorted his people to uphold.  It is astounding that such an individual is crowned with sainthood.

PAUL A SELF-ADMITTED LIAR: “For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my LIE unto his glory; why yet am I also judged a sinner?”–(Romans 3:7).  Paul is a sinner because God does not call on man to believe in Him through lies. God calls man to belief through “reason” and truth, not through deception and “lie.” One who propagates Godliness through “guile” and “lie” could not be apostle of Christ, much less messenger of God. Moreover, Paul’s “lie” is the worst of lies –attributing injustice to God and making Him complicit in murder: of Him having shifting sins around from the innocent onto the guilty and having an innocent man killed for the sins of others, which God did not reveal. God is truthful and Just: “He is …a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he”–(Deut. 32:4). Significantly, Paul’s “lie” does not bring man into the “truth of God;” Paul’s “lie” leads man astray into the “glory” of paganism.     

 Perhaps it is this un-principle of Paul (to “lie”) that has lead Christians to expunge the many terms –such as “virgin” of virgin birth;BEGOTTEN” of “begotten son;” the verses alluding to trinity; and the alleged Ascension of Jesus, as already noted–  from their English Bibles but have retained them in their nearly 1500 non-English Bibles so as to deceive the poor, unschooled natives into eating the “body” and drinking the mythical “blood” of Jesus Christ –SPIRITUAL CANNIBALISM. And Paul’s most heinous “lie” against God is the introduction of the Pagan’s Son of God belief into the Christian religion. Given the millions of those who call themselves Christians lined up behind Paul, perhaps Paul’s biggest and most successful “lie,” “crafty” and “guile” is his shrouding of Jesus in the pagan cloak of “Son of God.”

PAUL FORGED HIS OWN GOSPEL: “Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to MY GOSPEL”–(2 Tim, 2:8; Gal. 1:6). Not according to God’s or Jesus’ Gospel! but according to HIS (Paul’s) gospel!

PAUL INTRODUCED THE PAGAN DOCTRINE OF SON OF GOD INTO THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION: As noted above, Muhammad Ali notes that Paul “introduced the pagan doctrine of sonship of God into the Christian religion, so that it might become more acceptable to the pagans.” 

    And Maurice Bucaille states in his book The Bible, The Qur’an, And Science“As far as the decades following Jesus’s mission are concerned, it must be understood that events did not at all happen in the way they have been said to have taken place and that Peter’s arrival in Rome no way laid the foundations for the Church. On the contrary, from the time Jesus left earth to the second half of the Second century, there was a struggle between two factions. One was what one might call Pauline Christianity and the other Judeo-Christianity;” and

“PAUL IS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL FIGURE IN CHRISTIANITY. HE WAS CONSIDERED TO BE A TRAITOR TO JESUS’S THOUGHT BY THE LATTER’S FAMILY AND BY THE APOSTLES WHO HAD STAYED IN JERUSALEM IN THE CIRCLE AROUND JAMES. PAUL CREATED CHRISTIANITY AT THE EXPENSE OF THOSE WHOM JESUS HAD GATHERED AROUND HIM TO SPREAD HIS TEACHINGS.(While others ‘combated’ Paul’s writings) PAUL’S STYLE OF CHRISTIANITY WON THROUGH DEFINITIVELY, AND CREATED ITS OWN COLLECTION OF OFFICIAL TEXTS. THESE TEXTS CONSTITUTED THE ‘CANON’ WHICH CONDEMNED AND EXCLUDED AS UNORTHODOX ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT WERE NOT SUITED TO THE LINE ADOPTED BY THE CHURCH.” 1

PAUL WAS NOT CERTAIN HE HAD THE HOLY SPIRIT: (This is humorous considering that he lied and forged his own gospel): “I THINK also that I have the Spirit of God”–(1 Cor. 7: 40. Also 1 Cor 7:6, 12).    

PAUL GAVE HIS OWN JUDGMENT: “I have NO  commandment of the Lord: yet I give MY judgment, as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful”–(1 Cor. 7:25).   It is not “faithfulness” to forge in the name of God and to have people glorify God through lies.

