Christianity-a fake religion


In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.

Whether inherited sin or committed sin, the God that puts one person’s sin onto others and even have the innocent killed for the guilty is not worthy of adoration. Not even honest humans suffer the innocent for the guilty).
The God or son of God or prophet that regards one sector of humanity as “dogs” and “swine” and even preach so they would not understand and be saved is the God/son of God/prophet not worthy of honor much less of adoration and worship. Even humans fight against racism and bigotry).   

As shown on this site, the most over-represented, over-blown person in the world is Jesus Christ. (Jesus-is redundant) And that the Church is the antiChrist.

“…complete salvation of the human race lies through the blood of Jesus Christ, and that the death of Jesus Christ is not essential for this purpose.” –Pope John XXIII1
This is Papal’s verbal gymnastics. 
   How can salvation lie through the “blood” of Jesus Christ and there was no “blood” of Jesus Christ, and Christianity stands on the foundation of the “blood” of Jesus Christ (of inherited sin and vicarious atonement; and Christians are preaching to the world that Jesus Christ “died” for sin inherited from Adam)?
   (Note well, that “salvation of the human race lies through the blood of Jesus Christ” is the Pope’s [Christian’s] teaching; it is NOT God’s teachings; it is NOT Jesus’ teaching. What more proof is needed that CHRISTIANITY IS A FAKE?)
How can salvation lie through the “blood” of Jesus Christ when Jesus Christ, the Christian’s God and Son of God, taught that “salvation” lies in following the Mosaic Law (till the coming of the 
Comforter who will bring “all truth” and “abide forever”)? And as salvation lies in following the Mosaic Law THERE IS NO NEED FOR INHERITED SIN; THERE IS NO NEED FOR JESUS–Jesus is redundant!


“By Allah! We certainly sent (messengers)
to nations before thee (Mohammad),
but the devil made their deeds
fair-seeming to them.”
(Qur’an 16:63).                              

“The whole world was a world of fetish worshippers at the appearance of Islam. From an eggshell to the man-worship of Christianity and Hinduism, the adoration that should go to God went to His creatures.”–Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din, Open Letters To The Bishops of Salisbury And London, (p. 17). 
   Jesus called on and prayed to God; and Christians call on and pray to Jesus.

“Come now, and let us reason together,
saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet,
they shall be as white as snow;
though they be red like crimson,
they shall be as wool”
(Isaiah 1:18).

It is clear from the above-quoted verse that anything that goes against reason is not Divine. As reason is the factor that separates us from, and elevates us above, the beast, thus, our judgment is to be based on reason; if our judgment is not based on reason then we have degraded ourselves lower than the beast –seeing that they do not have the capacity to reason and that we have this capacity and do not utilize it. Blind faith is no passport to Paradise; Reason is the door to God.

   As they delineate between Heaven and Hell, cardinal doctrines of a religion are to be clearly expressed and not left to the function of interpretation. Much like a person embarking on a journey would need to have his route clearly mapped out lest he strays from his destination.
God gave clear doctrines to Jesus as to his status and mission. And Jesus taught clearly and simply that he was a prophet of God sent only for Jews to call them to repentance and forgiveness; that eternal life lies in following the Ten Commandments; to foretell the coming of another Comforter who will bring “all truth” and “abide forever” and whom his people are to follow; and that he finished his work, which was to preach to the Jews.

That Jesus preached remission of sins through repentance and forgiveness (not through crucifixion and vicarious atonement):

   -“I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to REPENTANCE” (not to vicarious atonement)–(Matthew 9:13).
   -“And when ye stand praying, FORGIVE, if ye have anything against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may FORGIVE you your trespasses, But if you do NOT forgive, NEITHER will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses”–(Mark 11:25-26; Luke 17:3-4). 
   -“When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven… FORGIVE US OUR SINS; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but DELIVER US FROM EVIL”–(Luke 11:2-4). 
   -“I tell you…except ye REPENT, ye shall all likewise perish”–(Luke 13:3, 5).
   -“I say unto you, there is JOY in the presence of the angels of God over ONE SINNER THAT REPENTETH”–(Luke 15:10).
   -“The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation (of Jews) and shall condemn it: because they REPENTED at the preaching of Jonas; and behold, a greater than Jonas is here” (that is to say, the people of Jonas repented but Jews do not repent even though Jesus who is greater than Jonas is preaching to them)–(Matthew 12:41).  
   Jesus is “redeemer” in that the Israelites who accept Jesus as “rabbi” (teacher) from God and repent, they are forgiven of their sins.

