In the name of Allāh,
the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Peace and Blessings of Allāh on Mohammad.
Allāh–the Glorious and the High,
Lord of the worlds
Mohammad–who brought the world
to our feet and eternity to our arms.


“And say: The truth has comeand falsehood vanished.
Surely falsehood is everbound to vanish.”
 (Allāh: Qur’an 17:81).

Jewish motive and plot:

“…after the [Second World] war the question of the land of Israel and the question of the Jews would be raised beyond the framework of “development”; amongst our-selves. It must be clear that there is no room for both peoples in this country. No “development” will bring us closer to our aim, to be an independent people in this small country. If the Arabs leave the country, it will be broad and wide-open for us. And if the Arabs stay, the country will remain narrow and miserable. When the War is over and the English have won, and when the judges sit on the throne of Law, our people must bring their petitions and their claim before them; and the only solution is Eretz Israel, or at least Western Eretz Israel, without Arabs. There is no room for compromise on  this point!The Zionist enterprise so far, in terms of preparing the ground and paving the way for the creation of the Hebrew State in the land of Israel, has been fine and good in its own time, and could do with “land-buying”–but this will not bring about the State of Israel; that must come all at once, in the manner of a Salvation (this is the secret of the Messianic idea); and there is no way besides transferring the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer them all; except maybe for Bethlehem, Nazareth and Old Jerusalem, we must not leave a single village, not a single tribe. And the transfer must be directed to Iraq, to Syria, and even to Transjordan. For that purpose we’ll find money, and a lot of money. And only with such a transfer will the country be able to absorb millions of our brothers, and the Jewish question shall be solved, once and for all. There is no other way out.”1 –Joseph Weitz.  

(Palestine) “…has been consecrated in the hands of our nation for thousands of years. For the Jews of this land there cannot be any partners.”2 –Chaim Herzog.

“We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here. In considerable areas of the country [the total area was about 6 percent] we bought the lands from the Arabs. Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahalal [Dayan’s own village] arose in the place of Mahalul, Gevat–in the place of Jibta, [Kibbutz] Sarid –in the place of Haneifs, and Kefar Yehoshua–in the place of Tell Shaman. There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population. [Ha-Aretz, April 4, 1969.”–Moshe Dayan. 3   

Palestinians did not kick Jews out of their lands
or take them into captivity for Jews to

kick Palestinians off their lands and
force them into refugee-hood!

In his book The Question Of Palestine Edward Said has given chilling details of this Jewish machination to not only evict the native Palestinians and occupy their lands, but to bar them from ever returning to their homes (as the present-day drive to prevent the Palestinians from returning to Palestine) and to erase all evi-dences of Palestinian history from Palestine (as noted by Dayan above).
   Ismail Zayid Palestine–A Stolen Heritage (a booklet pub; by The Middle East Action Committee) is also informative.
   And in his book Pirates And Emperors, Old and New, International Terrorism in the Real World Prof. Noam Chomsky has given an insight into Jewish and American atrocities; as well as government practice of “thought control.” 
   These books are a necessity for those who are interested in knowing what the government is not telling the people as well as to know the truth about events rather than digesting the white-washed crud the media is feeding us.

Regarding the Toronto International Film Festival, September 2009. The “Israeli” film about the city of “Tel Aviv” was oppo-sed by some people; seemingly because it promotes “Israel” in the face of its atrocities against the Palestinians.
This opposition was not a criticism of “Israel” or anti-Semitism. Neither was it a “blacklisting” of the film-makers–many books and movies are banned yet there were no “blacklisting” of the authors of these materials.

   If speaking out against “Israeli” injustice is criticism and anti-Semitism then speaking out against the “holocaust” would be criticism of Germany and anti-Teutonism.
   Speaking out against Jewish/“Israeli” atrocities or injustices is not criticism or anti-Semitism. Truth is not criticism or Anti-Semitism –Truth is truth! 
  Moreover, no person or nation (or any other entity) is beyond criticism or reproach.  To stifle “criticism” of any person, nation (or any other entity) a democracy would be no better than the tyranny it opposes or reviles. This democracy would then be worse than tyranny: it would be “hypocrisy”!

   As noted above, Moshe Dayan is noted as stating: “We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish state here….You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you, because these geography books no longer exist; the Arab villages are not there either. …There is not one place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.” 
 That the Canadian city of Toronto was built on destroyed native villages is no justification for “Tel Aviv” or “Israel” being built on destroyed Arab villages. Committing one wrong/evil and using another such wrong/evil committed in the past to defend or justify it is not only absurd, but no self-respecting individual would condone such an act or accept such an argument.  

   Using the argument that because (two hundred years ago) Canada destroyed “indigenous villages” to build the city of Toronto (or any other city) then it is acceptable for Jews to build “Tel Aviv” (or any other city) on destroyed Arab villages. One might counter-argue that since (two thousand years ago) Jews massacred the Amorites and the other thirty kingdoms–(Joshua 12:7-24), why skewer Hitler for killing “six million” Jews? Why isn’t this also acceptable? (If it be argued that Jews had Divine sanction to slaughter, Hitler, a Christian, may have had his own “communion with God”–who knows? And considering that Allāh, God, says that He will have Jews chastised to the Resurrection (for not fulfilling their covenant with Him, which requires them to follow the Prophet Mohammad–Qur’an 7:168; Deut; 18:18-19); maybe this was one such chastisement. (There seems to be Jews who are of the belief that Hitler acted under Divine direction. The simplest and quickest way to end the Palestinian-Jewish conflict would be for Jews to fulfill their covenant with God by following Islam; this would also end their chastisement to the Resurrection).

If Jews wanted a home only they would have taken
the land Britain offered them in Uganda.

Jewish flaming obsession to depopulate Palestine of the native Palestinians and to populate it with alien Jews is fueled by the delusional beliefs that they have a God-given right to Palestine and that they are “the most superior of all races”–a mentality that can, and do, lead to unspeakable horrors against others to satisfy this end; as is evident of the gross humiliation and degradation and periodic “en masse” slaughter of the Palestinians. The Jewish, “KHUZARI BOOK, which is approved by the office of education. In the introduction to the book Dr. Tzifroni writes:

“The nation of Israel is a chosen nation because of its race, its education and the climate of the land in which it was brought up. The race of the Israeli people is the most superior of all races””4.
(And Hitler was pilloried [still is] for his view that Germans is the master race. If supremacy is based on race, residency, and knowledge; then Palestinians/Arabs are the “most superior of all races”; having resided in Palestine for six thousand years, is the best nation, as Allāh says in His Qur’an, and has given Muslims knowledge that brought light to the world –at a time when Jews and everyone else were running around with flint tools and torches). 

   As to those who are proud of their so-called high-birth:

“And the Lord God formed man of

the dust of the ground

“So God created male and female…and said

unto them, Be fruitful and multiply.”

(Genesis 2:7; 1:27-28).

“He (Allāh) began the creation of man from dust

Then He made his progeny of an extract,

of worthless water (i.e. semen and ovum)”

“O mankind, surely We have created

you from a male and a female

“Surely We have created man from a drop

of mingled sperm (sperm mixed with ovum

or through the act of sexual intercourse)

(Qur’an 32:7-8; 49:13; 76:2).

   How rightly then the Prophet Mohammad gave the celestially and profoundly perfect answer to this mis-shapen mentality (of high-birth) that is unworthy not only of the enlightened Twen-tieth century but unworthy of all centuries. Said the magnificent Messenger of Allāh that whoever prides himself on being of high-birth ‘tell him to bite on his father’s penis’.5 (that is where he came from; that is the lowly beginning from where we all came). And the Prophet made it the point that when using this saying not to alter the word “penis” so as to make it a delicate expression; (the proud one must face the full impact of his vain pride; that his pride originated from or lies in his father’s “penis”).

   One is “superior” to the other only through his belief in God and doing good deeds.

(Reflectively, we are expected to take a stand against anti-Semitism. Yet when we expose Jewish atrocities we are invariably confronted with the hypocritical walls of “anti-Semitism” and “hatred” of Jews.
               Truth is not “Anti-Semitism”!
                     Truth is not “hatred”!

                  Truth is not “anti-Jewish!
                           Truth is truth!

-If “truth” is “anti-Semitism” and “hatred” then the “holocaust” memorials are to be obliterated for being “anti-Nazism” and “hatred” against Hitler and Germans.

-If “truth” is “anti-Semitism” and “hatred” then our yearly serving of The Ten Commandments and the occasional dose of the “holocaust” movies (as well as the “holocaust” sob stories saturating the newsprint) are to be fed to the cats as being “anti-Arabism” and “anti-Nazism,” and “hatred” against Egyptians and Germans, respectively.

-If “truth” is “anti-Semitism” and “hatred” against Jews then the Bible–The Old Testament and the New–and the Qur’an would need to be outlawed.

Those who make a charge of “anti-Semitism” must prove that they are descendants of Shem –one of the three sons of Noah– and also a descendant from one of the Twelve Tribes of Jacob/Israel.

   Those who make a charge of “hatred against Jews” must define who or what a Jew is.

   [A Muslim is one who professes that There is no God but Allāh; Mohammad is the Messenger of Allāh].

A mentality that expects its virtue to be extolled and its vice suppressed is a mentality that needs to cultivate dignity and maturity).

