Jesus-redundant no ransom

Share

In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
DEDICATED TO
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
AND TO
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.
*

JESUS REDUNDANT–NO RANSOM

Jesus declared:
“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the
HOUSE OF ISRAEL”
(Matt. 15:24).
“I pray for them (JEWS): I pray NOT for the world”
(John 17:9).
“For the Son of man is come to SEEK AND SAVE
THAT (JEWS) WHICH WAS LOST” 1
(Luke 19:10).
“Go NOT into the way of the Gentiles,
and into any of the city of the Samaritans
enter ye NOT:
But go rather to the LOST SHEEP OF
THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL”
(Matt. 10:5-6; 18:11).
Jesus told the Samaritan woman:
“Ye worship ye know not what:
we (
JEWS) know what we worship:
for
SALVATION IS OF THE JEWS
(John 4:21).
“Give NOT that which is holy unto the dogs,
neither cast ye your pearls before swine”
(Matthew 7:6).
“It is not meet to take the children’s bread,
and to cast it to dogs”
(Matt. 15:26)

and that he spoke in parables so the “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved; Jesus explained to his followers why he speak in parables:
“Unto you (who have God) it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them
(non-Jews) that are without (God), all these things
are done in
PARABLES: That seeing they may see,
and
NOT PERCEIVE; and hearing they may hear,
and
NOT UNDERSTAND; LEST AT ANY TIME
THEY SHOULD BE CONVERTED, AND THEIR SINS SHOULD BE FORGIVEN THEM

(Mark 4:9-12).
(The Good News Bible is clearer:
“You have been given the secret of the Kingdom
of God,” Jesus answered.
“But the others, who are on the outside, hear all things by means of parables, so that,
They may look and look, yet not see;
they may listen and listen,
yet not understand.
For if they did, they would turn
to God, and he would forgive them
’”.

Jesus’ mission as he clearly defined was“unto the lost sheep of the HOUSE OF ISRAEL” “to SEEK AND SAVE THAT (JEWS) WHICH WAS LOST” and “I pray for them (JEWS): I pray NOT for the world;” and that he “finished the work which thou (God) gavest me to do” which was to preach to the Jews–(John 17:4),

Jesus also exhorted his people to adhere to the Mosaic Law (until the coming of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and will abide “for ever”); he taught that eternal life lies in following the Ten Commandments; and that heaven is attained through righteousness–(Matthew 23:2-3; 19:17-18; 5:20; John 14:15-16; 16:13). 

Since Jesus “finished the work” which God gave him to do (which was to preach to the Jews), and since eternal life lies in the Mosaic Law (which Jesus upheld2), evidently, from his own declarations JESUS IS REDUNDANT!3 NO ONE NEEDS JESUS!

In fact, Jesus became redundant the moment he preached adherence to the Mosaic Law (and the Bible became obsolete 600 years after, with the advent of Mohammad, the Comforter).  

That Mohammad is the Comforter; Jesus says: “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter that he may abide with you for ever” “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth”–(John 14:16; 6:13).
Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– has shown in his revealing book Muhammad in the Bible that Mohammad is this Comforter; who abides “for ever” through the Qur’an.
That Mohammad is the Comforter is verified by Allāh: “And when Jesus, son of Mary said: O Children of Israel, surely I am the Messenger of Allāh to you, verifying that which is before me of the Torah and giving the good news of a Messenger who will come after me, his name being AHMAD”–(Qur’an 61:9). Ahmad is another name of Mohammad.

Jesus–no ransom for sins: As shown above, Jesus’ mission was wholly and solely to preach to the Jews and he taught that the Mosaic Law was their vehicle into Paradise (until the arrival of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and “abide for ever” and whom all are to follow).
How then did Jesus become “ransom for sins”?

