In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms
JEWS FOR JESUS
Jews for Jesus believes in one God in three Persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
They believe that the Bible, both Old and New, is the inspired Word of God.
They believe that salvation for both Jew and Gentile is through the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus the Messiah.
They believe that Jesus of Nazareth is the prophesied Messiah.
They believe that Jesus is co-equal with the Father and that He is both fully God and fully human.
They believe that the Jewish people are in a covenant relationship with God and that God will accomplish His purpose through them.
They also believe that the Church is under the New Covenant and composed of both Jewish and Gentile believers.
In other words, their beliefs reflect historic Christian orthodoxy. Their heart’s desire is to share the gospel with their Jewish family, neighbors and friends.
1.That Jesus is “one God in three Persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.”
Trinity is not Divine revelation/inspiration. Trinity was invented by the Church 300 years after Jesus.
As Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– points out:
“The Christians….make the Creator a divine father and His word a divine son; and also, because He breathed life into His creatures, He is surnamed a divine Spirit, forgetting that logically, He could not be father before creation, nor “son” before He spoke, and neither “Holy Ghost” before He gave life”–(Muhummed In The Bible, p. 15).
As noted in Jesus-Trinity whereas some Bibles have the verse of 1 John 5:7: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one” (which is assumed to be Trinity) the Gideons New American Standard Bible (1973) does not have this verse (whose Bible is the correct one?). Significantly, this statement was NOT made by Jesus, but by John.
Also, as noted in Bible corrupt & obsolete,
“The concluding eleven verses of St. Mark-(16:9-20) and the well-known verse of St. Matthew-(28:19), speaking of the Son and the Father and the Holy Ghost, are forgeries, an admitted addition to the ancient MSS (manuscripts). The fact was discovered by the first translator of the Bible into English and they made a marginal note in their version of the Bible which continued for some time. But we do not find the said note in any of the copies now published by the said society” (Foreign Mission Society).
Trinity is not only devoid of Divine, prophetic and logical foundations it is repugnant to reason, and is blasphemy –Trinity (that God incarnated Himself as Jesus) puts God in the belly of Mary and brings Him out her vagina and circumcised His foreskin (God forbid!).
2. That “the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, is the inspired Word of God.”
While the Bible does have words of God; the Bible is NOT ‘all” Word of God.
- The Bible could not be “all” Word of God when Paul was a self-admitted liar, who “forged” his own gospel; who was uncertain whether he had the Holy Spirit with him and gave his own judgment; and who snared people into following his teachings through guile and craft.
- The Bible could not be “all” Word of God when the Bible itself says that it was falsified: “How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us’? But behold, THE LYING PEN OF THE SCRIBES HAS MADE IT INTO A LIE”–(Jeremiah 8:8. New American Standard Bible, 1985 edition).
- The Bible could not be “all” Word of God when the Bible contains “forgeries;” and was “tampered with.
Aside from being “juggled” with, there are statements in the Bible that do not befit Divine limbs and lips. That God would:
- give David’s wives to his neighbor to be sexually violated because of David’s adultery–(2 Samuel 12: 7-11);
- have bears tear children for teasing a man about his bald head–(2 Kings 2:22-24);
- kill the non-virgin women and male children of His people’s opponents and take their little virgin girls as war booty–(Numbers 31: 1-53);
- have priests burn their daughters for being a “whore”–(Leviticus 21:9);
- detail that a fetus stuck his hand out his mother’s womb–(Genesis 38:27-28);
- slay “woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass”–(1 Samuel 15:2-3);
- reduce woman to an object for sex, good only “to avoid fornication and as “defiler” of man–(1 Corinthians 7:1-2; Revelation 14:3-4);
- detail that Aholah and Aholibah “committed whoredoms in their youth” in Egypt where they had “their breasts pressed” and “bruised the teats of their virginity,” and that Aholibah “doted on their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses”–(Ezekiel 23:1-20);
- slaughter pregnant women and impale the fetus–(Isaiah 13:15, 18; Hosea 13:16);
- say that His devotees will be “happy” because they dashed the “little ones” of their enemies “against the stones” and “ravished” the “wives” of their enemies–(Psalm 137:9; Isaiah 13:16);
- sell children into slavery–(Joel 3:8);
- declare “I will wail and howl, I will go stripped and naked: I will make a wailing like the dragons, and mourning as the owls”–(Micah 1:8);
- say to agree with your adversary before he gets you jailed (which would include agreeing with all kinds of injustices)–(Matt. 5:25; perhaps this is what the Church and Christian Europe were doing when Germans were holocausting Jews);
- make Himself/Son a “sin;” “curse;” “lower” than angels–(2 Cor. 5:21; Gal. 3:13; Heb. 2:9);
- tell man to eat cakes mixed with human “dung”–(Ezekiel 4:9-15).1
It is doubtful that an intelligent Christian (or Jew) would attribute such indignities to His Holy Highness.