   Jewish belief in an eschatological Messiah –the coming of a king in the last days to redeem the Israelites– is also delusional.  “The Old Testament never speaks of an eschatological Messiah.”6

(Interestingly, Jews were awaiting the return of Elias, but as Jesus told them: “Elias is come already, and they knew him not” because Elias came in the person of John the Baptist–(Matthew 17:10-13).

   God sending a Messiah to redeem Jews and their land would contradict His decree that power and prophethood would be taken from the Israelites, who are to follow Shiloh–(Gen. 49: 10); contradict His sending a prophet like Moses, whom the Is-raelites are to follow–(Deut. 18:15-19); contradict His sending the Comforter who will give “all truth”–(John 14:15-16; 16:12-13); contradict His taking His kingdom from Jews and giving it to another people–(Matt. 21:43); contradict His decree that Jerusalem would cease to be the focus of Divine worship–(John 4:21; Isaiah 60:7; 65:15; Haggai 2:9; Mal. 1:11); contradict His send-ing “another” angel with the “everlasting gospel”–(Rev. 14:6. As the “everlasting gospel” was yet to come and is now here the BIBLE IS RENDERED OBSOLETE); and also contradict His decree to chastise Jews to the Resurrection (unless they accept Islam).

   And which Shiloh and prophet like Moses and Comforter and “another angel” is, indisputably, the Prophet Mohammad; and which new centre of worship is the Ka’ba in Makkah which is for all people; and which “another people” who received the kingdom taken from the Jews are the Muslims; and which “ever-lasting gospel” is the Qur’an, having “all truth.”

   Thus, as Judaism was Divinely decreed to end upon the advent of Mohammad, “spiritually the Jewish religion has no future.”7

(In his book Muhammad In The Bible Prof. ‘Abdul Ahad Dawud, the former Rev. David Benjamin Keldani, has dealt at length with Biblical prophecies fulfilled in the person of the Prophet Mohammad).

   In His Qur’an Allāh says of the Israelites, “twice would they do mischief on the earth;” “when the latter promise came, We brought you all rolled up (or gathered in a mingled crowd)–Qur’an 17:4-7, 104).

   After the first warning–Jerusalem was destroyed by the Baby-lonians in 6c.BC–Allah gave Jews prosperity–(Qur’an 17:6). After the second warning–Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD–Allāh says: “It may be that your Lord will have mercy on you. And if you return (to mischief), We will return to punishment”–(Qur’an 17:7-8).

(Jews did return to mischief: violating their agreement of mutual protection with the Prophet Mohammad by sid-ing with the enemies; and feigning conversion to Islam to create dissension among Muslims–Qur’an 3:71. For 20th Century Jewish “mischief” read Prof Noam Chom-sky, Pirates and Emperors, Old and New, International Terrorism in the Real World, pub; by Between the Lines, Toronto, Canada; Edward said, The Question of Pales-tine, pub; by TIMES BOOKS, New York; both of which can be obtained from local libraries; and Ismail Zayid’s booklet, Palestine–A Stolen Heritage; pub; by The Mid-dle East Action Committee. Perhaps in their occupying/ usurping of Palestine Jews are setting up themselves for another Divine chastisement–Qur’an 7:167. Maybe the hands of Allāh, God are already tightening around their feet.

   On Allāh’s decree that “It may be that your Lord will have mercy on you. And if you return (to mischief), We will return to punishment” Muhammad Ali notes: “This relates to the advent of the Holy Prophet Muhammad, when the Israelites were again given a chance to reform, but they are told that if they return to mischief they will again be punished. When the Holy Prophet came to Madinah, the Jews were at first in a conciliatory mood, but their enmity increased day by day, until they joined hands with the enemies of Islam, devising plans to take his very life. The result was that they were swept out of Arabia, while their lot in all other countries of the world has always been one of hard trials and severe afflictions, and spiritually the Jewish religion has no future”).

   That after the second warning/latter promise Allāh gathered Jews does not mean Jews are to be gathered at a future date after the Prophet, as in 1948. Allāh already “gathered” (past tense) the Jews; this concurs with the verse that “when the second of the warnings came to pass we gathered you in a mingled crowd”: warning already “came,” they were already “gathered” or “rolled up.” Jews were in a “mingled crowd” of Arabs, Africans, Arme-nians and Persians in pre-Islamic Arabia. Jews can only be ‘gathered together in a mingled crowd’ if they are among non-Jews and are under dominion; not if they are in an entity of their own and have dominion over others–“mingled crowd” cannot mean the twelve Jewish tribes living together: if so, Jews were already “mingled” when they left Egypt and occupied Palestine under Joshua. Also, a Jew could hardly identify himself tribally: they may all now be of the same tribe. Arthur Koestler con-vincingly theorized in his book The Thirteenth Tribe that present day Jewry may not be Biblical Jews but descendants of the Khazar–an 8th century Turkish tribe–that converted to Judaism. The twelve Jewish tribes living together is not a “mingled crowd”: they are collectively one unit termed “Children of Israel.”

   When a document is completed or the term of a thing is ended, it is idiomatically referred to as being “rolled up” or “gathered.” Allāh “rolling up”/“gathering” Jews means their term in spiritual leadership has come to an end, which “rolling up”/“gathering” finds resonance in the prophecy of the prophet Jacob that king-ship and prophethood shall pass from the Israelites to another people; Moses’ saying that Jews are to follow the prophet like him; Jesus’ sayings that the kingdom of God shall be taken from the Jews and given to another people, and Jerusalem would cea-se to be the focus of Divine worship–(Gen. 49:10; Deut; 18:18-19; Matt. 21:43; John 4:21).

   It is doubtful that Allāh, God, would then dispossess the be-lieving Palestinians–who are not of “wickedness,” or “stiff-necked” or “rebellious,” but worship Him in His Purity as the One and Only, the Eternal Absolute, Who begets not nor is begotten, Who is the Incomparable, and Who has no “chosen people” to the exclusion of others and Who needs no “blood sacrifice” to forgive sins–and give their land to Jews who are “stiffnecked,” “rebellious,” “provocative,” and have lost the kingdom of God; killed the prophets of God and even tried to kill God’s “only begotten son” (Jesus), on whose head was poured all the righteous blood from Abel to Zacharias son Barachias, and whose house is cursed into desolation; and most of whom are faithless, treacherous, transgressors, on whom His curse is upon, and whom He has declared to subject to severe torment to the day of Resurrection–(Ex. 33:3; Deut. 9:7; 31:27; Isaiah 65:2-3; Matt. 21:43; 23:31-38. Qur’an 2:88-89; 2:100; 5:13; 5:81; 2:88-89; 7:167. That Jews do not believe in Jesus and Mohammad is of no significance. Jews cannot dispute Jesus’ claim to be a prophet of God as he taught and as substantiated by the Qur’an. Neither can Jews dispute the Divineness of the Qur’an and Messengership of Mohammad. Even if we omit Jesus and the Qur’an there is still the verdict of the Old Testament to contend with). 

   To argue that these pronouncements were applicable only to Jews of ancient times, the claim that ‘God gave us this land’ would also be redundant. Such argument would deny the Omni-science of God and the prophecies listed in this presentation; including that of Jesus that the kingdom of God shall be taken from the Jews and given to another people.

   The favor of God is not a family inheritance or social privilege that one can lay claim to at will.

(Allāh, God, subjecting Jews to torment to the Resur-rection is only so because of Jews not fulfilling their part of their covenant with Him; which covenant necessitates them following the prophet foretold by Moses, as men-tioned in the Book of Deuteronomy 18:18-19; and which prophet the Jewish leaders knew to be the Prophet Mohammad–(Qur’an 2:146; 73:15. Also 61:6). It is for this reason that no one can “exterminate” the Jews–be-cause Allāh   has declared to chastise them to the Resur-rection; after each torment, Allāh raises the Jews again, giving them the opportunity to fulfill their part of their covenant with Him–(Qur’an 7:168). Jews accepting the Prophet Mohammad might also end the conflict in Pal-estine. Jews becoming Muslims would not only fulfill their covenant with God and put an end to their torment to the Resurrection, but would secure their position in Palestine, as they would now belong to the brotherhood of Muslims and Islam).

   As stated, Jews could not be promised an eschatological Mes-siah and return to the Holy Land seeing that they are required by Allāh, God, to follow Islam.

The mendacious maneuver:

“the dispersion of the Palestinians was not a fact of nature but a result of specific force and strategies.”–Edward Said.

Arabs and Jews are both descended from Abraham. Abraham came to Canaan (Palestine) about 2400 B.C. Canaanite civiliza-tion dates back beyond 4000 B.C.

   Palestinians are the “Arabised” descendants of the Philistines and pre-Abrahamic Canaanites who inhabited Palestine centuries before the arrival of the Children of Israel, following their free-dom from Egypt, in the 13th century. B.C. Thus, whereas Jewish presence in Palestine dates back less than 3,500 years, Palestin-ian existence exceeds 6000 years. Further, as Edward Said points out, “the entire historical duration of a Jewish state in Palestine prior to 1948 was a sixty-year period two millennia ago.”8 Thus, it is the Palestinians whose roots are anchored the “earliest” and the “deepest,” and are the “most persistent” in Palestine.

