Allah or Jesus–who is final judge?

In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
DEDICATED TO
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
AND TO
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms
*

       ALLAH OR JESUS–WHO IS FINAL JUDGE?
One Christian on the Internet postulates:
If Jesus wasn’t God his claims make no sense. Jesus said things that only God should ever said. And to support his imagination the critic notes from the following:

-Qur’an 22:56-57:
“The kingdom on that day is Allah’s. He will judge between them. So those who believe and do good will be in Gardens of bliss. And those who disbelieve and reject Our messages, for them is an abasing chastisement.”

-Psalm 9:7-8:
“But the Lord shall endure for ever: he hath prepared his throne for judgment. And he shall judge the world in righteousness, he shall minister judgment to the people in uprightness

-Joel 3:1-3:
“For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat (where is Jehoshaphat and will all nations fit in it?), and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel whom they have scattered among the nations and parted my land. And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for an harlot, and sold a girl for wine, they they might drink.”

-Matthew 25:31-32; 34; 41:
“When the son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats….Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world…..Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.”

Question for Muslims “do you honor Jesus the same way you honor the father? No, you reject Jesus claim to be the son, and according to Jesus if you don’t honor him as you honor the father you don’t honor the father. That probably doesn’t bother you since you don’t refer to God as father but it should bother you because you’re supposed to believe what Jesus said. And what Jesus said thoroughly contradicts what we read in the Qur’an.”

ANSWER:
If by listing Qur’an 22:56-57 and the verses of the Bible the Christian is trying to convey that Jesus is Allah, this Christian must be suffering, to use his words, “serious mental health issues.” (See Critic on Mohammad’s sex life; women; Qur’an).

That Jesus “thoroughly contradicts” “what we read in the Qur’an” about him.
In fact, it is the other way around, Jesus “thoroughly” ACKNOWLEDGES “what we read in the Qur’an” about him –the Qur’an, as well as Jesus, “thoroughly contradicts” what Christians say about him. 

The Christian Trinity, which was formulated/invented by the Church 300 years after Jesus, consists of Father (God), Son (Jesus), and Holy Ghost (who is nameless. (Perhaps he should be named “Jasper” giving the Christian’s Godhead the three “J’s”: Jehovah, Jesus and Jasper).

In his question to Muslims, the Christian is saying that Jesus is Son of God and also God (Allah) and Muslims are to honor this Son of God as Christians honor him as the Father (God). (Strangely, in this Trinity the Christian does not make any mention of the third party, the Holy Ghost, “Jasper”).
In His Qur’an Allah not only belies Christian’s claim of inherited sin and vicarious atonement; Allah categorically denounced the Christian belief of Divinity of Jesus as blasphemy.

  • “O People of the Book, exceed not the limits in your religion nor speak anything about Allah, but the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, is only a messenger of Allah and His word which He communicated to Mary and a mercy from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And say not, Three. Desist, it is better for you. Allah is only one God. Far be it from His glory to have a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth. And sufficient is Allah as having charge of affairs”–(Qur’an 4:171).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    If Jesus is Allah, then Jesus here “contradicts” himself.
  • “They indeed disbelieve who say: Surely, Allah — He is the Messiah, son of Mary. Say; Who then could control anything as against Allah when He wished to destroy the Messiah, son of Mary, and his mother and all those on the earth? And Allah’s is the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and what is between them. He creates what He pleases. And Allah is Possessor of power over all things”–(Qur’an 5:17).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    If Jesus is Allah, then Jesus here “contradicts” himself.
  • “Certainly they disbelieve who say: Allah, He is the Messiah, son of Mary. And the Messiah said: O Children of Israel, serve Allah, my Lord and your Lord (compare with Deuteronomy 6:4 and Mark 12;29). Surely whoever associates (others) with Allah, Allah has forbidden to him the Garden and his abode is the Fire. And for the wrongdoers there will be no helpers.
    Certainly they disbelieve who say: Allah is the third of the three. And there is no God but One God. And if they desist not from what they say, a painful chastisement will surely befall such of them as disbelieve. Will they not then turn to Allah and ask His forgiveness? And Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
    The Messiah, son of Mary, was only a messenger; messengers before him had indeed passed away. And his mother was a truthful woman. They both used to eat food. See how We make the messages clear to them! then behold, how they are turned away!
    Say: Do you serve besides Allah that which controls for you neither harm nor good? And Allah — He is the Hearing, the Knowing.
    Say: O People of the Book, exaggerate not in the matter of your religion unjustly, and follow not the low desires of people who went astray before and led many astray, and went astray from the right path”–(Qur’an 5:72-77).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    If Jesus is Allah, then Jesus here “contradicts” himself.
  • “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. These are the words of their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before. Allah’s curse be on them! How they are turned away!
    They take their doctors of law and their monks for lords1 besides Allah, and (also) the Messiah, son of Mary. And they were enjoined that they should serve one God only — there is no god but He. Be He glorified from what they set up (with Him)!”–(Qur’an 9:30-31).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    If Jesus is Allah, then Jesus here “contradicts” himself.
  • “And they say: The Beneficent has taken to Himself a son. Certainly you make an abominable assertion!
    The heavens may almost be rent thereat, and the earth cleave asunder, and the mountains fall down in pieces, That they ascribe a son to the Beneficent!
    And it is not worthy of the Beneficent that He should take to Himself a son. There is none in the heavens and the earth but comes to the Beneficent as a servant”–(Qur’an 19:88-94).
    “They say: Allāh has taken a son (to Himself). Glory be to Him! He is the Self-sufficient. His is what is in the heavens and what is in the earth. You have no authority for this. Say you against Allāh what you know not? Say: Those who forge a lie against Allāh will not succeed”–(Qur’an 10:68-69).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    If Jesus is Allah, then Jesus here “contradicts” himself.