That Jesus was sent by God (and as Jesus carried out the “will” of God Jesus was a MUSLIM –one who submits to the “will” of God):

   -“I came…NOT to do mine own will, BUT THE WILL OF HIM THAT SENT ME”–(John 6:38);
-“My doctrine is NOT mine, BUT HIS THAT SENT ME”–(John 7:16);
-“He (God) GAVE ME a commandment, WHAT I SHOULD SAY, AND WHAT I SHOULD SPEAK”–(John 12:49);
-“My meat is to do the will of HIM that sent me and to finish HIS work”–(John 4:34).
-“I seek NOT MY OWN WILL, but the WILL OF THE FATHER… If I bear witness of myself, my witness is NOT TRUE”(John 5:30-31).

That Jesus was sent only to the Children of Israel/Jacob:
“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the HOUSE OF ISRAEL”–(Matt. 15:24).
-“I pray for them (JEWS): I pray NOT for the world”–(John 17:9);
-“For the Son of man is come to SEEK AND SAVE THAT (JEWS) WHICH WAS LOST”–(Luke 19:10).

That Jesus informed his people eternal life lies in following the Ten Commandments until the coming of the Comforter who will then guide them into “all truth” and whom they are to follow (and as Jesus instructed his people to abide by the “will” of God Jesus taught ISLAM –submission to the “will” of God):

   -“The Scribes and the Pharisees sit in MOSES seat: All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, THAT OBSERVE AND DO”–(Matt. 23:2-3);
  -“one came and said unto him (Jesus) Good Master, what good things shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him? Why callest thou me GOOD? There is NONE good but ONE, that is GOD: but if THOU WILT ENTER INTO LIFE, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS …Thou shalt do no murder….”–(Matt. 19:16-19); 
  -“except your RIGHTEOUSNESS shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall IN NO CASE enter into the kingdom of heaven”–(Matt. 5:20).  And the Mosaic law does not teach inherited sin and vicarious atonement. Since following the Mosaic law is what is required to get into heaven THERE IS NO NEED FOR JESUS! (See Jesus-redundant no ransom). And since heaven lies in faith (observance of the law) and good works (righteousness) THERE IS NO NEED FOR  inherited sin AND VICARIOUS ATONEMENT!
   –“And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever;” ”When he, the Spirit of truth (the Comforter), is come, he will guide you into ALL TRUTH”–(John 14:15-16; 16:13).
The Prophet 
Mohammad is this Comforter –as shown by Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud, the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani in his revealing book Muhammad in the Bible who has given us “all truth” (all that we need for our moral, social, intellectual, and spiritual upliftment are in the Qur’an which is to abide “FOREVER” to the Resurrection; the Qur’an consists of, exceeds, and supersedes all Scriptures). Christians can reject Mohammad but Christians cannot refute Mohammad’s claim to Divine Messengership.
Since the
Comforter will replace the Mosaic Law because he will guide into “ALL TRUTH” and will abide “FOREVER,” then, being devoid of “all truth” and perpetuity, the  Bible is obsolete
Since the
Comforter will replace the Mosaic law because he will guide into “ALL TRUTH” and will abide FOREVER,” THERE IS NO NEED FOR JESUS! Jesus is redundant!
   There is no wisdom in following a man who has not given “all truth.”
Mohammad, the Comforter, has given us “all truth” –all that we need for our moral, social, intellectual, and spiritual upliftment are in the Qur’an which is to abide “FOREVER” to the Resurrection; the Qur’an consists of, exceeds, and supersedes all Scriptures. Christians can reject Mohammad, Christians cannot refute Mohammad’s claim to Divine Messengership. 
   Even if Mohammad was not the Comforter, Jesus and the Mosaic Law would still be REDUNDANT and the Bible OBSOLETE at the coming of the Comforter with “all Truth” who will “abide FOREVER.” 
    And if we follow the Comforter and attain eternal life in Paradise
second coming OF JESUS. (Even in his alleged 1,000 years reign of his alleged second coming Jesus and the Mosaic law would be REDUNDANT and the Bible OBSOLETE as the “ANOTHER angel” with the “EVERLASTING Gospel” would rule–Revelation 14:6). 
   And since the Christian’s God and son of God, Jesus, says that heaven lies in faith (observance of the law) and good works (righteousness)
Jesus says: “If ye love me, keep my commandments” –(John 14:16). As Mohammad is the Comforter of whom Jesus foretold, then those who claim to “love” Jesus will follow Mohammad.