PAUL SNARED PEOPLE INTO FOLLOWING HIM THROUGH GUILE AND CRAFT: “being CRAFTY, I caught you with GUILE–(2 Cor 12:16).  God calls man to belief through “reason” and truth, not through deception and “lie.”One who propagates Godliness through “guile” and “lie” could not be apostle of Christ, much less messenger of God. Moreover, Paul’s “lie” is the worst of lies –attributing injustice to God and making Him complicit in murder: of Him having shifting sins around from the innocent onto the guilty and having an innocent man killed for the sins of others, which God did not reveal. God is truthful and Just: “He is…a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is he”–Deut. 32:4). As stated, Paul’s lie does not bring man into the “truth of God” but leads man astray into the “glory” of paganism. 

PAUL COMMITTED GROSS BLASPHEMY: He reduced Jesus, a prophet of God (and the Christians’ God and son of God) to a “sin,” a “curse” and “lower than the angels.”  

   (a) “For he (God) hath made him (Jesus) to be SIN for us”–(2 Cor. 5:21). (And if Jesus is God, God made Himself a “sin”) 

 (b) “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a CURSE for us: for it is written (in Deutero-nomy 21:23), cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree”–(Gal. 3:13). As God decreed that everyone who is hanged on a tree is a “curse,” then Christ cannot redeem anyone from this law. Christ did not come to change the law or the prophets: “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I AM NOT COME TO DESTROY but to fulfill”–Matthew 5:17). (And if Jesus is God, God had Himself hung on a tree and made Himself a “curse”).  

(c) “For we see Jesus (the Christians God and Son of God), who was made a LITTLE LOWER than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for EVERY MAN–(Hebrews 2:9). If Jesus tasted death for EVERY man, man should not taste “death” –man should not die. (Incidentally, if Jesus is God then God made Himself a “little lower” than the angels, His creation). 

   Jesus says that one of the things that defile a man is his uttering of blasphemy–(Matthew 15:19-20), and that the penalty for blasphemy against God is everlasting punishment in Hell: “But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath NEVER forgiveness, but is in danger of ETERNAL DAMNATION”–(Mark 3:29; “damnation” means suffering/punishment. Thus according to Jesus there is eternal suffering. Note well Jehovah’s Witnesses).

PAUL PREACHED CRUCIFIXION & RESURRECTION: Whereas Jesus upheld the law, Paul deprecates the law, stating: “a man is NOT justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ…for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified” –(Galatians 2:16).

   Paul states: “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree”–(Gal. 3:13).  If Christ was hanged on a tree to redeem us from this curse –because any sinner that is hanged on a tree is an accursed–(Deut. 21:22-23)– then (if Christ was killed) all it means is that if any sinner should be hanged on a tree after Christ was killed the sinner would not be an accursed.
   This law is not about inherited sin and vicarious atonement. There is no such Divine or prophetic teachings as inherited sin and vicarious atonement. As shown Jesus Christ was not killed. Christ was not killed/crucified/polified.   

Allāh, God, revealed that Jesus was not killed on the cross: “and they killed him not, nor did they cause his death on the cross, but he was made to appear to them as such”–(Qur’an 4:157).
   The Bible shows that Jesus was NOT killed; Jesus also said he was NOT killed; and investigative evidence by Christians showed that Jesus was NOT killed on the cross/pole. Briefly:

   -Jesus said his sign would be like Jonas, as Jonas was alive in the whale’s belly so he shall be–(Matt. 12:39-40; Jonah 1:17; 2:1-10; if Jesus came to die for sins there was no need for his sign to be like Jonas’); if Jesus was killed/crucified his sign would not have been like Jonas.’

   -After the alleged crucifixion and resurrection Jesus had his disciples examine him to verify he was not spirit, as the resurrected is, but was of flesh and bones: a mortal–(Luke 24:38-39). The resurrected “are (spiritualized) as the angels” –(Matt. 22:23-30. Luke 20:34-36). Jesus had flesh and bones: he was human.

