In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.
JESUS–ONLY NAME ON EARTH
Christians need to be honest and let the world know that the writings of The Acts and the many letters of the New Testament such as Romans, Corinthians, Timothy etc; are the writings of Paul, they are not the words of God or Jesus: “More than half of the Acts of the Apostles…together with the letters written by him (St. Paul) or in his name, comprises one-third of the New Testament”1
Paul was a self-admitted liar; who forged his own gospel; who was uncertain whether he had the Holy Spirit with him and gave his own judgment; and who snared people into following his teachings through guile and craft; and he committed gross blasphemy by saying God made Jesus, the Christian’s God and Son of God, into a “curse” and “lower” than the angels.2
Christians also need to inform the world that the verses of Mark 16:9-20 and Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are “forgeries”3 in the BIBLE.
“God’s anger is revealed from heaven against all the sin and evil of the people whose evil ways prevent the truth from being known”–(Romans 1:18).
“Let them bear, on the Day of Judgment, their own burdens in full, And also (part) of the burdens of those without knowledge, whom they misled. Alas, how grievous the burdens they will bear”–(Qur’an 16:25)
Paul’s claim that “there is none other name [except Jesus] under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved,” is fanciful–(Acts 4:12; Matt. 1:21).
Every prophet of God is a name under heaven whereby his people is saved. Else it would have been pointless for God to send these prophets to their people.
Moses not only gave the Israelites the Ten Commandments, Jesus emphasized obedience to the scribes and Pharisees and exhorted that the Ten Commandments is their pathway to Paradise (until the coming of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and abide “for ever” As the Comforter will bring “all truth” and abide “for ever,” there is no wisdom in following a man who did not give ‘all truth” or in following a Book that is devoid of “all truth”):
-“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: ALL therefore WHATSOEVER they bid you observe, that OBSERVE AND DO;”
-“if thou wilt enter into life, KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS (brought by Moses);
-“except your RIGHTEOUSNESS shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN”–(Matthew 23:2-3; 19:16-19; 5:20).
As eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law (till the coming of the Comforter) Jesus could not be the “only name” under heaven whereby man we be saved. In fact, since adherence to the Mosaic Law is the gate to heaven then JESUS IS REDUNDANT; NO ONE NEEDS JESUS. (See Jesus-redundant no ransom).
Regarding the Comforter, Jesus states: “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you ANOTHER COMFORTER, that he may abide with you FOREVER;” “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, HE will guide you into ALL TRUTH”–(John 14:16; 16:13).
If Jesus was the only name under heaven through which one is saved there would be no need for another Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and abide “forever.
And as the Comforter will guide into “all truth” and abide “forever,” it is the Comforter who is now the only name under heaven whereby men are saved. (Notably, Jesus, admittedly, did not give “all truth” and that he will not abide “forever”).
Since the Comforter will replace the Mosaic Law because he will guide into “ALL TRUTH” and will abide “FOREVER,” then, being devoid of “all truth” and perpetuity, the Bible is obsolete.
Thus Paul is incorrect in his claim that “there is none other name (except Jesus) under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.”
Significantly, Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud –the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani– has shown in his revealing book Muhammad in the Bible that this Comforter of whom Jesus spoke is the Prophet Mohammad (who will abide “forever” through the Qur’an).
Paul also wrongly ascribes to Jesus the prophecies “which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began,” including that made by Moses in which Moses spoke that God will raise up a prophet like him (Moses)–(Acts 3:21-23).
Jesus never claimed to be the fulfillment of this prophecy of Acts 3:21-23. And there are potent reasons:
-Jesus could not be the prophet LIKE MOSES foretold by Moses–(Deut. 18:18-19).This prophecy states: “I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee (Moses), and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him”–(Deuteronomy 18:18).
Jesus brought no new Law: he exhorted his people to keep the Law of Moses–(Matt. 23:1-3; 19:17-19).The Prophet MOHAMMAD brought a new Law, SHARI’AH-THE SUPREME SYSTEM. The words God put in Mohammad’s mouth is the QUR’AN which Mohammad spoke under God’s command.
-Jesus could not be the prophet who is “not learned”–(Isaiah 29:12). This prophecy states: “And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.”
There is no evidence of Jesus being presented with Divine revelation and him stating he did not know to read. There is evidence that the Prophet MOHAMMAD did not know to read. When Mohammad received the first revelation–(Qur’an 96:1-5), he said to the angel, “I do not know how to read”–Bokhari Vol. 1, #3). Allāh, God, also testifies that the Prophet Mohammad did not know to read: “And thou didst not recite before it (the Qur’an) any book, nor did thou transcribe one with thy right hand, for then could the liars have doubted”–(Qur’an 29:48).