Whereas the Bible is expected to be “all” Word of God, as evidenced in these pages the Bible has more human weavings than a Galilean’s fishnet.
3. That “salvation for both Jew and Gentile is through the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus the Messiah.”
As shown in Judaism Jewish “salvation” lies in their following the Prophet Mohammad.
There is no inherited sin and vicarious atonement. Inherited sin and vicarious atonement were devised by St. (?) Paul who was a self-admitted liar and forger of his own gospel.
Jesus taught that eternal life lies in observing the Mosaic Law until the arrival of the Comforter who will bring “all truth” and “abide for ever.” And this Comforter is the Prophet Mohammad.
It is erroneous to take the Holy Ghost as the Comforter. Not only is there no evidence of the Holy Ghost bringing any truth much more the “all truth” he is prophesied to bring, Christians do not know what or who the Holy Ghost is. Prof. Abdul Ahad Dawud B.D. –“the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani, B.D., a Roman Catholic priest of the Uniate-Chaldean sect”– points out:
“The Holy Spirit, in all the Christian literature of diverse languages, has not a fixed gender. He, she, it, are all commonly used as the personal pronouns for the Holy Ghost;” And
“The Comforter –the Spirit of Truth– spoken of by Jesus was no other than Muhammad himself. It cannot be taken as the Holy Ghost, as the Church theology says. “It is expedient for you that I go away,” says Jesus, “for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you, but if I depart I will send him unto you”(John 16:7). The words clearly show that the Comforter had to come after the departure of Jesus, and was not with him when he uttered these words. Are we to presume that Jesus was devoid of the Holy Ghost if his coming was conditional on the going of Jesus: besides, the way in which Jesus describes him makes him a human being, not a ghost. “He shall not speak of himself, but whatsoever he shall hear that he shall speak” (John 16:13). Should we presume that the Holy Ghost and God are two distinct entities and that the Holy Ghost speaks of himself and also what he hears from God? The words of Jesus clearly refer to some messenger from God. He calls him the Spirit of Truth, and so the Qur‘an speaks of Muhammad, “Nay, he has come with the Truth and verified the apostles” (Qur’an 37:37). (Muhammad In The Bible, p. 6).
Jesus says the Comforter will not speak of himself but what he hears, which is the same as God informing Moses about Him raising up a prophet like Moses and that: “I…will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him”–(Deut. 18:18. If Jesus is God then God put His words into His own mouth).
These words God put into the mouth of the prophet like Moses and the words the Comforter heard from God is the Qur’an–(Qur’an 53:3-5).
Jesus also said the Comforter will guided us into “all truth.” As shown, the Prophet Mohammad is the Comforter. And the Qur’an is the Book of “all truth: ”Nothing have We omitted from the Book (Qur’an)” “explaining all things” “A Messenger from Allāh, reciting pure pages, Wherein are (all) right books”–(Qur’an 61:6; 6:38; 12:111; 16:89; 98:2-3).
The Qur’an consists of teachings of past prophets that are applicable to all time and contains teachings that are not met with in past Scriptures. Thus, The Qur’an consists of, exceeds, and supersedes all other Scriptures.
Thus, like Jews, Christian ‘salvation” lies in their following the Prophet Mohammad.
4. That “Jesus of Nazareth is the prophesied Messiah.”
Allah says that Jesus is the Messiah sent to the Children of Israel–(Qur’an 3:44-48). And Jesus declared that he was sent wholly and solely to Jews/Israelites:
-go not to the Gentiles and the Samaritans, but “to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matt. 10:5-6).