   Whereas Allāh and Jesus revealed that Jesus was not killed/crucified; it was Paul who forged his own gospel and taught that Jesus was resurrected:  “Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead ACCORDING TO MY GOSPEL”–(2 Timothy 2:8; Galatians 1:6).
 
   Not according to God’s Gospel! Not according to Jesus’ Gospel! but according to HIS (Paul’s) gospel!  Whereas there was no crucifixion and thus no resurrection, Paul taught: “And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins”–(1 Cor. 15:17). Why is “your faith is vain” when you are following Allāh God, and Jesus?

PAUL CONDEMNED CIRCUMCISION: Circumcision is God’s everlasting covenant with those of the Abrahamic following –Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Even Jesus, the Christians’ God and son of God was circumcised–(Gen. 17:7-12; Luke 2:21). It is not likely then that Jesus (the Christians’ God and son of God) would have Paul trivialized this everlasting law of circumcision.
 
   Paul states: “What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision–(Rom. 3:1).  Unless he is an atheist, whether the circumcised Jew works righteousness or not he (or his parents) has honored this covenant of God; and there is “profit” in this.

   Paul taught: “Behold, I Paul (not Jesus or God, mind you!), say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love”–(Gal. 5:2-6).  But, contrary to Paul’s pronouncement, circumcision is so sacred that Jews broke the Sabbath to enforce it–John 7:22; and Jesus bid his followers to obey and follow the Pharisees who carried out the Mosaic law, and for his followers to “keep the commandments” given to Moses if they want to have eternal “life”–(Matt. 23:2-3; 19:17. Incidentally, Jesus was telling his people to follow Judaism; how then there is a religion, Christianity; and under Jesus’ name?)

   God said to Abraham about him and those who observe this covenant of circumcision that he “will be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee…I will be their God”–Gen. 17:7-8. And God made it clear that those not circumcised have broken this covenant: “And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant”–Gen. 17:14).  Clearly the uncircumcised man cannot claim to be a follower of Abraham or Moses or Christ or Mohammad! In fact, circumcision is so inviolable that Abraham (and other males of his household) had it done when he was an adult, ninety years old–(Gen. 17:23-27). Thus, anyone who desires to be a follower of Judaism, Christianity, or Islam would need to have himself circumcised if he expects to have the “grace” of God. (Bahais who profess to follow the Abrahamic lineage and yet do not practice circumcision should note this well).
 
   In this matter of circumcision Paul was anti-Christ as well as anti-God. And Christians not only follow this man over Christ, they crown him with sainthood.

PAUL REJECTED THE LAW OR WORKS: Is our good works/righteousness like “filthy rags”?
 
   Whereas Jesus upheld the law, Paul deprecates the law, stating: “a man is NOT justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ…for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified” –(Galatians 2:16).  Allāh, God, tells us in His Qur’an 2:177 that righteousness is a combination of faith and good works. And this is precisely what Jesus taught:

    –“Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord. And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart”–(Mark 12:29-30);

   –“Let your light so shine before men, that they might see your good works”–(Matt. 5:16);

   -“For I say unto you, that except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven”–Matt. 5:20); 

   -“if thou wilt enter into life keep the commandments”–(Matt. 19:16-19);

   -“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do”–(Matt. 23:2); (and the scribes and Pharisees do not teach Trinity, Divine sonship of God, inherited sin, and vicarious atonement).  

  -“Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill”–(Matt. 5:17). And Jesus deemed that the law must be fulfilled: “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled”–(Matt. 5:17-18).

   To restate. Whereas Jesus upheld the law, Paul deprecates the law. Contrary to Paul, faith without works will not save any one:

   -the devils also believe in God–(Qur’an 59:16. James 2:19).

   -“Even so faith, if it hath not WORKS, is dead, being alone,” Abraham engaged in faith and WORKS; the harlot, Rahab, was justified by WORKS; “by WORKS a man is justified and, not by faith only” “For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without WORKS is dead also”–(James 2:14-26).

