Jesus-had s-x with his mother

Share

In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
DEDICATED TO
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
AND TO
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms
*

                  JESUS–HAD S-X WITH HIS MOTHER
(NOTE WELL: The following is NOT our saying but the conclusion derived from the Gospels and Christians’ belief/teaching).

Since Christians say Jesus is God; and that Father (God), Son (Jesus) and Holy Ghost/Spirit are one. Then Jesus is God as well the Holy Ghost. Which has given rise to the charge that according to Christian teaching Jesus, in the form of the Holy Ghost, effected his own conception; and with his mother (which is incest).
Add to this unholy mortar of Trinity, the Christian aggregate that Jesus’ saying “Before Abraham was, I am” proves that Jesus is God, fortifies the structure that Jesus effected his own conception; and with his mother. (“….” see Jesus & God are one).

The Gospel of Matthew 1:18-20 and Luke 1:35 states, respectively:
“Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child OF THE HOLY GHOST….….the angel of the Lord appeared (to Joseph, saying) fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is CONCEIVED in her IS OF THE HOLY GHOST;
“The Holy Ghost SHALL COME UPON THEE (Mary), and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that the holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be CALLED the Son of God.”

   How did the Holy Ghost “COME UPON” Mary and caused her to be “CONCEIVED”? And to be conceived requires sperm and ovum.  And as spirit and humans cannot mate, then the obvious conclusion is that the Holy Ghost/Spirit had to take physical form (which, according to Christian, is not unusual as God came as Jesus). 

The “power of the Highest shall overshadow thee (Mary)” does not mean immaculate conception; if it had meant “virgin” birth there would have been no need for the Holy Ghost/Spirit to “come upon” Mary.  Moreover, the Bible as well as the Qur’an show that Jesus was NOT of virgin birth (see Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix?)
The “power of the Highest shall overshadow thee (Mary)” is an assurance that God will protect Mary from evil, (devils were running rampant then in Palestine. Jesus pulled some 2,000 just from one man –Mark 5:1-13). 

   Interestingly. As quoted above, Luke 1:35 states that Mary’s offspring (Jesus) “shall be CALLED the Son of God” (NOT that he is the Son of God, which is only an epithet of honor).
Nowadays, Christians are tripping over one another to explain the meaning of “Son of God –to make it palatable to an educated world. But their concoction is a camouflage to shield the truth from the unschooled.
Read again Matthew 1:20 which speaks about Mary’s pregnancy: “for that which is CONCEIVED in her IS OF THE HOLY GHOST” plus the early Christian Father(s) slavishly and boorishly aping the pagan’s sons of God whose mothers were impregnated by the gods and the conclusion is crystal clear: Jesus was regarded as a literal/physical Son of God –as Justin Martyr is noted as saying:

“It having reached the Devil’s ears that the prophets had foretold the coming of Christ (the Son of God) he set the heathen poets to bring forward a great many who should be called the sons of Jove. The Devil laying his scheme in this, to get man to imagine that the true history of Christ was of the same character as the prodigious fables related of the sons of Jove….By declaring the Logos, the first begotten of God, Our Master Jesus, to be born of a virgin, without any human mixture, we (Christians) say no more in this than what you (Pagans) say of those whom you style the sons of Jove. For you need not be told what a parcel of sons the writers most in vogue among you assign to Jove. (Just as the Bible assigns a legion of SONS to God)….As to the Son of God, called Jesus, should we allow him to be no more than man (note well, it is Christians who “allow” Jesus to be “more than man”), yet the title of the son of God is very justifiable upon account of his wisdom (then this “wisdom“ should make Einstein at least super son of God), considering that you (Pagans) have your Mercury in worship under the title of the Word, a messenger of God ….As to his (Jesus) being born of a virgin, you have your Perseus to balance that….if Jupiter could send a parcel of sons out of virgin mothers; the Father in heaven assuredly could do the same at least in our case.”” (True He could, but He did not).
(Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din, The Sources of Christianity. p. 37. KK quotes from Adol, I. Ch. xxii. (Italics in brackets and color added).
Such is the Christian religion: forged in the human foundry, stamped with the seal of Divine authority. (See Christianity is Paganism).
   (Perhaps Matthew 1:20 noted above, which speaks about Mary’s pregnancy: “for that which is conceived in her IS OF THE HOLY GHOST” was a later insertion in the Gospel to accord with the pagan doctrine of Divine fatherhood to give credibility to Jesus being son of God).