-“I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel”–(Matt. 15:24).
-“I pray for them (Jews): I pray not for the world”–(John 17:9).
-“For the Son of man is come to seek and save that (Jews) which was lost” (of which some ten of these Jewish tribes were said to be in Kashmir; Jesus is noted to have traveled to India)–(Luke 19:10. Compare with Matt. 10:5-6; 15:24; 18:11; John 17:9).
Khwaja Nazir Ahmad in his book, Jesus in Heaven on Earth, notes on p. 404:
“The Gospels record Jesus age twelve in the temple. Then about age thirty at the river Jordan. That leaves approximately seventeen years unaccounted for. During those so-called lost years, the child “increased in wisdom and stature,” as Luke wrote. But was it in the carpenter shop at Nazareth?
According to ancient Tibetan manuscripts, Jesus secretly withdrew from the home of Mary and Joseph at age thirteen. Young “Issa” joined a merchant caravan. Destination: India and the Himalayas.
At Juggernaut, “the white priests of Brahma made him a joyous welcome. They taught him to read and understand the Vedas, to cure by aid of prayer, to teach, to explain the holy scriptures to the people, and to drive out evil spirits from the bodies of men.”
-Buddhist scholars documented “The Life of Saint Issa” two thousand years ago.
-Nicholas Notovitch discovered the long-lost document in 1887 at the Himis monastery in Ladakh.
-Swami Abhedananda published a Bengali translation of the Himis manuscript in 1929.
-Nicholas Roerich quoted the same verses in a 1929 travel diary of his Asian expedition.
-And in 1939, a beaming lama at Himis presented a set of parchments to Elizabeth Caspari with the words: “These books say your Jesus was here!”
5. That “Jesus is co-equal with the Father and that He is both fully God and fully human.”
Jesus made it clear he is not God–(Matt. 19:17; Mark 10:18): “Why callest thou me good? there is NONE good but one, that is GOD.” Jesus not only denies that he is God, he also denies that he is good.
Jesus did NOT claim to be “co-equal” or equal with God. He clearly states that GOD sent him, that he only does according to what God instructs him and that he can do nothing without the power of God:
-“I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do–(John 17:4) If Jesus had come to die for the sins of the world, he could not have said that his work was finished.
-“I have manifested thy name unto the men (the Jews) which thou gavest me out of the world”–(John 17:6. If Jesus was sent to the world he could not have been given some men “out of the world”: he would have been given all men of the world).
-“I came …not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me”–(John 6:38).
-“My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me”–(John 7:16).
-“He (God) gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak”–(John 12:49).
-“I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me”–(John 14:10. It is to be known that God “dwelleth” in every man–1 Cor. 3:16. Qur’an 32:8-9).
-“My meat is to do the will of HIM that sent me and to finish HIS work”–(John 4:34).
-“I can of mine own self do NOTHING…..I seek NOT MY OWN WILL, but the WILL OF THE FATHER… If I bear witness of myself, my witness is NOT TRUE” –(John 5:30-31).
-“ALL power is GIVEN unto me in heaven and in earth”-(Matthew 28:18. God gave Himself “all power”?). As “all power” was “given” to Jesus, “all power” can be taken from him. And no one can “give” or “take” power from God; be it some or “all.”
- If Jesus was God, God would need to eat butter and honey in order to distinguish between evil and good: “Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”–(Isaiah 7:14-15)
- If Jesus was God, God would have grown in stature an needed to find favor in God and man: “And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with GOD and MAN”–( Luke 2:52). As more than half the world –atheists and non-Christians– does not accept Jesus as vicarious atoner (at least) it is doubtful the Christian’s God, Jesus, would ever find “favour” with (all) man. (See Jesus as God; Jesus & God are one; Miracles).
- If Jesus was God, God would have prayed to himself; “forsaken” himself on the cross; thanked himself; heard himself; and worshipped himself–(Matthew 26:39; 27:46; Luke 10:21; John 11: 41; 4:22).
6. That “the Jewish people are in a covenant relationship with God and that God will accomplish His purpose through them.”