   -And our WORKS are recorded: “And I saw the dead…stand before God; and the books were opened…and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their WORKS;” and “were judged every man according to their WORKS –(Rev. 20:12-13). 
 
   So who is telling the truth Allāh and Jesus or Paul, the self-confessed “liar”? In this matter of “works” Paul was anti-Christ as well as anti-God.

PAUL AND JESUS: Paul and Christians (not God or Jesus, mind you) say that to get into heaven you must accept that God had an innocent man killed so He could forgive sinners (though Christians are divided whether Jesus was killed for inherited sin or for committed sin). Christians ascribe the ultimate injustice to God –Him having a sinless man killed for the sinful. It is stated about Paul

“It is unlikely that he ever met Jesus. In Jerusalem, however, he learned enough about Jesus to regard him as a menace to Pharisaic Judaism, for Paul first appears on the scene of history as a persecutor of the Christian Church. In the Judgment of Paul the Pharisee, Jesus had broken the Law and taught others to break it and had been justly condemned under the curse that the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy pronounces on law-breakers.”2
  
What arrogance and audacity! Paul, an ordinary mortal and self-admitted liar giving judgment against Jesus, a prophet of God and even God/son of God according to Christians? Jesus did not break any law of the Old Testament. As prophet of God, Jesus knew that there are exceptions when the Law can be compromised under certain compulsion; much like, as noted in the Qur’an where belief in God and eating of forbidden food can be compromised–(Qur’an 16:106; 5:3). 

“For Paul, Christ, not the Law, was the full, final revelation of God’s nature and purpose; and all of his passionate devotion was transferred to this new centre.”3
    
Note well. That “Christ, not the Law,” was “the full, final revelation of God’s nature and purpose” is Paul’s opinion; it is not the teaching of Christ or revelation from God. Christ spoke of another Comforter to come and that every jot of the Law has to be fulfilled; and Revelation 14:6 speaks of “another angel” who will bring the “everlasting Gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people.”
   If Christ was “the full, final revelation of God’s nature and purpose” there would be no need for another Comforter to guide us into “all truth,” and no need for “another angel” to bring the “everlasting Gospel.” 

   Paul claimed that while he was on the road to Damascus he saw a light and heard Jesus’ voice–(Acts 9:3-5; 22:6-8; 26:12-15). Since Paul had never met Jesus how could he tell it was Jesus’ voice he heard and not the voice of the Devil? –if he had heard a voice and this claim was not one of his “lie(s).”
   Significantly, Satan had even tempted Jesus, who is said to be God, thus Satan could easily have seduced Paul into believing he was hearing Jesus’ voice. And if Jesus was God, then this alone would give lie to Paul’s claim that He heard Jesus’ voice, for Jesus said about God: “Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape”–(John 5:37).What evil unseen presence has the power to dazzle and throw his voice but Satan?

   Equally significant, Paul claims that in this “vision” Jesus said he (Jesus) will send him (Paul) to the Gentiles: “To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me”–(Acts 26:16-18). 
   (What a yarn!) This is the same Jesus (Christians’ God/Son of God) who regarded Gentiles as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in parables so the “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be forgiven and saved: “And he said unto them, Unto you (who have God) it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them (non-Jews) that are without (God), all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them”–(Matt. 7:6; 15:26; Mark 4:9-12). 
In other words though the non-Jews (who may be sincere seekers of God) have the faculties of sight and hearing and can see and hear, he (Jesus) spoke in parables so that they would not understand his words because he did not want them to accept God and have their sins forgiven. (This statement by Jesus also proves that Jesus did NOT come to save sinners).  
  
Thus, according to Paul’s claim that Jesus will send him to the Gentiles, after Jesus did all he could to shut the Gentiles out of the kingdom of God, shows that Jesus –the Christians’ God and son of Godwas not only uncertain about his mission which he originally stated was only for the Jews, but that Jesus was also confused about his cardinal doctrine –that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic law to eternal life now lies in having faith in the fabled crucifixion.  Fabled crucifixion as Jesus himself attested, as noted after the alleged crucifixion and resurrection when he (Jesus) had his disciples examine him to verify he was not spirit, as the resurrected is, but was of flesh and bones: a mortal–(Luke 24:38-39; Matt. 22:23-30. Luke 20:34-36).