   Since “the entire historical duration of a Jewish state in Pales-tine prior to 1948 was a sixty-year period two millennia ago,” compared to their centuries of life under Pharaoh, it is not Pales-tine but Egypt where Jews have their “earliest” and “deepest” and “most persistent” roots. In fact, those who currently call themselves Jews may not even be of the lineage of the Biblical fathers but of the Khazars–an eighth-century Turkish tribe that converted to Judaism. In which event Jews “earliest” and “deep-est” and “most persistent” roots” would be in Turkey. Maybe even in Russia.

   As the horn of history unclogs she may yet sound the muffled truth that Biblically there is no Jew.

   Like many other Muslim countries, Palestine was part of the Muslim Khilafat (Union) (the Ottoman Empire) based in Turkey. “In 1915, Great Britain encouraged the Arabs to join with her against Turkey, promising them independence after the war,” as noted by Ismail Zayid, but after Turkey was defeated the British proved treacherous, making what was known as the Sykes-Picot agreement in which Britain, France and Russia would carve up between themselves “the Arab countries and part of Turkey.”

(And on to this day Muslim yet trust these countries; and even though the illustrious Messenger of Allāh admonishes us that a Muslim does not get stung twice from the same hole).   

   To capitalize on Jewish influence in the Bolshevik party and keep Russia on Britain’s side in the war, Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary, in November 1917, informed Lord Rothschild, a British Jew and banker, that: “His Majesty’s Government views with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people…”9  

   But Britain reneged on her promise. (What else is new?) The result was Jewish “terrorism” directed against the British. Even-tually, the British gave up its mandate over Palestine.

   Shortly “after 1945” the American Government, under Presi-dent Harry Truman, took the lead in the creation of a Jewish State in Palestine. To acquire the two-thirds majority of votes in the UN needed to partition Palestine, Ismail Zayid notes:

“Sumner Welles affirmed: “By direct order of the White House, every form of pressure, direct or indirect, was brought to bear by American officials upon those coun-tries outside the Moslem world, that were known to be either uncertain or opposed to Partition.”” And “James Forrestal, then U.S. Secretary of Defense, wrote: “The methods that had been used to bring coercion and duress on other nations in the General Assembly bordered closely on scandal.””10

   No Court of Justice would view as one’s legal property an item acquired through “pressure” and/or “coercion and duress.”

(Where are the Muslim, and other just individuals, legal brains to challenge this illegally created Zionist entity in the World Court?) 

   Britain had no right to promise Muslim/Arab lands to Jews for a national homeland. America had no right to “pressure” non-Muslim countries to vote for the Partition Plan.

   The U.N. was not the sovereign owner of Palestine to apportion this land between Arab and non-Arab.*

*(“Non-Arab” instead of Jews, is used to illustrate the mendacity of His Majesty’s Government: in the Balfour Declaration, Arabs are referred to as “non-Jewish.” Would the British people accept being referred to as the “non-Jewish” population, or as the “non-black” sector of Britain? To refer to Arabs in their own country and who were the majority as “non-Jewish” is blatant British arrogance11).

   Given the political “war” fought by the U.S. in the U.N. and the Jews terrorist massacre of the Arabs at Deir Yassin to accomplish their purpose, this Jewish occupation of Palestine may be equated with German occupation of France. And to fault Palestinians/Arabs for taking up arms to reclaim their country would be to fault the Allies of World war II for liberating France.

   In fact, Jewish occupation of Palestine is more deplorable than German occupation of France: Germans did not massacre French

“old men, women, children, newly-born” as a prelude to their occupation of France as Jews massacred Arabs. Ismail Zayid has noted this massacre in his Palestine–A Stolen Heritage (pp. 11-12):

“On 9th April 1948, the Irgun Zwei Leumi led by Menachem Beigin (who later became a Prime Minister of Occupied Palestine) ….attacked the small Arab village of Deir Yassin near Jerusalem. An account of this barbaric massacre was given by Jacques de Reynier, the Chief Delegate of the International Red Cross, who was able to reach the village and witness the aftermath of the massacre: “Three hundred persons” he said, “were massacred….without any military reason or provocation of any kind; old men, women, children, newly-born were savagely murdered with grenades and knives by Jewish troops of the Irgun, entirely under the control of their chiefs.

Dov Joseph, one time Governor of the Israeli sector of Jerusalem and later Minister of Justice, called the Deir Yassin massacre “deliberate and unprovoked attack.” Arnold Toynbee described it as comparable to crimes committed against the Jews by Nazis. But “Menachem Beigin said “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.(Massacring defenseless old men, women, children and newly-born a “victory”?). Unashamed of their deed and unaffected by world con-demnation, the Zionist forces, using loud-speakers, roamed the streets of the cities warning Arab inhabitants “The Jericho road is still open,” they told Jerusalem Arabs– “Fly from Jerusalem before you are killed, like those in Deir Yassin.”(Italics/emphasis added).

That Palestinians were terrorized into fleeing their homes, Britannica: “The Irgun stormed and captured the village of Deir Yasin and massacred much of the population, terrorizing the Arab villagers, who began a mass exodus from Palestine.” (15th Edn; Vol. 17, p. 960. Italics/emphasis added.      

     (Regarding this massacre at Deir Yassin, as noted above, Ismail Zayid here quotes from the 1951 publication of Menachem Beigin’s book The Revolt, Story of the Irgun: “Menachem Beigin said “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.”

   However, the “Revised Edition” titled The Revolt and published 1983 by W.H. Allen, London, does not have these words by Beigin: “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.” Page 164 of this Revised Edition says in its footnote that this massacre at Deir Yassin was an “Arab…propaganda to smear the Irgun. ….The “Dir Yassin Massacre” lie is still propagated by Jew-haters all over the world.”

   But the Deir Yassin massacre could not be “a lie” when: (1) Beigin, the leader of the Irgun, himself is said to have declared that there was a massacre: “The massacre was not only justified, but there would not have been a state of Israel without the victory at Deir Yassin.”

   (2) there was an eyewitness to the aftermath of this massacre: “An account of this barbaric massacre was given by Jacques de Reynier, the Chief Delegate of the International Red Cross, who was able to reach the village and witness the aftermath of the massacre.”

   (3) There is a historical account of this massacre: Britannica, probably the world’s most recognized source of reference and accurate recorder of history states that there was a massacre: “The Irgun stormed and captured the village of Deir Yassin and massacred much of the population.”

   (4) Dov Joseph, a prominent Israeli, called the Deir Yassin massacre “deliberate and unprovoked attack.”  

(Reflectively, when anyone denies the “holocaust” or speak against it they are hauled before the judge; labeled “Jew hater” and “anti-Semite.” But there was no outcry against these deniers of the Deir Yassin massacre: no one was hauled into court, or labeled “Arab hater” or “anti-Arab.”  Perhaps when discussion(s) about the Revision-ist(s) of history are conducted, Beigin’s statement on this massacre at Deir Yassin should be on the agenda).

   It is not terrorism to fight the occupier/usurper. It is heroism!

   That ‘God gave us this land’ as justification to dispossess Palestinians of their country is one of the three biggest crocks peddled under the name of God and religion–the other two big-gest crocks are: that God has a “chosen people” to the exclusion of other people, and that God has a son.

   God did not promise to fulfill His covenant to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob twice.

   U.S. President, Harry Truman (and the UN) is not God or prophet of God. In fact, when Truman was asked by one reporter about his haste in recognizing the Jewish state, as to “What was all the hurry for? Do you not know that there are more than a hundred million Arabs there, who would be offended by us?” Truman replied “There are no Arabs in my constituency.”12 No devotee of God would entertain that God would replace one people with another to satisfy man’s political agenda.

   Interestingly, Ahmed Deedat notes (through his knowledge of two South African Jews experience, as he wrote), that: “One of the above Jews bemoaned the biggest joke in Israel. If you ask any Jew in Israel, “Who gave you Palestine?” (They have all programmed themselves with the idea of Genesis 17:8…..). Without the slightest hesitation every Jew will reply ‘GOD!’ That it was God Almighty who had given Palestine to the Jews. But over 75% of the Israeli Jews if questioned, “Do you believe in God?” They immediately respond with “NO!” Yet these atheist and agnostic Jews falsely use God’s name for their usur-pation of the land of the Palestinians.”13  

   God says He had chosen the earlier Children of Israel because they were a “holy people,” that He “loved” them, and because He “would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers” –(Deut. 7:6, 8; 10:15).

(These earlier Israelites whom God “loved” were those preceding liberation from Pharaoh, as the liberated ones from the time of their leaving Egypt were provocative, stiff-necked, and rebellious: “Remember, and forget not, how thou provokedst the Lord thy God to wrath in the wilderness: from the day that thou didst depart out of the land of Egypt, until ye came unto this place, ye have been rebellious against the Lord”–Deut. 9:7; 31:27. And Ex. 33:3; Isaiah 65:2-3. These rebellious Jews, twenty years and older, perished without reaching the land that God promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel–(Num. 14:20-35. The later Israelites also were “provo-cative,” “rebellious,” “treacherous,” “transgressor,” and an “impudent children and stiffhearted,”–Isaiah 65:2-3; Jerem. 5:11, 23; Ezek. 2:3-4; Hosea 5:3-7).

   And that His grace upon the later Israelites was dependent upon them keeping His commandment (one of which was for them to follow the prophet like Moses which “prophet like Moses” is the Prophet Mohammad–Deut. 18:18-19. Qur’an 46:10; 73:15):

“Wherefore it shall come to pass, if you hearken to these judgments, and keep, and do them, that the Lord thy God shall keep unto thee the covenant and the mercy which he sware unto thy fathers”–(Deut. 7:12).