Jesus says that he came to “give his life a ransom for many,” and urged his disciples to “Take, eat; this is my body…this is my blood of the new testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins”–(Matthew.20:28; 26:28).
That Jesus was “ransom” and remitter of sins only for his disciples/apostles is clearly stated in Luke 22:14-20, 30: “This cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for YOU (his apostles) ….That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (This eating of the “body” and drinking the “mythical” blood of Jesus Christ can be construed as SPIRITUAL CANNIBALISM).

(Apart from the fact that Jesus’ dying for the remission of his disciples’ sin is a contradiction of his teaching that eternal life lies in observing the Mosaic law, until the coming of the Comforter who will then guide into all truth’ and ‘abide for ever”)
For which “sin” did Jesus die (though as shown he did not die on the cross).
No one knows!
Thus we have the Christian cow-dance: some saying Christ died for inherited sin (though there is no teaching from God or Jesus that God loaded Adam’s sin onto fetuses and then transferred onto Jesus) and some saying Christ died for committed sin, arguing, rightly, that your father being a millionaire does not make you a millionaire.
Though both guesstimations are wrong.

For as shown (and the Church fathers were given proof from their own Christian investigators, that) the body in the shroud of Turin, which is believed to be the body of Christ after the so-called crucifixion, was “not a dead body.” Even the Gospel as shown proves that Jesus was not killed on the cross.

The Bible shows Jesus was not killed
-Jesus said his sign would be like Jonas. Jonas was alive in the whale’s belly–(Matt. 12:39-40; Jonah 1:17; 2:1-10; if Jesus came to die for sins there was no need for his sign to be like Jonas’). If Jesus was killed his sign would not have been like Jonas’.

-Jesus prayed to be spared from death–(Matt. 26:36-44); Jesus’ prayers were answered-(Heb. 5:7); prayers of the righteous are always answered–(James 5:16; Psalm 22: 24; 34:15-19; John 9:31; Matt. 7:8-9); God always answered Jesus’ prayers–(John 11: 41-42). Jesus only seemed dead. This is how God answered his prayers and saved him. In those days no one checked for pulses, if you’re limp you’re dead. Jesus’ followers realized he was not dead for they took “spices and ointments” to “anoint” him–Mark 16:1; Luke 23:56; 24:1. And as Deedat points out Jews do NOT anoint their “dead”).

-The Apostles treated Jesus’ resurrection as “idle tales”–(Luke 24:11. The Apostles would not do so if crucifixion and resurrection were prophecies).

-After the alleged crucifixion and resurrection Jesus had his disciples examine him to verify he was not spirit, as the resurrected is, but was of flesh and bones: a mortal–(Luke 24:38-39). The resurrected “are (spiritualized) as the angels”–(Matt. 22:23-30. Luke 20:34-36). Jesus had flesh and bones: he was HUMAN; he was ALIVE.

Christians show Jesus was not killed
M.A. Faruqui has taken “Extracts from the book Jesus Nicht am Kreuz Gestorben (Jesus Did not Die on the Cross) by Kurt Berna of Stuttgart, Germany. Faruqui notes that after carrying out scientific tests on photographs of the Shroud of Turin (the sheet in which Jesus is said to have been placed after he was taken down from the cross) Kurt Berna sent a letter to the Vatican with his conclusion that the body in the Shroud was not a dead body, because at that time a free movement of the heart was traceable. The existence of the flowing of blood, its position and its nature which is found on the Holy Shroud furnishes a clear scientific and medical proof that the so-called execution was legally not complete. According to the present discovery the present as well as the past teachings of Christianity are incorrect.”
(The committee suggested certain tests be carried out). “The aforementioned results of the investigation by the German Research Convent and by some other agencies, can only be refuted if the suggested scientific tests are applied… We can safely say that no one and nothing on this earth can refute these discoveries. This is an open challenge by the Research Convent.”