   That Jesus instructed his followers to teach the gospel to all nations and baptize them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are “forgeries” in the Bible. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din notes:

“The concluding eleven verses of St. Mark-(16:9-20) and the well-known verse of St. Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are forgeries, an admitted addition to the ancient MSS (manuscripts). The fact was discovered by the first translator of the Bible into English and they made a marginal note in their version of the Bible which continued for some time. But we do not find the said note in any of the copies now published by the said society (Foreign Mission Society). Is it fair and honest to keep others in darkness as to the true value of the contents of the Bible? The reader must know that the concluding portion of St. Mark and the verse in St. Matthew are spurious and a subsequent addition. But I am afraid the Foreign Mission would not allow the correction. It would tell against their very Mission, if they eliminate the verse from St. Matthew; they lose the only pillar that supports the structure of the Trinity. No other verse in the whole Scripture speaks of it. The said eleven verses of St. Mark are the only justification for the existence of the Foreign Mission. You, as well as I, know, my Lord, that the call to Jesus came solely and wholly from Judaism. He came only to gather the scattered sheep and would not give the children’s bread to the dogs, the world beyond the Israelites. The Foreign Mission is a mere trespass on lands forbidden by the Master. It transcends the limit marked by Jesus. Throughout his life the Gentiles and others did not concern him: they were the swine. Then came the make-believe Resurrection, and they say the Master changed his mind as to his mission and ordered it to be carried to the four corners of the world (indicating that he was unsure of his mission), but this all depends upon the questionable verses of St. Mark, and hence their retention  in the Bible. St. Matthew is no authority on this point. The word “nations” there is a mistranslation and a wrong substitute for “the tribes”–the rest of the Jewish tribes scattered all over the world. This being the case, the Mission cannot afford to eliminate the verses from their version, nor will they put marginal notes, as did the old versions, to show the true nature of the verses. It would weaken the cause and show the futility of their status, since in carrying on evangelical work in the non-Christian world they are acting against the express admonition of the Master. It may that reasons other than religion are at the back of it all, and goading their activities, but decency, if not religion, assuredly demands the publishing of things as they are.4  (And Christians peddle the Bible as the “all” Word of God. And Christians expect to go to heaven. It is doubtful that a man of God would make forgeries in a Book of God. It is doubtful that one who alters the command of God would go to heaven. It is doubtful that the “son of God” or God would take kindly to one who changed his words. Perhaps less kindly to those who knowingly adhere to such falsehood). 
   Even if Jesus had said to teach the Gospels to all nations, yet this would not make Jesus 
God or son of God or one in a trinity with God or vicarious atoner or that mankind inherited sin from Adam. These cardinal doctrines of Christianity are lies, falsehood, and blasphemy. (See Christianity-lies, evil, hate; Christianity-a fake; Jesus-inherited sin to ascension). 

   Even if Paul had met Jesus (and would then know Jesus’ voice); there is no way to know if the voice he heard was Jesus’ and not an imitation by Satan.  However, Paul was such a liar that he made himself into a human chameleon to spread his “lie;” here in his own words: “And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as (one) under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; To them that are without the law, as (one) without the law…that I might gain them that are without law. To the weak became I as (one) weak, that I might gain the weak: I AM MADE ALL THINGS TO ALL MEN, that I might by all means save some”–(1 Corinthians 9:20-22).

   As noted, Paul did NOT save anyone but instead lead them into paganism as son of God belief is paganism!  Paul did NOT teach the gospel of Christ! Paul forged and taught his OWN gospel!
   Paul also contradicts himself in spreading his “lie” and being “all things to all men.” Regarding his seeing a light and hearing a “voice” on his journey to Damascus:

   -In Acts 9:4-7 Paul says that his companions “stood speechless, HEARING a voice;” but in Acts 22:7-9 he says, “And they that were with me…heard NOT the voice.”