   And this covenant that God swore is that of Genesis 17:8; God says to Abraham: “And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee…all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possess-ion.” (Notably, and significantly, Ishmael was also the “seed” of Abraham. And that God’s promise was made with Abraham not with the Israelites. And as Prof. ‘Abdul Ahad Dawud explained, and shown further on, this promise of God to Abraham was fulfilled through the descendants of Ishmael –Muslims not Jews– who were made to inherit all the territories of the Middle East).

   God’s promise was not made to the laterIsraelites (who drove Him up the wall) with their stiff-neckedness, rebellion, and provocation–(Ex. 33:3; Deut. 9:7; 31:27; Isaiah 65:2-3); nor was God’s promise made for the children of those who killed the prophets of God, lost the kingdom of God, and on whose head was poured all the righteous blood from Abel to Zacharias son Barachias, and whose house is cursed into desolation–(Matt. 23:31; 21:43; 23:31-38); and most of whom are faithless, trea-cherous, transgressors, on whom His curse is upon, and whom He has declared to subject to severe torment to the day of Resur-rection–(Qur’an 2:88-89; 2:100; 5:13; 5:81; 2:88-89; 7:167).

(That Jews do not believe in Jesus and Mohammad is of no significance. Jews cannot dispute Jesus’ claim to be a prophet of God as he taught and as substantiated by the Qur’an. Neither can Jews dispute the Divineness of the Qur’an and Messengership of Mohammad. Even if we omit Jesus and the Qur’an there is still the verdict of the Old Testament to contend with.

It is rather intriguing that Jews believe that one drop of oil kept a lamp burning for eight days –as celebrated in Hanukkah– that Moses transformed a stick into a serpent and parted the river; that the statue of a brass serpent had the power to preserve life; that Balaam’s ass spoke to Balaam; and that God Isaac to Sarah when she was “old and well stricken in age;” but do not accept Jesus as being of ‘virgin birth’ or at least as prophet of God–Exodus 7:10; 14:21; Num. 21:8-9; Num. 22:28, 30; Gen. 17:17;18:11-12). 

   To emphasize, these descendants of Abraham refer to his early descendants who were righteous –Isaac, and Jacob, who was renamed Israel by God (Gen. 35:10). These descendants are not the later Israelites descended from the Twelve Tribes of Jacob/ Israel that are described by God as being “stiff-necked” and “rebellious.”

   These later Children of Israel/Jacob’s twelve sons being made to inhabit Canaan/Palestine under Joshua–(Joshua 6:21; 12:1-24) was only incidental: incidental through God fulfilling his promise to Abraham and his early descendants Isaac and Jacob; as evidenced by God Himself; God told the later Israelites that after they are brought into the land of the wicked nations that:

“Speak not in thine heart…saying, For my righteous-ness the Lord hath brought me in to possess this land: but for the wickedness of these nations the Lord doth drive them out from before thee… and that he may perform the word which the Lord sware unto thy fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

Understand therefore, that the Lord thy God giveth thee not this good land to possess it for thy righteousness; for thou art a stiffnecked people. …from the day that thou didst depart out of the land of Egypt, until ye came unto this place, ye have been rebellious unto the Lord.” (Deut. 9:4-7).

   As clearly shown God’s covenant was made with Abraham for Isaac, Jacob not with the Children of Israel/Jacob. These later descendants of Abraham (i.e. of the Twelve tribes of Jacob/ Israel) were made to inhabit Palestine despite their “stiff-necked-ness” and “rebellion” and “provocation” only so that God could fulfill His word to Abraham and his early descendants who were the righteous ones. (And these later descendants, if they really are descendants of Jacob/Israel and not descendants of converts to Judaism), who are “stiff-necked” and “rebellious” and do not keep God’s “judgments” want God’s/Palestinians’ land. And are taking God’s name in vain to achieve their goal. God warns those who take His name in vain: “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain”–(Exodus 20:7).

   Allāh’s, God’s favor/promise does not include the wrong-doers–(Qur’an 2:124); and Biblically: “Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked–(Ex. 23:7).

   And to intrigue and dispossess the non-“wicked”, non-“stiff-necked” and non-“rebellious” Palestinians of their homes lands and country, forcing them into horrific refugee camps and, moreover, to slaughter these “innocent and righteous” Palestinians to hang on to “stolen” property as they jihad–engage in their God-given right of struggle–to reclaim their “stolen” property is “wicked” and evil.

   Jewish claim that God gave us (ancient) Palestine (because of merit) or modern Palestine–is at best fanciful, and at worst sac-rilegious.

(Notably, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were not Jews or Israelites. By nationality Abraham was a Chaldean and later a Canaanite, and Isaac and Jacob were Canaanites. And religiously, they, as all prophets, were Muslims. The term “Jew” originated from Judah, one of the twelve sons of the prophet Jacob/Israel. And the term “Israe-lite(s)” refers to the twelve sons/tribes of Jacob/Israel and their descendants.

Deuteronomy 32:43 which says: “Praise his People, O Nations: For he will avenge the blood of his servants. He will render vengeance against his adversaries and make expiation for his land and his People” does NOT refer to future nations; it refers to those nations at the time of the many “ites” kingdoms that Joshua would exterminate, so God can keep His word to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob–Deut. 7:6, 8, 12; 10:15. This is clearly stated a few verses later, in verse 49, where God showed Moses the land of Canaan: “and behold the land of Canaan, which I give unto the Children for Israel for a possession.” And this blessing was tied in to Jews following the Prophet Mohammad as stated early in the next chapter: “And this is the blessing, wherewith Moses the man of God bless-ed the Children of Israel before his death. And he said, The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them”–(Deut; 33:1-2).

If Sinai and Seir refer to Moses and Jesus, respectively, “Mount Paran is not found in any other country except Arabia, Makka being located in its valley;”14 and refers to Mohammad; the ten thousand saints is the number of followers the Prophet Mohammad had upon his conquest of Makkah; and the fiery law in his right hand is the Holy Qur’an–this shows that the Prophet Mohammad is this blessing to Jews. This prophecy of Moses is also tied in to that of Deut. 18:18-19 (noted later) that speak of the prophet like Moses that God will raise up and in whose mouth God will put His words. And these two prophecies (Deut. 33:1-2; 18:18-19) are tied in to that of Jacob as noted in Genesis 49:10 which decrees: “The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a law-giver from between his feet until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.” Prof. ‘Abdul Ahad Dawud–the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani–in his book Muhammad in the Bible, has explained this prophecy in detail to show that it cannot apply to either Moses, David, or Jesus, but, that this prophecy could relate only to the Prophet Mohammad because “Muham-mad came with military power and the Qur‘an to replace the old Jewish worn-out sceptre and the impracticable and old-fashioned law of sacrifices and of a corrupt priesthood.” Prof. Dawud notes, that the Jewish “institu-tions” of “Royal Sceptre and the Prophetical Success-ion” “have been extinct for over thirteen centuries;” and that “the tribe of Judah also has disappeared together with its royal authority and its sister –the prophetical successionboth have been out of existence for the same period of time as the advent of Mohammad.(Moreover, present-day Jews may not even be Biblical Jews, but off-springs of converts to Judaism). Thus, “The Jews are forced to accept one or the other of the two alternatives, namely, either to admit that Shiloh has come already, but that their forefathers did not recognize him (Allāh, God, says they knew Qur’an 2:146; 26:197), or to accept the fact that there exists no longer a tribe of Judah from which Shiloh will have to descend.” Moreover, the prophecy clearly states that Shiloh “is to be a total stranger to the tribe of Judah, and even to all the other tribes,” –the sceptre and the law-giver were to remain with Judah until the arrival of Shiloh. “If Shiloh be a descendant of Judah, how could those two elements [sceptre and lawgiver] cease to exist in that tribe?” Shiloh “could not be a descendant of any of the other tribes either, for the sceptre and the lawgiver were for all Israel, and not for one tribe only. This observation explodes the Christian claim as well. For Jesus is a descendant of Judah–at least from his mother’s side.” It is clear from the above that “the Jews are vainly ex-pecting the coming of another Shiloh, and that the Chris-tians are obstinately persisting in their error in believing that it was Jesus who was intended by Shiloh.” (Muhammad in the Bible, pp. 54, 55, 58, 57. “Red” added).

   Even if we put aside all the prophecies and Divine sayings against Jews. With the mischief and mayhem on their hands probably more than the hairs on their heads, to claim that the Just and impartial God is telling future “nations” to “praise” Jews (or “acclaim” them or “re-joice” with them as other translations have) has to be a fantastic fantasy; or morbid delusion:

“Keep thee far from a false matter;

             and the innocent and righteous slay thou not:

            for I will not justify the wicked”

                 (Ex. 23:7).

         “My covenant does not include the

         wrong-doers, said He (Allāh, God)”

    (Qur’an 2:124).

Jews salvation lies in them following Mohammad/Islam).

   On the secular plane. Using ancestry to justify the occupation/usurpation of the land of another would give the descendants of Columbus the legality to occupy the Americas (where there were no natives); would give the descendants of the slaves brought to America and to the West Indies the right to claim their ancestral homelands in Africa; would give the native Indians the right to reclaim North, South and Central Americas; and would give the Mexicans the right to re-take San Diego, which was taken from them in their war with America.