       M.A Faruqui notes further:
“St. Paul had thought of and adopted the doctrine of Jesus Christ having died on the Cross and being resurrected afterwards, and this became the confirmed doctrine of the Christian Church. But the investigations made about the imprints of Christ’s body on the Shroud put the Church in difficulties. Pope John XXIII had made a proclamation on 30 June 1960, which was printed in an issue of the Vatican newspaper, Osservator Romano dated 2nd July 1960, under the title “Complete Salvation through the Blood of Jesus Christ,” in which the Pope informed and directed all the Catholic Bishops to believe and to propagate that the complete salvation of the human race lies through the blood of Jesus Christ, and that the death of Jesus Christ is not essential for this purpose.”4
This is Papal’s verbal gymnastics. How can salvation be through the “blood” of Jesus Christ when there was no “blood” of Jesus Christ? and Christianity stands on the foundation of the “blood” of Jesus Christ –of “inherited sin” and vicarious atonement?
Note well, that “salvation of the human race lies through the blood of Jesus Christ” is the Pope’s/ Christian’s teaching; it is NOT God’s teaching; it is NOT Jesus’ teaching.
How can salvation lie through the “blood” of Christ when Christ, the Christian’s God and Son of God, taught that “salvation” lies in following the Mosaic Law (until the coming of the Comforter who will bring “all truth” and “abide for ever”?) And as salvation lies in following the Mosaic Law THERE IS NO NEED FOR INHERITED SIN.

(Putting aside the fact that the Christian Communion among other practices are traced to Paganism). Jesus says that he came to “give his life a ransom for many,” and urged his disciples to “Take, eat; this is my body…this is my blood of the new testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins”–(Matthew.20:28; 26:28).
That Jesus was “ransom” and remitter of sins only for his disciples/apostles is clearly stated in Luke 22:14-20, 30: “This cup is the new testament in my blood which is shed for YOU(his apostles) ….That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel”

(Apart from the fact that Jesus’ dying for the remission of his disciples’ sin is a contradiction of his teaching that eternal life lies in observing the Mosaic law, until the coming of the Comforter who will then guide into all truth’ and ‘abide for ever”). For which “sin” did Jesus die (though as shown he did not die on the cross)?
No one knows!
Thus we have the Christian cow-dance: some saying Christ died for inherited sin (though there is no teaching from God or Jesus that God loaded Adam’s sin onto fetuses and then transferred onto Jesus) and some saying Christ died for committed sin, arguing, rightly, that your father being a millionaire does not make you a millionaire.
Though both guesstimations are wrong.
For as shown (and the Vatican was given proof from their own Christian investigators, that) the body in the shroud of Turin, which is believed to be the body of Christ after the so-called crucifixion, was “not a dead body.” Even the Gospel, as shown, proves that Jesus was not killed on the cross.

There is yet another proof that Jesus was no “ransom” and no remitter of sins. Since God did not say that mankind inherited sin from Adam or that He loaded the sin of Adam onto every newborn and then loaded everyone’s sins onto Jesus and that He sent Jesus to be killed for sin, but since (according to the Gospels) Jesus says he is a “ransom for sin” and that his blood “is shed for many for the remission of sins,” who is to be believed God or Jesus?

God says in the Bible that if the thing that a prophet says does not come true then God did not say that thing: “And if thou say in thins heart, How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord HATH NOT SPOKEN, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: THOU SHALT NOT BE AFRAID OF HIM”–(Deut. 18:21-22).

Did Jesus’ saying that he would be killed so he could be a “ransom” for sin come to pass? NO! IT DID NOT COME TO PASS! As noted, the Bible shows Jesus was NOT killed; Jesus said he was NOT killed; and investigative evidence by Christians showed Jesus was NOT killed on the cross/pole.