   -In Acts 9:4-7 Paul says that “HE (alone) fell to the earth;” but in Acts 26:14 he says, “WE were ALL fallen to the earth.”  

   -In Acts 20:26 Paul says: “I am PURE from the blood of ALL MEN;” but in Acts 22:4 and 22:20 he says, respectively: “I PERSECUTED this way unto the DEATH, binding and delivering into prisons both MEN and WOMEN;” “And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I ALSO was standing by, and CONSENTING UNTO HIS DEATH, and KEPT the raiment of them that slew him.”  

  Paul also wrote(in 2 Timothy 3:16): “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” Perhaps Paul “craft”ed this bit to be“guile” people into believing in and follow him. But the Bible could not be “all” scripture “given by inspiration of God” when Paul “forged” his own gospel, and the Bible testifies thatTHE LYING PEN OF THE SCRIBES HAS MADE IT INTO A LIE:  “How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us’? But behold, THE LYING PEN OF THE SCRIBES HAS MADE IT INTO A LIE–(Jeremiah 8:8. New American Standard Bible, 1985 edition).

   If “All scripture is given by inspiration of God” then God not only “inspired” errors but contradictions seeing that, as already noted, God and Jesus require circumcision and observance of the law whereas Paul condemns circumcision and the law.

    Paul was “A renegade from Judaism –the hatred of his own people left Saul, afterwards Paul, no chance to work among the lost tribes to reclaim whom only, Jesus had come. Paul was driven to the Gentiles, the people beyond the pale of the Hebraic law.”
 
 “What an irony of faith that he (Jesus) who declared “Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or title shall in no wise pass from the Law, till all be fulfilled,” should be followed –nay, superseded– by him (Paul) who declared the Law a curse and not a blessing from God, and that only to win favour with those with whom the Master would have nothing to do –the Greeks and the Romans. But the reason is not far to seek. St. Paul could not claim any respect from his own people. At first an implacable enemy of Jesus and persecutor of his followers, then a renegade from Judaism and therefore hated by the Jews –so much so that his very presence in the synagogue, where he came to explain his schism to Judaism at the request of the other apostles, excited such contempt and hatred of the people as to drive him, an exile from his home. He could not, moreover, work with the other apostles, who would take him to task for ignoring the Law. He, therefore, had sufficient reason to make the Gentile lands the field of his future work. He must work somewhere, and that was his last resort. The Gentiles were not the people of the Law. Actions in observance of the Law could not carry any weight with them; Law was a burden and a gate to sin if not observed, and hence a curse.
 
 Thus begins the philosophy of his epistles to the Gentiles; they were a sinful tribe, like others. They were visited by calamities, as others were. They ascribed it to their mis-deeds. But sacrifice only, and not repentance and reclamation, could please the angered Deity, in their belief. Sin and sacrifice was the basic principle of their creed.…No action, but bare belief in the story, was sufficient for salvation.”5
   
 “To-day it is an establish verity that Church theology was only an assimilation of Paganism: what an irony of fate that those who called others heathens should have turned out to be heathens themselves in their beliefs!”6

Evidently, Christians are following Paul and his pagan ‘son of God,’ they are not following God and His Christ.

    Who then are you going to follow, Allāh and Jesus; or Paul, “a renegade from Judaism” who “was considered to be a traitor to Jesus’s thought by the latter’s family and by the apostles who had stayed in Jerusalem in the circle around James;” the man who believed he heard Jesus’ “voice,” gave contradictory statements and forged his own gospel; who thought he had the Spirit of God, who had no Divine commandment and gave his own judgment, who made himself into a “chameleon” and lured people through “craft” and “guile” and “lie;” who grafted “paganism” onto Jesus’ head; and condemned the “law” that Jesus upheld and enjoined?
 