Jesus also denies being Divine, While the Bible has Jesus referring to himself as Son of God (and Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God), Son of God is an epithet of honor. God has battalions of sons and even daughters; even “peacemakers,” which would include the atheist are “children of God:

  • Jesus says to Satan: “man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of GOD”
    “It is written again (in Deuteronomy 6:16) Thou shalt not tempt the Lord THY GOD”
    “it is written (in Deuteronomy 6:13; 10:20) Thou shalt worship the Lord THY GOD, and HIM ONLY shalt thou serve”–(Matthew 4:3-10).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    Why then are Christians worshipping Jesus as God and final judge?
    Thus, what Jesus says do not contradict the Qur’an, “thoroughly” or otherwise, what Jesus says “contradicts” your (and Christians’) beliefs.
  • Jesus declares: “I have glorified THEE on the earth: I have finished the work which THOU gavest me to do–(John 17:4)
    “I have manifested THY name unto the men (the Jews) which THOU gavest me out of the world”–(John 17:6).
    “I came …NOT to do mine own will, but the will of HIM that sent me”–(John 6:38).
    “My doctrine is NOT mine, but HIS  that sent me”–(John 7:16).
    “He (GOD) GAVE ME a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak”–(John 12:49).
    “My meat is to do the will of HIM that sent me and to finish HIS work”–(John 4:34).
    “I seek NOT MY OWN WILL, but the WILL OF THE FATHER… If I bear witness of myself, my witness is NOT TRUE”(John 5:30-31).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    Why then are Christians worshipping Jesus as God and final judge?
    Thus what Jesus says do not contradict the Qur’an, “thoroughly” or otherwise, what Jesus says “contradicts” your (and Christians’) beliefs.
  • “I am NOT SENT BUT UNTO THE LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL”–(Matthew 15:24).
    “I PRAY for THEM (Jews): I PRAY NOT for the world”–(John 17:9).
    “For the Son of man IS COME TO SEEK AND SAVE THAT (Jews) WHICH WAS LOST” (of which some ten of these Jewish Twelve Tribes were said to be in Kashmir; Jesus is noted to have traveled to India, where the Hindu Brahmin priests taught him the Vedas and to cure)2–(Luke 19:10. Compare with Matt. 10:5-6; 15:24; 18:11; John 17:9).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    Why then are Christians worshipping Jesus as God and final judge?
    Thus what Jesus says do not contradict the Qur’an, “thoroughly” or otherwise, what Jesus says “contradicts” your (and Christians’) beliefs.
  • “And, behold, one came and said unto him (Jesus), Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is NONE good but one, that is GOD”–(Matthew 19:16-17. Jesus not only denies he is God, he denies he is “good”).
    How then are Muslims to honor Jesus as we honor Allah and accept Jesus as final judge?
    Why then are Christians worshipping Jesus as God and final judge?
    Thus what Jesus says do not contradict the Qur’an, “thoroughly” or otherwise, what Jesus says “contradicts” your (and Christians’) beliefs.
    (Notably, this statement of Matthew 19:16-17 is taken from the “Authorized King James Version” of the Bible. Other Bibles such as “Good News” and “New American Standard” do not have the words “WHICH IS IN HEAVEN;” their verse ends at “even the Son of man.”
    Obviously they do not want the world to know that the Son of man was yet “IN HEAVEN” to come. So much for Christian’s claim that their Bible is all “word of God. See APPENDIX I).