And what is this “purpose” that God will accomplish through the “Jewish people?”
The “covenant” the Jewish people had with God is for them to follow “Shiloh,” the prophet “like Moses” and the Comforter –which are three names/identities of the same one person, Mohammad. (For details please see Judaism).
The word/term “Jew” is derived from Judah, one of the twelve sons of the prophet Jacob (who was renamed “Israel” by God–Genesis 35:10). It is doubtful that present-day “Jews” can identify themselves with a tribe of Jacob/Israel. (Modern World Jewry are mostly descendants of European converts to Judaism, see Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe).
While there is no Biblical Jew today, those who call themselves Jews or followers of Judaism are, as followers of the Bible, obligated to abide by the commands of the Bible to follow this “Shiloh,” prophet like Moses and Comforter; who has been shown to be the Prophet Mohammad.
7. That “the Church is under the New Covenant and composed of both Jewish and Gentile believers.”
Jesus was wholly and solely only for Jews. Jesus considered non-Jews (and even the Jewish Samaritan sect) as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in parables so they would understand and be converted and saved.
Moreover, the teachings of the “Church’ –trinity, inherited sin and vicarious atonement– are antiChrist.
Thus, the “Church” is not under any “Covenant,” New or Old, with God.
8. That Jews for Jesus “beliefs reflect historic Christian orthodoxy.”
And this tree of “historic Christian orthodoxy” is firmly rooted in the soil of ancient mythology.
In contrast to Jesus’ teaching of him being only a prophet –a seeker of the lost tribes of Israel, that eternal life lies in following the Mosaic Law till the coming of the Comforter who will guide into “all truth” and “abide forever”– Christians have cast Jesus into the mould of David.
Encyclopaedia Britannica notes:
“David was Israel’s first successful king…
David became the prototype of an awaited Messiah. As symbol of the Messiah, the return of David, or the coming of David’s “son” stood for the reassertion of the divine rule and presence in history: to judge it, to redeem it, to renew it. David thus became the symbol of a fulfilment in the future, final peace.
In the apocalyptic developments in Judaism that mark the last two pre-Christian centuries, the symbolic rule of David stressed his status as divine mediator. The son of David became more emphatically a heavenly figure, the son of God enthroned to rule over the nations of the world. This was the matrix for the rise of Christianity. The new faith interpreted the career of Jesus by means of the titles and functions assigned to David in the mysticism of the Zion cult, in which he served as priest-king and in which he was the mediator between God and man.”2
Regarding Jesus’ alleged 1000-year reign some time in the future on which Christians “pin their hope” to sit with Jesus. The Book of Revelation is said to be a vision given to John by Jesus through an angel with the permission of God–(Revelation 1:1). But the Book of revelation is not prophecies about a future coming and rule of Jesus.
Encyclopaedia Britannica notes:
“Revelation to John appears to be a collection of separate units composed by unknown authors who lived during the last quarter of the first century, though it purports to have been written by John…
Although Christ is clearly the central figure of Revelation, an understanding of the text presupposes familiarity with the Old Testament language and concepts, especially those taken from the books of Daniel and Ezekiel …References to a “thousand years” (ch. 20) have led some to expect that the final victory over evil will come after the completion of some millennium.”3
“One of the most pervading and dominant mythological themes to be noted in the New Testament and the writings of the subapostolic church (late 1st–early 2nd centuries) was that of the ages of the world. Derived from Indo-Iranian (or Indo-European) sources and trans-formed through Jewish concepts of history, the theme of the ages of the world that most influenced Christianity came from the apocalyptic speculation that flourished during the period of the rise of Christianity.
…It was Iranian mythological concepts of the ages of the world, translated though Jewish apocalyptic views, that most influenced Christian views of time, history, and man’s ultimate destiny.