   Clearly, such a man cannot be a “good tree (that) bringeth forth good fruit”–(Matthew 7:16). Paul taught the lie of human blood sacrifice; millions will go to Hell following him.

   And to know that Christians not only follow Paul over Jesus but confer onto him sainthood.

   “Having eyes, see ye not?
And having ears, hear ye not?”
(Jesus, Mark 8:18).

If Jesus was around today he may have added another dictum: having heads reason ye not?
Ask yourself –"How can I go to heaven by following doctrines God did not reveal?"

*

JESUS’ STATUS AND MISSION: God gave clear doctrines to Jesus as to his status and mission. And Jesus taught clearly and simply his status and mission:

Jesus declared that God sent him only for Jews:

   -“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the HOUSE OF ISRAEL”–(Matt. 15:24).

   -“I pray for them (JEWS): I pray NOT for the world”–(John 17:9).

   -“For the Son of man is come to SEEK AND SAVE THAT (JEWS) WHICH WAS LOST”–(Luke 19:10).

   -“Go NOT into the way of the Gentiles, and into any of the city of the Samaritans enter ye NOT: But go rather to the LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL”–(Matt. 10:5-6; 18:11).

   -Jesus told the Samaritan woman: “Ye worship ye know not what: we (Jews) know what we worship: for SALVATION IS OF THE JEWS”–(John 4:21).

   –“Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine” –(Matt. 7:6).

   -“It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs”–(Matthew 15:26).

   -Jesus spoke in parables so the “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved. Jesus explained in private to his followers why he speak in parables: “Unto you (who have God) it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them (non-Jews) that are without (God), all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them”–(Mark 4:9-12). This statement by Jesus also proves conclusively that Jesus did NOT come to save sinners.

Jesus preached remission of sins through repentance and forgiveness in accordance with his mission to preach to the Jews that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law (not through crucifixion and vicarious atonement):

  -“I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to REPENTANCE” (not to vicarious atonement) –(Matthew 9:13).

   -“And when ye stand praying, FORGIVE, if ye have anything against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may FORGIVE you your trespasses, But if you do NOT forgive, NEITHER will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses”–(Mark 11:25-26; Luke 17:3-4). 

-“When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven …FORGIVE US OUR SINS; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but DELIVER US FROM EVIL” –(Luke 11:2-4).   

-“I tell you…except ye REPENT, ye shall all likewise  perish”–(Luke 13:3, 5). 

-“I say unto you, there is JOY in the presence of the angels of God over ONE SINNER THAT REPENTETH” –(Luke 15:10).

-“The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation (of Jews) and shall condemn it: because they REPENTED at the preaching of Jonas; and behold, a greater than Jonas is here” (that is to say, the people of Jonas repented but Jews do not repent even though Jesus who is greater than Jonas is preaching to them)–(Matthew 12:41). .  

Jesus declared that he was sent by God to do the “will” of God (and as he carried out the “will” of God, Jesus was a MUSLIM –one who submits to the “will” of God– and he taught ISLAM –submission to the “will” of God:

Jesus declares he is a MUSLIM:

   -“My meat is to do the will of HIM (God)that sent me and to finish HIS work;”

   -“I seek NOT MY OWN WILL, but the WILL OF THE FATHER…If I bear witness of myself, my witness is NOT TRUE;

   -“I came…not to do mine own will, BUT THE WILL OF HIM THAT SENT ME;

   -“My doctrine is not mine, BUT HIS THAT SENT ME;

  -“HE (God) gave me a commandment, WHAT I SHOULD SAY, AND WHAT I SHOULD SPEAK”(John 4:34; 5:30-31; 6:38; 7:16; 12:49.

   -“I have glorified thee on the earth: I HAVE FINISHED THE WORK WHICH THOU GAVEST ME TO DO’–(John 17:4. If Jesus had come to die for the sins of the world, he could not have said that his work was finished).

-“I have manifested thy name unto the men (the Jews) which THOU GAVEST ME out of the world”–(John 17:6. If Jesus was sent to the world he could not have been given some men “out of the world”: he would have been given all men of the world). If Jesus was God or Son of God, the Christian’s God and Son of God is/was a MUSLIM.