The Biblical quotes of Psalms and Joel submitted by the Christian also do not support the claim that Jesus is God and final judge. Here are the verses with our comment in “red” injected in between:

Psalm 9:7-8:
“But the Lord shall endure for ever: he hath prepared his throne for judgment. And he shall judge the world in righteousness, he shall minister judgment to the people in uprightness.”
It is ludicrous to conflate this verse with Jesus and of him being final judge; when Jesus implored:
“Father, the hour is come, GLORIFY THY SON, that the son may also glorify thee: As THOU hast GIVEN him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as THOU hast GIVEN him (and God only gave Jews to Jesus). And this is life eternal, that they might know THEE THE ONLY TRUE GOD, and Jesus Christ whom THOU HAST SENT”–(John 17:1-3).
This cry by Jesus also obliterates all the other verses which the Christian use to claim Jesus as God and final judge.
Notably, all prophets gave ‘eternal life” to their people by teaching them the Divine Message, else it would have been pointless for God to send these messengers. Moreover, Jesus did not give “all truth” this “all truth” he left for Comforter, Mohammad to give.

Joel 3:1-3:
“For, behold, in those days, and in that time, when I shall bring again the captivity of Judah and Jerusalem, I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat
(but there is no Judah in existence to bring again into captivity. The Valley of Jehoshaphat is the same as the “valley of decision.” Jehoshaphat means “Yahweh judges”; if “Jehoshaphat” is allegorical, then so must also be this gathering; if it is literal –and Christians seem to believe it is literal else their belief in Jesus being “final judge” is “poof! then considering that there are about seven billion people on earth, minus the under-aged, plus the billions that have died since the beginning of creation plus those yet to come till this ‘final’ judgement, to load these “nations” in this twenty mile area Jesus would have to stock them tower-high. Think Dubai’s Buruj Tower)
and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel
(God pleading and with man for His people?)
whom they have scattered among the nations and parted my land. And they have cast lots for my people; and have given a boy for an harlot, and sold a girl for wine, they might drink.”
(Joel here is a remake of Jeremiah 30:3-4 which seems to be a prophecy fulfilled eons ago when Jews returned to Jerusalem after their first captivity by the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar in 570 B.C. Even if it relates to the Jews second destruction by the Romans under Titus in 70 A.D. Jews have already returned to Jerusalem in 1948. Though these occupiers of Palestine can hardly identify themselves as Biblical Jews. Thus the Christian is trying to “resurrect’ a defunct prophecy and applying it to his non-existent God, Jesus).

Matthew 25:31-32; 34; 41:
“When the son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations
(“nations” is an incorrect translation, should be “tribes,” referring to tribes of Israel, as Jesus declared he was sent only to Jews): (See APPENDIX II)
and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats….Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world…..Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.”
The Christian did not quote Matthew 19:28 where Jesus told his disciples that in the next world that “when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel”–(also Luke 22:28-30).
It would seem an absurdity for Jesus to give these twelve individuals the seat of judgment if he would be “final judge” –re-judging those the twelve have judged. And it would be pointless to have these twelve judge people whom he will re-judge.
Perhaps Jesus would re-judge these twelve because he does not trust his disciples judgment; and he would have good reasons not to trust their judgment, considering they were of “little faith” and “no faith” not even as much as a “grain of mustard seed” and were “of unbelief” and “doubt(ing)”–(Matthew 6:30; 17:20; 21:21; Mark 4:40); and that Peter, the “rock, on which he built his Church, was ‘satan(ic)–(Matthew 16:18, 23).