-Jesus could not be the “Shiloh” foretold by the prophet Jacob–(Genesis 49:10). This prophecy states: “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a law-giver from between his feet until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.”
Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud –the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani– has explained this prophecy in detail in his revealing book Muhammad in the Bible showing that this prophecy cannot apply to either Moses, David, or Jesus, but, that this prophecy could relate only to the Prophet Mohammad because “Muhammad came with military power and the Qur‘an to replace the old Jewish worn-out sceptre and the impracticable and old-fashioned law of sacrifices and of a corrupt priesthood.”
Prof. Dawud notes, that the Jewish “institutions” of “Royal Sceptre and the Prophetical Succession” “have been extinct for over thirteen centuries.” And that “the tribe of Judah also has disappeared together with its royal authority and its sister–the prophetical succession.”
Thus, “The Jews are forced to accept one or the other of the two alternatives, namely, either to admit that Shiloh has come already, but that their forefathers did not recognize him, or to accept the fact that there exists no longer a tribe of Judah from which Shiloh will have to descend.”
Moreover, the prophecy clearly states that Shiloh “is to be a total stranger to the tribe of Judah, and even to all the other tribes,” the Prof. points out –the sceptre and the law-giver were to remain with Judah until the arrival of Shiloh. “If Shiloh be a descendant of Judah, how could those two elements [sceptre and lawgiver] cease to exist in that tribe?” Shiloh “could not be a descendant of any of the other tribes either, for the sceptre and the lawgiver were for all Israel, and not for one tribe only. This observation explodes the Christian claim as well. For Jesus is a descendant of Judah–at least from his mother’s side.”
It is clear from the above that “the Jews are vainly expecting the coming of another Shiloh, and that the Christians are obstinately persisting in their error in believing that it was Jesus who was intended by Shiloh.”(pp. 54, 55, 58, 57).
Clearly, this prophecy of Acts 3:21-22 could only be fulfilled in the person of Mohammad. Allāh, God, tells us in His Qur’an: “And when Allāh made a covenant through the prophets: Certainly what I have given you of Book and Wisdom — then a Messenger comes to you verifying that which is with you, you shall believe in him, and you shall aid him. He said: Do you affirm and accept My compact in this (matter)? They said: We do affirm. He said: Then bear witness, and I (too) am of the bearers of witness with you”–Qur’an 3:81).
And Muhammad Ali comments:
“Mithåq al-nabiyyin means literally the covenant of the prophets, and may therefore signify either the covenant of the prophets with Allåh or the covenant of the prophets with their people. As the words that follow are plainly addressed to the people, the Jews and the Christians being particularly addressed in the last two verses, I adopt the latter interpretation, and therefore translate the words as meaning a covenant through the prophets. According to Kf: When Allåh made the covenant which the prophets confirmed with their peoples. Both Moses and Jesus specially laid an obligation on their people to accept the prophet about whom they prophesied. Thus, through Moses, Almighty God had warned the Israelites, after promising them “a prophet from among their brethren like unto thee”, that “Whosoever will not hearken unto My words which he shall speak in My name, I will require of him” (Deut. 18:19). And Jesus was equally emphatic when, prophesying the advent of the Comforter, he added: “He will guide you into all truth; for he shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak” (John 16:13). As a matter of fact the Prophet had his advent foretold by all the prophets of the world. The new Testament bears testimony to this: “Whom the heaven must receive until the time of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began. For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me: him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you” (Acts 3:21, 22). The covenant referred to was made through each prophet separately as he appeared in the world. And just as all the prophets foretold the advent of the Prophet Muhammad and laid an obligation upon their people to accept him, so the Prophet Muhammad also taught his followers to believe in all the prophets that had appeared among different people in different ages, and this is stated in what follows. The truth of the first statement that all prophets foretold the advent of the Prophet Muhammad is borne out by the second statement that that Prophet would bear testimony to the truth of all the prophets of the world.”
Further Allāh tells us: “And surely this (the Qur’an) is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds. The Faithful Spirit has brought it, On thy (Mohammad’s) heart that thou mayest be a warner,In plain Arabic language. And surely the same is in the Scriptures of the ancients. Is it not a sign to them that the learned men of the Children of Israel know it?”–(Qur’an 26:192-197).
Muhammad Ali notes:
“The prophecies relating to the advent of the Prophet Muhammad, as met with in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures, are referred to very often in the Holy Qur’an. The statement made here is, however, more compre-hensive: They are met with in all ancient scriptures. See 3:81, where a covenant is spoken of as being made through all the prophets of the world with regard to the Prophet’s advent; see 3:81a. There is a reference in the next verse to the learned men of the Children of Israel in particular because the Jews and the Christians had long been in contact with the Arabs.”
As stated, every prophet of God is a name through which their respective people is saved. As Mohammad came to the world those who know of him and accept him are saved through him–(Qur’an 7:157).