   This theft of Palestine would not have been possible had Muslims adhered to the words of the All-Knowing Allāh and His magnificent Messenger to not divide ourselves; and to have military preparedness–not for offense/aggression but for defense (And yet we divide ourselves. And we expect Allāh to grant us Jannah).

The nauseating injustice:

At the time of Partition of Palestine Jews were 34% of the population and owned less than 6% of the land. Yet the Plan allotted Jews 56% of the land including the valuable coast-land, 42% for a Palestinian state and 1% as an international sector.

   What would you do should your Government forcibly squeezes you and family into forty-four percent of your house and put a homeless family of fewer members into the remaining fifty-six percent; and give this homeless people title of ownership to this fifty-six percent of yourproperty? And whereas members of your family do not have the right to come and live in your house, members of the homeless people born anywhere in the world has the right to live in your house–whereas a Jew born anywhere in the world has automatic citizenship to Palestine, a Palestinian born in Jaffa, his own country, is a refugee. This is the reality and injustice Palestinians face.

No one in the world –No King or Queen or Prince or pauper or President or Prime Minister or doctor or lawyer or Rabbi or teacher or writer or student or peasant– would accept such an ignominious scheme and not challenge it in every way open to him and her. Yet Palestinians are forced to accept the fate that no one in the world would accept. 

   Those who criticize and condemn the Palestinians must put their dignity where their mouths are: they must swallow this unpalatable bit of morsel the fearless and forbearing Palestinians are being force-fed for sixty-years now–they must give half of their property to the homeless and half of their country to the natives or ethnic sector for their State; they must suffer what the Palestinians have suffered and endure what the Palestinians are enduring and accept what the Palestinians are forced to accept.

Jews wanting a home is no legitimacy to deprive the Palestinians of theirs.

(The odd sentiment has been expressed, why go back to 1948 [when the UN ‘stole’ Palestine and gave it to the Jews].  Coming from a Muslim this would be not only a defeatist attitude but also an ignorant attitude. If Jews can go back two thousand years to ‘God gave us this land’ as justification to dispossess the Palestinians of their homes, lands, and country, certainly Palestinians can go back sixty years to assert their right to Palestine. In fact, Palestinians can go back four thousand years, seeing that their presence in Palestine predate the Jews).

In the modern era, no other people have been the victim of such long-suffering human sav-agery as the Palestinians. 

The arrogance:

   It is claimed that Jews could live with the “other”; that the Arabs did not want the Jews to “exist” in Palestine; that the Arabs want to “exterminate” the Jews. But the indelible truth is, it was Jews that did not want to exist with Palestinians, it was the Zionist’s declared scheme to rid Palestine of Palestinians. From their own declarations, Jews are the ones who have tried to “ex-terminate” the Arabs from Palestine.

Read Edward Said, The Question of Palestine

and Ismail Zayid Palestine–A Stolen Heritage.

   Theodor Herzl wrote that Jews would have to “spirit the penniless” Arabs out of Palestine “while denying” them “employment in our own country”16 (??? our “own” country? How did Pales-tine become your country? Arrogance at its peak).

   As noted at the beginning, Joseph Weitz wanted an Israel “without Arabs.17

   Chaim Weizman “promised” that ““Palestine will be as Jewish as England is English.””18

   Israel Zangwill envisioned “a land without people for a people without land”19–in other words a land without Arabs for Jews who had no land.

   And Theodor Herzl envisioned the Jewish state to stretch from Turkey to Egypt: ““The northern frontier is to be the mountains facing Cappadocia (in Turkey), the southern, the Suez.””20

   Moshe Dayan, as Chief of Staff of the Jewish army is noted as stating in 1952: ““It lies upon the Israeli army to carry out the fight with the ultimate objective of erecting the Israeli em-pire.””21. (And this was only a meager four years after their occupation of Palestine).   And as Jewish general, Dayan boasted after their victory in the 1967 six-day war with Egypt and Syria: ““Our fathers had reached the frontiers which was recognised in the Partition Plan. Our generations reached the frontiers of 1949. Now the six-day generation have managed to reach Suez, Jordan and the Golan Heights. This is not the end. After the present ceasefire lines, there will be new ones. They will extend beyond Jordan – perhaps to Lebanon and perhaps to Central Syria as well.”22 (How is he so certain there will be new ceasefire lines? Seems like it is their plan to instigate wars and occupy more territory? Clearly, from their own declarations and actions Jews had no intention of having only a home-land; their ideal was/is to occupy/usurp all of Palestine).

   These are some of the declarations of the people who project themselves to the world as “doves of peace and examples of injured innocence.”23

   Ismail Zayid notes from William Zuckerman who wrote in the “Jewish Newsletter, December 1958”:

““To this observer, nothing demonstrates more sharply the terribly uncanny power of modern propaganda to control minds, sway emotions and brutalize people than the Zionist propaganda on the Arab refugees during the last decade. It literally succeeded in turning black into white, a big blatant lie into truth, a grave social injustice into an act of justice glorified by thousands. It has turned clever people with more than average intelligence into starry-eyed fools, believing everything they are told; and has converted kindly and gentle men and women with a strong sense of mercy into callous fanatics, insensible to the suffering of any people except their own. In no other way can this writer explain the many paradoxes which the Arab refugee problem has created in Jewish life.””24      

   Keep blaming the victims long enough and hard enough and soon you will have the uninformed and the unthinking parroting your every twisted syllable.

   Professor Noam Chomsky notes “Israeli diplomat Chaim Her-zog, later President” (enunciating in 1972): “I do not deny the Palestinians a place or stand or opinion on every matter…But certainly I am not prepared to consider them as partners in any respect in a land that has been consecrated in the hands of our nation for thousands of years. For the Jews of this land there cannot be any partners.”25 (Who is a Jew? And can Chaim Herzog and those who parrot him prove that he is descended from any of the twelve tribes of the prophet Jacob/Israel?)

   Herzog’s claim is either Jewish grandstanding, arrogance, or ignorance of Scripture. Or all three. God does not make a thing holy by putting it in the hands of the “stiffnecked” and the “rebellious” and who did not fulfill their covenant. This “land” was not “consecrated” in the hands of Jews. Jews were given control of this land–which control lasted for a mere “sixty years” instead of the bally-hooed “thousands of years”–because, as already noted, of God fulfilling His promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob–(Deut. 9:4-7). Paramountly, God’s covenant does not include wrong-doers. And Allāh, God, promised to have Jews chastised to the Resurrection–(Qur’an 7:167). Jews having lost this land recourse to it could hardly be made under the name of God–perhaps, Jerusalem being destroyed and Jews taken into captivity was one such Divine chastisement.

   Jews who are “stiffnecked” and “rebellious;” have killed the prophets of God, and even tried to kill God’s “only begotten son” (Jesus); having lost the kingdom of God; on whom are God’s curse; most of whom are faithless, treacherous, and trans-gressors; and would be tormented to the Resurrection; and are yet to fulfill their covenant with God could hardly trumpet any claim to special Divine gifts.

   That God would dispossess the believing Palestinians of their homes, lands, and country and give them to a people who are “stiffnecked,” “rebellious,” have lost the kingdom of God; killed the prophets of God and even tried to kill God’s “only begotten son” (Jesus); and most of whom are faithless, treacherous, trans-gressors, on whom His curse is upon, and whom He has declared to subject to severe torment to the day of Resurrection; is not only hilarious but must be the biggest joke of creation!

   That Jewish presence in Palestine would be transitory is evident from the fact that not only did they not fulfil their cove-nant with God–which necessitates them following Mohammad as per Deut; 18:18–19–but that God had decreed power and prophethood to the Israelites to end with the advent of Shiloh (who has been shown to be the Prophet Mohammad)–(Genesis 49:10), and that the kingdom of God will be taken from Jews and given to another people–(Matt. 21:43).

(As shown further on, this “land” was “consecrated in the hands of” Abraham and Ishmael but Jews “effaced” the name of “Ishmael” from Genesis 22:2, 6, 7 and inserted in its place “Isaac”–at no time was Isaac Abraham’s “only son”: Isaac was born fourteen years after Ishmael. Equally significant, whereas Jews are a meager millions in number it is Muslims whose numbers are “like the stars and the sands on the seashore,” a literal fulfillment of the prophecy of Genesis 22:17; and Muslims are the only ones to have conquered and owned all the lands of the Middle East, until the Middle East was treacherously divided by Britain, France and Russia under their secretive “Sykes-Picot Agreement.” And Palestine was “shanghaied” and given to Jews).

This “land” is the moral, social, historical, and spiritual heritage of Palestinians and all Muslims. No amount of Jewish strutting or verbal “acrobatics” can negate this indelible and Divine truth!

(Another preposterous reason advanced as justification for Jewish occupation/usurpation of Palestine is that Jews make the ‘desert bloom.’ As if Palestinians did not cultivate the land–the Palestinians’ wheatfields at Akraba razed by Jews using American Piper jets must have sprung up by magic. Jews can even make the tar talk, they can even make the rock sing, they can even make the snow dance this is no justification to dispossess Pal-estinians of their lands).

   Arabs are charged as being “enemies” of Jews. But Arabs did not transgress against Jews. Arabs did not scheme and occupy Jewish lands. It is not the Arabs that are the “enemies” of Jews. It is the other way around: it is the Jews who are the “enemies” of the Arabs.