That Jesus will be judging the Twelves Tribes of Israel is not unique. On the day of Judgment every people will be called with their respective prophet:

  • “But how will it be when We bring from every people a witness and bring thee (Mohammad) as a witness against these (Muslims)?”–(Qur’an 4:41)
  • “And on the day when We raise up in every people a witness against them from among themselves, and bring thee as a witness against these–(Qur’an 16:89).
  • “And when Allāh will say (on the Day of Judgment): O Jesus, son of Mary, didst thou say to men, Take me and my mother for two gods besides Allāh? He will say: Glory be to Thee! It was not for me to say what I had no right to say…I said to them naught save as Thou didst command me: Serve Allāh, my Lord and your Lord (comp. Mark 12:29); and I was a witness of them so long as I was among them, but when Thou didst cause me to die Thou wast the Watcher over them. And Thou art witness of all things”–(Qur’an 5:116-117). And which words of Allah are echoed by Jesus:
    “Many will say to me in that day (of Judgment), Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then I will profess unto them, I NEVER KNEW YOU; DEPART FROM ME, YE THAT WORK INIQUITY”–(Matt. 7:22-23).
    And one of the worst “iniquity” is to ascribe Divinity to Jesus.

More proofs that Jesus is not God and final judge; Jesus declares:

  • salvation is of the Jews” (non-Jews take note) –(John 4:22. Also Luke 19:10). Clearly, a just God will not give salvation to one section of humanity and leave the others.
  • Jesus shall save his people–(Matt. 1:21. And Jesus’ people are the Jews). Clearly, God will not save Jews only.
    Out of Bethlehem shall come “A Governor that shall rule my people Israel”–(Matt. 2:6). Clearly, God is not “Governor” of Israel only.
  • “He (Jesus) shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever”-(Luke 1:33). Clearly, God does not reign over the house of Jacob only.
  • Jesus told his disciples that whichever of them followed him that they will “sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel”–(Matthew 19:28). Clearly, if the disciples will judge the twelve tribes of Israel, then they would be the final judge of the Israelite. How then is Jesus “final judge”?
    (Notably, those who will sit with Jesus would be men –12,000 from each of the twelve tribes of Israel, making a total of 144,000– and would be “virgins”:
    “These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins” (Women defiling men? Talk about misogyny)–(Rev. 7:4-8; 14:3-4) (See Jesus-second coming).

Yet more proofs that Jesus is not God and final judge:

  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when he did not have “all truth?” (Notably, Jesus said he had many things to tell NOT “all” things to tell. Mohammad told us everything we need to know for our moral, social, intellectual and spiritual development.)
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when he needed to eat butter and honey to be able to differentiate between evil and good –(Isaiah 7:14-15).
    And as there is no instance in the Gospels of Jesus eating butter (though there is one or two instances of him partaking honey) then Jesus yet does not know the difference between evil and good.
  • Jesus cannot be God final judge when he lacked knowledge. Jesus said “no man hath ascended up to heaven but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man WHICH IS IN HEAVEN”–(John 3:13). Yet the Bible says that Elijah and Enoch ascended to heaven–(John 3:13; 2 Kings 2:1, 11; Hebrews 11:5).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when Jesus did not even know the time and season of figs–(Mark 11:12-13).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when Jesus did not know the day and hour of future events–(Mark 13:32).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when Jesus has pre-condemned rich people to hell (and a person can be rich and yet be righteous):
    (Regarding a rich young man who became disappointed Jesus tells him that in order for him to get into heaven he needs to sell his possessions and give the proceeds to the poor), Jesus said to his disciples:
    “Verily, I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven, And again I say unto you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, then for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God”–(Matthew 19:20-24).
    (Whereas it is “impossible” for men to pass a camel through the eye of a needle, “with God all things are possible,” as Jesus added). The context clearly shows this is a literal expression about the rich man not being able to get into heaven.
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when he did not know the identity of the woman “having an issue of blood” who touched his garment–(Luke 8:43-46).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when he was not able to do things of himself–(John 5:30).
  • (Whether Jesus is in heaven or on earth) Jesus cannot be God and final judge when man would do greater works than him–(John 14:12).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when he was made into a “curse”–(Galatians 3:13; Deuteronomy 21:23).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when God said Jesus is His son (metaphorically)–(Matt. 3:17; Heb. 5:5; a person cannot be both himself and his son).
  • Jesus cannot be God and final judge when he is subjected to God–(1 Corinthians 15:27-28).