But the matter about Jesus does not end there. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad notes in his scholarly presentation “Jesus in Heaven on Earth”:

“So long as the early Christians did not assert the virgin birth of Jesus, none of his contemporaries challenged his legitimacy. But the moment Jesus was raised to the pedestal of Godhead, the imaginations of the hagiographers had full scope to indulge in the most affecting or foolish fabrications accorded to their literary skill. In the second century they attributed supernatural birth to Jesus. The Pagans retorted with the charge of illegitimacy. The Christian legendary cult has to thank itself for this calumny against Jesus and Mary. Josephus had provided the Pagans with a parallel–(Josephus, Antiq; XVIII: 3-4) for he records that Mundus, a Roman knight, won Paulina, the chaste knight of a Roman noble, to his wishes by causing her to be invited by a priest of Isis into the temple of the goddess under a pretext that the god Anubis desired to embrace her. In the innocence of faith Paulina resigned herself and would perhaps have afterwards believed that she gave birth to the son of this god had not the intriguer, with bitter scorn, soon after disclosed to her the true state of affairs.
The Pagans substituted Mary for Paulina and Joseph (for) Pandera, a soldier, for the Roman knight mentioned by Josephus.
This calumny was taken up by the Jews of the second century, and found a place in the Talmud. Jesus was then styled as ben Pandera. (i.e. son of Pandera). It is this calumny of which Celsus accuses Jews and which is referred to by Origen–(Orig; C: Celsus, I:32) but of which the Jews of the time of Jesus were ignorant and innocent” (See Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix?)

Significantly, the Prophet Mohammad, through Divine Revelation of the Qur’an, repudiated these Jewish calumnies against Jesus and his mother, Mary –that Mary was an “adulteress” and Jesus a “bastard”– and appareled them in rubious robes of righteousness, and have secured for them today the unflagging allegiance of some one-and-one-half billion Muslims. And counting as Islam spirits on. Inexorably! Invincibly! Impregnably! As Divinely decreed! To prevail over all religions:
“He (Allah) it is Who sent His Messenger (Mohammad) with guidance and the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religions, though the polytheists are averse”-(Qur’an 9:32-33; 48:28; 61:8-9).
Allāh God truly is Great! 
Subhāna Rabbayyal A’lā!  
Allāho Akbar!

In answer to the question who created God, Allāh God revealed to the Prophet Mohammad: “Say: He, Allah, is One. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute. He begets not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like Him”–(Qur’an 112:1-4).
And Professor Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– explains in his book, Muhammad in the Bible:
“If the Christian priests and theologians knew their Scriptures in the original Hebrew instead of in translations as the Muslims read their Qur-an in its Arabic text, they would clearly see that Allāh is the same ancient Semitic name of the Supreme Being who revealed and spoke to Adam and all the prophets” (pp. 12-13).

While God and Jesus are eminently free of these Christian-manufactured anathemas –Trinity and Sonship of God.
That Jesus effected his own conception and with his mother, Christians have their Fathers/Gospel writers to thank for this monumental and grotesque portrait they have painted of their God/Son of God in their  “Word of God.”
This is the bitter fruit Christians reap for the Jesus-is-“more than man” tree they planted. And are nurturing.

Jesus was a Muslim and taught Islam.
And he taught that God sent him only for Jews and he foretold the coming of another Comforter (who is shown to be the Prophet Mohammad) who will guide into “all truth” and will abide ‘for ever.”

Christians can go on to the Resurrection swallowing the sordid camels of Trinity and Sonship of God or they can swallow their pride and toss these ignominious creations onto the dung-hill of horrible history and bend their knees to Allāh and secure for themselves that mansion or “bungalow” they crave in heaven.
Christians are hereby given, again, the Divine Message:
“There is no God but Allah; Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah!”


Share