(And. Lest we forget! It was the Muslim Salahhuddin Ayyube –the Majestic Saladin– who brought Jews back to Jerusalem from where they were barred by the Christians. And this is how Jews repay Muslims/Arabs’ benevolence and love –with hatred, intrigue, massacre, expulsion, occupation/usurpation and more than sixty years of torture, humiliation, and barbarism; they devour the hand that fed them! But this could hardly have been unexpected; considering that they were treacherous to God–breaking their covenant with Him27–and were arrogant/ungrateful to their prophet–telling Moses to go and fight while they sit and wait–(Num. 14:1-4; Qur’an 5:22-24); killed the prophets of God–(Matt. 23:31-35, and even tried to kill God’s “only begotten son,” Jesus); was treacherous towards the Prophet Mohammad; and tried to deceive Muslims–(Qur’an 3:71); and as M. H. Haykal points out “their opposition and hostility were never open;”28 and in post-1948 Palestine they colluded with France and Britain and attacked Egypt so Britain could “occupy” Egypt’s Suez Canal;29 were the first air-plane hijackers in the Mid-East;30 and provoked the war in Lebanon.31 And “Ariel Sharon” “advised that the way to deal with demonstrators is to “cut off their testi-cles.””32 [Wonder what Sharon had in mind to “cut off” from female demonstrators]; through its “Operation Tro-jan” deception suckered America into bombing Libya;33 and “hijacked” a Syrian civilian jet to get “hostages.”34 [For a marathon-long list of Jewish atrocities read Noam Chomsky, Pirates and Emperors, Old And New, Interna-tional Terrorism in the Real World, and Edward Said, The Question of Palestine; if you can digest intellectual, “civilized,” and “democratic” savagery. See also SHAPED BY TERRORISM, NOURISHED BY BLOOD By Barbara L of The criminali-ty of God’s “chosen” people is so sordid it can impel even angels to arms]).

One instance of this sickening savagery against Arabs noted by the Professor:

“These included regular exercises of humiliation, such as forcing Araboushim to urinate and excrete on one another and crawl on the ground while they call out “Long Live the State of Israel” or lick the earth; or on Holocaust day, to write numbers on their own hands “in memory of Jews in the exter-mination camps.”” (p. 9).  

   And they expect to be viewed through rose-“colored glasses” and garlanded with flowery words. [Speak out against their atrocities and they are likely to become fast-er than Wyatt Earp on the “law-suit” draw].

Truth is truth! Truth is not “anti-Semitism”!

Truth is not “hatred”!

[Notably, Muslims are profiled because of 911].

   Ironically –and this is no mockery, only an observation; though some might say it is poetic justice– whereas Ariel Sharon “advised” to “cut off their [demonstrators] testicles” he now has his brains “cut off”: lying senseless/ comatose in hospital.

   Whether we call Him Ishwar, Eli, Yahweh, Allāh, At-natu or Manitou, one by one the arrogant butchers of Palestine (and of the world) are returned to God to toast for their crimes. The magnificence of it is, in the Court of Allāh, God, there is no diplomatic immunity, no legal technicality, no hung-jury/no mistrial; no bribery; no one to “pressure” or bring “coercion and duress” on; and no godfather to shield behind his coat –in fact, the godfather would be hustling for a skirt for himself to hide behind– you did the crime, or was involved in it, you toast the time. And considering that one Divine day is equal to a thousand human years, even if the maximum time spent in Hell is twelve months, in Divine terms that would be 365,000 human years. You’re well crisped!)

As noted above, Arab prisoners are made, “on Holocaust day, to write numbers on their own hands “in memory of Jews in the extermination camps.””

(When one is forced to believe and is subjected to Judiciary for denying a thing the truth of such a thing becomes highly suspect. If an event or doctrine is truth there is no necessity to legislate belief in it or to criminalize question or denial of it; proponents and opponents alike must provide proofs of their claim and let the public judge who is truthful and who is liar. To institute a law against denial of a thing is an abomination and an insult to the intellectuals and to all members of society –it may be equated with tyranny; and may be an avenue to other such legislation(s). Laws do not prevent people from being violated: laws can only bring violators to justice; laws do not sanctify or justify a claim: truth does. Forcing people to not speak out only serves to silence voices: it does not change mentality. Such a law may bring more harm than benefit –it may attract more opposition to the “truth” it professes to protect. It is a monumental disgrace that “civilized” society would allow such a law to be instituted. Such a law is repugnant to reason. And is to be repealed. Forthwith! Be it history or theology Truth stands by itself; Falsehood needs to be propped up!) 

   The despots must be having a “laugh-a-rama” at this “democratic” law: ‘and they call us tyrants. Hah!’

   It is claimed that Arabs initiated (post-Partition Palestine) war against Jews. Wrong! This war was not “initiated” by Arab counries. This conflict was “initiated” by those who “stole” Palestine. The “retaliation” by Arab countries is a natural response to this flagrant theft. If Palestine was not “stolen” there would not have been this Arab response.

   To state that this war was “initiated by Arab countries” would be like saying that World War II was “initiated” by the Allies.

(It is crass intellectual, political, and rabbinical putrefaction that Hamas does not have the right to fight for what is his; but that Jews have the right to kill for what is not theirs.

   Let’s see these “self-respecting”(?) intellectuals, politicians, and teachers of religion [and those who parrot them] accept this grotesque monstrosity for themselves that they are trying to foist onto the proud and intrepid Palestinians.

Twistedly, like Saddam Hussein being blamed for the deaths of Iraqi children from US/UN sanctions, Jewish killing of Palestinian civilians is blamed on Hamas. Why then isn’t Hamas rocketing of Jews blamed on these Jews themselves for being occupiers/usurpers, and the deaths of their children blamed on these Jewish fathers and mothers for setting their children as objects against liberation?

   Faced with threats from Jews and Christians the Prophet Mohammad is said to have prayed to Allāh to perish them.  Muslims everywhere are to pray to Allāh –individually and collectively, and privately and publicly– to send His help to Hamas to be successful, victorious, and triumphant; and for Allāh to perish these Jews and who help them in this abomination against Hamas and the Palestinians.

“So let those fight in the way of Allāh

who sell this world’s life for the Hereafter.

And whoever fights in the way of Allāh,

Be he slain or be he victorious,

We shall grant him a mighty reward.”

“And be not weak-hearted in

pursuit of the enemy.

If you suffer they (too) suffer.

And you hope from Allāh what they hope not.

And Allāh is ever Knowing, Wise.”

(Qur’an 4:74, 104).

   Muslims are the people of hope. In this world and in the next!

 So long as Jannah sits in the lap of justice Muslims will spare no dew-drop to extinguish the hell of injustice!

   Palestinians are often criticized for not accepting Partition whereas Jews accepted. Why would Jews reject this Crown Jewel of a Plan that gave them another people’s land? Why should Palestinian accept this dastard deed that ‘stole’ their land?

-The U.N. had no right to Partition Palestine–The U.N. is not the Sovereign owner of Palestine

-Britain had no right to promise Jews a homeland in Palestine–let Britain give Jews England or Scotland or Ireland or Wales (or Tristan da Cunha).

-America had no right to bring “coercion and duress,” and “pressure’ on nations to effect partition of Palestine–let America give Jews Texas or California.

-If France wants Jews to have a homeland let the French give Jews Paris or Marseilles.

-If Canada wants Jews to have a homeland let Canadians give Jews Ontario or Alberta.

-If Germany wants to atone for the “Holocaust” let the Germans give Jews half of the Fatherland.

   Let’s see the Americans and the British and the French and the Canadians swallow this unpalatable bit of morsel that their gov-ernments have been trying to force-feed the fearless and forbearing Palestinians for six torturous decades now!

   Palestinians are not to suffer for Christian's/Europe’s shame.

   Palestinians are often called to task for their creed to drive Jews into the sea. But never in the history of the Western media have Jews been called to answer for their plan to drive the Palestinians out of Palestine: and which they did.

   Palestinians are not calling for the destruction of a Jewish country: only for the return of what was “stolen” from them. Reclaiming your wallet from a robber is not depriving him of his property, the wallet being not his to begin with. (If Pike erects a tent on Crown lands, no court would charge the government with destruction of Pike’s property–the tent having no right to be there to begin with).

   Jews have a right to be there. Not the state.

(In this matter of Palestine there are writers –authors, magazines, and newspapers– who could not write truth/justice even if truth/justice was strapped to their fingers; either because of anti-Arab/anti-Muslim/anti-Islam bigotry, partisanship, patriotism, or toeing the political line. Whereas such writers may be considered “sad” and even “pathetic” the great tragedy is of those writers who could not write this truth/justice because of having traded their dignity for benefit: in the words of one brilliant poet (quoting from memory) “The mouth is muzzled by the food it eats” (or, in this instance, the hands are crimped by the gifts they take).

   For those familiar with Scripture: “And thou shalt take no gift: for the gift blindeth the wise, and perverteth the words of the righteous”–Exodus 23:8). And for “yo” judges and Rabbis and Reverends who aspire to having golf-time in Heaven instead of hard-time in Hell this is for you: “they shall judge the people with just judgment. Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift: for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the wise”–Deut. 16:18-19). Amen!  