That Jesus declared he finished his work, which was to preach to the Jews:

“I have glorified thee on the earth: I HAVE FINISHED THE WORK WHICH THOU (GOD) GAVEST ME TO DO”–(John 17:4) If Jesus had come to die for the sins of the world, he could not have said that his work was finished); “I have manifested thy name unto the men (the JEWS) which thou gavest me out of the world”–(John 17:6. If Jesus was sent to the world he could not have been given SOME men “out of the world”: he would have been given ALL men of the world).

Since Jesus clearly stated his status and mission how is it that two thousand years after Jesus’ mission ended Christians are wandering in “darkness and misunderstanding” and confusion as to who Jesus was and his mission?:
  ● Whereas some Christians say that Jesus is God some say he is only son of God. Whose belief is right?
● Whereas some Christians say that there is
trinity some sayTrinity as a “senseless God-dishonoring doctrine” that can come only from the mind of “Satan the Devil.” Who is right?
●  Whereas some Christians say that Christ died for 
inherited sin some say he died for committed sin (arguing, rightly, that your father being a millionaire does not make you a millionaire). Whose belief is true?
  ● Whereas some Christians believe Jesus was killed, buried, and raised, “some of the early Christian sects did not believe that Christ was killed on the cross. The Basilidans believed that some one else was substituted for him. The Docetae held that Christ never had a real physical or natural body, but only an apparent or phantom body, and that his Crucifixion was only apparent, not real. The Marcionite Gospel (about A.D. 138) denied that Jesus was born, and merely said that he appeared in human form.”2 (And these Christians being closer in time to Jesus would know better than modern-day Christians).
● Whereas some Christians say Jesus was of “virgin” birth some say he was not3 (“virgin” birth is a forgery in the Bible; see
Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix).

   Who then is Jesus and what then is Christianity? No one seems to know. 
  ● Arianism –after Arius, a fourth century Christian priest– “affirmed that Christ is not truly divine but a created being. The fundamental premise of Arius was the uniqueness of God, who is alone self-existent and immutable; the Son, who is not self-existent cannot be God.”4
(But the Bible says that Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God and God has tons of sons and daughters and even firstborn, and son of God is only an epithet of honor given even to “peacemakers.” And unlike God, Jesus was subjected to the laws of human nature: birth, growth, eating etc; and he had no knowledge about the time of future events: “But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not even the angels which art in heaven, NEITHER THE SON, but the FATHER” –Mark 13:32; “it is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the FATHER hath put in his OWN POWER”–Acts 1:7). This truth of Arian that Jesus was no more than human ignited the wrath of his opponents).

   ● The Unitarians and Universalists “generally agree that God is One and thus deny the divinity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity.”5 
  ● The “I Am movement” –a religious movement in the U.S. which “begun in the 1930s by Guy Ballard” and “his wife, Edna,” and named after God who told Moses that His name is I AM (Ex. 3:14)– “essentially taught that the power of the Mighty I Am was available to individuals through many Ascended Masters, the principal ones being Jesus and St. Germain. The Ascended Masters spoke through their special representatives on earth, the Accredited Messengers, who were Edna and Guy Ballard and their son, Donald.”6   Thus according to the “I Am movement” Jesus was NOT God but only a prophet or servant of God.
(Note that St. Germain also is said to have ascended to heaven; which would make it four individuals who had ascended to heaven: Elijah,7 Enoch,8 Jesus9 though the verses about Jesus’ Ascension etc; are shown to be “forgeries” in the
Bible; and St. Germain; yet Jesus says no man hath ascended to heaven–John 3:13. And the Zoroastrian’s Arta/Artay Viraf is also said to have ascended to heaven. And Buddha is said to have ascended to heaven and will return to restore the world to happiness. If Buddha and Jesus were to return to lord the world the two might have to battle for supremacy. Bets on the winner, anyone?).  