That “Jesus said things that only God should ever said.”
ANSWER:
Then God advocates murder:

  • “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me” (though the enemies might not militate against him)–(Luke 19:27).
    If this saying of Jesus was to be implemented more than five billion people of the world that do not accept Jesus as Divine and vicarious atoner, as Christians say he was, would be slaughtered.
  • Then God enjoins injustice, advising his devotees to agree with their adversary lest the adversary throw them in jail; and which agreeing with the adversary could send an innocent man to the gallows:
    “Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison”–(Matt. 5:25).
    Wonder what Nelson Mandela, modern-day anti-Apartheid icon, would say about this dictum: he may have saved himself thirty years jail; and his brother-in-cause, Steve Biko, may be alive; and South Africa may still be in “prison”–Apartheid).
    So for fear of imprisonment, a Christian must agree to frame an innocent man for murder and send him to the gallows. The Christian nations that acquiesced to or supported German invasion were only following Jesus’ precept to “agree” with their “adversary.” And Christian individuals who handed Jews over to the Germans should be honored for obeying Jesus to “agree” with their adversary.
    (Perhaps this is why the Vatican was silent during Hitler’s reign, for fear of violating Jesus’ decree to agree with the adversary).
    As noted elsewhere, Jesus commanded that his enemies who did not want him to rule over them be slain, and “He that is not with me is against me”-(Matthew 12:30); perhaps these also are reasons why the Vatican was silent when “Christian” Europe was being purged of Jewish presence.
    Jesus cannot be God when Jesus gave absurd doctrines
  • Jesus says that whoever says the word “fool” is in danger of hell:
    “But I say unto you…whoever shall say unto his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire”–(Matthew 5;22); 
    yet Jesus calls the Jews “fools”:
    -“Ye fools and blind”–(Matthew 23:17, 19);
    -“O fools, and slow of heart to believe”–(Luke 24:25);
    -and according to Jesus’ parable God says to a rich man proud of his goods and expecting to live a long life: “But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee”–(Luke 12:20).
    Thus instead of being God and judge, the Christian’s God is not only hypocritical, but by his own words, is fuel for the fire.

Even if Jesus was ‘judge” he would not be a fair judge considering that he referred to people –his own creation who had no say in which race they were created: a race he/Jesus made them– as “dogs’ and “swine” and even preached in parables so they would not understand and be converted and saved.

  • go not to the Gentiles and the Samaritans, but “to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matt. 10:5-6).
  • “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine”–(Matt. 7:6; 15:26);
  • Jesus told the Samaritan woman: “Ye worship ye know not what: we (Jews) know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews(non-Jews take note)–(John 4:21);
  • After relating the parable of the sower to the people Jesus said to them: “He that hath ears to hear, let him hear;” and, afterwards, when he (Jesus) was alone with the Israelite they asked him about the meaning of the parable:
    “And he said unto them, Unto you (who have God) it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them (non-Jews) that are without (God), all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them”–(Mark 4:9-12).
    The Good News Bible put it even more clearly:
    “You have been given the secret of the Kingdom of God,” Jesus answered. “But the others, who are on the outside, hear all things by means of parables, so that, ‘They may look and look, yet not see; they may listen and listen, yet not understand. For if they did, they would turn to God, and he would forgive them.’”
    In other words though the non-Jews (who may be sincere seekers of God) have the faculties of sight and hearing and can see and hear, he (Jesus) spoke in parables so that they would not understand his words because he did not want them to accept God and have their sins forgiven. What a ghastly horribly sickening thing to do.
    (As prophet, Jesus could not turn away anyone; this is why he indulged non-Jews; but he could avoid them, which he did, as is evident from his admonition to his disciples not to preach to non-Jews, and from his speaking in parables so that they would not understand).
    This statement by Jesus also proves that Jesus did NOT come to save sinners.
    What kind of God and “judge” is Christian worshipping and following?  It is doubtful any sane individual would want to be presided over by this “God” and “judge.”

Hilariously, whereas Muslims know who Jesus was/is and his mission and know what we follow.3
After two thousand years Christians are yet wandering in the forest of “darkness and misunderstanding” and confusion as to who Jesus is and his mission:

  • Whereas some Christians say that Jesus is GOD some say he is only SON OF GOD. Whose belief is right?
  • Whereas some Christians say that there is TRINITY some say Trinity as a “senseless God-dishonoring doctrine” that can come only from the mind of “Satan the Devil.” Who is right?
  • Whereas some Christians say that Christ died for INHERITED SIN some say he died for committed sin (arguing, rightly, that your father being a millionaire does not make you a millionaire). Whose belief is true?
  • Whereas some Christians believe Jesus was killed, buried, and raised, “some of the early Christian sects did not believe that Christ was killed on the cross. The Basilidans believed that some one else was substituted for him. The Docetae held that Christ never had a real physical or natural body, but only an apparent or phantom body, and that his Crucifixion was only apparent, not real. The Marcionite Gospel (about A.D. 138) denied that Jesus was born, and merely said that he appeared in human form.”4 (And these Christians being closer in time to Jesus would know better than modern-day Christians).
  • Whereas some Christians say Jesus was of “virgin” birth some say he was not.
    Ibn Warraq notes in his book Why I Am Not A Muslim: “Martin Luther (1483-1546), writing in the sixteenth century, conceded that “We Christians seem fools to the world for believing that Mary was the true mother of this child, and nevertheless a pure virgin. For this is not only against all reason, but also against the creation of God, who said to Adam and Eve, ‘Be fruitful and multiply.’”” p. 144.5
    “Virgin” birth is a forgery in the Bible; see Jesus-birth miracle or mechanix?

In summary. Christianity is:

  • Trinity–God growing in the womb (and of a woman He created), coming out the vagina and getting circumcised; and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15)
  • Son of God–attributing the animal function of sex to God; as “fatherhood” requires the union of sperm and ovum; (and Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God-Luke 1:35); and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15)
  • Inherited sin–God loading a man’s (Adam’s) sin onto innocent, helpless and morally and mentally non-competent babies
  • Vicarious atonement–God having a blameless man (Jesus) killed for the sin of others.
    Which are gruesome, unGodly monstrosities!

What kind of God and son of God are Christians following that need to eat butter and honey in order to differentiate between good and evil?
What kind of God are Christians following that lived in the belly of a woman (and whom He created) and came out her vagina and circumcised?

Incidentally, Jesus is noted as saying:
“Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature” (which would include the baboon)–(Mark 16:15; though this verse, as noted elsewhere, is a “forgery” in the Bible),
and, regarding “the end of the world” Jesus says:
“This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and THEN SHALL THE END COME”–Matthew 24:3, 14).
Thus, if any nation(s) should ban the Gospel from its land the “end” shall never come.

Even Hinduism is superior to Christianity.
Whereas both religions reduce God to “son” of a woman and make woman “mother” of God by placing God in the body of a woman and bring Him out her genital. Unlike Christianity which attributes injustice to God and makes God complicit in murder by shifting Adam’s sin around onto every person and then onto Jesus and having him murdered, Hinduism, does not attribute injustice to God and make Him complicit in murder; Hinduism gives to man an equal and opposite reaction to his action; though this renders God as being mercy-less, see Karma & Reincarnation.

Also, whereas Jesus/Christianity regards non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in “parables” so these metaphorical “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved, Hinduism does not regard non-Jews or non-Hindus as “dogs” and “swine” or preached in parables so they would not understand.
The God or son of God or prophet that regards one sector of humanity as “:dogs” and “swine” and even preach so they would not understand and be saved is the God/son of God/prophet not worthy of honor much less of adoration and worship.
Even humans fight against racism and bigotry.

Moreover, the Hindu God is even greater than the Christian God. Whereas the Christian God is said to have incarnated Himself only as Jesus, the Hindu God, Vishnu, is said to have incarnated as several individuals such as Rama, Krishna and Balarama; and even as lower species: Man-Lion, Boar, Fish.
If Christians want to follow God incarnate they are to follow Hinduism.

However, if this Christian wants to go to heaven, and as he knows about Islam/Mohammad, this Christian has no choice but to bend his knees to Allah; to
         “There is no God but Allāh; 
      Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh.”


                   APPENDIX I
Jesus said “no man hath ascended up to heaven but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man WHICH IS IN HEAVEN”–(John 3:13. Notably, this verse is taken from the “Authorized King James Version” of the Bible. Other Bibles such as “Good News” and “New American Standard” do not have the words “WHICH IS IN HEAVEN;” their verse ends at  “even the Son of man.”
Obviously they do not want the world to know that the Son of man was yet “IN HEAVEN” to come. So much for Christian’s claim that their Bible is all “word of God.

  • Authorized King James Version, Self-Pronouncing Edition, Published by The World Publishing Company, 2231 West 110TH Street, Cleveland 2, Ohio.
  • Good News New Testament, The New Testament (Fourth Edition) And Psalms, in Today’s English Version; Canadian Bible Society, 1835 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, M4S 1Y1.
    N.T. Text: American Bible Society 1966, 1971, 1976. Psalms: American Bible Society 1970; Maps: United Bible Societies 1976, 1977.
  • New American Standard Bible, 1985 Edition. (“Placed by the Gideons”). Printed and bound in Canada by RBW Graphics. The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973.
    According to “The Editorial Board” “This translation follows the principles used in the American Standard Version 1901 known as the Rock of Biblical Honesty”
    “Rock of Biblical Honesty”? Really now! This is hilarious. If your verse (of John 3:13) is Biblical “Honesty” then the Authorized King James Version is Biblical dis-“Honesty.” Tell them!