…The theme of the ages of the world and its attendant subthemes that came primarily from Iranian mythology were transformed by apocalyptic literature––which flourished in Judaism and then Christianity from about the 2nd century BC to about 2nd century AD––into a historical context, though Zoroastrian had done this in reference to the last age. Indo-Iranian myth was thus historicized through the Judeo-Christian view of historical time as the arena of struggle between good and evil. The four ages of the world in Christianity are: (1) from creation of the world and man to the Fall of man; (2) from the Fall of man to the first advent of Christ; (3) from the first to the second advent of Christ, which includes the 1,000-year reign of Christ and his saints and the Last Judgment; and (4) the creation of a new heaven and a new earth in which those who have chosen the good (i.e., Christ) will live in eternity.”4
Note well these Christian apocalyptic writings are not Divine revelations. They are Christian inventions that are based on the “mythology” of other people(s). The imageries in the Book of Revelation are either echoes from Old Testament writings or Christian imaginations.
As Jesus completed his mission there is no return. It is the Comforter who guides into “all truth” as Jesus says, that will abide “forever.’
While mythology may have its purpose in certain areas of life, the road to God needs no human embellishments or inventions.
Evidently, Christians tailored Jesus to suit the Bible. Whereas God made David an earthly king, Christians try to make Jesus a heavenly king. And to effect this, Christians consigned Jesus to the bed of celibacy, crowned him with Divinity, made him scapegoat for non-existent inherited sin, and consecrated him ruler of the future-world.
In summary. Christianity is:
● Trinity –God growing in the womb, coming out the vagina and getting circumcised; and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15)
● Son of God –attributing the animal function of sex to God; as “fatherhood” requires the union of sperm and ovum; (and Jesus is only “CALLED” son of God-Luke 1:35); and needing to eat butter and honey “that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good”-(Isaiah 7:14-15)
● Inherited sin –God loading a man’s (Adam’s) sin onto innocent, helpless and morally and mentally non-competent babies -and worldwide and for more than 5,000 years now and will continue to do so to the Resurrection
● Vicarious atonement –God having a blameless man (Jesus) killed for the sin of others.
Which are gruesome, unGodly monstrosities!
Even Hinduism is superior to Christianity. Whereas both religions reduce God to “son” of a woman and make woman “mother” of God by placing God in the body of a woman and bring Him out her genital.
Unlike Christianity which attributes injustice to God and makes God complicit in murder by shifting Adam’s sin around onto every person and then onto Jesus and having him murdered, Hinduism, does not attribute injustice to God and make Him complicit in murder; Hinduism gives to man an equal and opposite reaction to his action; though this renders God as being mercy-less, see Karma & Reincarnation.
Also, whereas Jesus/Christianity regards non-Jews as “dogs” and “swine” and preached in “parables” so these metaphorical “dogs” and “swine” would not understand and be saved, Hinduism does not regard non-Jews or non-Hindus as “dogs” and “swine” or preached in parables so they would not understand. The God or son of God or prophet that regards one sector of humanity as “:dogs” and “swine” and even preach so they would not understand and be saved is the God/son of God/prophet not worthy of honor much less of adoration and worship. Even humans fight against racism and bigotry).
Given the humanness of the Bible and the clouds of conjectures surrounding the existence of Jesus, but for the Qur’an/Islam/ Mohammad Jesus may have long since been relegated to the bin of myths and legends.
It is the Qur’an/Islam/Mohammad that is keeping Jesus alive; and not only keeping him alive but has cleansed him and his mother, Mary, of the calumnies of “bastard” and “adulteress,” respectively, hurled on them by Jewish Fathers, and appareled them in rubious robes of righteousness, and have secured for them today the unflagging allegiance of some one-and-one-half billion Muslims. And counting as Islam spirits on. Inexorably! Invincibly! Impregnably! As Divinely decreed! To prevail over all religions!
“He it is Who sent His Messenger
(Mohammad) with guidance and
the Religion of Truth,
that He may cause it to
prevail over all religions,
though the polytheists are averse”
(Qur’an 9:32-33; 48:28; 61:8-9).
Allāh God truly is Great!
Subhāna Rabbayyal A’lā!
Whereas “Jews for Jesus” has the right to follow whatever they wish. If “Jews for Jesus” desires to go to heaven, and they know about Islam/Mohammad, “Jews for Jesus” has no choice but to bend their knees to Allah: to “There is no God but Allah; Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah!”
- That the Bible tells man to eat cakes mixed with human “dung”–(Ezekiel 4:9-15).