   ● Whereas some Coptic Christians believe that Jesus was of “dual nature” other Coptic Christians believed in Jesus as being “Monophysite,” i.e. “the doctrine that Christ is not “in two natures” (human and divine), but is “one nature out of two natures.””10
(Notably, these are Christian conjectures. That Jesus is “one nature out of two natures.” What are these “two natures” from which Jesus came? If Jesus is from the Father and the Holy Ghost aren’t the Father and the Holy Ghost of the same “nature”–Spirit? In which event Jesus should also be Spirit. And if Jesus is from God and Mary isn’t Mary of flesh and blood, and can Spirit and flesh procreate?

   ● Catholics believe in trinity. According to Encyclopaedia Britannica

“Trinity, the doctrine of God taught by Christianity that asserts that God is one in essence but three in “person,” Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Sheema of the Old Testament: “Hear. O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deut. 6:4). The earliest Christians, however, had to cope with the implications of the coming of Jesus Christ and of the presence and power of God among them –i.e. the Holy spirit whose coming was connected with the celebration of the Pentecost. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were associated in such New Testament passages as the Great Commission: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19) and in the apostolic benediction: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all” (II Cor. 13:14). Thus, the New Testament established the basis for the doctrine of Trinity. 
    The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies. Initially, both the requirements of monotheism inherited from the Old Testament and the implications of the need to interpret the biblical teaching to Greco-Roman paganism seemed to demand that the divine in Christ as the Word, or Logos, be interpreted as subordinate to the Supreme Being. An alternative solution was to interpret Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three modes of the self-disclosure of the one God but not as distinct within the being of God itself. The first tendency recognized the distinctness among the three, but at the cost of their equality and hence of their unity (subordinationism); the second came to terms with their unity, but at the cost of their distinctness as “persons” (modalism). It was not until the 4th. century that the distinctness of the three and their unity were brought together in a single orthodox doctrine of one essence and three persons.
   The Council of Nicaea in 325 stated the crucial formula for that doctrine in its confession that the Son is “of the same essence [homoousios] as the Father,” even though it said very little about the Holy Spirit. Over the next half century, Athanasius defended and refined the Nicene formula, and, by the end of the 4th. Century, under the leadership of Basil of Caesarea, Gregory of Nyssa, and Gregory of Nazianzus (the Cappadocian Fathers) the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since.”11

   Understand now why two thousand years after Christ’s clear and simple teachings Christians are wandering in “darkness and misunderstanding” and confusion as to who Jesus was and his mission? Christians try to explain the non-existent.
   So whose Trinity is the true Trinity, Christianity’s with its Resurrection and Judgment or Hinduism’s with its Karma and Reincarnation? Any wonder some Christians view the trinity as, rightly, a “senseless, God-dishonoring doctrine” that could come only from the mind of “Satan”? In fact even the Pagan Romans had Trinity –Juno, Jupiter, and Minerva. Perhaps this where the Christian Fathers got their idea for Trinity).

(Notably, the Holy Spirit was already here before Pentecost and during Jesus’ time and thus there was no need to concoct Trinity; see Jesus-Comforter.
The verses of Matt. 28:19 and Mark 16:9-20 speaking about the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and to preach the Gospels to all nations have been shown to be forgeries in the
Bible; which would also render Paul’s “apostolic benediction questionable; especially seeing that it was  Paul who introduced the pagan doctrine of son of God into the Christian religion. Moreover, Jesus regards non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and he preached in parables so they would not understand and be converted and saved. See Jesus-only for Jews.
The New Testament is four Books “according to” Matthew, Mark Luke and John, not according to God or Jesus; and it is the King James and Catholic’s Douay Version not God’s and Jesus’ version. And Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were not eyewitnesses of the data they recorded, see
Bible corrupt & obsolete.
“Word/Logos” was taken from the writings of Philo see
Jesus-word of God).

   Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud –the former Reverend David Benjamin– notes in his insightful and scholarly presentation Muhammad in the Bible: 

“More than sixteen Ecumenical Councils have been summoned to define the religion of Christianity, only to be discovered by the Synod of the Vatican in the nineteenth century that the mysteries of the “Infallibility” and the “Immaculate Conception” were two of the principal dogmas, both unknown to the Apostle Peter and the Blessed Virgin Mary! Any faith or religion dependent upon the deliberations and decisions of General Synods –holy or heretical– is artificial and human. The religion of Islam is the belief in one Allāh and absolute resignation to His will, and this faith is professed by the angels in heaven and by the Muslims on earth. It is the religion of sanctification and of enlightenment, and an impregnable bulwark against idolatry.” Amen! (For full text see Baptism of water or fire).