That Jews, Christians and Sabians who believe in Allāh would have their reward–(Qur’an 2:62), refers to those who followed their prophets prior to the advent of Islam, and to these later religionists who died without knowing about Islam –as they could not be charged as having rejected Islam– and followed their Scriptures. Jews and Christians who follow the Prophet Mohammad would be rewarded twice–(Qur’an 28:54).
Mohammad, having brought “all” truth and through whom the Divinely chosen religion is perfected and God’s favor to man completed, is the ultimate path to God. As no religion can be shown to be superior than, or equal with, Islam whoever rejects Mohammad/Islam is going to Hell–(Cf. Qur’an 3:85; 9:113.Muslim, Vol. 1; # 284).
Even if Jesus was the only name under heaven through which man is saved yet this would not make Jesus Divine or vicarious atoner.
Whereas Jesus was only a messenger of God sent to the Israelites to call them to “repentance” and “forgiveness”, Christians con-signed Jesus to the bed of celibacy, crowned him with Divinity and made him scapegoat for non-existent inherited sin. (See JESUS-LIKE DAVID).
Jesus says you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free (from lies, falsehood, and blasphemy). And the Divine truth is, Jesus was a prophet of God sent ONLY FOR JEWSand to foretell the coming of the COMFORTER(MOHAMMAD)who will guide into “all truth” and will “abide forever” and whom all are to follow; and
“THERE IS NO GOD BUT ALLĀH;
MOHAMMAD IS THE MESSENGER OF ALLĀH!”
While Allāh, God, would not call us to account for that which we do not know, when knowledge comes to us what reason or excuse can we have for not accepting and follow it? “But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath NEVER forgiveness but is in danger of ETERNAL DAMNATION”–(Mark 3:29).
While we are alive we have the grand opportunity to repent and have eternal life in Paradise. When we die there is no second chance.
What is holding you back from BAPTIZING
with Allāh, the Best of Baptizers?
1. Ency. Brit. 15th Ed. Vol. 13. art; Paul the Apostle, Saint; p. 1090.
2. See ALLAH & JESUS OR PAUL
3. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din points out in his book Open Letters To The Bishops of Salisbury & London:
“The concluding eleven verses of St. Mark-(16:9-20) and the well-known verse of St. Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are forgeries, an admitted addition to the ancient MSS (manuscripts). The fact was discovered by the first translator of the Bible into English and they made a marginal note in their version of the Bible which continued for some time. But we do not find the said note in any of the copies now published by the said society (Foreign Mission Society). Is it fair and honest to keep others in darkness as to the true value of the contents of the Bible? The reader must know that concluding portion of St. Mark and the verse in St. Matthew are spurious and a subsequent addition. But I am afraid the Foreign Mission would not allow the correction. It would tell against their very Mission, if they eliminate the verse from St. Matthew; they lose the only pillar that supports the structure of the Trinity. No other verse in the whole Scripture speaks of it. The said eleven verses of St. Mark are the only justification for the existence of the Foreign Mission. You, as well as I, know, my Lord, that the call to Jesus came solely and wholly from Judaism. He came only to gather the scattered sheep and would not give the children’s bread to the dogs, the world beyond the Israelites. The Foreign Mission is a mere trespass on lands forbidden by the Master. It transcends the limit marked by Jesus. Throughout his life the Gentiles and others did not concern him: they were the swine. Then came the make-believe Resurrection, and they say the Master changed his mind as to his mission and ordered it to be carried to the four corners of the world (indicating that he was uncertain of his mission), but this all depends upon the questionable verses of St. Mark, and hence their retention in the Bible. St. Matthew is no authority on this point. The word “nations” there is a mistranslation and a wrong substitute for “the tribes”–the rest of the Jewish tribes scattered all over the world. This being the case, the Mission cannot afford to eliminate the verses from their version, nor will they put marginal notes, as did the old versions, to show the true nature of the verses. It would weaken the cause and show the futility of their status, since in carrying on evangelical work in the non-Christian world they are acting against the express admonition of the Master. It may that reasons other than religion are at the back of it all, and goading their activities, but decency, if not religion, assuredly demands the publishing of things as they are.”(pp. 31-32). (Such is Christian’s deception and desperation to have uninformed and unthinking people eat the body and drink the mythical blood of Jesus Christ -SPIRITUAL CANNIBALISM. This must be the lowest depths of spiritual depravity).
Even if Jesus had said to teach the Gospels to all nations, yet this would not make Jesus GOD or SON OF GOD or one in a TRINITY with God or vicarious atoner or that mankind INHERITED SIN from Adam/Eve. These cardinal doctrines of CHRISTIANITY are lies, falsehood, and blasphemy. (See CHRISTIANITY-LIES, EVIL, HATE).