One party on the Internet says the “human dung” and “cow’s dung” were to be used as “fuel” to bake the cakes. But even if Jews saved this dung for fuel and even if fresh dung can burn, the Bible itself belies the claim. God tells Ezekiel to take a mixture of barley and other grains: “And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it WITH dung that cometh out of man, in their sight. And the Lord said, Even thus shall the children of Israel EAT their DEFILED bread among the Gen-tiles…Then said I, Ah Lord God! behold, my soul hath not been POLLUTED: for from my youth up till even now have I not EATEN of that which dieth of itself, or is torn to pieces; neither came there ABOMINABLE FLESH INTO MY MOUTH.”
The bread could not be “defiled” if the dung was used as fuel, moreso if it was a common practice by Jews to use dung as “fuel.” The bread could only be “defiled” and an “abomination” to eat if it was mixed with human dung. Clearly, it was meant for Ezekiel to eat the human “dung” which to him was an “abomination” whereupon God substituted “cow’s dung” instead: “Then he (God) said to me, Lo, I give thee cow’s dung FOR MAN’S DUNG, and thou shalt PREPARE THY BREAD THEREWITH”–(Ezekiel 4:15).
Notably, Critics denigrate Prophet Mohammad for telling some men to drink camel urine to cure their abdominal ailment–(Bokhari Vol. 7, #590).
Unlike the camel urine curing the men, God telling Ezekiel to eat cakes made with human “dung” or cow’s “dung” is not for any cure. It is doubtful that one suffering from a severe condition of which the only known cure is camel urine would not take the urine. Perhaps these critics engage in oral sex and come in contact with genital fluid and urine, and they fault Mohammad for helping people with whatever cure was then available. Mohammad taught about diseases, cures, and medicines–(Bokhari Vol. 7).
I recall the statement of one public figure that (unless there is an infection) urine upon leaving the body is sterilized.
Regarding camel urine as cure, the Saudi Gazette (on the Internet) Monday, 19 July 2010, reports in the article Nano-particles in Camels’ urine may help treat cancer, by Farah Mustafa Wadi. The Arabian doctor conducting the experiment is Dr. Faten Abdel-Rahman Khorshid.
“Dr. Faten Abdel-Rahman Khorshid is responsible for one of the Kingdom’s greatest national achievements in the field of science for her work which began with the urine of camels and concluded in a potential cure for cancer.…(She) has discovered that nano-particles in the urine of camels can attack cancer cells with success. Her work began with experiments involving camel urine, cancer cells found in patients’ lungs and culminated in injecting mice with leukemic cancel cells and camel urine to test the results.
Speaking to the Saudi Gazette, Dr. Khorshid claimed that she was inspired by Prophet Muhammad’s (pbuh) medical advice and that camel urine consists of natural substances that work to eradicate malignant cells and maintain the number of healthy cells in a cancer patient. “This treatment is not an invention, but rather, taken from our Prophet’s legacy,” she remarked. A Hadith narrated by Al-Bukhari (2855) and Muslim (1671) claims that some people came to Madina and fell ill with bloated abdomens. The Prophet (pbuh) told them to combine the milk and urine of a camel and drink that, after which they recovered. A swollen abdomen may indicate edema, liver disease or cancer. ….
In the case of a volunteer patient with lung cancer, the medicine helped in halving the size of the tumor after only one month. The patient, and others like him, are still undergoing treatment. Heeding the advice found in the Hadith, Dr. Khorshid is combining specific amounts of camel milk and urine to develop her medicine and focuses on particular types of cancer, including lung cancer, blood cancer, stomach cancer, colon cancer, brain tumors and breast cancer.”
It is doubtful that if Dr. Faten should develop a cure from this camel urine-milk for cancer that a critic suffering from this type of cancer would hesitate to drink this camel urine-milk preparation to cure himself/herself. (He or she might want a double-dip).
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th, ed; Vol. 5; art. David; Nation Builder, and Messianic symbol, pp. 518, 519. Color added.
- .Ency. Brit. 15th Edn; Vol. VIII, art. Revelation to John, p. 537.
- Ency Brit. 15th Edn; Vol. 4, art. Myth and legend from the 1st to the early 2nd centuries, pp. 551-552. Color added.