Jesus taught ISLAM:

   -“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat:  ALL therefore WHATSOEVER they bid you observe, that OBSERVE AND DO;”

   -“if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS  (brought by Moses);

   -“except your RIGHTEOUSNESS shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN” –(Matthew 23:2-3; 19:17-18; 5:20). And the Mosaic law does not teach inherited sin and vicarious atonement). Since following the Mosaic law is what is required to get into heaven THERE IS NO NEED FOR JESUS! JESUS IS REDUNDANT!

   -“And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever;”  “When he, the Spirit of truth (the Comforter), is come, he will guide you into ALL TRUTH” –(John 14:15-16; 16:13). And this Comforter as Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud –the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani– has shown in his revealing book Muhammad in the Bible is the Prophet Mohammad. Mohammad abides “forever” through the Qur’an.

   Since the Comforter will replace the Mosaic Law because he will guide into “ALL TRUTH” and will abide “FOREVER,” then, being devoid of “all truth” and perpetuity, the BIBLE IS OBSOLETE!

   Since the Comforter will replace the Mosaic law because he will guide into “ALL TRUTH” and will abide “FOREVER,” THERE IS NO NEED FOR JESUS! JESUS IS REDUNDANT!

   There is no wisdom in following a man who has not given “all truth.” Mohammad, the Comforter, has given us “all truth” –all that we need for our moral, social, intellectual, and spiritual upliftment are in the Qur’an which is to abide “FOREVER” to the Resurrection; the Qur’an consists of, exceeds, and supersedes all Scriptures. Christians can reject Mohammad, Christians can-not refute Mohammad’s claim to Divine Messenger-ship.

   Even if Mohammad was not the Comforter, Jesus and the Mosaic Law would still be REDUNDANT and the Bible OBSOLETE at the coming of the Comforter with “all Truth” who will “abide FOREVER.”

   And if we follow the Comforter and attain eternal life in Paradise THERE IS NO NEED FOR A SECOND COMING OF CHRIST! (Even in his alleged 1,000 years reign of his alleged second coming Jesus and the Mosaic law would be REDUNDANT and the Bible OBSOLETE as the “ANOTHER angel” with the “EVERLASTING Gospel” would rule –Revelation 14:6). 

   And since the Christian’s God and son of God, Jesus, says that heaven lies in faith (observance of the law) and good works (righteousness) THERE IS NO NEED FOR INHERITED SIN AND VICARIOUS ATONEMENT!

Jesus says you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free (from lies, falsehood, and blasphemy). And the Divine truth is, Jesus was a prophet of God sent only for Jews and to foretell the coming of the Comforter (Mohammad)who will guide into “all truth” and will “abide forever” and whom all are to follow; and

“THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLĀH;
MOHAMMAD IS THE MESSENGER OF ALLĀH!”

While Allāh, God, would not call us to account for that which we do not know, when knowledge comes to us what reason or excuse can we have for not accepting and follow it? “But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath NEVERforgiveness but is in danger of ETERNAL DAMNATION”–(Mark 3:29).
   While we are alive we have the grand opportunity to repent and have eternal life in Paradise. When we die there is no second chance. 

What is holding you back from baptizing
w
ith Allāh, the Best of Baptizers?
(Qur’an 2:138).

*

NOTES

1. Bucaille, Maurice, The Bible The Qur’an And Science, pp. 52-53. Caps, emphasis added).

2. Ency. Britannica, 15th Edn, Vol. 13, Paul the Apostle, Saint, p. 1090).

3. Ibid; p. 1091.

4. Kamal-ud-Din, Khwaja, Open Letters To The Bishops of Salisbury & London, pp. 31-32:

5. Kamal-ud-Din, Khwaja, The Sources of Christianity, pp. 28, 80-82. (See: www.muslim.org).    

6. Kamal-ud-Din, Khwaja, Open Letters to the Bishops of Salisbury & London, p. 15.

Share