   Palestinians are charged as not making a counter-offer in negotiating for their country. This is nauseatingly shameless. Some-one usurps your property and you must play poker with him to get lodging in it. It would be exhilarating to witness the proponents of such an argument bargain with the mugger for only a partial return of his wallet rather than its full value and to have the mugger thrown in jail and tossing the key into oblivion.

   Occasionally, reference is made to the some “850,000” Jews that were “banished” from Arab States following the dismembering of Palestine. While this eviction may have been unjusttified, there is no comparison with the Palestinians: these Jews were not dispossessed of their country, nor were they and their children massacred. In fact, the Zionist State must have welcomed this banishment, as its policy was [still is?] to dilute the Arab presence.

In modern history, if there ever was a people who had all legitimacy to rise up with whatever means and in whatever manner against the injustices perpetrated against them this right, unequivocally, belongs to the Palestinian people. It behooves not only all Muslims but also all honest human beings to support them in this striving. No human being –religionist or atheist– would expect any less from his fellow human-being for himself and herself.

   If the Allies can have the authority to take the right to stam-pede Germany out of France; if America can have the authority to take the right to devastate Iraq not once but twice–over the fictional Iraq killing Kuwaiti babies and over Iraq’s phantom weapons of mass destruction; if Britain can have the authority to take the right to sail halfway round the globe to boot Argentina off the disputed Falklands Island; if America can have the authority to take the right to bomb Libya over yet-to-be-identified bogeymen sent to assassinate Ronald Reagan; then definitely Allāh, the Sovereign Supreme, has all authority to give Palestinians/Muslims the right to reclaim Palestine. And He has given Palestinians/Muslims this right:  “And drive them out from where they drove you out”–(Qur’an 2:191).

Palestine is the moral, social, historical, and spiritual heritage of Palestinians and all Muslims:

   -Morally: they are the descendants of the natives.

   -Socially: a country is not dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the “other”(a country forced into dividing because two races militate against each other is not the same as Jewish intent to create a state, or because they desire their own state; the Sikhs and the Gypsies of Europe should petition the UN for their res-pective State in India and Europe, if only to test the integrity of the UN); those who do not wish to live with the “other” must leave. If ownership to a piece of land constitutes the right to secede from the whole, or if a country is dissected because one sector does not wish to live with the “other,” or along sectist, racial, and theolo-gical lines, or for want of their own state many a country might now be standing in rumps.

-Historically: their history in Palestine predates that of Jews–Jewish sovereignty in Palestine was for a mere sixty years, two thousand years ago.

   -Spiritually: as in the Bible (noted below, by Prof. Dawud). As stated, Allāh, the God of Justice and Good-ness, would not take Palestine from the believing Pales-tinians and give it to a stiffnecked and rebellious people, most of whom are faithless, treacherous, transgressors, on whom His curse is upon, whom He has declared to subject to severe torment to the day of Resurrection, and who have lost the kingdom of God.

(Regarding the Palestinians/Muslims spiritual heritage of Palestine, Professor ‘Abdul Ahad Dawud–the former Reverend David Benjamin Keldani–explains in his reve-aling book Muhammad In The Bible:

“There are three distinct points which every true believer in God must accept as truths. The first point is that Ishmael is the legitimate son of Abraham,his firstborn, and therefore his claim to birthright is quite just and legal. The second point is that the Covenant was made between God and Abraham as well as his only son Ishmael before Isaac was born. The Covenant and the institution of the Circumcision would have no value or signification unless the repeated promise contained in the divine words, “Throughout thee all the nations of the earth shall be blessed,” and especially the expression, the Seed “that shall come out from the bowels, he will inherit thee” (Gen. xv. 4). This promise was fulfilled when Ishmael was born (Gen. xvi.), and Abraham had the consolation that his chief servant Eliezer would no long-er be his heir. Consequently we must admit that Ishmael was the real and legitimate heir of Abraham’s spiritual dignity and privileges. The prerogative that “by Abra-ham all the generations of the earth shall be blessed,” so often repeated–though in different forms–was the heritage by birthright, and was the patrimony of Ishmael. The inheritance to which Ishmael was entitled by birth-right was not the tent in which Abraham lived or a certain camel upon which he used to ride, but to subjugate and occupy forever all the territories extending from the Nile to the Euphrates, which were inhabited by some ten different nations (Gen. xvii. 18-21). These lands have never been subdued by the descendants of Isaac, but by those of Ishmael. This is an actual and literal fulfilment of one of the conditions contained in the Covenant.

The third point is that Isaac was also born miraculous-ly and specially blessed by the Almighty, that for his people the land of Canaan was promised and actually occupied under Joshua. ….

….The Jews have always been jealous of Ishmael because they know very well that in him the Covenant was made and with his circumcision it was concluded and sealed, and it is out of this rancour that their scribes or doctors of law have corrupted and interpolated   many passages in their Scriptures. To efface the name “Ishmael” from the second, sixth, and seventh verses of the twenty-second chapter of the Book of Genesis and to insert in its place “Isaac,” and to leave the descriptive epithet “thy only begotten son” is to deny the existence of the former and to violate the Covenant made between God and Ishmael. It is expressly said in this chapter by God: “Because thou didst not spare thy only begotten son, I will increase and multiply thy posterity like the stars and the sands on the seashore,” which word “mul-tiply” was used by the Angel to Hagar in the wilderness: I will multiply thy offspring to an innumerable multi-tude, and that Ishmael “shall become a fruitful man” (Gen. xvi. 12. It is Muslims whose numbers are “like the stars and the sands on the seashore”–(Gen. 22:17). Now the Christians have translated the same Hebrew word, which means “fruitful” or “plentiful” from the verb para–identical with the Arabic wefera–in their ver-sions “a wild ass”! Is it not a shame and impiety to call Ishmael “a wild ass” whom God styles “Fruitful” or “Plentiful”?” (pp. 30-32. Italics/Emphasis/color added).

Man can alter Scripture(s),

man cannot alter decree of God.

(That Ishmael, and not Isaac, was the son Abraham offered in his intended sacrifice is also borne out by Allāh, God, in His Qur’an: Abraham prayed for an heir and is given a son; then he had a vision about him sacrificing this son–(Qur’an 37:100-111), and AFTERWARDS Abraham was promised Isaac as stated in verses 112-113:

“And We gave him the good news of ISAAC, a prophet, a righteous one. And We blessed him (Abraham) and Isaac.” Allāh blessing Abraham as Muhammad Ali explains: “Abraham and Isaac are spoken of distinctly to show that by blessing Abraham is here meant blessing his descendants through Ishmael.”

Muslims who say that the Qur’an is not clear about which son was the intended sacrifice are to study the Qur’an carefully).

Celestially Ours!

Who will be the next Salahuddin Ayyube (Saladin?):

Anything that is said or done against God –to make a false claim in His name or to commit an unGodly act– is an obscenity.

   Muslims have all rights and the Highest Authority to undertake the noble jihad –to the best of our ability: to hate this occupation/usurpation of Palestine in our hearts, to speak out or write against it, to finance it, to take up arms against it– to erase the obscene blot in the heart of the Islamic sun and reclaim every grain of Arab sand: “and drive them out from where they drove you out”–(Qur’an 2:191).

   The Occupied has the right to fight by whatever means and whatever methods available; man has no right to edict judgment against them: this judgment is only for Allāh. The occupier/usurper has NO “right,” “inalienable” or otherwise, to “retaliate” against his victim: he being the transgressor to begin with (a mugger has no “right” to break the arm of his victim when his victim turns on him. “Right” is for the victims. Palestinians are the victims).

   Muslims who acquiesce to this domination of Palestine are traitors to Allāh and His noble Messenger–(Qur’an 48:10; 2:190-191; 8:72-73; 60:9; 42:39-41. Such Muslims are to begin formulating their excuse for when they face Allāh on Judgment Day. And they expect Allāh to give them Jannah).

   This is not a Palestinian struggle, this is not an Arab struggle, this is not a Muslim struggle, this is a human struggle for truth and justice–no one would expect any less for himself or herself. This is a Muslim struggle in that all the lands in the Middle-east are Muslims’.

   Truth and justice are not to be butchered on the stones of politics and friendship.

   In replanting the gardens of the world to suit their parasitic designs the Emperors sow the venomous seeds of hatred that grow into towering trees of conflict whose bitter fruits are tasted long after the sordid wretches are gone.    

All the nations that were signatories to this grave offence –the Partitioning of Palestine– against the Palestinians must apologize to the Palestinians, return to them their homes, lands and country and compensate them for their more than half-a-century of loss and suffering and humiliation. Or continue to live unrepentant with this indelible stain of shame and injustice on their histories.

   That truth and justice are without border: unless and until the masses become courageous to detonate this explosive truth and obliterate the wicked walls of partisanship, patriotism, and politics truth and justice will remain subjugated under the jack-boot of injustice.

   Honorable Jews in Palestine who are not able to effect an end to the occupation of Palestine must take the dignified road and leave (if they can). Honorable Jews outside of Palestine are to vociferate for an end to the occupation of Palestine.

   Swiftly the hours and briefly the years. Time, which steals our minds and memories will soon seal soul’s mortal journey.

There is no people in modern era that has suffered such injustice and humiliation and savagery and for so long as the Palestinians have suffered. In the timeless and memorable words of Omar Khayyam: You know how little while we have to stay, And, once departed, may return no more.”35  If there is any cause worthy of our stand if there is any cause on which to immortalize our name it is the cause of the Palestinians. Graduates and students and princes and peasants worldwide, rise up and march for the “Return of Palestine” to the Palestinians.