Regarding Matthew 19:16-17. The first quote in the following is from the Authorized King James Version, the second quote is from New American Standard which is based on the “Rock of Biblical Honesty.”
Bolderized words show the alteration; underlined words are NOT in the New American Standard (Gideons Bible):

(1) “And, behold, one came and said unto him (Jesus), Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good  but one, that is God: but…”  (King James)

(2) “And behold, one came to Him (Jesus) and said, “Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may obtain eternal life? And He said to him, “Why are you asking Me about what is good? There is only One who is good; but…” (American New Standard)

Even the forgery is clumsy: who better is there to tell or to ask “what is good” than God or the “Son of God.”
Is it not telling a “lie” on God that He revealed the changed words? Is it not telling a “lie” on Jesus that he uttered the changed words?
It is not goodness to tell a “lie” on God or His prophet. It is not goodness to blaspheme against God: it is Hell-Fire–Mark 3:29).
Are these changes Biblical “Honesty’?
(Incidentally, the Good News translation is similar to that of the American New Standard).

American New Standard pledges about their Bibles:
“These publications shall be true to the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.”
(Never mind Jesus was not Greek nor spoke Greek).
So whose translation is “true to the original” and whose is false?

American New Standard also promises to “give the Lord Jesus Christ His proper place, the place which the Word gives Him.”
So what is Christ’s “proper place” that “the Word gives him”? Is Christ God, Son of God, Trinity, or prophet like Moses?
Is Christ vicarious atoner, and for which sin inherited or committed?
Or is Christ only a “Teacher” wholly and solely to “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” and prayed only “for them” and “not for the world”?–(Matthew 15:24; John 17:9).
See
Bible corrupt & obsolete
Christianity-a fake;
Christianity is Paganism;
Jesus as God;
Jesus-inherited sin to ascension;
Jesus-only for Jews
Jesus-Son of God
Jesus-Trinity


              APPENDIX II
Regarding Jesus ordering that the Gospel be preached to the world and that the word meaning “tribes” was incorrectly translated into ‘world.” Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din points out in his book Open Letters To The Bishops of Salisbury & London, (pp. 31-32):

“The concluding eleven verses of St. Mark-(16:9-20) and the well-known verse of St. Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are forgeries, an admitted addition to the ancient MSS (manuscripts). The fact was discovered by the first translator of the Bible into English and they made a marginal note in their version of the Bible which continued for some time. But we do not find the said note in any of the copies now published by the said society (Foreign Mission Society). Is it fair and honest to keep others in darkness as to the true value of the contents of the Bible? The reader must know that concluding portion of St. Mark and the verse in St. Matthew are spurious and a subsequent addition. But I am afraid the Foreign Mission would not allow the correction. It would tell against their very Mission, if they eliminate the verse from St. Matthew; they lose the only pillar that supports the structure of the Trinity. No other verse in the whole Scripture speaks of it. The said eleven verses of St. Mark are the only justification for the existence of the Foreign Mission. You, as well as I, know, my Lord, that the call to Jesus came solely and wholly from Judaism. He came only to gather the scattered sheep and would not give the children’s bread to the dogs, the world beyond the Israelites. The Foreign Mission is a mere trespass on lands forbidden by the Master. It transcends the limit marked by Jesus. Throughout his life the Gentiles and others did not concern him: they were the swine. Then came the make-believe Resurrection, and they say the Master changed his mind as to his mission and ordered it to be carried to the four corners of the world (indicating that he was unsure of his mission), but this all depends upon the questionable verses of St. Mark, and hence their retention  in the Bible. St. Matthew is no authority on this point. The word “nations” there is a mistranslation and a wrong substitute for “the tribes”–the rest of the Jewish tribes scattered all over the world. This being the case, the Mission cannot afford to eliminate the verses from their version, nor will they put marginal notes, as did the old versions, to show the true nature of the verses. It would weaken the cause and show the futility of their status, since in carrying on evangelical work in the non-Christian world they are acting against the express admonition of the Master. It may be that reasons other than religion are at the back of it all, and goading their activities, but decency, if not religion, assuredly demands the publishing of things as they are.” (For references see Bible corrupt & obsolete).