That Jesus was sought by Jews to be killed because of his condemnation of Jewish authorities and NOT for fulfilling scripture is noted by Biblical scholars. The ‘Bible Dictionary’ notes as part of its explanation of the term ‘scribe’:

“Their familiarity with the law allowed the scribes to take on a role of growing importance in Jewish society –teaching in the synagogues, serving as judges, and becoming members of the Sanhedrin. Jesus refused to accept the mass of detail and the superficial technicalities which they affixed to the law, and He accused them of hypocritical interpretations of the law. For these reasons they opposed His teachings and were one of the groups, as were the Pharisees, that helped to plot His death–(Matt. 5:20; 21:15; Mark 10:33; 14:53; Luke 11:44; 20:46; John 8:3; Acts 4:5; 6:12).”5

Even if Jesus was killed for sins he would have been “ransom” only for Jews, as his mission was wholly and solely to his people, JEWS.
As noted, Jesus spoke in parables so the non-Jewish “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved–(Mark 4:9-12).
Not only is it a ghastly, horribly, sickening thing for God/Son of God to refer to people as “dogs” and “swine” –which are scavengers and the worst of denigrations– and to preach in words they would not understand but it also contradicts the claim that Jesus came to “die” for sinners –one who came to die for sinners would not couch his words in parables so they would not understand him.

Contrary to Christians claim. The Gospel of John chapter 3 verse 16 that says: “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son that who-soever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” is NOT about Jesus dying for sins.

When taken in its context, from verses 2-15, it shows that Jesus was having a conversation with Nicodemus who concluded that from his miracles Jesus could only be a man from God.
Jesus answered that man must undergo spiritual birth before he can see the kingdom of God. Jesus then compared himself to the brass serpent Moses lifted up in the wilderness; which serpent had the power to preserve the life of those bitten by a snake–(Num. 21:9), for “as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the son of man be lifted up” –the allusion being, as the serpent had power to preserve life of the afflicted on account of their belief on it, likewise, Jews who believed in his (Jesus’) miracles and accept him as a prophet from God–(John 8:28)–would also be saved: “That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life”–(John 3:14-15).
Then came the verse of John 3:16 which, when expressed in the context of this discussion would convey the full meaning of:

“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten son the power to perform miracles that whosoever believeth in him to be from God through these works of miracles   should not perish, but have   everlasting life.”
Miracles were necessary because the people believed only in miracles: “Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe” –(John 4:48).

To infer that John 3:16 is about crucifixion is to inject a meaning that is alien to the subject.
If Jesus came to die for sins and for him to pray pitifully as if he was sweating “great drops of blood” to be spared from this glory and to indict God as having forsaken him: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”–(Matthew 26:36-44; 27:46; Luke 22:44); this must be the blackest degree of disgrace exampled by a son of God (and by God as Christians say Jesus is God) in Scriptural history -the “Mother” of all disgraces.
Not even Jonah in the whale’s belly made such a grotesque and ignominious expression as that of the Christian’s God and Son of God but rather prayed to God–(Jonah 2:1-10).
Even the 1400’s Viennese Jews behaved more honorably than the Christian’s God and Son of God, choosing to die in the Christian inferno than desecrate their Holy Sheema and kiss the useless and unGodly crucifix.
(In Vienna, “hundreds of Jews were burned alive in 1421 for refusing to convert to Christianity,” Toronto Star, Sat; Sept; 8, 2007; p. AA2; Pontiff shows…by Tracy Wilkinson).

But Jesus made it clear that he came to call his people JEWS, to repentance and forgiveness:

   -“I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to REPENTANCE” (NOT to belief in inherited sin and vicarious atonement/crucifixion) –Matt. 9:13. This is how Jesus [and all prophets] saved his people from their sin, by calling them to repentance);

   -“I say unto you, there is JOY in the presence of the angels of God over one SINNER that REPENTETH”–(Luke 15:10).

   -“For I say unto you, that except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven”–(Matthew 5:20);

-“If thou wilt enter into life keep the commandments”–(Matthew 19:16-19);

   -“The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: ALL therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do”–(Matt. 23:2. Scribes and Pharisees do not teach inherited sin, vicarious atonement, and crucifixion).

   -“And when ye stand praying, FORGIVE, if ye have anything against any: that your Father also which is in heaven may FORGIVE you your trespasses, But if you do NOT forgive, NEITHER will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses”–(Mark 11:25-26; Luke 17:3-4).