‘Forever Justice! Forever Palestine!’
Vive le Palestine libre!
Azad Philistine Zindabad!
Ashat Philistine hurra!
Long live free Palestine!


   One paper notes: “U.S. President Barack Obama was surely speaking for many when he said in a September 2008 speech that he worries, “the child who goes to a radical madrassa outside of Karachi can end up endangering the security of my daughters in Chicago.””36 (Never mind the daughters [and sons] of others in the world that American foreign policy have endangered).

   (While there is no terrorism in Islam). President Obama needs to use his head. It is not the child that goes to madrassa outside of Karachi that endangers his daughters in Chicago. It is the U.S. wresting Palestine from Muslims and giving it to Jews and supporting this occupation for more than sixty years and for wanting to run Muslim countries and control their oil that are “endangering the security of” his “daughters in Chicago.”



1. Cited in Edward Said, The Question of Palestine, p. 99-100. Emphasis and brackets are Said’s. “Red” color added.

2. See note # 25.

3. Edward Said. The Question of Palestine, p. 14. “Red” color added.

4. Published in “Haolam Haze”, an Israeli newspaper, (issue 1594)  and quoted in “Israel Imperial News “, October 1968. Cited in Ismail Zayid, Palestine–A Stolen Heritage, p. 33.

The entire material states: “I am a pupil in a college in Be’er Sheva. I don’t want trouble. The director of the office of edu-cation will not like my letter; therefore I am not signing my full name.

The problem: KHUZARI BOOK, which is approved by the office of education. In the introduction to the book Dr. Tzif-roni writes:

“The nation of Israel is a chosen nation because of its race, its education and the climate of the land in which it was brought up. The race of the Israeli people is the most superior of all races”. I think that these sentences require no explanation.

            Mira, Be’er Sheva.”

5.    From a Friday sermon. According to the Imam this saying is listed in Bokhari Adab al-mufraad

6. Ency Brit; 15th Edn; Vol; 11; Art; Judaism; p. 1018.

7.  Muhammad Ali, Qur’anic comm; 1415.

8.  Edward Said, The Question Of Palestine; p. 58.

9. Ency. Brit. 15th Edn, Vol 1, Balfour, Vol 17, p. 937e.

10. Ismail Zayid, Palestine, A Stolen Heritage, pp. 10, 11.

11. Ency. Brit. 15th Ed; Art. Syria and Palestine, History of, The Balfour Declaration, Vol. 17; p. 957).

12. Ahmed Deedat, Arabs and Israel–Conflict or Conciliation, pp. 73-74.

13. Ibid; pp. 24, 26.  

14. Khwaja Kamal-ud-Din, Introduction to the Study of the Holy Qur’an, p. 67.

16. Edward W. Said, The Question Of Palestine, p. 13.

17. Ibid; p. 100.

18. Ismail Zayid, Palestine, A Stolen Heritage, p. 11.

19. Edward W. Said, The Question Of Palestine, p. 9.

20. Ismail Zayid, Palestine, A Stolen Heritage, p. 18.

21. Ibid; p.19. Italics/emphasis added.

22. Ibid; outside back-cover. Italics/emphasis added.

23. Ibid; p. 19.

24. Ibid; pp. 6-7.

25. Noam Chomsky, Pirates and Emperors, Old and New, International Terrorism in the Real World, p. 11

27. God making covenant with Jews is noted in various places in the Bible and the Qur’an as noted by Muhammad Ali: in the Bible, Exodus 19:17; Numbers 25:8-9; Deut. 28:64-65; Ezek. 22:8-15; and in the Qur’an 2:63-66, 83-84, 93, 100; 4:154-155; 5:13-14; 7:169; 20:86. See Muhammad Ali’s commentaries on Qur’an chapter 2 verses 61, 63, 65 and 66. His translation of the Qur’an can be viewed online:

28. Muhammad Husayn Haykal, The Life Of Muhammad, p. 207.

M. H. recounting the Jewish relation with the Prophet notes: “We have already seen how upon Muhammad’s arrival at Madinah, the Jews hoped to bring him into alliance with them and how, after befriending him and pledging to honor his freedom to practice and preach the new religion, they had begun to oppose and plot against him. In fact, no sooner had Muhammad settled down and the prospects of Islam had begun to improve, than the Jews, for their part, began their undeclared war against him. Their opposition and hostility were never open. (Perhaps this is true even today). Above all, they feared lest any harm might befall their trade; and, although they had fanned and fueled the fires of civil war in the past, they adeptly avoided every possible involvement. (Jews also “fanned” the civil war in 1980 Lebanon, as Noam Chomsky notes in his Pirates And Emperors). Henceforth, their covenant with Muhammad prevented them from any such open involvement; and they recoursed to every hidden way to instigate enmity and hostility between the Muhajirun (the Prophet’s followers from Makkah) and the Ansar (the Madinites) so as to revive the old hatred between al Aws and al Khazraj by reminding them of the day of Bu’ath in reciting the war poetry which had been composed on that occasion.” (pp. 206-207. Italics/emphasis added).            

29. Ismail Zayid, Palestine, A Stolen Heritage, pp. 14.

30. Noam Chomsky, Pirates And Emperors, New And Old, International Terrorism in the Real World, p. 66.

31. Ibid; pp. 46-47.

32. Ibid; p. 9.

 33. Taken from the Internet. Excerpted.

Operation Trojan
by, Col. Victor Ostrovsky and Claire Hoy

“A Trojan was a special communication device that could be planted by naval commandos deep inside enemy territory. The device would act as a relay station for misleading transmissions made by the disinformation unit in the Mossad, called LAP, and intended to be received by American and British listening stations.”

“…..The only catch was that the Trojan itself would have to be located as close as possible to the normal origin of such transmissions, because of the sophisticated methods of triangulation the Americans and others would use to verify the source.”

“……….The commandos were charged with the task of planting the Trojan device in Tripoli, Libya.”

“On the night of February 17-18, two Israeli missile boats………..”

“The van parked at the back of an apartment building on Al Jamhuriyh Street in Tripoli, less than three blocks away from the Bab al Azizia barracks that were known to house Qadhafi's headquarters and residence.”

“In the apartment, the top section of the cylinder was opened and a small dishlike antenna was unfolded and placed in front of the window facing north. The unit was activated, and the Trojan horse was in place.”

“The Mossad combatant had rented the apartment for six months and had paid the rent in advance”

“By the end of March, the Americans were already intercepting messages broadcast by the Trojan, which was only activated during heavy communication traffic hours. Using the Trojan, the Mossad tried to make it appear that a long series of terrorist orders were being transmitted to various Libyan embassies around the world (or, as they were called by the Libyans, Peoples' Bureaus).”

“…… The Trojan gave the Americans the proof they needed. The Mossad also plugged into the equation Qadhafi's lunatic image and momentous declarations, which were really only meant for internal consumption.”

“….. Ultimately, the Americans fell for the Mossad ploy head over heels dragging the British and the Germans somewhat reluctantly in with them. Operation Trojan was one of the Mossad's greatest successes. It brought about the air strike on Libya that President Reagan had promised….”

“On April 14, 1986, one hundred and sixty American aircraft dropped over sixty tons of bombs on Libya. The attackers bombed Tripoli international airport, Bab al Azizia barracks, Sidi Bilal naval base, the city of Benghazi, and the Benine airfield outside Benghazi. …On the Libyan side, there were approximately forty civilian casualties, including Qadhafi's adopted daughter. On the American side, a pilot and his weapons officer were killed when their F-111 exploded.”

“Ephraim had spelled it all out for me and confirmed some of the information I'd already known. He then went on. "After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We're starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there's no doubt it'll work."

"But isn't Saddam regarded as moderate toward us, allied with Jordan, the big enemy of Iran and Syria?"

"Yes, that's why I'm opposed to this action. But that's the directive, and I must follow it. Hopefully, you and I will be done with our little operation before anything big happens. After all, we have already destroyed his nuclear facility, and we are making money by selling hlm technology and equipment through South Africa."

“In the following weeks, more and more discoveries were made regarding the big gun and other elements of the Saddam war machine. The Mossad had all but saturated the intelligence field with information regarding the evil intentions of Saddam the Terrible,….It was very clear what the Mossad's overall goal was. It wanted the West to do its bidding, just as the Americans had in Libya with the bombing of Qadhafi. ….The Mossad leaders knew that if they could make Saddam appear bad enough and a threat to the Gulf oil supply, of which he'd been the protector up to that point, then the United States and its allies would not let him get away with anything, but would take measures that would all but eliminate his army and his weapons potential, especially if they were led to believe that this might just be their last chance before he went nuclear.

Ostrovsky knows that being famous keeps him alive.

  About the Author: Victor Ostrovsky was raised in Israel, but was born in Canada. At eighteen he became the youngest officer in the Israeli military, eventually rising to the rank of lieutenant commander in charge of naval weapons testing. He was a Mossad case officer from 1984-1986”

34. Noam Chomsky, Pirates and Emperors, Old and New,  International terrorism in the Real World, pp. 66, 134.

35. Edward Fitzgerald, The Rubaiyat Of Omar Khayyam, verse III, p.  39.

36. Toronto Star, Sunday, February 21, 2010; Schools try to lift veil of suspicion by Rick Westhead, p. A 13.