And Christians peddle the Bible as the “all” Word of God. And Christians expect to go to heaven. Such is Christian’s deception and desperation to snare the unschooled and the unthinking into drinking the mythical blood of Jesus Christ (spiritual cannibalism). Utterly disgraceful and unGodly!

It is doubtful that a man of God would make forgeries in a Book of God, and even yet proclaim it to be Book of God. Christians adulterate their Word of God and then have the arrogance and the audacity to turn around and ask this very God to give them their daily bread. In fact, they not only turn around and ask God to give them their daily bread, they even pray to him to have Muslims (and others) follow them in their wickedness and blasphemy.
Sadly, some Muslims do apostatize and follow them. And only the peripheral Muslim and the unthinking would embrace the useless and unGodly crucifix).

Even if Jesus had said to teach the Gospels to all nations, yet this would not make Jesus God or Son of God or one in a Trinity with God or vicarious atoner or that mankind Jesus-inherited sin from Adam/Eve. These cardinal doctrines of  Christianity are lies, falsehood, and blasphemy.
Christianity-a fake religion.


                   NOTES

  1. “They (Christians) take their doctors of law and their monks for lords besides Allāh, and (also) the Messiah, son of Mary. And they were enjoined that they should serve one God only — there is no god but He. Be He glorified from what they set up (with Him)!–(Qur’an 9:31, 34). To which Muhammad Ali notes:
    “It is related in a hadith that, when this verse was revealed, ‘Adi ibn Hatim, a convert from Christianity, asked the Holy Prophet as to the significance of this verse, for, he said, we did not worship our doctors of law and monks. The Holy Prophet’s reply was: Was it not that the people considered lawful what their priests declared to be lawful, though it was forbidden by God. Hatim replied in the affirmative. That, the Prophet said, was what the verse meant (Tirmidhi, 44:9; IJ). Muslims who accord a similar position to their pirs or saints are guilty of the same error.”
    (Muhammad Ali in his translation of the Qur’an has explained Arabic words/terms and given a background to verses, and his preliminary notes is an invaluable source of information. His translation can be viewed at: www.muslim.org).
  1. In his revealing book Jesus in Heaven on Earth, Khwaja notes the accounts of several travelers and a “Map illustrating the route followed by Jesus in his first journey to India” –from Jerusalem Jesus traveled to Damascus onto Nisibin, through Iran to Sindh, onto Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Jaggannath, Benaras, Nepal, Kashmir, Afghanistan, Iran, and back to Jerusalem. Khwaja concludes:
    According to ancient Tibetan manuscripts, Jesus secretly withdrew from the home of Mary and Joseph at age thirteen. Young “Issa” joined a merchant caravan. Destination: India and the Himalayas.
    At Juggernaut, “the white priests of Brahma made him a joyous welcome. They taught him to read and understand the Vedas, to cure by aid of prayer, to teach, to explain the holy scriptures to the people, and to drive out evil spirits from the bodies of men.”
  • Buddhist scholars documented “The Life of Saint Issa” two thousand years ago.
  • Nicholas Notovitch discovered the long-lost document in 1887 at the Himis monastery in Ladakh.
  • Swami Abhedananda published a Bengali translation of the Himis manuscript in 1929.
  • Nicholas Roerich quoted the same verses in a 1929 travel diary of his Asian expedition.
  • And in 1939, a beaming lama at Himis presented a set of parchments to Elizabeth Caspari with the words: “These books say your Jesus was here!” (p. 338/404).
    And how did Christian Fathers take the news about their non-existent son of God and “God,” Jesus, being in India and taught by Hindu priests? (See Jesus-18 missing years).
  1. Jesus was a messenger of Allah sent to minister to the Children of Israel and to foretell the coming of the Prophet Mohammad.
    Unlike the cardinal doctrines of Christianity –Trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement– which have no Divine foundation, no prophetic foundation, no logical foundation and are repugnant to reason. The cardinal doctrines of Islam –Unity/Purity of Allah God, Prayer, Zakaat/Charity, Fasting and Hajj are clearly expressed in the Qur’an and explained by Prophet Mohammad; and are conducive to reason.
  1. Yusuf Ali, Qur’anic comm. #663.
  2. For a refutation of Ibn Warraq’s book see Why I am not a Muslim