   No one is able to explain the trinity:

“A council of the clergy was held at Nicea, in 325 A.D. which council confirmed the doctrine of trinity…The clergy have ever held to this senseless God-dishonoring doctrine…If you ask a clergyman what is meant by the trinity he says: “That is mystery.” He does not know, and no one else knows, because it is false. Never was there a more deceptive doctrine advanced than that of the trinity. It could have originated only in one mind, and that the mind of Satan the Devil.”12

According to Christians, their God and Son of God, Jesus, did not give them clear teachings as to his status and mission so that three hundred years after his mission was over his so-called followers had to band together and conjecture whether Jesus is God or Son of God or three Gods in one (Trinity) and vicarious atoner and that mankind inherited sin from Adam and that the wage of sin is “death.”
(Tragically, there are Muslims who know nothing about Islam –and who know even less about Christianity– and instead of learning about Islam have apostatized to blindly follow Christians in their head-rush to Hell).


    Like inherited sin and vicarious atonement which were devised by Paul, Trinity was invented  by Christians three hundred years after Jesus Christ, and both was then institutionalized. M.A. Faruqui notes in his revealing book The Crumbling of the Cross:

“The Christian Church had caused a General Council of the Church dignitaries to be appointed in A.D. 325 in which certain doctrines were made to be the foundation of the Christian Church, and belief therein was made essential for one to be Christian. This is known as the Nicene Creed. Under this, the confirmed doctrine of Atonement may be explained as follows:

   (i) Adam (and Eve) committed a Sin, and this Sin was inherited by their descendants.
  (ii) The attribute of “Justice” in God demanded that a sin must be punished, for the wage of Sin is death.
  (iii) God sent his son Jesus Christ to this world, so that he may die on the Cross an “accursed” death, and after spending some time in Hell, atone for the Sins of the human race, and then be resurrected again. (pp. 109-110).

    Since to teach doctrines in the name of Christ that Christ did not teach is antiChrist, then, as Muhammad Ali points out: Christianity, in its present form, being opposed to the true teachings of Christ, is thus the only Antichrist known to the Qur’an”–(comm. Qur’an 18:1).
   The Christian religion may rightly be named Churchianity or Paulianity and its followers called Churchians or Paulians. 

Whereas Jesus was only a messenger of God sent to the Israelites to call them to “repentance” and “forgiveness”, Christians walled Jesus in the bed of celibacy, crowned him with Divinity, made him scapegoat for non-existent inherited sin, and consecrated him ruler of future-world. Whereas David was earthly king Christians make Jesus heavenly/spiritual king   (see Jesus-like David 

   Christianity is lies; evil; hate; intolerant; falsehood; blasphemy; backward; brutally misogynistic (see  Christianity-Women).   Christians lie on God they lie on Jesus, they blame the Devil.
And the Gospels portray
Jesus as hypocrite, liar, fraud.

As shown, these cardinal doctrines of Christianity are NOT Divine Revelations -they are not clearly expressed in the Bible- these doctrines are assumptions.
Trinity was invented by the Church 300 years after Christ; and inherited sin and vicarious atonement were devised by St. (?) Paul.

In summary. Christianity is:
  Trinity –God growing in the womb, coming out the vagina and getting circumcised; and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15)
  Son of God –attributing the animal function of sex to God; as “fatherhood” requires the union of sperm and ovum; (and Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God-Luke 1:35); and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15)
  Inherited sin –God loading a man’s (Adam’s) sin onto innocent, helpless and mentally non-competent babies
  Vicarious atonement –God having a blameless man (Jesus) killed for the sin of others.
Which are gruesome, unGodly monstrosities!

What kind of God and son of God are Christians following that need to eat butter and honey in order to differentiate between good and evil?
What kind of God are Christians following that lived in the belly of a woman and came out her vagina and circumcised?
What kind of God are Christians following that puts one man’s sin onto innocent, helpless, and morally and mentally non-competent babies?
What kind of God are Christians following that had a blameless man killed for the sins of others?
This is the insanity that Christians have hundreds of thousands of missionaries plying the world and blowing billions of dollars (which could be utilized to eradicate/alleviate world poverty) for Muslims and others to nail our intelligence to the “cross” of lunacy and blind faith and follow.