-“When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven …FORGIVE US OUR SINS; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but DELIVER US FROM EVIL”–(Luke 11:2-4).  

-“I tell you…except ye REPENT, ye shall all likewise perish”–(Luke 13:3, 5).

-“The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation (of Jews) and shall condemn it: because they REPENTED at the preaching of Jonas; and behold, a greater than Jonas is here” (that is to say, the people of Jonas repented but Jews do not repent even though Jesus who is greater than Jonas is preaching to them)–(Matthew 12:41).  

It was Paul who grafted the pagan doctrine of Son of God onto Jesus’ head. Allāh reveals in His Qur’an 9:30 that Son of God belief is paganism (and which research has verified) to which Muhammad Ali notes: “when St. Paul saw that the Jews would on no account accept Jesus Christ as a messenger of God, he introduced the pagan doctrine of sonship of God into the Christian religion, so that it might become more acceptable to the pagans.” (See Allāh and Jesus or Paul)

   Maurice Bucaille states:

“As far as the decades following Jesus’s mission are concerned, it must be understood that events did not at all happen in the way they have been said to have taken place and that Peter’s arrival in Rome no way laid the foundations for the Church. On the contrary, from the time Jesus left earth to the second half of the Second century, there was a struggle between two factions. One was what one might call Pauline Christianity and the other Judeo-Christianity;” and

“PAUL IS THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL FIGURE IN CHRISTIANITY. HE WAS CONSIDERED TO BE A TRAITOR TO JESUS’S THOUGHT BY THE LATTER’S FAMILY AND BY THE APOSTLES WHO HAD STAYED IN JERUSALEM IN THE CIRCLE AROUND JAMES. PAUL CREATED CHRISTIANITY AT THE EXPENSE OF THOSE WHOM JESUS HAD GATHERED AROUND HIM TO SPREAD HIS TEACHINGS. (While others ‘combatedPaul’s writings) PAUL’S STYLE OF CHRISTIANITY WON THROUGH DEFINITIVELY, AND CREATED ITS OWN COLLECTION OF OFFICIAL TEXTS. THESE TEXTS CONSTITUTED THE ‘CANON’ WHICH CONDEMNED AND EXCLUDED AS UNORTHODOX ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT WERE NOT SUITED TO THE LINE ADOPTED BY THE CHURCH.”6

And Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din points out:
Paul was “A renegade from Judaism –the hatred of his own people left Saul, afterwards Paul, no chance to work among the lost tribes to reclaim whom only, Jesus had come. Paul was driven to the Gentiles, the people beyond the pale of the Hebraic law.”
“What an irony of faith that he (Jesus) who declared “Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or title shall in no wise pass from the Law, till all be fulfilled,” should be followed –nay, superseded– by him (Paul) who declared the Law a curse and not a blessing from God, and that only to win favour with those with whom the Master would have nothing to do –the Greeks and the Romans. But the reason is not far to seek. St. Paul could not claim any respect from his own people. At first an implacable enemy of Jesus and persecutor of his followers, then a renegade from Judaism and therefore hated by the Jews –so much so that his very presence in the synagogue, where he came to explain his schism to Judaism at the request of the other apostles, excited such contempt and hatred of the people as to drive him, an exile from his home. He could not, moreover, work with the other apostles, who would take him to task for ignoring the Law. He, therefore, had sufficient reason to make the Gentile lands the field of his future work. He must work somewhere, and that was his last resort. The Gentiles were not the people of the Law. Actions in observance of the Law could not carry any weight with them; Law was a burden and a gate to sin if not observed, and hence a curse.
Thus begins the philosophy of his epistles to the Gentiles; they were a sinful tribe, like others. They were visited by calamities, as others were. They ascribed it to their mis-deeds. But sacrifice only, and not repentance and reclamation, could please the angered Deity, in their belief. Sin and sacrifice was the basic principle of their creed.…No action, but bare belief in the story, was sufficient for salvation.”7
“To-day it is an establish verity that Church theology was only an assimilation of Paganism: what an irony of fate that those who called others heathens should have turned out to be heathens themselves in their beliefs!”8

Evidently, Christians are following Paul and his pagan ‘son of God,’ they are not following God and His Christ.  And Paul admitted he was a “lie”ar and “being CRAFTY, I caught you with GUILE–(Roman 3:7; 2 Cor 12:16).