Incidentally, Jesus is noted as saying: “Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature” (which would include the baboon)–(Mark 16:15; though this verse is a “forgery” in the Bible), and, regarding “the end of the world” Jesus says: “This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and THEN SHALL THE END COME”–(Matthew 24:3, 14. Thus, if any nation(s) should ban the Gospel from its land the “end” shall NEVER COME).
Bluntly put, Christianity -Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement- is not only lies,, falsehood and blasphemy, Christianity is nonsense.        

(Even Hinduism is superior to Christianity. Whereas both religions reduce God to “son” of a woman and make woman “mother” of God by placing God in the body of a woman and bring Him out her genital. Unlike Christianity which attributes injustice to God and makes God complicit in murder by shifting Adam’s sin around onto every person and then onto Jesus and having him murdered, Hinduism, does not attribute injustice to God and make Him complicit in murder; Hinduism gives to man an equal and opposite reaction to his action; though this renders God as being mercy-less, see Karma & Reincarnation.
Also, whereas Jesus/Christianity regards non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in “parables” so these metaphorical “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved, Hinduism does not regard non-Jews or non-Hindus as “dogs” and “swine” or preached in parables so they would not understand. The God or son of God or prophet that regards one sector of humanity as “:dogs” and “swine” and even preach so they would not understand and be saved is the God/son of God/prophet not worthy of honor much less of adoration and worship. Even humans fight against racism and bigotry).   

Jesus says you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free (from lies, falsehood, and blasphemy). And the Divine truth is, Jesus was a prophet of God sent only for Jews and to foretell the coming of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and will “abide forever” and whom all are to follow; and
                        “THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLĀH;


1. M.A. Faruqui notes in his revealing book The Crumbling of the Cross that a group of Christians after carrying out investigation on photographs of the Shroud in which Jesus was covered, the findings showing that Jesus was not dead was forwarded to the Vatican; “the investigations made about the imprints of Christ’s body on the Shroud put the Church in difficulties. Pope John XXIII had made a proclamation on 30 June 1960, which was printed in an issue of the Vatican newspaper, Osservator Romano dated 2nd July 1960, under the title “Complete Salvation through the Blood of Jesus Christ,” in which the Pope informed and directed all the Catholic Bishops to believe and to propagate that the complete salvation of the human race lies through the blood of Jesus Christ, and that the death of Jesus Christ is not essential for this purpose.”(p.109). For more on this see Jesus-inherited sin to ascension. For The Crumbling of the Cross visit:

2. Yusuf, Ali, Qur’anic comm. #663. (Color added).

3. Ibn Warraq notes in his book Why I Am Not A Muslim: “Martin Luther (1483-1546), writing in the sixteenth century, conceded that “We Christians seem fools to the world for believing that Mary was the true mother of this child, and nevertheless a pure virgin. For this is not only against all reason, but also against the creation of God, who said to Adam and Eve, ‘Be fruitful and multiply.’”” p. 144. For a refutation of Ibn Warraq’s book see Why I am Not a Muslim.

4. Ency, Brit; 15th. Ed; Vol. I; art; Arianism, pp. 509-510.

5. Ency, Brit; 15th. Ed; Vol. X; art; Unitarians and Universalists, p. 261.

6. Ency, Brit; 15th. Ed; Vol. V; art. I Am Movement, p. 263.

7. 2 Kings 2:1, 11;

8. Hebrews 11:5; Gen. 5:24.

9. Mark 16:19: “So then after the Lord hath spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.” Clearly, as has been pointed out, not only were the writers of the Gospels NOT eyewitnesses to the data they recorded, but no man can certify that Jesus went and “SAT ON THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD.”

10. Ency. Brit. 15th Ed. Vol. IX, art. Syrian Orthodox Church, p. 747.

11. Ency. Brit. 15th Ed. Vol. X, art; Trinity, p. 126. Highlights added.

12. Quote taken from A.H. Vidyarthi, Muhammad in World Scriptures, Vol. 1, pp. 312-313. For full text and details see Jesus-trinity.