There is NO inherited sin.
NO vicarious atonement.
NO “ransom” for sin.

And as Jesus’ mission was restricted to preaching to Jews and eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law (until the arrival of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and “abide for ever”) JESUS IS REDUNDANT! He was NO RANSOM FOR SINS!          

Whereas Jesus was only a messenger of God sent to the Israelite to call them to “repentance” and “forgiveness”, Christians consigned Jesus to the bed of celibacy, crowned him with Divinity and made him scapegoat for non-existent inherited sin. (See Jesus-like David).

Muslims who have apostatised from Islam, while you are alive you have the grand opportunity to return to Allāh/Islam.
Even if you do not want to observe any of the tenets of Islam you should not hold in worship anyone but Allāh. There is no religion superior to, or equal with, Islam. Islam is superior to all other religions.

The Church doctrines of Jesus as Trinity; Jesus as God; Jesus as Son of God; inherited sin and vicarious atonement are not Divine revelations or taught by Jesus.
These doctrines are blasphemy and leads into hell-fire; as Christ says: “But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath NEVER forgiveness but is in danger of ETERNAL DAMNATION”–(Mark 3:29).
And damnation is Hell! which is the “everlasting fire” that “never shall be quenched;” the “furnace of fire” in which there shall be “wailing and gnashing of teeth”–(Matt. 10:28; 18:8; Mark 9:43; Matt. 23:14, 33; 13:42. Those who do not have teeth shall bear it on their gums).

The Divine truth is Jesus was only a prophet of God sent wholly and solely only for Jews and
“There is no God but Allāh;
        Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh!”


NOTES

1. At the time of Jesus’ mission only two of the Twelve Tribes of Israel were in Palestine, the remaining ten tribes were said to be in Kashmir and Jesus, during the years of which the Gospels have no record of him, had traveled to India and Afghanistan. See Khwaja Nazir Ahmad, Jesus In Heaven On Earth which may be obtained from www.muslim.org.

2: “Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till ALL BE FULFILLED–(Matt. 5:17-18).

3. The Qur’an consists of teachings of the Bible and other Scriptures that are applicable to all time–(Qur’an 98:3) and also contains teachings not met with in these Scriptures. The Qur’an having exceeded all previous Scriptures is thus the Best Message–(Qur’an 7:185; 39:23; 77:50) and it therefore supersedes all previous Books. Though they are useful for references to the histories of prophets. 

   All prophets prior to Mohammad were tribal and their message temporary and limited to their people. Mohammad being the world Prophet–(Qur’an 7:158; 21:107; 34:28) having brought the best Message with “all truth”–(Qur’an 6:38; 12:111; 16:89) and through whom religion was perfected and God’s favor completed–(Qur’an 5:3) surpasses all prophets. Though these prophets are to be honored, all are now to follow Mohammad, as taught by Jacob, Moses and Jesus; and required by God–(Genesis 49:10; Deut. 18:18-19; John 14:16; 16:13).

4. The Crumbling of the Cross, pp. 98-109. Emp. added.

5. King James Bible, Self-Pronouncing Edition, The World Publishing Company, 2231 West 110TH Street, Cleveland 2, Ohio, p. 77. (Empha-sis added).

6. Bucaille, Maurice, The Bible, The Qur’an, And Science, pp. 50, 52-53. Caps, emphasis added.

 7. Kamal-ud-Din, Khwaja, The Sources of Christianity, pp. 28, 80-82. (See: www.muslim.org).    

 8. Kamal-ud-Din, Khwaja, Open Letters to the Bishops of Salisbury & London, p. 15.

Share